I’ve been asked to provide some information on the upcoming eclipse Sunday, so here it is.
I’ll actually miss the first part of the Heartland conference (Sunday night and Monday) due to the promise to my children we’d see this together. Timing for the eclipse, getting back from the spot I’ve picked out in the high desert and airplane schedules didn’t pencil out.
Click to enlarge. Image by Anthony using Google Earth as basis.
Images, data, and other facts:
Click to enlarge
Diagrams of the moon’s shadow from Magdalena Ridge Observatory New Mexico Tech
What you may see (with a proper filter) is this:
University of Manitoba western USA path:
From NASA
Description of the 2012 Annular Solar Eclipse
The 2012 May 20 eclipse occurs at the Moon’s descending node in central Taurus. An annular eclipse will be visible from a 240 to 300 kilometre-wide track that traverses eastern Asia, the northern Pacific Ocean and the western United States. A partial eclipse is seen within the much broader path of the Moon’s penumbral shadow, that includes much of Asia, the Pacific and the western 2/3 of North America (Figure 1).
The annular path begins in southern China at 22:06 UT. Because the Moon passed through apogee one day earlier (May 19 at 16:14 UT), its large distance from Earth produces a wide path of annularity. Traveling eastward, the shadow quickly sweeps along the southern coast of Japan as the central line duration of annularity grows from 4.4 to 5.0 minutes.
Tokyo lies 10 kilometres north of the central line. For the over 10 million residents within the metropolitan area, the annular phase will last 5 minutes beginning at 22:32 UT (on May 21 local time). The annular ring is quite thick because the Moon’s apparent diameter is only 94% that of the Sun. Traveling with a velocity of 1.1 kilometres/second, the antumbral shadow leaves Japan and heads northeast across the Northern Pacific. The instant of greatest eclipse [1] occurs at 23:52:47 UT when the eclipse magnitude [2] reaches 0.9439. At that instant, the duration of annularity is 5 minutes 46 seconds, the path width is 237 kilometres and the Sun is 61° above the flat horizon formed by the open ocean.
The shadow passes just south of Alaska’s Aleutian Islands as the central track slowly curves to the southeast. After a 7000 kilometre-long ocean voyage lasting nearly 2 hours, the antumbra finally reaches land again along the rugged coastlines of southern Oregon and northern California (Figure 2) at 01:23 UT (May 20 local time).
Redding, CA lies 30 kilometres south of the central line. Nevertheless, it still experiences an annular phase lasting 4 1/2 minutes beginning at 01:26 UT. It is already late afternoon along this section of the eclipse path. The Sun’s altitude is 20° during the annular phase and decreasing as the track heads southeast. Central Nevada, southern Utah, and northern Arizona are all within the annular path.
By the time the antumbra reaches Albuquerque, NM (01:34 UT), the central duration is still 4 1/2 minutes, but the Sun’s altitude has dropped to 5°. As its leading edge reaches the Texas Panhandle, the shadow is now an elongated ellipse extending all the way to Nevada. Seconds later, the antumbra begins its rise back into space above western Texas as the track and the annular eclipse end.
During the course of its 3.5-hour trajectory, the antumbra’s track is approximately 13,600 kilometres long and covers 0.74% of Earth’s surface area. Path coordinates and central line circumstances are presented in Table 1.
Partial phases of the eclipse are visible primarily from the USA, Canada, the Pacific and East Asia. Local circumstances for a number of cities are found in Table 2 (Canada, Mexico and Asia) and Table 3 (USA). All times are given in Universal Time. The Sun’s altitude and azimuth, the eclipse magnitude and obscuration are all given at the instant of maximum eclipse.
The NASA JavaScript Solar Eclipse Explorer is an interactive web page that can quickly calculate the local circumstances of the eclipse from any geographic location not included in Table 1:
eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/JSEX/JSEX-index.html
This is the 33rd eclipse of Saros 128 (Espenak and Meeus, 2006). The family began with a series of 24 partial eclipses starting on 0984 Aug 29. The first central eclipse was total and took place on 1417 May 16. After three more totals and four hybrid eclipses, the series changed to annular on 1561 Aug 11. Subsequent members of Saros 128 were all annular eclipses with increasing durations, the maximum of which was reached on 1832 Feb 01 and lasted 08 minutes 35 seconds. The duration of annularity of each succeeding eclipse is now dropping and will reach 4 minutes with the last annular eclipse of the series on 2120 Jul 25. Saros 128 terminates on 2282 Nov 01 after a string of 9 partial eclipses. Complete details for the 73 eclipses in the series (in the sequence of 24 partial, 4 total, 4 hybrid, 32 annular, and 9 partial) may be found at:
eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsaros/SEsaros128.html
The above information is based on the article published in the RASC Observer’s Handbook for 2012.
Footnotes
[1] The instant of greatest eclipse for solar eclipses occurs when the distance between the Moon’s shadow axis and Earth’s geocentre reaches a minimum.
[2] Eclipse magnitude for solar eclipses is defined as the fraction of the Sun’s diameter occulted by the Moon.
[3] Eclipse obscuration is defined as the fraction of the Sun’s area occulted by the Moon.
[4] The Saros is a period of 6,585.3 days (18 years 11 days 8 hours) in which eclipses (both solar and lunar) repeat. The geometry isn’t exact but close enough for a Saros series to last 12 or more centuries.
Orthographic Map of the Annular Solar Eclipse
The following map shows the overall regions of visibility of the partial eclipse as well as the path of the Annular eclipse through Asia, the Pacific and North America. It uses high resolution coastline data from the World Data Base II (WDB).
Interactive Map of the Path of Annularity
An implementation of Google Map has been created which includes the central path of the 2012 total solar eclipse. This allows the user to select any portion of the path and to zoom in using either map data or Earth satellite data.
Detailed Maps of the Path of Annularity
Although a NASA eclipse bulletin was not published for this eclipse, Jay Anderson still generated a series of detailed eclipse maps.
Michael Zeiler and Bill Kramer have also produced an excellent set of maps for the annular eclipse using the NASA Besselian elements.
Eclipse Elements, Shadow Contacts and Path of Annularity
The following tables give detailed predictions including the Besselian Elements, shadow contacts with Earth, path of the antumbral shadow and topocentric data (with path corrections) along the path.
- Table 1 – Elements of the Eclipse
- Table 2 – Shadow Contacts and Circumstances
- Table 3A – Path of the Antumbral Shadow
- Table 3B – Path of the Antumbral Shadow (Extended Version)
- Table 4A – Physical Ephemeris of the Antumbral Shadow
- Table 4B – Physical Ephemeris of the Antumbral Shadow (Extended Version)
- Table 5 – Local Circumstances on the Central Line
- Table 6 – Topocentric Data and Path Corrections Due to Lunar Limb Profile
Coordinate Tables for the Path of Annularity
The following tables provide detailed coordinates for the path of the antumbral shadow as well as the zones of grazing eclipse. They are listed in a format convenient for plotting on maps.
- Table 7A – Mapping Coordinates for the Antumbral Path
- Table 7B – Mapping Coordinates for the Antumbral Path (North America; Extended – 15´ step size)
- Table 8A – Mapping Coordinates for the Zones of Grazing Eclipse
- Table 8B – Mapping Coordinates for the Zones of Grazing Eclipse (North America; Extended – 15´ step size)
Local Circumstances
The following table gives the local circumstances of the eclipse from various cities throughout the Western Hemisphere. All contact times are given in the tables are in Universal Time.
Explanation of Eclipse Maps and Tables
The following links give detailed descriptions and explanations of the eclipse maps and tables.
- Map 1 – Orthographic Map of the Eclipse Path
- Table 1 – Elements of the Eclipse
- Table 2 – Shadow Contacts and Circumstances
- Table 3 – Path of the Umbral (or Antumbral) Shadow
- Table 4 – Physical Ephemeris of the Umbral (or Antumbral) Shadow
- Table 5 – Local Circumstances on the Central Line
- Table 6 – Topocentric Data and Path Corrections Due to Lunar Limb Profile
- Table 7A & 7B – Mapping Coordinates for the Central Path
- Table 8A & 8B – Coordinates for the Zones of Grazing Eclipse
- Mean Lunar Radius
- Lunar Limb Profile
- Limb Corrections to the Path Limits: Graze Zones
Weather
Eclipse Photography
Reproduction of Eclipse Data
All eclipse calculations are by Fred Espenak, and he assumes full responsibility for their accuracy. Permission is freely granted to reproduce this data when accompanied by an acknowledgment:
“Eclipse Predictions by Fred Espenak, NASA’s GSFC”
==============================================
WARNING & Admonition:
Do not look at the sun during the eclipse with the naked eye or even with sunglasses, use an approved solar filter, solar glasses, or solar projection system.
Attempts to use a binoculars, telescope, or other optical viewing device without a proper filter will likely result in instant and permanent eye damage!
It is super easy to view solar eclipses without any special optical equipment. A sheet of cardboard, with a hole punched in it will project an image of the sun and moon shadow on another surface in the card shadow. And you don’t even need the sheet of cardboard, if you have a tree with dense leaves you can just let the sun shine through the leaves, onto a paper, and you will get multiple eclipse images all at once. A nail or a pencil will make a nice hole. The bigger the hole, the further you place the imaging screen from the hole, but the image will be brighter.
Works for sunspots as well; use small hole and long distance.
TimC says:” I disagree with both your premise and your conclusion. As the moon rotates once around its own axis…”
In this matter,as in climate,I have taken the view of Pascal in that counter assertions tend to aggravate rather the resolve an issue so rather than try to disprove lunar rotation it is better to widen observations to look at how planets behave as the circle the Sun .
“When we wish to correct with advantage and to show another that he errs, we must notice from what side he views the matter, for on that side it is usually true, and admit that truth to him, but reveal to him the side on which it is false. He is satisfied with that, for he sees that he was not mistaken and that he only failed to see all sides.” Pascal
The North/South poles of the Earth act like a beacon for the planet’s orbital behavior in that apart from daily rotation,all locations on the planet will turn to the central Sun as the planet makes a circuit of the Sun.It is absolutely crucial for a new approach to climate hence it is not a matter of disproving a spinning moon but talking up the Earth’s orbital behavior.It just happens that the planet Uranus provides ideal observations which set off its daily rotation to the central Sun (running South to North) against its annual orbital component which turns East to West –
http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn12529/dn12529-1_800.jpg
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1999/11/video/b/
The problem with the climate issue is that the assertions are so narrow that the proponents have left themselves nowhere to go and they register any opposition as an assault on their intelligence and their models .Rightly understood,the moon doesn’t turn as it orbits the Earth but the Earth does turn in two different way to the central Sun and that is a point of departure for modifying the explanation for the seasons,why natural noon cycles vary and a multitude of new avenues.
Excuse the pun,but it is better to put a positive spin on the issue rather than end in stalemate as it did in the mid 19th century insofar as a conceptual stalemate provides no clear resolution and that is what can be expected with climate if this continues to run on the way it does,In short,genuine climate studies will be dragged down to the narrowest possible view and the flow of information from astronomical inputs into terrestrial effects will cease and I say that with the utmost dismay.
It was an awsome view, just got home from Redding, we made up to Whiskeytown Lake. Talk to folks from India and British Columbia, place looked like it was infested with high end telescopes and home made contraptions.
GKELL1 says:
May 20, 2012 at 4:48 am
Reply to Smoking Frog in response to the lunar orbital cycle of the Earth
Smoking Frog says “Are you serious? If it didn’t rotate, we would see all sides”
The issue of carbon dioxide and human control over the planet’s climate is just one in a series of ill-conceived conclusions while the idea of a spinning moon is also in the same category as it defies common sense.It would not normally dignify a response as a person walking/orbiting a central object with an outstretched arm pointing at that object is imitating the orbital behavior of the moon as it makes a circuit of the Earth and why we see the same face constantly.
An object only rotates or non-rotates relative to something. The moon non-rotates relative to every observer who, in a month, traverses any “circular” path whose center is coincident with the earth’s center, and whose radius or extension thereof intersects the center of the moon. Relative to every observer otherwise situated, it rotates. Obviously, it rotates relative to a person standing anywhere on the earth’s surface.
Smoking Frog says: “Obviously, it rotates relative to a person standing anywhere on the earth’s surface.”
I wouldn’t dream of convincing you that the moon doesn’t spin as a separate motion to its lunar orbital circuit of the Earth,in older scientific circles it was seen as a lost cause should a person adopt an unreasonable assertion and try to plug in details to support that view.Again,most notably Galileo’s comment on reckless assertions which climatological,astronomical or bottom line –
” I know; such men do not deduce their conclusion from its premises or
establish it by reason, but they accommodate (I should have said
discommode and distort) the premises and reasons to a conclusion which
for them is already established and nailed down. No good can come of
dealing with such people, especially to the extent that their company
may be not only unpleasant but dangerous.” Galileo
The older scientists who relied on a balance between interpretation and speculation had a clear sense that dynamical inputs were primarily responsible for terrestrial effects and especially tidal fluctuations and temperature fluctuations.It is a less aggressive approach than modelers today have it insofar as the original Royal Society scientists were adept at taking in considerations from all angles to account for experiences rather than having a fixed conclusion and distorting data or taking shortcuts to suit that conclusion.In the instance of lunar motion and tidal fluctuations,these guys discounted lunar rotation and treated the moon the way it should- as a separate astronomical object with its own traits and motions.Try the letter from John Wallis to Robert Boyle in 1666 and you may see a lot of material that we ascribed to other people –
http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/1-22/263.full.pdf+html
This is the 21st century where men have already set foot on the moon and who can look out at a rotating Earth from a non rotating moon and if they so choose,can hop into the lunar buggy and drive around the the opposite side of the moon that never rotates to the Earth.The meaningless idea of lunar rotation is distracting from the orbital trait of the Earth’s orbital motion around the Sun and the explanation of the polar day/night cycle and at lower latitudes ,where it mixes with daily rotation,we know as the seasons.