From the San Jose Mercury News, Dana Hull reports:
Peter Gleick, a nationally known expert on water and climate issues, on Friday asked for a short-term leave of absence from the Oakland-based Pacific Institute, where he is co-founder and president.
…
The Heartland Institute released a string of emails Friday that Gleick sent to Heartland earlier this year that show how Gleick pretended to be a Heartland board member to get copies of documents sent to a gmail email address. Heartland has set up a website detailing the e-mails at Fakegate.org.
…
“Given the events of the past week, I would like, with the permission of the Board, to take a temporary, short-term leave of absence from the Institute,” said Gleick in a letter released Friday. “I believe such a leave would allow the Institute staff to continue to refocus on its work, while permitting the Board to conduct a full and fair review and determine an appropriate course of action.”
===============================
Meanwhile, the story I referenced earlier this week, about the press release on the Pacific Institute website that said:
UPDATE19: 2:12PM 2/21 For now, Dr. Gleick still has an office, though I’m not sure that will true in the future. The Pacific Institute made an announcement on their web page that Dr. Gleick has been and continues to be an integral part of our team.
That statement is now gone. This remains in Google cache, but only as a thumbnail:
Now it says this:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Gleick requesting a “short term” leave of absence speaks volumes. Gleick apparently thinks that this will eventually die down, and he can resume his position at the institute he co-founded.
If Gleick has any shred of the ethics he so loudly proclaimed, he would resign. Not the mealy-mouthed type of resignation from the AGU where his resignation was stated for “personal reasons”, but a resignation that boldly states he is taking responsibility for his own actions, and does not wish to drag the Pacific Institute into this.
Short term leave of absence though does not bode well for this leader-of-all-things-ethical actually taking responsibility for his own failings. It does speak volumes about the kind of ethics he actually lives by.
Now, now, leave Arlo and Pete out of this. Dragging them into this means we will have to cross swords.
After all, Arlo took full responsibility for placing that envelope underneath that pile of trash!
I hear that the UEA’s Climate Research Unit can always use an honest, high-powered “climate scientist” like Peter Gleick.
In fact, they should endow a special professorial chair for him there.
“Neither the Board nor staff knew of, played any role in, or condones these events”
Hang on, wasn’t Gleick staff? Are they now saying Gleick did all this without knowing or condoning? Does he have multiple personality dissociative disorder?
@Ron Dean says:
February 25, 2012 at 12:20 am
GogogoStopSTOP says:
February 24, 2012 at 10:54 pm
“After all, Arlo took full responsibility for placing that envelope underneath that pile of trash!”
And Michael Savage said it best: “Liberalism is a mental disorder.” But when Officer Obie asked me the same question, I replied: “I paid some guy to take my garbage away. He said he had a ‘dump permit!'” A deee-furrrrrr-ment!
Gleick didn’t, IMO, want to kill a bug. He was, IMO, hoping to obtain a document showing that McIntyre was being funded by Heartland. That would have been a bombshell. In a widely publicized Climategate 2e-mail, Michael Mann voiced that suspicion–and he added that he wished some investigative journalist would dig into the matter. I suspect that this is what inspired Gleick’s snooping.
If that was the case, his great error was in “carrying on” once the documents he obtained failed to reveal such machinations. If he’d been caught later by his electronic trail, but had not circulated the documents, nothing would have happened to him. But he recklessly decided to go “all in” on a pair of deuces.
Roger Knights says:
February 25, 2012 at 1:15 am
“Gleick didn’t, IMO, want to kill a bug. He was, IMO, hoping to obtain a document showing that McIntyre was being funded by Heartland. That would have been a bombshell. In a widely publicized Climategate 2e-mail, Michael Mann voiced that suspicion–and he added that he wished some investigative journalist would dig into the matter. I suspect that this is what inspired Gleick’s snooping.
If that was the case, his great error was in “carrying on” once the documents he obtained failed to reveal such machinations. ”
The fact that he carried on shows that he wasn’t looking for something specific as that. I would say he just wanted to have some material for starting his crusade at NSCE, no matter what. He targeted Heartland because he got that invitation by them – he felt provoked, and he could have started the crusade with an attack on any of the known climate-sceptic outlets.
– Tallblokes computers were seized in a police raid, with no evidence & a much lower “public interest”. So In a just world Gleick’s would have already been seized. But this is a topsy turvy world where the Activist-science community (acti-science) have 1000 times the, cash & PR resources & so own the debate. Managing to get words published again and again so they become true. Manage to get the English language changed (“denier” etc.) & then use them to frame the debate with standard tricks of creating false dichotmies (with us or against us) i.e if you don’t support dogma you are a “denier” cos we own science. While at the same time as name calling & deleting polite but inconvenient comments on their blogs etc. They’ll dig up some dirt on someone & get the debate closed down they always do.
– “Neither the Board nor staff knew of, played any role in, or condones these events”
well if this turned out not to be true then PI as well NCSE will end up paying compensation to Heartland
Has Gleick been on any trips to Indonesia lately?
http://www.usaspending.gov
Federal Award ID: AID497A1100004 (Grants)
Date Signed: November 25 , 2010
Obligation Amount: $1,300,000
Starting Date 11/26/2010
Ending Date 11/25/2013
Recipient DUNS Number 860029271
Recipient: PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT
654 13TH ST STE A , OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
Reason for Modification:
Program Source: 72-1021:Development Assistance Program
Agency: United States Agency for International Development : U.S. Agency for International Development
CFDA Program : 98.001 : USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas
Description: DGP WATSAN: WATER SMS: IMPROVING WATER SERVICES IN INDONESIA THROUGH …
Executive Compensation for Prime-recipient as Reported in FSRS (Award)
The Prime awardee has declared that, for this DUNS, no reporting of executive compensation is required under Section 6202 of P.L. 110-252, amending the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (P.L. 109-282).
The Oakland-based Pacific Institute is insulating the organization, and their liability insurance policy, from the coming legal battle between the Heartland Institute and Dr. Gleick. The honorable Dr. Gleick is now on his own when it comes to representation in the courts.
In the event Dr. Gleick announces his intention to go on a ’round the world quest to find the “missing heat”, should the FBI request that he turn in his passport?
“requests leave of absence”
I can only hope that means that the lawyers from PI are making the termination of Gleick neat and tidy.
It sounds grand, but what really is the Pacific Institute, and how many people actually do work there? It seems Gleick is its only paid “employee” (and paid a ton, not counting trips, expenses, etc.), and that over the years, millions of dollars have been poured into it by the U.S. government using taxpayers’ money. PI, which is tax-exempt, turns around and uses this grant money for political purposes, including propaganda, and pushing or opposing specific political candidates: all in violation of federal laws.
It seems to me that a large percentage of alleged non-profits are just scams created by crooks to get free government money and sucker contributions, and to provide employment and cushy benefits for themselves. If our government weren’t so politicized, maybe the FBI, Justice Department, etc. would put an end to this trillion-dollar rip-off, but without fake charities, the unemployment numbers would be twice as high, and politicians would have to raise money from real individuals, instead of giving tax money to the fake charities so they can funnel some of it back in the form of contributions.
Pacific Institute are completely right not to remove him, they obviously need Gleicks skills to get business done. Heartland Institute was the one organization he got found out committing fraud on, how many more organizations has he infiltrated or impersonated.
Ian says:
February 24, 2012 at 10:46 pm
Re: zootcadillac’s comment on salary:
Gleick’s 2010 salary (according to the PI’s 990) is just over $152,000 – or about $5K more than Bast’s salary at Heartland. So much for big money from big oil: EPA grants pay better.
—
I’m sure $152K is just the beginning of his taxable income – he certainly earns much more than that.
You know, I never want to deny anyone the opportunity to make buck, but what has struck me about the CAGW scientists is that they want to make you believe they’re not in it for the money – B.S.! OF COURSE, they’re in it for the money! Let me know when they start doing their “science” for free. And as we all know, there are a lot of opportunities these days to make big money in the climate industry versus, say, being in the service of “big oil” or “big energy” or “big whatever”.
BTW, I am guessing that we will be hearing about Peter Gleick taking a leave of absence at a rehab ranch somewhere in the California mountains, where he can eat organic yogurt, take yoga classes, and meditate with Buddhist camp councilors.
Why the assumption that AGU wants an impartial arbiter of scientific ethics?
Were they previously unaware of Gleick’s rabidly partisan,unethical behaviours?
More likely that they’re setting up a “Ministry of Truth” to persecute apostates.
Lisa Jackson is still head of Obama’s EPA. The money will continue to flow. If not from there then redevelopment funds or stimulus funds. Gleick just forgot who he was, a well paid hatchet man.
jtom says:
February 24, 2012 at 9:10 pm
My employer has a written policy that permits limited personal use of the computer system, a not-so-written expectation that the work gets done, and makes it easy to to work at home (on clearly personal equipment), but basically expects the job to get done.
OTOH, using company resources to help commit wire fraud would be grounds for immediate dismissal, at least at my level.
He asked to be placed on leave? How odd is that?
He’s founder and president, all he needs to do announce, he doesn’t need to ask permission.
The Three Stooges are re-uniting with Anthony Wiener, Eliot Spitzer and Peter Gleick. Oh, I almost forgot Charlie Sheen as Shemp!
“he felt provoked, and he could have started the crusade with an attack on any of the known climate-sceptic outlets.”
Perhaps these other outfits should check their records to see if there have been any attempted phishing expeditions lately?
The “absence” is simply a smart tactical move by both sides. The Institute gets to wait and see how bad the damage is before making a decision. (And there will be the normal rally ’round the Chief mindset in the meantime.) The absence sends a signal that the Institute is taking ‘some’ action, albeit small in this case.
And Gleick likewise keeps his options open to see how bad is the pressure over time or whether the American short memory works to his favor. There is actually a high probability of his returning via the “absence” route. If the Institute was truly upset they would have canned him versus leaving the door open. (Also keeps them from a possible termination lawsuit and large payment to Gleick. Even if he is wrong, that would be cheaper than court.)
@hawkwood says:
February 25, 2012 at 6:28 am
The Three Stooges are re-uniting with Anthony Wiener, Eliot Spitzer and Peter Gleick. Oh, I almost forgot Charlie Sheen as Shemp!
Hawk-ster… very apt association, indeed. But, the problem is that the Wiener’s, Spitzer’s, Gleick’s eventually, given time, money & power turn into Adolf, Josef & Idi… & that’s no laughing matter.
BTW, have you noticed that hirsute adornment of doKtor Gleick looks like a negative of a blackface actor!? (It’s a legit phraseology, really, don’t censor it, please!)
I believe the expression would be ‘smoke and mirrors’.
The Potemkin Institute is the public face of Peter Gleick’s laptop.
The American Geophysical Union has responed quickly to the ethical challenge of the EPA funded advocate, turned cyber high jinkster. The NEW Director of the AGU Task Force on Scientific Ethics is to be fellow Gleick TFSE committee member Dr Linda Gundersen. Dr Gundersen is the Director of the Office of Science Quality and Intergity with the US Geological Survey. Therefore the seamless ‘Continuity of Government’ oversight on the philosophical direction of science will be maintained….lest you think that big brother might be forced to recuse itself over ‘ethics’.
This place is so much more entertaining than any MSM, I can’t imagine ever being subjected to that distorted world again. Thanks to all for the thought provoking, insightful. and clever posts.
jtom says:
February 24, 2012 at 9:10 pm
They need to distance themselves, and their assets, from the liability that Gleick has become.”
Nothing on the PI website this morning; so they’re not distancing themselves fast enough. The problem is, he’s the president of the board, and their highest paid staff member. What astonishes me, given the other names on that board, is that they have been so slow – they have to know that their Directors and Officers policy is at risk, here, to say nothing of all their contracts.
What they’re thinking defeats me.