Arctic Death Spiral: no sale – the public isn't buying

Current Arctic Sea Ice extent with anomaly boundaries -from NSIDC - click for hi-res version

From the Carsey Institute: Americans’ Knowledge of Polar Regions Up, But Not Their Concern

Environmental Issues in Polar Regions Are Polarizing

DURHAM, N.H. – Americans’ knowledge of facts about the polar regions of the globe has increased since 2006, but this increase in knowledge has not translated into more concern about changing polar environments, according to new research from the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire.

“People’s knowledge of polar regions and issues improved from 2006 to 2010, consistent with hopes that the International Polar Year in 2007 would boost public awareness. Unfortunately, we did not see a companion increase in concern about the environmental changes in these regions, due, in part, to ideological and political divisions,” said Lawrence Hamilton, professor of sociology at UNH and a senior fellow at the Carsey Institute.

Carsey Institute researchers, with support from the National Science Foundation, conducted the first comparative analysis of queries about the polar regions, which were included on the General Social Survey in 2006 and 2010. The polar questions covered topics such as climate change, melting ice, rising sea levels, and human or ecological impacts from environmental change. The surveys formed bookends to the International Polar Year in 2007-2008, which focused on scientific research along with outreach and education efforts to raise awareness of polar science.

The researchers found that the public’s knowledge about the north and south polar regions showed modest gains between 2006 and 2010. The average “polar knowledge score” improved from 53 to 59 percent.

The surveys also carried an 11-question “science literacy” quiz, testing background knowledge about science. Science literacy did not improve from 2006 to 2010, but people with higher science literacy tend to care more about polar environmental change. More scientifically literate respondents also are more likely to favor reserving the Antarctic for science, rather than opening it to commercial development.

Unlike polar knowledge, concern about climate change in the polar regions showed no up or down trend, and there were no changes in support for reserving the Antarctic for science. However, the researchers found there has been an increase in political disagreement between Democrats and Republicans on climate-related questions.

“Among the environment-related issues, all but reserving Antarctica for science show increasing political polarization — and even support for reserv­ing the Antarctic divides along party lines. Polar issues, like many other topics in science, increasingly are viewed by the public through politically tinted glasses,” Hamilton said.

The complete Carsey Institute report about this research is available at http://www.carseyinstitute.unh.edu/CarseySearch/search.php?id=183. The research was conducted by Hamilton, Matthew Cutler, graduate student in sociology, and Andrew Schaefer, graduate student in sociology and a research assistant at the Carsey Institute.

The Carsey Institute conducts policy research on vulnerable children, youth, and families and on sustainable community development. The institute gives policy makers and practitioners the timely, independent resources they need to effect change in their communities. For more information about the Carsey Institute, go to www.carseyinstitute.unh.edu.

The University of New Hampshire, founded in 1866, is a world-class public research university with the feel of a New England liberal arts college. A land, sea, and space-grant university, UNH is the state’s flagship public institution, enrolling 12,200 undergraduate and 2,300 graduate students.

-30-

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Blade
February 9, 2012 10:24 am

James E. Hansen February 8, 2012 at 12:05 pm says:
“Listen everybody, you anti-science folks just don’t follow. Let me explain. I have a map of the world on the wall in my office at NASA. It clearly shows the Arctic at the top and the Antarctic at the bottom. Nobody can dispute that.
In line with the well-established scientific fact that heat rises, this is causing all of the excess heat produced by human activity to spiral to the top and melt all of the ice in the Arctic.
In a parallel but equally devastating effect, due to gravity, the heavy ice breaking off from the ice pack in the Arctic (because of global warming) is sinking from the top of the world to the bottom. That’s why it appears that Antarctica seems to be growing, whereas in fact it is just heavy icebergs moving from the top of the world to the bottom. And gathering there. Gravity, you see.
So be scared of global warming. Go switch your lights and heating off. Right now.”

LOL Funny Post Of The Week!

February 9, 2012 12:28 pm

David A. Evans says:
February 9, 2012 at 3:39 am
I quite like the idea of the North pole drifting around the Arctic on floating ice. 😛
DaveE.

Actually, they follow independent trajectories, so the Pole cuts a notional swathe through the ice in a complex pattern. Winnie and Santa have their work cut out for them!

February 20, 2012 5:35 am

My bnrugcokad was science, but limited (B.S. math, with physics minor)back in 1960…..But I did take a course in scientific method, and it’s clear that the proponents of AGW have no evidence to back up their claims whereas there seems to be plenty of evidence to dispute their claims.Some time ago I put together a climate tutorial, if any of your readers are interested… there’s also plenty of references to websites and books.https://docs.google.com/a/ablesfamily.com/View?id=ddrj9jjs_0fsv8n9gw&pli=1

February 20, 2012 9:36 am

The BBC this AM buogrht on some stupid idiot to explain that MMGW is now proven because of, wait for it… BEDBUGS! yes you heard right! apparently bedbugs are on the increase because of global warming, according to this so called climate expert, the phrase clutching at straws comes to mind!Are the BBC so desperate to flog its MMGW agenda that they will resort to such outright trash? The fact is that bedbugs live INDOORS and the outside temperature has NO bearing on the increase in bedbugs, Its dirty bedding that is not cleaned and treated with insecticide that encourages bedbugs to proliferate NOT fake MMGW fairy stories!Is there no end to the lies that the eco nutters will peddle to gullible people to get its fake theories by fake scientists like AL GORE believed?