UNFCCC wants 'immunity' from prosecution prior to Rio+20

English: Emblem of the United Nations. Color i...
Emblem of the United Nations.

Oh, this can’t be good. Dr. Tim Ball writes in with:

“What is going on here? It suggests they are feeling pressure for liability for their activities?”

From Fox News: U.N. Climate Organization Wants Immunities Against Charges of Conflict of Interest, Exceeding Mandate, Among Others

The organization responsible for managing a global cap-and-trade system worth billions of dollars for carbon emissions projects around the world is trying to get sweeping legal immunities for its actions, even as it plans to expand its activities dramatically in the wake of the United Nations’ Rio + 20 summit on sustainable development, which starts June 20.

Despite its name, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC, legal experts ruled in 2006 that it was not to be part of the U.N. system of organizations that has enjoyed diplomatic and legal immunities since the end of World War II. Now, it is scrambling to figure out how to get them. A meeting of a UNFCCC subsidiary in Bonn last month agreed to forward a new draft treaty covering the issue to another meeting in November.

Internal UNFCCC documents, examined by Fox News, show that among other things, top officials hope to use those immunities to avoid challenges in the future based on such things as:

–possible conflicts of interest in their duties,

–breaches of confidentiality in their work,

–violations of the due process rights of those affected by UNFCCC actions,

–making decisions or actions that are beyond the legal mandate of the organization or its subsidiaries.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

70 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 12, 2012 1:39 pm

“No controlling legal authority.” Where have we heard that before?
No offense to our British friends but, didn’t we “decentralize” from the 1700’s British monarchy for the purpose of securing rights for the individual? Why are we “recentralizing” authority over us via the UN?

Jimbo
June 12, 2012 2:01 pm

If the science is so clear and unambiguous then why worry. You are simply doing the right thing to avert disaster. Or do they know they are talking CRAP and future generations may take them to court for their crimes against humanity. I say crimes against humanity because if we did everything they suggest many millions will die (food for fuel anyone?).

kim2ooo
June 12, 2012 2:10 pm

It isn’t just the science.
It’s asking for immunity for UNCC schemces…i.e . carbon credits schemes…AND the Bankers who handle the funds. Think…. World Bank.

KnR
June 12, 2012 3:05 pm

Given the UNFCCC this, makes as much sense as given Charles Manson control of a children’s day care center . If your looking for truly epic scale corruption and incompetence, you have no difficulty finding it at the UN.

Myrrh
June 12, 2012 3:54 pm

Gunga Din says:
June 12, 2012 at 1:39 pm
“No controlling legal authority.” Where have we heard that before?
No offense to our British friends but, didn’t we “decentralize” from the 1700′s British monarchy for the purpose of securing rights for the individual? Why are we “recentralizing” authority over us via the UN?
==
Because the British got it back in 1913 – you just didn’t notice.
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/The.History.of.the.Money.Changers.htm

June 12, 2012 4:09 pm

They want to be protected from the results of their actions, so we immediately know that they know that the result of their actions could, would and probably will be deleterious to a very big number of people in the World Population.

George E. Smith;
June 12, 2012 4:31 pm

“””””…..UNFCCC wants ‘immunity’ from prosecution prior to Rio+20……””””””
I don’t have a problem with granting them immunity from prosecution; it’s easier that way anyhow; so Just hang them all, and forget about prosecuting them.

ExWarmist
June 12, 2012 5:37 pm

Someone can always claim to be immune from consequence.
But having that in fact is another matter – just ask Muammar Ghadaffi, Saddam Hussain, et al

H.R.
June 12, 2012 5:42 pm

“Father forgive us for we know exactly what we are doing.”

johanna
June 12, 2012 6:34 pm

Unelected, and immune from prosecution. It’s the Divine Right of Kings all over again.

Firey
June 12, 2012 7:14 pm

All other areas of business have a duty of care. If they cause loss they are held accountable through the Courts for it. Immunity should not be granted. In fact normal law should apply.

June 12, 2012 7:26 pm

Nuts!!

CRS, Dr.P.H.
June 12, 2012 7:30 pm

They should just move their organization to Chicago. Then, they’d have nothing to worry about.

Merovign
June 12, 2012 9:29 pm

No. With an extra helping of no, and no on top. Side dish of no. To drink? No.

Merovign
June 12, 2012 9:29 pm

H. R. : More like “Father, forgive me for what I am planning to do.”

June 12, 2012 10:38 pm

Typical sociopathic behaviour.

Rhys Jaggar
June 13, 2012 3:45 am

Next they’ll ask for immunity from a bullet.
Unfortunately, if they refuse challenge in a law court, they may die from the barrel of a gun.
Analysis of history, not an exhortation to action, you understand……

June 13, 2012 7:34 am

Wunderbar !
Wer ist der UNFCCC eigentlich ?
Address …
Main office
UNFCCC secretariat
Haus Carstanjen
Martin-Luther-King-Strasse 8
53175 Bonn
Germany
Mailing address
UNFCCC secretariat
P.O. Box 260124
D-53153 Bonn
Germany
Phone: (49-228) 815-1000
Fax: (49-228) 815-1999
Web: http://unfccc.int

dev
June 17, 2012 7:00 am

Maybe a pre-emptive tribunal held in Kualar Lumpur might help! – sarcasm off 😉