New Evidence Released in Fakegate Global Warming Scandal

This is in addition to the forensics report that I had done by the JGAAP folks here: Forensic analysis of the fake Heartland ‘Climate Strategy Memo’ concludes Peter Gleick is the likely forger

Peter Gleick - World Economic Forum Annual Mee...
Peter Gleick - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2009 (Photo credit: World Economic Forum)

by Joe Bast (via Fakegate.org)

The Heartland Institute today released more evidence that Pacific Institute President Peter Gleick was the likely author of a fake “climate strategy memo” that Gleick originally claimed came from a “Heartland insider,” and later said he received “in the mail” from an anonymous source.

Heartland released a computer forensics report, conducted by Protek International, which states: “We conclude that the Memo did not originate on the Heartland System. It was not created on the Heartland System and was never present there prior to its February 14 posting online.”

The new report contradicts disgraced climate scientist Gleick’s claim to have received the memo from someone affiliated with The Heartland Institute and adds to a growing body of evidence pointing to Gleick’s guilt.

A month ago, Juola & Associates, the premier provider of expert analysis and testimony in the field of text and authorship, said “it is more likely than not that Gleick is in fact the author/compiler of the document entitled ‘Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy,’ and further that the document does not represent a genuine strategy memo from the Heartland Institute.”

Heartland Institute President Joseph Bast said: “The Protek International forensic report is one more piece of evidence that Peter Gleick created the fake document with the intent of defaming us and the scientists we work with. He and his co-conspirators are so desperate to discredit anyone who disagrees with their alarmist views on man-made global warming that they are willing to lie, steal, and even defraud their own friends and allies in the media.”

Bast added: “We once again call on Gleick to make a full confession, and on the Pacific Institute and its allies to stop defending Gleick and his unethical and illegal conduct.”

Background:

On February 20, Gleick, a prominent climate scientist, confessed to being the anonymous party who obtained confidential corporate documents from The Heartland Institute and circulated them along with a document titled “Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy.” While confessing to using fraud to obtain the stolen documents, he claimed to have received the “climate strategy” memo anonymously in the mail.

Since “Fakegate” occurred, ThinkProgress, Greenpeace, 350.org, and other radical environmental groups have been using the stolen and fake documents to attack Heartland’s corporate donors and the scientists who work with it.

The Protek investigation was conducted by Protek co-founder Daniel Bellich, a 27-year veteran of the FBI and former supervisor of the Chicago Division’s Special Operations Group, and Keith G. Chval, former chief of the High Tech Crimes Bureau of the Illinois Attorney General’s Office and president of the Chicago Chapter of The American Society of Digital Forensics and Electronic Discovery. Both men signed the report on April 20, certifying they would swear to its findings in a court of law.

For more information about the global warming scandal and the complete forensic report from Protek International, visit Fakegate.org or contact Director of Communications Jim Lakely at jlakely@heartland.org and 312/377-4000.


The Heartland Institute is a 28-year-old national nonprofit organization with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Washington, DC. Its mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. For more information, visit our Web site or call 312/377-4000.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

88 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
noaaprogrammer
May 2, 2012 9:23 am

Read Only Memory never changes!

May 2, 2012 9:34 am

Heartland officers and lawyers have so far carefully timed and measured each legal footstep in their strategic plan for bringing Peter Gleick to justice by due process of law.
Gleick is already damaged goods in the open intellectual marketplace dominated by independent thinkers. That is the case no matter what intellectual support he receives from his fellow activists who represent the pseudo-consensus which is called the IPCC’s CAGW.
Heartland will maximize exposure of Gleick’s professional dishonesty and fraudulent acts shown in Fakegate.
I do not agree with many commenters on this post who think there is a delay by Heartland. What I see is a process evolving to meet changing circumstances and contingencies. Looks reasonable.
John

MarkW
May 2, 2012 9:56 am

Derek Sorensen says:
May 1, 2012 at 1:42 pm
Why don’t Heartland just take the fool to court and stop messing around?

Courts don’t usually go for the “why it’s obvious” type arguments. You have to present your evidence with all the ‘i’s dotted and all the ‘t’s crossed. That takes time to do properly.
My middle girl graduated from high school last May, I still don’t have a final court order, officially lowering my child support payments.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 11:04 am

TomB says:
May 1, 2012 at 12:12 pm
The results of this forensics analysis was posted here at WUWT some time ago, was it not?

Read all the words! The previous one was by Juola. It concerned stylistics, etc. This is an examination of the Heartland’s systems for traces of the memo prior to its distribution by Gleick.
See the difference?

Merovign
May 2, 2012 1:33 pm

Attention Deficit Disorder appears to be a real epidemic, from a lot of the reactions.
NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!
No.

Reply to  Merovign
May 2, 2012 1:52 pm

Merovign says:
Attention Deficit Disorder appears to be a real epidemic, from a lot of the reactions.
NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!
No.

Merely an understanding of human nature and a realization that the longer it takes for something to be done, the less overall impact it will have.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 2:53 pm

Chuck Wiese says:
May 1, 2012 at 5:58 pm
I would love to see this jerk ( Gleick ) go to prison, but under the Obama administration, don’t be surprised if they drag their feet on prosecuting him.

You may have hit it. There have been, after all some truly remarkable non-prosecutions under Holder, and the Administration has a leftist in charge everywhere Obama could quasi-legally stuff one. Everywhere else, a “czar”. HI may be waiting/hoping for a less hostile political/legal environment. And their sponsors may have gotten squoze, etc.
So perhaps it’s prudent to try and put down a few solid public “markers” before charging in where many angels have met untimely ends.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:10 pm

Scottish Sceptic says:
May 2, 2012 at 2:14 am

I know the Heartland institute are [is] a commercial business.

Like Regan said of ‘our liberal friends’, “Well, the trouble … is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” Similarly with some Scots, it appears.
Heartland is “national nonprofit research organization dedicated to finding and promoting ideas that empower people”. Hardly “a commercial business”, selling product, or services for fees.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:11 pm

typo: Reagan

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:28 pm

DaveS says:
May 2, 2012 at 4:39 am
Has Gleick been,at the very least, suspended from his job? If not, why not? Anyone in my company doing something like this would have been out the door in a flash.

The Pacific Institute is not much more than a Tides Foundation shell and vehicle for Gleick. So who’s going to fire him? The Board is a handful of sock puppets.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:30 pm

DaveS says:
May 2, 2012 at 4:39 am
Has Gleick been,at the very least, suspended from his job? If not, why not? Anyone in my company doing something like this would have been out the door in a flash.

P.S. But, yes, he was sorta kinda suspended for a little while. Lots like Connolley was “suspended” from editing Wiki for a while. Meanwhile, informally through a transparent cut-out or two, business as usual.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:33 pm

Charles says:
May 2, 2012 at 7:23 am

Well noted, sir. Makes a great deal of sense.

Brian H
May 2, 2012 3:36 pm

noaaprogrammer says:
May 2, 2012 at 9:23 am
Read Only Memory never changes!

But EPROM can be flash-erased. >:-/