
Oh, this can’t be good. Dr. Tim Ball writes in with:
“What is going on here? It suggests they are feeling pressure for liability for their activities?”
From Fox News: U.N. Climate Organization Wants Immunities Against Charges of Conflict of Interest, Exceeding Mandate, Among Others
The organization responsible for managing a global cap-and-trade system worth billions of dollars for carbon emissions projects around the world is trying to get sweeping legal immunities for its actions, even as it plans to expand its activities dramatically in the wake of the United Nations’ Rio + 20 summit on sustainable development, which starts June 20.
Despite its name, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC, legal experts ruled in 2006 that it was not to be part of the U.N. system of organizations that has enjoyed diplomatic and legal immunities since the end of World War II. Now, it is scrambling to figure out how to get them. A meeting of a UNFCCC subsidiary in Bonn last month agreed to forward a new draft treaty covering the issue to another meeting in November.
Internal UNFCCC documents, examined by Fox News, show that among other things, top officials hope to use those immunities to avoid challenges in the future based on such things as:
–possible conflicts of interest in their duties,
–breaches of confidentiality in their work,
–violations of the due process rights of those affected by UNFCCC actions,
–making decisions or actions that are beyond the legal mandate of the organization or its subsidiaries.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“No controlling legal authority.” Where have we heard that before?
No offense to our British friends but, didn’t we “decentralize” from the 1700’s British monarchy for the purpose of securing rights for the individual? Why are we “recentralizing” authority over us via the UN?
If the science is so clear and unambiguous then why worry. You are simply doing the right thing to avert disaster. Or do they know they are talking CRAP and future generations may take them to court for their crimes against humanity. I say crimes against humanity because if we did everything they suggest many millions will die (food for fuel anyone?).
It isn’t just the science.
It’s asking for immunity for UNCC schemces…i.e . carbon credits schemes…AND the Bankers who handle the funds. Think…. World Bank.
http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/tag/green-climate-fund-immunity-from-prosecution/
Given the UNFCCC this, makes as much sense as given Charles Manson control of a children’s day care center . If your looking for truly epic scale corruption and incompetence, you have no difficulty finding it at the UN.
Gunga Din says:
June 12, 2012 at 1:39 pm
“No controlling legal authority.” Where have we heard that before?
No offense to our British friends but, didn’t we “decentralize” from the 1700′s British monarchy for the purpose of securing rights for the individual? Why are we “recentralizing” authority over us via the UN?
==
Because the British got it back in 1913 – you just didn’t notice.
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/The.History.of.the.Money.Changers.htm
They want to be protected from the results of their actions, so we immediately know that they know that the result of their actions could, would and probably will be deleterious to a very big number of people in the World Population.
“””””…..UNFCCC wants ‘immunity’ from prosecution prior to Rio+20……””””””
I don’t have a problem with granting them immunity from prosecution; it’s easier that way anyhow; so Just hang them all, and forget about prosecuting them.
Someone can always claim to be immune from consequence.
But having that in fact is another matter – just ask Muammar Ghadaffi, Saddam Hussain, et al
“Father forgive us for we know exactly what we are doing.”
Unelected, and immune from prosecution. It’s the Divine Right of Kings all over again.
All other areas of business have a duty of care. If they cause loss they are held accountable through the Courts for it. Immunity should not be granted. In fact normal law should apply.
Nuts!!
They should just move their organization to Chicago. Then, they’d have nothing to worry about.
No. With an extra helping of no, and no on top. Side dish of no. To drink? No.
H. R. : More like “Father, forgive me for what I am planning to do.”
Typical sociopathic behaviour.
Next they’ll ask for immunity from a bullet.
Unfortunately, if they refuse challenge in a law court, they may die from the barrel of a gun.
Analysis of history, not an exhortation to action, you understand……
Wunderbar !
Wer ist der UNFCCC eigentlich ?
Address …
Main office
UNFCCC secretariat
Haus Carstanjen
Martin-Luther-King-Strasse 8
53175 Bonn
Germany
Mailing address
UNFCCC secretariat
P.O. Box 260124
D-53153 Bonn
Germany
Phone: (49-228) 815-1000
Fax: (49-228) 815-1999
Web: http://unfccc.int
Maybe a pre-emptive tribunal held in Kualar Lumpur might help! – sarcasm off 😉