Text of Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address

Note the section on climate and energy in bold, looks like nothing more than lip service to climate to me.

On the issue of energy, he seems to be proposing some sort of revenue diversion from oil and gas. It is unclear if this means a new tax or a carbobn tax since the language is vague. – Anthony

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, fellow citizens:

Fifty-one years ago, John F. Kennedy declared to this Chamber that “the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress…It is my task,” he said, “to report the State of the Union – to improve it is the task of us all.”

Tonight, thanks to the grit and determination of the American people, there is much progress to report. After a decade of grinding war, our brave men and women in uniform are coming home. After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over six million new jobs. We buy more American cars than we have in five years, and less foreign oil than we have in twenty. Our housing market is healing, our stock market is rebounding, and consumers, patients, and homeowners enjoy stronger protections than ever before.

Together, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis, and can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is stronger.

But we gather here knowing that there are millions of Americans whose hard work and dedication have not yet been rewarded. Our economy is adding jobs – but too many people still can’t find full-time employment. Corporate profits have rocketed to all-time highs – but for more than a decade, wages and incomes have barely budged.

It is our generation’s task, then, to reignite the true engine of America’s economic growth – a rising, thriving middle class.

It is our unfinished task to restore the basic bargain that built this country – the idea that if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, what you look like, or who you love.

It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few; that it encourages free enterprise, rewards individual initiative, and opens the doors of opportunity to every child across this great nation.

The American people don’t expect government to solve every problem. They don’t expect those of us in this chamber to agree on every issue. But they do expect us to put the nation’s interests before party. They do expect us to forge reasonable compromise where we can. For they know that America moves forward only when we do so together; and that the responsibility of improving this union remains the task of us all.

Our work must begin by making some basic decisions about our budget – decisions that will have a huge impact on the strength of our recovery.

Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion – mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. As a result, we are more than halfway towards the goal of $4 trillion in deficit reduction that economists say we need to stabilize our finances.

Now we need to finish the job. And the question is, how?

In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn’t agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars’ worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year. These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They’d devastate priorities like education, energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That’s why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as “the sequester,” are a really bad idea.

Now, some in this Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training; Medicare and Social Security benefits.

That idea is even worse. Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms – otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations.

But we can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and most powerful. We won’t grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers, cops, and firefighters. Most Americans – Democrats, Republicans, and Independents – understand that we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that’s the approach I offer tonight.

On Medicare, I’m prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. Already, the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health care costs. The reforms I’m proposing go even further. We’ll reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors. We’ll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn’t be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital – they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive. And I am open to additional reforms from both parties, so long as they don’t violate the guarantee of a secure retirement. Our government shouldn’t make promises we cannot keep – but we must keep the promises we’ve already made.

To hit the rest of our deficit reduction target, we should do what leaders in both parties have already suggested, and save hundreds of billions of dollars by getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and well-connected. After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks? How is that fair? How does that promote growth?

Now is our best chance for bipartisan, comprehensive tax reform that encourages job creation and helps bring down the deficit. The American people deserve a tax code that helps small businesses spend less time filling out complicated forms, and more time expanding and hiring; a tax code that ensures billionaires with high-powered accountants can’t pay a lower rate than their hard-working secretaries; a tax code that lowers incentives to move jobs overseas, and lowers tax rates for businesses and manufacturers that create jobs right here in America. That’s what tax reform can deliver. That’s what we can do together.

I realize that tax reform and entitlement reform won’t be easy. The politics will be hard for both sides. None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, and visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. So let’s set party interests aside, and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future. And let’s do it without the brinksmanship that stresses consumers and scares off investors. The greatest nation on Earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. Let’s agree, right here, right now, to keep the people’s government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America. The American people have worked too hard, for too long, rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause another.

Now, most of us agree that a plan to reduce the deficit must be part of our agenda. But let’s be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan. A growing economy that creates good, middle-class jobs – that must be the North Star that guides our efforts. Every day, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation: How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills needed to do those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?

A year and a half ago, I put forward an American Jobs Act that independent economists said would create more than one million new jobs. I thank the last Congress for passing some of that agenda, and I urge this Congress to pass the rest. Tonight, I’ll lay out additional proposals that are fully paid for and fully consistent with the budget framework both parties agreed to just 18 months ago. Let me repeat – nothing I’m proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime. It’s not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth.

Our first priority is making America a magnet for new jobs and manufacturing.

After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three. Caterpillar is bringing jobs back from Japan. Ford is bringing jobs back from Mexico. After locating plants in other countries like China, Intel is opening its most advanced plant right here at home. And this year, Apple will start making Macs in America again.

There are things we can do, right now, to accelerate this trend. Last year, we created our first manufacturing innovation institute in Youngstown, Ohio. A once-shuttered warehouse is now a state-of-the art lab where new workers are mastering the 3D printing that has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost everything. There’s no reason this can’t happen in other towns. So tonight, I’m announcing the launch of three more of these manufacturing hubs, where businesses will partner with the Departments of Defense and Energy to turn regions left behind by globalization into global centers of high-tech jobs. And I ask this Congress to help create a network of fifteen of these hubs and guarantee that the next revolution in manufacturing is Made in America.

If we want to make the best products, we also have to invest in the best ideas. Every dollar we invested to map the human genome returned $140 to our economy. Today, our scientists are mapping the human brain to unlock the answers to Alzheimer’s; developing drugs to regenerate damaged organs; devising new material to make batteries ten times more powerful. Now is not the time to gut these job-creating investments in science and innovation. Now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race. And today, no area holds more promise than our investments in American energy.

After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it. And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen.

But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change. Yes, it’s true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is, the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15. Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, and floods – all are now more frequent and intense. We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it’s too late.

The good news is, we can make meaningful progress on this issue while driving strong economic growth. I urge this Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago. But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.

Four years ago, other countries dominated the clean energy market and the jobs that came with it. We’ve begun to change that. Last year, wind energy added nearly half of all new power capacity in America. So let’s generate even more. Solar energy gets cheaper by the year – so let’s drive costs down even further. As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we.

In the meantime, the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence. That’s why my Administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water.

Indeed, much of our new-found energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together. So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good. If a non-partisan coalition of CEOs and retired generals and admirals can get behind this idea, then so can we. Let’s take their advice and free our families and businesses from the painful spikes in gas prices we’ve put up with for far too long. I’m also issuing a new goal for America: let’s cut in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next twenty years. The states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make it happen.

America’s energy sector is just one part of an aging infrastructure badly in need of repair. Ask any CEO where they’d rather locate and hire: a country with deteriorating roads and bridges, or one with high-speed rail and internet; high-tech schools and self-healing power grids. The CEO of Siemens America – a company that brought hundreds of new jobs to North Carolina – has said that if we upgrade our infrastructure, they’ll bring even more jobs. And I know that you want these job-creating projects in your districts. I’ve seen you all at the ribbon-cuttings.

Tonight, I propose a “Fix-It-First” program to put people to work as soon as possible on our most urgent repairs, like the nearly 70,000 structurally deficient bridges across the country. And to make sure taxpayers don’t shoulder the whole burden, I’m also proposing a Partnership to Rebuild America that attracts private capital to upgrade what our businesses need most: modern ports to move our goods; modern pipelines to withstand a storm; modern schools worthy of our children. Let’s prove that there is no better place to do business than the United States of America. And let’s start right away.

Part of our rebuilding effort must also involve our housing sector. Today, our housing market is finally healing from the collapse of 2007. Home prices are rising at the fastest pace in six years, home purchases are up nearly 50 percent, and construction is expanding again.

But even with mortgage rates near a 50-year low, too many families with solid credit who want to buy a home are being rejected. Too many families who have never missed a payment and want to refinance are being told no. That’s holding our entire economy back, and we need to fix it. Right now, there’s a bill in this Congress that would give every responsible homeowner in America the chance to save $3,000 a year by refinancing at today’s rates. Democrats and Republicans have supported it before. What are we waiting for? Take a vote, and send me that bill. Right now, overlapping regulations keep responsible young families from buying their first home. What’s holding us back? Let’s streamline the process, and help our economy grow.

These initiatives in manufacturing, energy, infrastructure, and housing will help entrepreneurs and small business owners expand and create new jobs. But none of it will matter unless we also equip our citizens with the skills and training to fill those jobs. And that has to start at the earliest possible age.

Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road. But today, fewer than 3 in 10 four year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program. Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for private preschool. And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives.

Tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America. Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime. In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like Georgia or Oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own. So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind. Let’s give our kids that chance.

Let’s also make sure that a high school diploma puts our kids on a path to a good job. Right now, countries like Germany focus on graduating their high school students with the equivalent of a technical degree from one of our community colleges, so that they’re ready for a job. At schools like P-Tech in Brooklyn, a collaboration between New York Public Schools, the City University of New York, and IBM, students will graduate with a high school diploma and an associate degree in computers or engineering.

We need to give every American student opportunities like this. Four years ago, we started Race to the Top – a competition that convinced almost every state to develop smarter curricula and higher standards, for about 1 percent of what we spend on education each year. Tonight, I’m announcing a new challenge to redesign America’s high schools so they better equip graduates for the demands of a high-tech economy. We’ll reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering, and math – the skills today’s employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.

Now, even with better high schools, most young people will need some higher education. It’s a simple fact: the more education you have, the more likely you are to have a job and work your way into the middle class. But today, skyrocketing costs price way too many young people out of a higher education, or saddle them with unsustainable debt.

Through tax credits, grants, and better loans, we have made college more affordable for millions of students and families over the last few years. But taxpayers cannot continue to subsidize the soaring cost of higher education. Colleges must do their part to keep costs down, and it’s our job to make sure they do. Tonight, I ask Congress to change the Higher Education Act, so that affordability and value are included in determining which colleges receive certain types of federal aid. And tomorrow, my Administration will release a new “College Scorecard” that parents and students can use to compare schools based on a simple criteria: where you can get the most bang for your educational buck.

To grow our middle class, our citizens must have access to the education and training that today’s jobs require. But we also have to make sure that America remains a place where everyone who’s willing to work hard has the chance to get ahead.

Our economy is stronger when we harness the talents and ingenuity of striving, hopeful immigrants. And right now, leaders from the business, labor, law enforcement, and faith communities all agree that the time has come to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Real reform means strong border security, and we can build on the progress my Administration has already made – putting more boots on the southern border than at any time in our history, and reducing illegal crossings to their lowest levels in 40 years.

Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship – a path that includes passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English, and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally.

And real reform means fixing the legal immigration system to cut waiting periods, reduce bureaucracy, and attract the highly-skilled entrepreneurs and engineers that will help create jobs and grow our economy.

In other words, we know what needs to be done. As we speak, bipartisan groups in both chambers are working diligently to draft a bill, and I applaud their efforts. Now let’s get this done. Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months, and I will sign it right away.

But we can’t stop there. We know our economy is stronger when our wives, mothers, and daughters can live their lives free from discrimination in the workplace, and free from the fear of domestic violence. Today, the Senate passed the Violence Against Women Act that Joe Biden originally wrote almost 20 years ago. I urge the House to do the same. And I ask this Congress to declare that women should earn a living equal to their efforts, and finally pass the Paycheck Fairness Act this year.

We know our economy is stronger when we reward an honest day’s work with honest wages. But today, a full-time worker making the minimum wage earns $14,500 a year. Even with the tax relief we’ve put in place, a family with two kids that earns the minimum wage still lives below the poverty line. That’s wrong. That’s why, since the last time this Congress raised the minimum wage, nineteen states have chosen to bump theirs even higher.

Tonight, let’s declare that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, no one who works full-time should have to live in poverty, and raise the federal minimum wage to $9.00 an hour. This single step would raise the incomes of millions of working families. It could mean the difference between groceries or the food bank; rent or eviction; scraping by or finally getting ahead. For businesses across the country, it would mean customers with more money in their pockets. In fact, working folks shouldn’t have to wait year after year for the minimum wage to go up while CEO pay has never been higher. So here’s an idea that Governor Romney and I actually agreed on last year: let’s tie the minimum wage to the cost of living, so that it finally becomes a wage you can live on.

Tonight, let’s also recognize that there are communities in this country where no matter how hard you work, it’s virtually impossible to get ahead. Factory towns decimated from years of plants packing up. Inescapable pockets of poverty, urban and rural, where young adults are still fighting for their first job. America is not a place where chance of birth or circumstance should decide our destiny. And that is why we need to build new ladders of opportunity into the middle class for all who are willing to climb them.

Let’s offer incentives to companies that hire Americans who’ve got what it takes to fill that job opening, but have been out of work so long that no one will give them a chance. Let’s put people back to work rebuilding vacant homes in run-down neighborhoods. And this year, my Administration will begin to partner with 20 of the hardest-hit towns in America to get these communities back on their feet. We’ll work with local leaders to target resources at public safety, education, and housing. We’ll give new tax credits to businesses that hire and invest. And we’ll work to strengthen families by removing the financial deterrents to marriage for low-income couples, and doing more to encourage fatherhood – because what makes you a man isn’t the ability to conceive a child; it’s having the courage to raise one.

Stronger families. Stronger communities. A stronger America. It is this kind of prosperity – broad, shared, and built on a thriving middle class – that has always been the source of our progress at home. It is also the foundation of our power and influence throughout the world.

Tonight, we stand united in saluting the troops and civilians who sacrifice every day to protect us. Because of them, we can say with confidence that America will complete its mission in Afghanistan, and achieve our objective of defeating the core of al Qaeda. Already, we have brought home 33,000 of our brave servicemen and women. This spring, our forces will move into a support role, while Afghan security forces take the lead. Tonight, I can announce that over the next year, another 34,000 American troops will come home from Afghanistan. This drawdown will continue. And by the end of next year, our war in Afghanistan will be over.

Beyond 2014, America’s commitment to a unified and sovereign Afghanistan will endure, but the nature of our commitment will change. We are negotiating an agreement with the Afghan government that focuses on two missions: training and equipping Afghan forces so that the country does not again slip into chaos, and counter-terrorism efforts that allow us to pursue the remnants of al Qaeda and their affiliates.

Today, the organization that attacked us on 9/11 is a shadow of its former self. Different al Qaeda affiliates and extremist groups have emerged – from the Arabian Peninsula to Africa. The threat these groups pose is evolving. But to meet this threat, we don’t need to send tens of thousands of our sons and daughters abroad, or occupy other nations. Instead, we will need to help countries like Yemen, Libya, and Somalia provide for their own security, and help allies who take the fight to terrorists, as we have in Mali. And, where necessary, through a range of capabilities, we will continue to take direct action against those terrorists who pose the gravest threat to Americans.

As we do, we must enlist our values in the fight. That is why my Administration has worked tirelessly to forge a durable legal and policy framework to guide our counterterrorism operations. Throughout, we have kept Congress fully informed of our efforts. I recognize that in our democracy, no one should just take my word that we’re doing things the right way. So, in the months ahead, I will continue to engage with Congress to ensure not only that our targeting, detention, and prosecution of terrorists remains consistent with our laws and system of checks and balances, but that our efforts are even more transparent to the American people and to the world.

Of course, our challenges don’t end with al Qaeda. America will continue to lead the effort to prevent the spread of the world’s most dangerous weapons. The regime in North Korea must know that they will only achieve security and prosperity by meeting their international obligations. Provocations of the sort we saw last night will only isolate them further, as we stand by our allies, strengthen our own missile defense, and lead the world in taking firm action in response to these threats.

Likewise, the leaders of Iran must recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet their obligations, and we will do what is necessary to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon. At the same time, we will engage Russia to seek further reductions in our nuclear arsenals, and continue leading the global effort to secure nuclear materials that could fall into the wrong hands – because our ability to influence others depends on our willingness to lead.

America must also face the rapidly growing threat from cyber-attacks. We know hackers steal people’s identities and infiltrate private e-mail. We know foreign countries and companies swipe our corporate secrets. Now our enemies are also seeking the ability to sabotage our power grid, our financial institutions, and our air traffic control systems. We cannot look back years from now and wonder why we did nothing in the face of real threats to our security and our economy.

That’s why, earlier today, I signed a new executive order that will strengthen our cyber defenses by increasing information sharing, and developing standards to protect our national security, our jobs, and our privacy. Now, Congress must act as well, by passing legislation to give our government a greater capacity to secure our networks and deter attacks.

Even as we protect our people, we should remember that today’s world presents not only dangers, but opportunities. To boost American exports, support American jobs, and level the playing field in the growing markets of Asia, we intend to complete negotiations on a Trans-Pacific Partnership. And tonight, I am announcing that we will launch talks on a comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union – because trade that is free and fair across the Atlantic supports millions of good-paying American jobs.

We also know that progress in the most impoverished parts of our world enriches us all. In many places, people live on little more than a dollar a day. So the United States will join with our allies to eradicate such extreme poverty in the next two decades: by connecting more people to the global economy and empowering women; by giving our young and brightest minds new opportunities to serve and helping communities to feed, power, and educate themselves; by saving the world’s children from preventable deaths; and by realizing the promise of an AIDS-free generation.

Above all, America must remain a beacon to all who seek freedom during this period of historic change. I saw the power of hope last year in Rangoon – when Aung San Suu Kyi welcomed an American President into the home where she had been imprisoned for years; when thousands of Burmese lined the streets, waving American flags, including a man who said, “There is justice and law in the United States. I want our country to be like that.”

In defense of freedom, we will remain the anchor of strong alliances from the Americas to Africa; from Europe to Asia. In the Middle East, we will stand with citizens as they demand their universal rights, and support stable transitions to democracy. The process will be messy, and we cannot presume to dictate the course of change in countries like Egypt; but we can – and will – insist on respect for the fundamental rights of all people. We will keep the pressure on a Syrian regime that has murdered its own people, and support opposition leaders that respect the rights of every Syrian. And we will stand steadfast with Israel in pursuit of security and a lasting peace. These are the messages I will deliver when I travel to the Middle East next month.

All this work depends on the courage and sacrifice of those who serve in dangerous places at great personal risk – our diplomats, our intelligence officers, and the men and women of the United States Armed Forces. As long as I’m Commander-in-Chief, we will do whatever we must to protect those who serve their country abroad, and we will maintain the best military in the world. We will invest in new capabilities, even as we reduce waste and wartime spending. We will ensure equal treatment for all service members, and equal benefits for their families – gay and straight. We will draw upon the courage and skills of our sisters and daughters, because women have proven under fire that they are ready for combat. We will keep faith with our veterans – investing in world-class care, including mental health care, for our wounded warriors; supporting our military families; and giving our veterans the benefits, education, and job opportunities they have earned. And I want to thank my wife Michelle and Dr. Jill Biden for their continued dedication to serving our military families as well as they serve us.

But defending our freedom is not the job of our military alone. We must all do our part to make sure our God-given rights are protected here at home. That includes our most fundamental right as citizens: the right to vote. When any Americans – no matter where they live or what their party – are denied that right simply because they can’t wait for five, six, seven hours just to cast their ballot, we are betraying our ideals. That’s why, tonight, I’m announcing a non-partisan commission to improve the voting experience in America. And I’m asking two long-time experts in the field, who’ve recently served as the top attorneys for my campaign and for Governor Romney’s campaign, to lead it. We can fix this, and we will. The American people demand it. And so does our democracy.

Of course, what I’ve said tonight matters little if we don’t come together to protect our most precious resource – our children.

It has been two months since Newtown. I know this is not the first time this country has debated how to reduce gun violence. But this time is different. Overwhelming majorities of Americans – Americans who believe in the 2nd Amendment – have come together around commonsense reform – like background checks that will make it harder for criminals to get their hands on a gun. Senators of both parties are working together on tough new laws to prevent anyone from buying guns for resale to criminals. Police chiefs are asking our help to get weapons of war and massive ammunition magazines off our streets, because they are tired of being outgunned.

Each of these proposals deserves a vote in Congress. If you want to vote no, that’s your choice. But these proposals deserve a vote. Because in the two months since Newtown, more than a thousand birthdays, graduations, and anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun.

One of those we lost was a young girl named Hadiya Pendleton. She was 15 years old. She loved Fig Newtons and lip gloss. She was a majorette. She was so good to her friends, they all thought they were her best friend. Just three weeks ago, she was here, in Washington, with her classmates, performing for her country at my inauguration. And a week later, she was shot and killed in a Chicago park after school, just a mile away from my house.

Hadiya’s parents, Nate and Cleo, are in this chamber tonight, along with more than two dozen Americans whose lives have been torn apart by gun violence. They deserve a vote.

Gabby Giffords deserves a vote.

The families of Newtown deserve a vote.

The families of Aurora deserve a vote.

The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence – they deserve a simple vote.

Our actions will not prevent every senseless act of violence in this country. Indeed, no laws, no initiatives, no administrative acts will perfectly solve all the challenges I’ve outlined tonight. But we were never sent here to be perfect. We were sent here to make what difference we can, to secure this nation, expand opportunity, and uphold our ideals through the hard, often frustrating, but absolutely necessary work of self-government.

We were sent here to look out for our fellow Americans the same way they look out for one another, every single day, usually without fanfare, all across this country. We should follow their example.

We should follow the example of a New York City nurse named Menchu Sanchez. When Hurricane Sandy plunged her hospital into darkness, her thoughts were not with how her own home was faring – they were with the twenty precious newborns in her care and the rescue plan she devised that kept them all safe.

We should follow the example of a North Miami woman named Desiline Victor. When she arrived at her polling place, she was told the wait to vote might be six hours. And as time ticked by, her concern was not with her tired body or aching feet, but whether folks like her would get to have their say. Hour after hour, a throng of people stayed in line in support of her. Because Desiline is 102 years old. And they erupted in cheers when she finally put on a sticker that read “I Voted.”

We should follow the example of a police officer named Brian Murphy. When a gunman opened fire on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, and Brian was the first to arrive, he did not consider his own safety. He fought back until help arrived, and ordered his fellow officers to protect the safety of the Americans worshiping inside – even as he lay bleeding from twelve bullet wounds.

When asked how he did that, Brian said, “That’s just the way we’re made.”

That’s just the way we’re made.

We may do different jobs, and wear different uniforms, and hold different views than the person beside us. But as Americans, we all share the same proud title:

We are citizens. It’s a word that doesn’t just describe our nationality or legal status. It describes the way we’re made. It describes what we believe. It captures the enduring idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another and to future generations; that our rights are wrapped up in the rights of others; and that well into our third century as a nation, it remains the task of us all, as citizens of these United States, to be the authors of the next great chapter in our American story.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
88 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Larry Wirth
February 12, 2013 10:10 pm

“12 of the last 15”? Ok, maybe, maybe even probably. So what?
We have just crested the top of a rather obvious 60 year climate cycle and are now, likely, on the downward side. This may, or may not, be the peak of the “Modern Warm Period.” but I hope not. We’ll need to hang around another sixty years to know for sure.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch… I just reached the summit of Mt. Whitney (chosen because I’ve been there) and the last eight steps were all uphill, but for a couple of slight depressions. Now I’m going back to the trailhead, eight more steps- oops! a slight rise needed to continue. So 12 of the last 16 steps I’ve taken were near the highest altitude I’ve ever reached on foot. Isn’t that what a reasonable person would expect to be the case? Well, yeah, that sounds right. Do warmunists ever think about such things? No, no evidence of any logical thought whatever.
I’m also quite certain that the Pilgrims of 1690 would have said that 12 of the last 15 years were the coldest ever (since records have been kept), and would have been correct. BFD
Spent yesterday afternoon watching the snow silently falling at 3400 feet near Tucson, AZ, sitting in front of a mesquite-burning fireplace and wondering about “extreme” weather events. 2″ of snow on the ground this morning is unusual, but “extreme”?
Sorry about the mesquite logs, but the local Walmart doesn’t (so far) sell any warmunist logs. When they do, I’ll buy ’em. Cheers, L

barryS
February 12, 2013 10:16 pm

It’s great that Obama wants to do something about climate change and there are all these trends. But this article looks at temperature and finds a weak case for global warming. http://www.statisticsblog.com/2012/12/the-surprisingly-weak-case-for-global-warming/

michaeljmcfadden
February 12, 2013 10:20 pm

“We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. ”
Why is this something to be proud of? Does it mean that we don’t produce as much as we did 16 or 20 years ago?
“We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas,”
This statement puzzles me because I’m old enough to remember car advertising from the 1970s/80s, and unless my memory is WAY off, they were advertising all sorts of little cars that were getting 40 or 50 mpg back in those days. It’s possible I’m just mis-remembering, but does anyone know the figures on this?
“[and we’ve doubled] the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar”
Since when? Last year? Ten years ago? Fifty years ago? Without a reference the statement is meaningless. Did I miss the reference?
“We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it.”
Is this because of “fracking”? If so, shouldn’t he have said “Due our increasing use of fracking we produce… etc” ?
“And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen.”
Anyone want to comment on that last point? Would that possibly also be because of fracking?
– MJM

RealOldOne2
February 12, 2013 11:22 pm

Zeke Hausfather says:
February 12, 2013 at 7:54 pm
justsomeguy31167,
To be fair, you’d have to be rather daft to claim that there is any chance of 5 C warming in the next 50 years.

Zeke,
I’m glad to hear that you would classify Joe Romm as daft. Romm claims: “come the 2030s when the world is desperate, desperate to avoid 7, 8, 9 degrees Fahrenheit warming”. That’s 4-5 C warming only 18-28 years from now. Skip to 8:19 in the following video:

February 12, 2013 11:23 pm

Mr Lynn says:
February 12, 2013 at 7:12 pm

From the end of the Financial Post article you partially quoted:

Alberta’s new representative in Washington, David Manning, said last week Premier Alison Redford is ready to deal with Washington over Keystone. “We have much more in our toolbox” to offer Washington in return for a green light on Keystone, he said, without elaborating.
Many in the oil industry in Canada and the United States support a carbon tax paid by consumers, especially if it means getting political support for energy projects. Better to tax consumers than industry. The Canada West Foundation, a big Keystone booster, has often supported a carbon tax in Canada. “We need a carbon price: transparent, unmistakable and extending across the economy,” wrote a foundation official recently.
Fully implemented, a carbon tax would impose major burdens on consumers and energy users in an effort to use so-called “market signals” to reduce fossil fuel use. For Canadians, the trade-off would be higher prices for energy at home in exchange for greater energy exports to the United States. Hello Canada!

That may be, but there is a greater geopolitical play here: the Chinese. The Chinese have invested heavily in the Oil Sands in the last three/four years. Ottawa put the brakes on early last year out of fear of a takeover, and the US balked. So the Chinese started doing joint ventures with Alberta companies. Then the Keystone thing happened. And Canadians were not about to be bullied.

Environment Minister Jim Prentice is no fan of a single-buyer market for exported bitumen, which actually sells at a discount in the U. S. compared with Middle East oil despite coming from a friendly neighbour. He’d like competition injected into the system.
“Doesn’t it help Canada’s exporters to have alternative market choices?” he noted in a recent interview.
“We need transportation mechanisms to ship it to the West Coast. Refineries in the U. S. have limited capacity and we don’t have anywhere else to sell it. Having the capacity to ship it to the West Coast would keep everybody honest, so I think it’s good policy.”

From: China dives into oil sands as U. S. balks
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a045c7a5-4146-496c-b477-2e7f77a30ed5
This last takeover deal was approved today, February 12th…in the USA. Canada approved it on Dec 15, 2012, and said it would be the last, along with Petronas buying a nat gas company.

The U.S. government approved Cnooc Ltd.’s 0883.HK -0.13% $15.1 billion purchase of Canadian oil-sands operator Nexen Inc., NXY.T +2.04% clearing the last significant hurdle in China’s biggest overseas deal.
The Canadian government approved the deal in December, after an extensive review of its foreign investment rules and its policy toward state-owned enterprises, in particular. Britain also approved the deal. The acquisition was subject to U.S. and British approval because Nexen controls significant assets in the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324196204578299862176958542.html
So the quid pro quo could be Keystone to hold Canada’s feet to the fire about allowing any more takeovers, and possibly joint ventures. After all, most of the domestic operators in the Oil Sands are American oil companies, and America needs to protect its oil supply. A duplicate pipeline fits the bill (there already is one to the US, been there for 30 years). Selling it all to China, when China also controls the rare earth market and has stated it will be reducing RE exports in 2013…not a smart idea. (Quebec has huge rare earth deposits in the northern part of its province, and deals were made in Manhattan last year; however, once the Quebecers discover the enormous toxic radiation waste and the damage to the water supply if they dump it into the lakes the way they do in China–that’s all they’ll need to hear–they’ll shut it down.)

February 13, 2013 1:00 am

“In the meantime, the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence.”
I thought fracking was bad. It causes earthquakes and the world will split in half, or some such thing. (Sarc.)
Did the ruffling sound of money change his mind?
Greenie-loons will not be pleased.

Réaumur
February 13, 2013 2:31 am

“It is unclear if this means a new tax or a carbobn tax since the language is vague. – Anthony”
I’d vote for a carbobn tax.

February 13, 2013 3:17 am

So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good.
It’s a pity that the President does not refer to the possibility of the start of a mini ice age as did the London mayor Boris Johnson on January 21 of this year. With this statement, the mayor witnesses of an open mind. Why does Obama one-sidedly believe in the overwhelming judgment of science? Thirty years ago I also believed in the conclusions of the Club of Rome. It was predicted that in the beginning of the years 2000 oil should be exhausted!!
Which technology will replace oil and gas? The promotion of electric cars in wintry circumstances is very dangerous. I read in a folder about an electric car that the autonomy of the battery will be reduced by 5/8 in wintry conditions! And I don’t know if the running of the electric heater is reckoned in. This is a must otherwise one would freeze to death especially when the temperature outside is 0°F or -20°C. I hope that ambulances and fire engines will be exempted from the obligation to ride with electric cars or trucks.
I find it also revolting that China has been held up as an example concerning clean energy. We recently witnessed how during several weeks a deadly cloud was suffocating every citizen in Bejing so that many factories had to be closed.

M Courtney
February 13, 2013 5:05 am

A Brit here so you Americans are free to ignore this comment as ignorant and irrelevant.
However, I note that the speech is significant in what it doesn’t mention; Culture, the arts and the creative industries (other than engineering).
This may be warm, bipartisan words which are intended to avoid inciting a flare up of the Culture Wars. But gun-ownership looks like a divisive issue from this side of the Pond. Your President doesn’t look like a meek and mild conciliator.
Instead he chooses to focus on Science, Engineering and building Infrastructure. Look at the passage immediately below the bold text. How does this play with wildlife-loving Hollywood celebrities? Not well. But it will boost local money-circulation and long-term investment.
We can all realise that 3d-printing is of more use for prototypes than mass production, that the recent warm years are not a sign of continued warming and that windpower is economically dubious. But at least your President is talking about the right subjects.
My point is simple; you may not like his arguments or his answers but his agenda is good.

Cal Smith
February 13, 2013 5:39 am

Welcome to post-modern America on steroids.

February 13, 2013 6:12 am

But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change. Yes, it’s true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is, the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15. Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, and floods – all are now more frequent and intense.
Beware anyone telling you “its for the sake of the children” because any argument used like that is being used to manipulate for their own purposes. Its also condescending to our children to assume that we can handle a “supposed catastrophe” better then the children can. Are we saying that our children are dumber then we are? Are we trying to claim that we have better technology today then our children will have in the future? I just don’t get it, we are told that we must sacrifice for the greater good, and yet all the evidence points to the fact that our children will have an easier time dealing with any sort of catastrophe then we will.
Having said that, Of all the lies told by Obama, the claims of the last 15 years being hot is probably the worst….. I covered this in a write-up on my blog…. but to paraphrase, the entire concept that he last 15 years have been warm is a no-brainer. Its a statement like that which is meant to be misleading. Of course we have been hot the last 15 years. Warming stopped 15 years ago, and since we did not cool, temperatures are the same as they have been over the last 15 years. So knowing that, we have over 100 years of record keeping for temperatures and the last 15 years are the hottest out of that greater then 100 years. So is it a surprise that our planet is warmer then it has been in the last 100 years? If so, then I have a bridge to sell to you. I mean seriously…..
That is proof that warming is continuing? Is Obama stupid or just the people who tell him what to say? Or are they lying?
I just don’t get it really to repeat the line “we are warmer then we have been in 100 years” and to say this is proof of catastrophe while pointing to weather events that are normal on our planet. Did these people take leave of their senses?
Think about that for a second….. These people will have you believe that its unexpected to find the last 15 years being hot when compared to the last 100 years. But of course man! These people would understand when you explain the statistics to them when talking about say elevations and how on the Earth you find the highest elevations in the mountains, but golly gee, The highest temperatures are found on our planet when we are at our warmest? That is proof of catastrophe of course, but its also unimportant, tells you nothing and is meant to mislead people into thinking the world really is going to hell. The worst part of all of this is that these people just want to dictate what we can and can not do.
You can not use coal power. You can not use normal light bulbs. You can not use too much water. You can not tell the truth, otherwise you are denier. These people are fascists to the core when you think about it. They just want to tell everyone else how to live while they make no sacrifices or perhaps token sacrifices themselves. Just a bunch of hypocrites telling lies and deceiving people so as to gain power. I guess we are not as advanced as we thought we were if silly superstitions and sound-bites like Obama uses is thought of as the truth. These people truly are bizarre. But shrug, I guess we are forced to fight against the deceptions since no warmist will. They won’t correct Obama or any other politician who misleads or lies…because “its for the greater good.”

February 13, 2013 6:12 am

This is my translation of the energy portion of the SOTU message from Obamaspeak to Reality English:
“After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years.”
Thanks to drilling leases approved under the Bush administration we produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years.
“ We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. “
We are requiring future cars to double the driving distance on a gallon of gas by making them smaller and lighter. We have also doubled the amount of renewable energy from sources like solar and wind – from half a percent to a full percent of our energy need at a cost of over half a million dollar per job created.
“We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it.”
Thanks to fracking, done nearly exclusively on private land in spite of the efforts of the EPA we produce more natural gas than ever before driving down the cost of natural gas.
“And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen.”
Over the last four years our emissions of the beneficial carbon dioxide have actually fallen. Thanks to the increase in carbon dioxide the world can now feed two billion people more. Without this increase there would be mass starvation in the developing countries.
“But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change.”
Our children are now facing a national debt of more than sixteen trillion dollars, in no small part by tilting at windmills.
“Yes, it’s true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is, the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15.”
Thanks to the fact that we have put weather stations on airports, on paved surfaces and in places of rapid land use changes, the measured temperatures have shown 12 of the last 15 years have been the hottest on record. It is true that urban heat islands show an increase, but temperature records for weather stations in undisturbed areas show a slight decrease.
The whole portion can be seen at:
http://lenbilen.com/2013/02/13/a-response-to-the-energy-portion-of-the-state-of-the-union-message/

michaeljmcfadden
Reply to  lenbilen
February 13, 2013 6:41 am

lenbilen, on an anecdotal level, but an extended one, I can see the “urban heat island” effect here in the Philadelphia area. My brother lives about 35 miles north of me in Pipersville. If you look at the monthly long term temperature averages, Philly is just a few degrees higher for highs, but is almost TEN degrees higher for lows! I’m guessing there must be other factors at play, but the urban heat island thing could be rather major given how rural Pipersville is. 35 miles north sure as qumquats ain’t enough to account for a ten degree drop! Heh… the North Pole would be at absolute zero if THAT kept up!
Pipersville monthly graph: http://www.weather.com/outlook/health/allergies/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/18947
Philly monthly graph:
http://www.weather.com/outlook/health/allergies/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/19104- MJM

Resourceguy
February 13, 2013 6:51 am

The lure of new revenue is never far below the surface of rhetoric. It’s like a magnet that compels them to say stupid things, subvert public policy, and ignore climate model forecast errors or data quality issues.

Bruce Cobb
February 13, 2013 6:54 am

” We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it’s too late.”
Is he really an idiot, or just a puppet mouthing platitudes? Hard to tell. It’s going to be a long four years.

Gene Selkov
February 13, 2013 7:05 am

“the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress…”
He is actually misquoting JFK because the word “progress” has since been redefined to mean its exact opposite. Progress today is the power to obstruct other people’s activity. The only really progressive part in today’s meaning of “progressive” is that Progressives are becoming progressively more obstructionist.

Resourceguy
February 13, 2013 7:07 am

The speech writers of such ilk know that time is running out before cyclical temp increases turn down from the flat pattern in recent years. At that point the mountain to climb on spin will be too high even for a silver tongue lawyer with top flight win-the-day debate skills. Or you simply play off the various donor blocks with words in place of commitment.

Rational Db8
February 13, 2013 9:07 am

re post by: justsomeguy31167 says: February 12, 2013 at 7:34 pm

Ya Kevin, and we will never be energy independent (oops, we are headed there) nor will we ever have control of our budgets (oops, deficit dropping every year since Bush). Facts:

Your “facts” and interpretations are extremely deceptive and misleading. How about we try some more accurate information relative to your two issues.
Fact: Oil and gas exploration, development, and production on federal lands is significantly DOWN under Obama. The only reason we are producing more is because of fracking on private lands that Obama cannot rein in. His offshore drilling moratorium and subsequent delays in violation of court order, and many other actions have not only reduced the amont we could be producing, but driven up costs significantly for all of us, and wasted literally billions of tax dollars. e.g., The move towards energy independence is in spite of Obama, not because of him.
Fact: Historically an incoming president has always been considered responsible for that years deficit for a number of reasons, and in many ways this is even more true for Obama than many past presidents (I’ll elaborate below), e.g., Obama owns the 2009 deficit, not Bush.
Fact: In 2009, Bush requested far lower spending (3% increase) than the Democratically controlled congress passed (17.9%!!!) – with Obama voting “yes” for the greatly expanded spending. Bush didn’t sign that budget into law, Obama did in March 2009. e.g., Obama and the Democrats own the 2009 budget, not Bush.
Fact: The average deficit during Bush’s eight years was $221 Billion – that’s even tho he inherited a recession when taking office (remember the dot.com bust), had 9/11 occur, and two wars. Leaving aside the controversial issue of 2009 budget, Bush’s highest deficit was $458 billion. Under Obama we’ve had four years with annual deficits above $1300 Billion
In 8 years Bush added $4.8 Trillion in federal debt. In 3 1/2 years, Obama added over $5 Trillion. e.g., by any rational measure, Obama’s deficits and effect of the debt has been radically worse than Bush’s, on both an annual and presidential term basis.
Fact: In 2007 when the democrats took over both houses the budget deficit created by the outgoing Republican Congress was only $168 billion, e.g., about a tenth of Obama’s worst deficit. Under Obama it has been over $1 trillion every year, and as high as $1.7 trillion. e.g., Obama and the democratic party controlled congress are responsible for the drastic increase in spending since 2007, not Bush.
Fact: The total outstanding debt in January 2007 was $8.2 trillion (the last year of a Republican controlled congress). It is now over $16 trillion – and while the Republican controlled House has passed budgets, Obama’s 2 proposed budgets (he’s required to do them annually, but has not) were so grossly profligate, it was unable to get a single vote – even from democrats. Meanwhile, the Democratically controlled Senate has refused to pass a budget for 4 years, which means we’ve been running on continuing resolutions from the last budget passed – e.g., the vastly increased spending of 2009, which Obama had promised would be temporary. e.g., Obama and the democratic party controlled congress are responsible for the drastic increase in spending since 2007, not Bush.
Fact: Obama didn’t “inherit” the 2009 deficit, he helped create it. As Senator, he voted for TARP & bailouts, as president elect he specifically requested Bush approve the 2nd half of TARP, which Bush said he would only approve on Obama’s request, and Obama voted for the 2009 budget. It goes even further: ““The Democrat Congress [in 2008], confident Obama was going to win in 2008, passed only three of fiscal 2009’s 12 appropriations bills (Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Homeland Security). The Democrat Congress passed the rest of them [in 2009], and [President] Obama signed them.” So Obama played a very direct role in the runaway fiscal 2009 spending explosion.” e.g., Obama and the Democrat controlled congress are responsible for the 2009 budget, it wasn’t ‘inherited.’
Fact: Furthermore, Obama wasn’t obligated to accept the 2009 budget. In fact, he not only voted in favor of it, he signed it into law himself in March 2009. He could have refused to sign it. Even had it already been signed, Obama could have overturned much of Bush’s 2009 budget had he wanted to, just as Reagan did to Jimmy Carter’s when Reagan took office. See here. Obama wasn’t just stuck with it, especially considering his party had strong control of both houses of congress, even a filibuster proof majority for some time. He chose not to, he chose, instead, to INCREASE spending drastically. He chose to add on the nearly trillion dollar stimulus that had little effect, the 2nd half of TARP, and all the other bailouts during that time and since. He’s now calling for even more stimulus spending. Nor was any of Obama’s deficit from ‘unfunded wars,’ as some try to claim. Supplementary appropriations, as those were, are still counted in that year’s deficit and debt figures. Those went into Bush’s deficit and debt tally, not Obama’s. e.g., Obama and the Democrat controlled congress are responsible for the 2009 budget, it wasn’t ‘inherited,’ and they are responsible for the massive deficits each year of Obama’s term.
Fact: To be meaningful, the deficit has to be compared to GDP. Since you want to falsely blame the 2009 budget on Bush, I’ll present the deficit/GDP ratio using an average so it’s partially attributed to Bush, partially to Obama. The source linked provides all three scenarios tho, with incoming year as historically judged to be that of the incoming president, the average as below, and the Obama deception of trying to blame the incoming year on the previous president. Any version shows Bush with vastly better ratio.
Here are the ratios of deficit to GDP for the past five presidents, adjusted to account for partial year budgets both incoming and outgoing at start & finish of their terms.
Ronald Reagan …..4.2%
G. H. W. Bush……. 4.2%
Bill Clinton ………….0.5%
George W. Bush ….2.7%
Barack Obama …..*8.9%
*fiscal2012 ends Sept.30, therefore estimated
Data source: Economic Report of the President, February 2012
Note: G.W. Bush’s is worsened by TARP – but recall that Bush said he would only approve the second half of TARP if requested to do so by Obama, since Obama had already been elected. Obama requested it, yet that is counted towards Bush. Then in 2010 & 2011, a sizable chuck of that was repaid, significantly helping lower Obama’s percentage – and even so his is sky high in historical terms. For this fact and the next one below, see: source here. e.g., by any relevant measure, Obama has grossly increased spending and deficits compared to any of the Bush years.
Fact: “As for spending itself, during the George W. Bush years (2001-08), federal outlays averaged 19.6 percent of GDP, a little less than during the Clinton years (1993-2000), at 19.8% and far below Reagan, whose outlays never dropped below 21 percent of GDP in any year and averaged 22.4%. Even factoring in the TARP year (2009), Bush’s average outlays as a proportion of the economy was 20.3 percent – far below Reagan and only a half-point below Clinton. As for Obama, even excluding 2009, his spending has averaged 24.1 percent of GDP – the highest level for any three years since World War II.” e.g., by any relevant measure, Obama has grossly increased spending and deficits compared to any of the Bush years.
Some bits above from this Forbes article.

Rational Db8
February 13, 2013 9:17 am

Oops, minor correction to my post that doesn’t affect the conclusions – Bush signed off on the 2009 budget, not Obama. However not only did Obama vote yes to that budget, he drastically increased 2009 spending: “Obama didn’t come in and live with the budget Bush had approved. He immediately signed off on enormous spending programs that had been specifically rejected by Bush. This included a $410 billion spending bill that Bush had refused to sign before he left office. Obama signed it on March 10, 2009. Bush had been chopping brush in Texas for two months at that point.” My apologies for the error.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/05/24/msnbc-and-white-house-cite-bogus-report-claiming-obama-spending-binge#ixzz2KngVIfg6

DD More
February 13, 2013 9:36 am

After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it.
Doubled gas mileage? Just because you sign a law for 50 mpg average cars do not perform to your wishes. A bit like the EPA rule on cellulosic biofuel.
see – http://www.energyxxi.org/sites/default/files/MetricoftheMonth-NOV11MotorVehicleMPG.pdf and the chart on page 3. Doubling not even close past 2035.
Doubled renewable energy? Per EIA renewable output doubled from 2005 to 2011. Is time frame he was stating?
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_03_01_a.html
Everyone energy bill lower? Since the war on coal has progressed, state mandates inflate the price of renewable and PUC commissions set rates has your bill actually gone down?
Last year, wind energy added nearly half of all new power capacity in America.
Capacity versus output?
We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it’s too late.
Belief = Faith – Believe what ever you want, what can you prove.
Can we also ‘believe’ this is a propaganda war with made up statistics and false ‘computer models’ in lieu of science.

Rational Db8
February 13, 2013 9:49 am

Obama said:
“We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it’s too late.”
We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy (which was far from unprecedented), and the most severe drought in decades (which hasn’t been nearly as bad as the dust bowl years which occurred long before man was adding any significant amount of CO2 to the atmosphere, and which also isn’t nearly as bad as the anthropological and geological records show us have occurred periodically multiple times in the past), and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen (caused primarily by our faulty land use laws which have resulted in a massive pile up of combustible materials, resulting in far less frequent but far worse fires), were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of orwellian pseudo-science, and emotional belief and fears on the part of some people, and the desires of politicians to find any excuse to exert more control – and act before it’s too late.
There, fixed Obama’s statement for him.

D.B. Stealey
February 13, 2013 9:50 am

Rational Db8,
Excellent deconstruction of the false claims made by “justsomeguy31167”. Kudos for setting the record straight. Obama owns the deficit and the resulting fiscal crisis, which is far from being over. Now we have many more $Trillions to pay off. And what did we get for it? Crony capitalism a la Solyndra. But our roads still have the same old pot holes.

Chris R.
February 13, 2013 10:46 am

To policycritic:
One sentence in your long post grabbed my attention:
“…once the Quebecers discover the enormous toxic radiation waste and the damage to the water supply…”
Uhhh–what are you talking about? “Rare earths” refers to the lanthanide series in
the periodic table. All but one of those are most emphatically NOT radioactive. Further, the
exception, promethium (element number 61), is considered an artificial element, because all
of its isotopes have short half-lives. Therefore it’s all but unknown in nature. If you want
to produce promethium, you need a nuclear fission reactor.
Lanthanide salts are somewhat toxic chemically, but you are way off base talking about
radiation.

Tamara
February 13, 2013 12:15 pm

“But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will.”
Bye, bye Constitution. Hello government Of Obama, By Obama, and For Obama.

February 13, 2013 12:23 pm

@KevinK,
I’ve heard all the promises of “breakthroughs” in battery technology and PV solar cell technologies for decades now, I ask again; WHERE ARE THE BREAKTHROUGHS ??????????
Sitting on tarmacs in grounded 787s?

Carbonicus the Copernicus of Carbon
February 13, 2013 12:30 pm

Speaking about his gun control proposals (I caught the last 10 minutes, refused to watch any more), he said, “But we were never sent here to be perfect. We were sent here to make what difference we can….” (talking about voters sending a president to office and members to Congress)
But instead, this is the liar who’s Sec of State uttered the words, during questioning by Congress on Benghazi, “what difference does it make”.
Make a difference? Or “what difference does it make”? I want to puke.  
“What difference does it make” is the mantra I’m now hanging on all Libs and their policy prescriptions.
Wind, solar, biomass physically incapable of meeting US energy demand for electricity? “What difference does it make”?
Another trillion in federal “stimulus” spending, another trillion of budget deficit this year, national debt equal to 100% of GDP? “What difference does it make”?
Stricter federal  gun control laws despite the fact that Chicago – where handgun ownership is ILLEGAL – is empirical proof that it absolutely, unequivocally doesn’t work? “What difference does it make”?
Carbon tax despite the fact that it won’t make ANY difference to average global temps and despite the fact that the nat gas boom lowered US CO2 emissions more than cap and trade would have or a carbon tax possibly could? “What difference does it make”?
I am counting down the days until I go John Galt on America’s ass.  If all the productive eventually join me, we will show libtards EXACTLY “what difference” we made once we are no longer funding their utopian Socialist dream.