Mysterious 'electron stash' found hidden among Van Allen belts

You’d think the science on the Van Allen Radiation belts was long ago considered “settled science”. Nope. And yet, while we discover new things like this, some insist we fully understand all aspects of the workings of Earth’s climate.

This NASA rendering depicts Earth's Van Allen radiation belts and the path of the Van Allen Probe spacecraft, which were launched in August 2012. Data from the spacecraft have confirmed a never-before-seen phenomenon—a long-lived zone of high-energy electrons residing between the inner and outer radiation belts. (Credit: NASA illustration)
This NASA rendering depicts Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts and the path of the Van Allen Probe spacecraft, which were launched in August 2012. Data from the spacecraft have confirmed a never-before-seen phenomenon—a long-lived zone of high-energy electrons residing between the inner and outer radiation belts. (Credit: NASA illustration)

Instruments detect never-before-seen phenomenon in Earth’s Magnetosphere

The belts are a pair of donut shaped zones of charged particles that surround Earth and occupy the inner region of our planet’s Magnetosphere.

LOS ALAMOS, N.M., March 1, 2013—U.S. researchers, including a trio from Los Alamos National Laboratory, have witnessed the mysterious appearance of a relatively long-lived zone of high-energy electrons stored between Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts.

The surprising findings, discovered by NASA’s Van Allen Probes (formerly known as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes), were outlined Thursday in Science Express and during a press conference at NASA headquarters in Washington, D.C. The research was led by Dan Baker of the University of Colorado, Boulder, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics.

“Nature keeps on surprising us by producing long-lived harsh environments in space in regions not previously considered,” said Los Alamos plasma physicist Reiner Friedel of LANL’s Intelligence and Space Research Division. “This finding may impact the planning of future space missions.”

The Van Allen radiation belts — named in honor James Van Allen, who discovered them nearly 50 years ago — are a pair of donut shaped zones of charged particles that surround Earth and occupy the inner region of our planet’s Magnetosphere. The outer belt contains extremely high-energy electrons, while the inner belt is comprised of energetic protons and electrons. The belts have been studied extensively since the dawn of the Space Age, because the high-energy particles in the outer ring can cripple or disrupt spacecraft. Long-term observation of the belts have hinted that the belts can act as efficient and powerful particle accelerators; the recent observations by the Van Allen Probes—a pair of spacecraft launched in August 2012—now seem to confirm this.

Shortly after launch, the spacecraft activated their Relativistic Electron-Proton Telescope (REPT) instruments to measure particles within the belts and their immediate environs. The instrument immediately detected on September 1, 2012, the presence of a stable zone of high-energy electrons residing between the belts. This donut-shaped third ring nestled between the belts existed for nearly a month before being obliterated by a powerful shockwave of particles emanating from center of the solar system.

Such a distinct, long-lasting ring of high-energy electrons had never before been seen by any prior instrument in space or on Earth. The findings suggest that the Van Allen Belts somehow capture and store energetic electrons in a circular path around our home planet, perhaps in much the same way as a cyclotron can capture and store charged particles here on Earth.

“One of the main reasons the Van Allen Probe instruments are seeing these new features are their unprecedented sensitivity and rejection of backgrounds,” Friedel said. “As the mission proceeds, we expect further surprises that will challenge our conventional wisdom on the transport, loss and energization processes in these highly energetic electron radiation regions.”

In addition to Friedel, Los Alamos research team members include Geoffrey D. Reeves and Michael G. Henderson. The research team is also represented by the Goddard Space Flight Center, University of New Hampshire, The Southwest Research Institute, Dartmouth College, the University of California—Los Angeles, University of Iowa, and The Aerospace Corporation.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

157 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 4, 2013 1:06 pm

The findings suggest that the Van Allen Belts somehow capture and store energetic electrons in a circular path around our home planet, perhaps in much the same way as a cyclotron can capture and store charged particles here on Earth.
And what is so new about this? The concept of a ‘ring-current’ has been with us for many decades.

Peter C.
March 4, 2013 1:09 pm

More evidence of the Electric Universe?

March 4, 2013 1:09 pm

Reblogged this on The Science Blog.

March 4, 2013 1:20 pm

Peter C. says:
March 4, 2013 at 1:09 pm
More evidence of the Electric Universe?
Your comment is evidence of people willing to believe nonsense
[Reply: Yes, nonsense. Please, folks, no posts re: Electric Universe. — mod.]

davidxn
March 4, 2013 1:24 pm

“And what is so new about this?”
“Such a distinct, long-lasting ring of high-energy electrons had never before been seen by any prior instrument in space or on Earth.”
Is that statement at odds with some information you know of?

Tom in Florida
March 4, 2013 1:24 pm

Peter C. says:
March 4, 2013 at 1:09 pm
“More evidence of the Electric Universe?”
Didn’t know there was any evidence at all in the first place. Could you give some.
[Reply: Please, let’s not encourage the Electric Universe silliness. Thanks. — mod.]

major
March 4, 2013 1:28 pm

Maybe high altitude nuke tests have something to do with that?

March 4, 2013 1:28 pm

lsvalgaard, “The concept of a ‘ring-current’ has been with us for many decades.”
You are not implying that LANL would sex up a press release are you? 🙂

March 4, 2013 1:36 pm

Last week I had an email from my S. Hemisphere’s friend enquiring:
‘as a person who turns everything into ‘pseudoscience’ any ideas?’
My reply:
It lasted about a month. In September 2012 Earth’s and Jupiter’s magnetospheres were in line with sun, so if there is permanent strong Sun-Jupiter electric current / magnetic field link and the Earth got caught in it, there should be another ‘appearance’ some 13 months later i.e. in October 2013. Let’s wait and see.

March 4, 2013 1:41 pm

Forgot video link

wws
March 4, 2013 1:45 pm

I sing the Van Allen belt Electric…

Tom
March 4, 2013 1:45 pm

although it`s obviously off-topic, I find the attempt to censor ideas in the comments section a step in the wrong direction.

March 4, 2013 1:46 pm

Anthony, you write “The belts have been studied extensively since the dawn of the Space Age”
I think this statement is a little misleading. Orginally the Van Allen belts were called the Heavyside Layer (Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Cats). The were studied extensively well before WWII. I suggest that the period over which studies,exist is around 100 years.

paullinsay
March 4, 2013 1:49 pm

OK, where’d they come from and where’d they go? Why is it a surprise to have small rings inside bigger ones? There are all sorts of resonance phenomena in physics.

tallbloke
March 4, 2013 1:50 pm

Leif:
Does the ring current get dissipated by “a powerful shockwave of particles emanating from center of the solar system” from time to time?

tallbloke
March 4, 2013 1:56 pm

Wiki:
The ring current energy is mainly carried around by the ions, most of which are protons. However, one also sees alpha particles in the ring current, a type of ion that is plentiful in the solar wind. In addition, a certain percentage are O+ oxygen ions, similar to those in the ionosphere of Earth, though much more energetic. This mixture of ions suggests that ring current particles probably come from more than one source.
Don’t see any mention of electrons here. Maybe what NASA has observed is what they say they have observed: something not observed before.
Leif?

keith
March 4, 2013 1:58 pm

[Reply: Please, let’s not encourage the Electric Universe silliness. Thanks. — mod.]
As an engineer by training I see more sense in the electric universe than any other currently proposed hypothesis. As for measurements, predictions etc there are many, and have been for a long while.
Mathematics invents really stupid things that any logical thinking person can understand are not real, like black holes and neutron stars. I am profoundly shocked to find censorship and actual derision of any alternative non-mainstream hypothesis on here. Especially one that will have predicted such electrical phenomena, as it has predicted the recent so called “baffling” findings of Voyager.
WWUT how the mighty have fallen. I suggest a retraction of word such as slliness, and an open invitation for open discussion, which is not just limited to lsvalgaard deriding everyone who disagrees with him.
K
[Reply: OK, I retract “silliness”. But please, electric universe is on par with HAARP. – mod.]

Robert of Ottawa
March 4, 2013 1:58 pm

Like Lief, I’m not shocked by this, interesting thou it is. But it appears that it’s become de riggeur that your research generates headlines. BTW mod, wot’s the problem with http://www.google.com.br/search?q=youtube+electric+avenue+song&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari&redir_esc=&ei=FRg1Uej7PIb88gS7sIHYDA
OK, being a little disingenuous there 🙂

Poor Yorek
March 4, 2013 2:01 pm

“U.S. researchers, including a trio from Los Alamos National Laboratory, …”
Presumably the same three whose photo is entitled “Free Range and Out of Control” just below the thread? Sort of makes me wish I’d post-doc’d at LANL rather than NRL! 🙂

Matt
March 4, 2013 2:03 pm

dallas says:
March 4, 2013 at 1:28 pm
lsvalgaard, “The concept of a ‘ring-current’ has been with us for many decades.”
You are not implying that LANL would sex up a press release are you? 🙂
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The way I read it, Dr Svalgaard isn’t implying anything. 🙂

Theo Goodwin
March 4, 2013 2:13 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 4, 2013 at 1:06 pm
“And what is so new about this? The concept of a ‘ring-current’ has been with us for many decades.”
Apparently, this is an entirely new discovery for NASA. Maybe you should send them your email address, Dr. Svalgaard.

Eliza
March 4, 2013 2:15 pm

Roy Spencer came in at 0.18C for Feb so pretty much down again looks like AGW is dead by now LOL

Steve C
March 4, 2013 2:17 pm

Fascinating. So close to home, yet only now with the aid of very expensive hardware does it come to light. Nice one, NASA. We really don’t know the half of what’s in our own backyard.
Also fascinating: that this swirl of high energy plasma is reported by proper hard science, yet we may not mention the (“silliness”) theory – despite that theory being based on the universe being full of plasma …

March 4, 2013 2:17 pm

davidxn says:
March 4, 2013 at 1:24 pm
>i>“Such a distinct, long-lasting ring of high-energy electrons had never before been seen by any prior instrument in space or on Earth.”
Is that statement at odds with some information you know of?
The regular Van Allen belts are such information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

March 4, 2013 2:18 pm

Even though the _concept_ of the “ring-current” might have been with us for many decades, isn’t it interesting at least to have an observation/confirmation of it ?

1 2 3 7