The Anatomy of a Global Warming Smear

Guest post by Alan Caruba

Full disclosure: Years ago I received a small stipend from The Heartland Institute to help cover the costs of writing articles regarding the global warming hoax, well before it was exposed in 2009 when emails between its perpetrators—the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—revealed the total lack of real science involved. I have continued to expose the hoax without any support from Heartland or any other entity.

A total of six conferences on climate change have been sponsored by The Heartland Institute. I attended the first conference in New York City in 2008 and my initial observation was that virtually no one from the press was there and the meager coverage it received disparaged it.

This week, a major smear campaign against the Institute erupted as the result of an act of deception and thievery that may well result in criminal charges against its as yet unknown perpetrator.

The President of the Institute, Joe Bast, immediately informed its supporters, directors, donors and friends that someone pretending to be a board member had sent Heartland an email claiming to be a director and asking that documents regarding a January board meeting be re-sent.

A clever ruse, but the result was that elements of the confidential documents were then posted on a number of so-called climate blogs and from there to various members of the media who, with the exception of The Guardian, took no steps whatever to verify the authenticity of the documents, some of which Heartland says were either a concoction of lies or altered to convey inaccurate information.

The leading disseminator of the global warming hoax, The New York Times, published its version on Wednesday, February 15th, titled “Leak Offers Glimpse of Campaign Against Climate Science.”

Suffice to say, the “climate science” served up by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been a pack of lies from the day it first convened. Its “science” was based on computer models rigged by co-conspirators that include Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia.

The original leak of their emails in November 2009 instantly revealed the extent of their efforts to spread the hoax and to suppress any expression of doubt regarding it. A second release in 2011 confirmed what anyone paying any attention already knew.

The “warmists”, a name applied to global warming hoaxers, launched into a paroxysm of denial that has not stopped to this day. Their respective universities have since engaged in every possible way to hide the documentation they claimed supported their claims. Suffice to say, the global warming hoax was the golden goose for everyone who received literally billions in public and private funding.

We have reached the point where the warmists have been claiming that global warming causes global cooling! Along the way the bogus warming has been blamed for thousands of utterly absurd events and trends. What really worried the perpetrators was the fact that the planet had entered a cooling cycle in 1998.

At the heart of the hoax was the claim that carbon dioxide (CO2) was causing the Earth to heat and that CO2 emissions must be reduced to save the Earth. Next to oxygen, CO2 is vital to all life on Earth as it sustains all vegetation which in turn sustains every creature that depends on it as a source of food. It represents a mere 0.033% of the Earth’s atmosphere and is referred to by warmists as a “greenhouse gas.” It is, as any meteorologist or climatologist will tell you, the atmosphere that protects the Earth from becoming a dissociated planet like Mars.

The New York Times article is a case study in bad journalism and bias on a scale for which this failing newspaper is renowned. The Times reported that “Leaked documents suggest that an organization known for attacking climate science is planning a new push to undermine the teaching of global warming in public schools, the latest indication that climate change is becoming part of the nation’s culture wars.”

Wrong, so wrong. Polls have demonstrated that global warming is last on a list of concerns by the public. It barely registers because the public has concluded that it is either a hoax or just not happening. Teaching global warming in the nation’s schools constitutes a crime against the truth and the students.

The Times article makes much of the amounts some donors to Heartland have contributed, but in each cited case, with one exception, the donations had nothing to do with its rebuttal of global warming science.

“It is in fact not a scientific controversy”, said the Times article. “The majority of climate scientists say that emissions generated by human beings are changing the climate and putting the planet at long-term risk, although they are uncertain about the exact magnitude of that risk.”

The exact magnitude is zero. Thousands of scientists have signed petitions denouncing global warming as a hoax. The Times lies.

A post at The Daily Bayonet on February 14th said it well, “What the Heartland documents show is how badly warmists have been beaten by those with a fraction of the resources they’ve enjoyed. Al Gore spent $300 million advertising the global warming hoax. Greenpeace, the WWF (World Wildlife Fund), the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense Council, NASA, NOAA, the UN and nation states have collectively poured billions into climate research, alternative energies, and propaganda, supported along the way by most of the broadcast and print media.

The Times will continue to publish lies about global warming, as will others like Time and Newsweek magazines. The attacks on Heartland and the many scientists and others like myself who debunk this fraud will continue, but their efforts are just the dying gasp of the greatest hoax of the modern era.

There’s a reason the theme of Heartland’s sixth conference in 2011 was “Restoring the Scientific Method.” Real science does not depend on declaring “a consensus” before the hypothesis has been thoroughly tested, a process that often involves years of effort. Meanwhile, the planet continues to cool.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
256 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Myrrh
February 19, 2012 2:46 am

Alexander Feht says:
February 19, 2012 at 12:13 am
No, it’s like not giving out visas to the people who declared war to your country, and keep your citizens in jail without trial.
So we shouldn’t let any Americans post here?
How polite are you going to be to a bandit who robs you at the point of the gun? Stop pretending that we and them are equal in any respect.
No it’s not at all like that. It’s like a snake-oil salesman coming into a market place and making his pitch – and those in the crowd, who can see his sleights of hand and understand his conniving spiel, by engaging him directly show him to be what he is. And the rest of us are then educated to the tricks of his trade. We know better why we shouldn’t be buying from him and his ilk.

February 19, 2012 5:03 am

Myrrh,
You are being disingenuous. We are being robbed, and you know it.

Myrrh
February 19, 2012 12:44 pm

No, I’m certanly not being disingenuous, these are honestly my thoughts on this. Yes of course we are being robbed! My fuel costs have sky-rocketted, not just the car, I’m on oil heating. But he’s one of the ‘useful idiots’, as the Communists dubbed them, he’s not the brains behind this, there’s heavyweight industrial and banking interests playing their own ego trip out on the world stage – even politicians are ‘useful idiots’ for these – they get fobbed off with a few million and think they’re in with the in crowd, but they’re just dupes, puppets, the real manipulators think billions is small change…
How did Connolley get back onto wiki when we were told he was chucked off because of the stink people raised about him changing entries and deleting anything alternative to AGW? He’s back because some want him there doing just what he does, he’s useful to them, he’s altered thousands of entries and still doing so. These people pulling Connolley’s strings want to destroy our non-mega industries, get rid of the ‘middle class’, think the working class shouldn’t be taking holidays abroad.. They’re just your bog standard dictator mindset, kept in power by the useful idiots, and if we don’t point out just how their fictional science doesn’t stack up, then people will think they’re honest and have the people’s best interests at heart and so will continue to believe them..
Let them come.
If they stick around long enough they might even get interested in real science..
http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/08/06/the-bbc-takes-a-look-at-soviet-communisms-useful-idiots/
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Occupy_Wall_Street_Protests_Full_Of_Useful_Idiot_Communists_And_Socialists/15972/0/38/38/Y/M.html

February 19, 2012 12:56 pm

> How did Connolley get back onto wiki when we were told he was chucked off because of the stink people raised about him changing entries and deleting anything alternative to AGW?
People haven;t been telling you the truth. Of course, the decision is available in full public view so you could just read it yourself, but you won’t.
[REPLY: Dr. Connolley, maybe they will, maybe they won’t, but a link would be nice. -REP]

BillD
February 20, 2012 3:24 am

Incredible that so many posters to a “science blog” can support such utter nonsense about science. Really, so you really believe that the fact that CO2 is is a small component of the earth’s atmosphere precludes it from acting as a greenhouse gas? Do you really need to attack the simplest scientific facts. It’s posts and responses like this one that strain your credibility

Myrrh
February 20, 2012 10:59 am

BillD says:
February 20, 2012 at 3:24 am
Incredible that so many posters to a “science blog” can support such utter nonsense about science. Really, so you really believe that the fact that CO2 is is a small component of the earth’s atmosphere precludes it from acting as a greenhouse gas? Do you really need to attack the simplest scientific facts. It’s posts and responses like this one that strain your credibility
================
What sort of thermal blanket do you use? One which is practically 100% holes? It’s your view that strains credibility…
Carbon dioxide is fully part of the Water Cycle, the main greenhouse gas is water – without water the Earth would be 67%deg;C, can you do the arithmetic? This means that greenhouse gases cool the Earth. Think deserts.
Earth without atmosphere: -18°C
Earth with our atmosphere: 15°C
Earth with our atmosphere but minus water: 67°C
= Greenhouse gases cool the earth by 52°C.
Just what warming do you, rationally and logically, think that carbon dioxide which is a trace gas has against the great cooling effect of the greenhouse gas water?
All rain is pure clean carbonic acid. Any carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will join with rising lighter than air water vapour taking heat away from the Earth’s surface and condensing in the colder heights, releasing its heat to come down as rain or snow.

1 9 10 11