It’s Not About Me

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

One response to Christopher Booker graciously mentioning my climate research in the Telegraph is the predictable increase in the usual personal attacks on me, as opposed to attacking my ideas and claims. People are rehashing Tim Lambert calling me a liar because he disagreed with my methods, as though that meant something about me rather than simply revealing something about Tim. They point out that I am an amateur scientist (as though that were other than a badge of honor). I’m told that I’m out of my depth. I am constantly assured that I am not qualified to offer a scientific opinion on climate, because of my lack of academic qualifications (BA in Psychology), and because of the shortness of my scientific publications list. The supply of reasons given to try to convince people to ignore my work is seemingly endless. To hear people tell it, I’m not fit to kiss the boots of a true scientist.

My point is that none of that matters. Either my scientific claims are correct, or they are not. It’s not about me. Period. End of story.

Photo Source

When I was younger, for decades I was a Zen Buddhist. There is an important saying that Zen is not the moon, it is just the finger pointing at the moon. Complaints, arguments, and discussions about the finger miss the point – the subject of importance, the subject worthy of discussion, is the moon.

That’s the ultimate egalitarianism of science. Doesn’t matter if the person who made a scientific claim is a world-renowned expert or a semi-literate ditch digger. They are just the finger pointing at the moon. All that matters is, can the claim be falsified? What are the facts that support the claim? What are the facts that falsify the claim? Is the logic correct? Is the mathematics solidly based? Does it agree with other understandings?

Whether I lie (I don’t), or whether I have peer-reviewed publications (yes, three with a fourth currently in peer-review) is immaterial. All that matters is, are my ideas right or wrong? That’s why I put my ideas up here in the public square, so someone can falsify them. That’s the game called science. I make scientific claims, and you try to poke holes in my claims. Or you make scientific claims, and I try to poke holes in your claims. I play the game from both sides, falsifying the claims of others as well as publishing original and falsifiable claims of my own for people to attack.

So, attack is the very nature and essence of the science game. But it is supposed to be an attack on my SCIENTIFIC IDEAS. Not an attack on me, not an attack on my qualifications, not an attack on my occasionally rough cowboy nature, not an attack on my honesty, not an attack on what I have chosen to study. Truly, it’s not about me.

Now, having said that this is not about me, enough people have questioned my fitness to comment on climate science that I would like to give an answer as to why I am qualified to do so. However, as with many things in my life, it’s kinda complicated, and involves a number of misunderstandings and coincidences. Pour yourself a cup of coffee, it’s a sea-dog’s tale of military madness.

The main strength that I bring to the analysis of the climate, curiously, is that I am a generalist. In a field like climate science, which is far broader than it is deep and encompasses a host of scientific disciplines, this is a huge advantage.

How does one get to be a generalist? In my case, it was a combination of being a freak of nature, of growing up on a very remote and isolated cattle ranch surrounded by virgin forest, and of my curious interaction with the US Army.

I went to a two-room country grade school. There were 21 kids in eight grades, and seven of them were me, my three brothers, and my three cousins. For the last four years of grade school, I was the only kid in my grade. I loved math and wordplay and puzzles of any kind, I sopped up knowledge and read everything I could lay hands on. In grade school, my Dad hauled me and my older brother off to Stanford University, where a guy who actually wore a white scientist coat gave us some version of the Sanford-Binet IQ test. They said my IQ was over 180, his was over 160. They didn’t believe it the first time, so they tested us again with different questions and got the same result. Freaks of nature.

My brother focused on electronics, was in charge of one of the two Hewlett-Packard Research Labs, invented the first civilian version of the GPS, and was a Discover Magazine Scientist Of The Year.

Me, I became a generalist.

The grade school teacher said I could skip two grades. My mom said no, so the school let me go at my own speed. I finished eighth-grade spelling in sixth grade. In seventh grade, I studied Spanish on my own. In eighth grade, the entire school district introduced Spanish education via TV. All the teachers in the county went to Spanish class one night a week so they could teach the kids and support the TV lessons with in-class training. My teacher couldn’t make it to the weekly teacher’s training, so they sent me instead. As a result, when I was in eighth grade, I was already in my second year of studying and first year of teaching Spanish … I also completed a year of high school algebra while in grade school, which let me take college calculus in high school.

My mother was a single mom who raised four sons and ran a 280 acre cattle ranch. She was both a wise and a well-educated woman with a binge drinking problem, working for months without a drop and then going on a one-week bender. We never had much money. After some years of seeing other kids who always had better clothes and newer toys, one day I screwed up my courage and asked my mom if we were poor. “No,” she said angrily, “we’re not poor, and we’ll never be poor. Poor is a state of mind.” She sighed and relaxed, rubbed her work-hardened hands, looked wistfully at the summer sky, and added “I admit we’ve been broke for a while now, but we’re not poor …”

Growing up broke on a remote cattle ranch surrounded by wild forest means that if something has to get fixed, you have to fix it. If something has to get made, you have to make it. If you have to learn something to do that, you learn it. Growing up like that is a huge advantage to a future generalist. I came away with Leonardo da Vinci and George Washington Carver and Jim Bridger as my heroes, with the ability to do most practical things with my hands, and with the blind, wildly incorrect, but fervently-held belief that whatever needed to be done, somehow, someway, I could do it even if I had nothing but baling wire and a balky Crescent wrench.

In high school, I was the kid who carried a circular slide rule in his pocket and knew how to use all of the scales on both sides. Not a nerd, I was class president, but eccentric, obsessed with math and music and science. I ascribe my nose for bad numbers to the use of the slide rule. A slide rule doesn’t have a decimal point. So if you are say multiplying 3.14 times 118, you have to mentally estimate the size of the answer to decide where the decimal point goes. To this day, this sense of the right size for a number still serves me well. I often see a numerical value describing some natural phenomenon and correctly say “No way, that answer’s out of scale, something’s wrong”, even though I’m not familiar with the subject.

I started working as soon as I was old enough to legally work, the summer after my freshman year in high school.  That summer was spent bucking hay, six ten-hour days a week, 30 cents an hour. I was fourteen. I was a Boy Scout. I got my Merit Badge for Weather, I found it fascinating. The next summer I worked as a bicycle messenger in San Francisco. I rode a one-speed bike loaded with blueprints up and down the hills of San Francisco.

The summer after that (1963) I went to a National Science Foundation special summer school for mathematicians in Oregon. We learned how to program computers. I was in heaven. I had read about computers, and I had heard about them, but to see one taking up an entire room, with its relays clicking and vacuum tubes humming, was my science fiction dream come true. And they let us write programs and run them! I was hooked, hooked bad, but of course, there were no desktop computers or work in computing for me then.

Just before my last year of high school we moved into town. I worked a 20-hour week, running the photo lathe and the Fairchild machine at the local newspaper past midnight into the small hours of the morning, and then coming in on Saturday to proofread the legal notices. Oh, plus washing dishes in the high school cafeteria to pay for my school lunches like I did every year for four years.

Then, without warning of any kind, in my senior year of high school, my mom ran away from home.

I was 16. I woke up one morning to find a thousand bucks and a note saying she wasn’t coming back, and could I take care of my two younger brothers. And just like on the ranch, what I had to do, I did. I ran the house, made sure they had food and did their studies, and with the invaluable help of my 20-year-old cousin, bless her, we kept the home together for the rest of the school year. At the end of the school year, I graduated as the class valedictorian, my brothers went to live with my dad, and when the money ran out I took a job as a cowboy on a cattle ranch up by the Oregon Border.

Now in my senior year, I’d won a $1,000 award from Bank of America as the most outstanding high school student in the state. That’s about $9,700 in today’s 2024 money … of course, I’d used it to buy a Honda 90 motorcycle and a guitar and a sleeping bag, and wasted the rest. So at the end of that job as a cowhand, I took my Honda 90, strapped my guitar to one side and my sleeping bag to the other, and took it from California to Portland, up the Columbia to Yellowstone, back through Utah to Las Vegas and LA, and back north again. I had very little money, of course. Mostly I lived by singing for my supper in restaurants and sleeping under the stars. I was 17.

In the fall of 1964, I started college at the University of California at Berkeley, but I hated it. I lasted one year, and then I went to Alaska to seek my fortune. Instead, mostly I starved. I worked as a short-order cook. I worked in a floating crab cannery. I worked emptying boats of rotten stinking crabs. I worked as a longshoreman horsing 300-pound bales of pulp around a ship’s hold. And mostly I made my living singing folk songs and playing my guitar in saloons and coffeehouses. When it got cold I fled down the Alcan highway to Greenwich Village, New York in November, still singing. There, through the usual coincidences and misunderstandings, I lost everything I owned but my guitar and the clothes I had on. I slept in the streets. I learned before going to sleep to wrap newspapers around my arms and legs under my clothing to keep warm. And as soon as I could, I hooked a ride to Coconut Grove in Florida because it was warm and I was freezing. I played music.

Then the Army sent me a draft notice. 1966, something about a little conflict in Southeast Asia, they wanted cannon fodder. But if I enlisted, I could choose my specialty. I enlisted and chose, ironically, weather observer. But I barely made it through Basic Training. Halfway through, I’d had enough. I didn’t go postal, I just quit taking orders. I calmly told the Sergeant that I couldn’t blindly take orders from someone I didn’t know, because they might order me to do something I didn’t believe in … his eyes bugged out and he took me to the Captain. I told him the same story. The Captain scratched his head, stuck me in front of a typewriter, and gave me a stack of papers to deal with. God bless my high school typing class where I was the only boy among 25 or so girls …

I graduated with my company, but I never marched or trained with them again. They’d roll out at five-thirty AM for reveille. I got up at seven, walked over to the Company HQ, did company paperwork all day, filled out the forms the Captain hated to fill out, then went to the mess hall and had dinner with the guys. I desperately wanted the Army to let me out. Instead, they just went around me. Go figure.

After Basic, they sent me to Weather Observer’s school in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, near New York City. I learned how the Army categorizes clouds and what an “octa” is, how to use a wet bulb thermometer, weather theory, what a cold front looks like on a weather map and what it means, the usual stuff, and mostly, how to fill out US Army weather reporting forms. And I was going slowly nuts. They wouldn’t let us off base at all. So I stole a Class A pass from the Company safe.

The safe was in the Sergeant’s office. I timed his morning breaks for a couple of weeks. Never shorter than 8 minutes, and he left the safe open rather than relock it/unlock it. Easy.

With my stolen pass, every weekend I snuck out with my guitar and went into Greenwich Village. I played music in the clubs and hung out with the beatniks and the people I knew from the year before and slept on the streets or in Central Park. For a couple Sundays, I was playing in a club on one side of the street, and the Loving Spoonful was playing on the other side. But at eight on Monday morning, they were sleeping in, and I had to be back in my fatigues waiting for the other soldiers to catch up to the instructor’s slowly explained ideas about the weather. That split lifestyle went on for three months or so, half beatnik, half GI. I hated the Army. I hated the war. I constantly risked arrest for being AWOL or for my stolen pass. I developed an uncontrollable tic in my eye. That eye twitched like a demon, I couldn’t stop it. I was losing the plot—my dreams were of endless wandering in strange landscapes, I found myself lashing out in random anger at strangers, or brooding in my room for hours. After a while the plot was lost entirely.

Finally, one weekend I had gone up to Boston, and through the usual misunderstandings and coincidences I couldn’t make it back to the base in New Jersey on time. That meant I was headed for real trouble when I returned because I was AWOL, my Class A Pass was stolen. I was mondo depressed. I decided I had to get out. I ate a double fistful of sleeping pills and told someone to call the ambulance when I passed out. I didn’t care if I lived or died.

I passed out.

I woke up with the docs pumping the bad drugs out of my stomach in some emergency room and the cops questioning me about what happened. Then to counteract the bad drugs, they shot me full of good drugs.

I passed out.

I woke up firmly lashed to a bed. They told me I was in the Terminal Heart and Cancer Patient Ward of the Bethesda Naval Hospital. They gave me more of what they said were good drugs.

OK.

I passed out.

I stayed lashed hand and foot to the bed for several days. Couldn’t feed myself. They fed me through a tube in my arm. I watched people die around me every day. They wouldn’t move the corpses during the day to avoid upsetting the others. So I’d wake up at two am, sleeping on my back because I couldn’t turn over, each arm tied to the bedrail, and watch them carry out yet another body.

One day, a man with kind eyes walked through the ward. He told the orderly to untie me and bring me to his office. He looked at me and said, “Son, you don’t belong in the military.”

I could have cried. I could have told him I knew that. I didn’t belong there in any sense. But I stayed silent. He said, “This is a Navy hospital, I don’t even know why you’re here. The Army wants me to send you right back to your unit. I’m not comfortable with that. I’m putting you in the Bethesda Navy Mental Hospital.” I can’t remember if I offered to kiss his feet. After what I’d been through, I wasn’t tracking all that well.

In 1966, the US Navy’s idea of what constituted a nuthouse might misleadingly be described as nautical and quaint. It was a Quonset hut divided in half crossways from floor to ceiling by a chain link fence. Half was for violent contestants, half for non-violent. Plus, in the violent half was the rubber room, where they’d put you so you could bounce off the walls as much as you wanted. They stuck all of us new contestants into the violent half, packed us full of Thorazine pills (a very heavy tranquilizer that they said was good drugs). They watched us nod out.

Most of us were too sleepy to be attentive, much less violent, so we were let out into the other half of the nuthouse in a few days. There was no therapy. There was no radio, no books, just announcements from some Nurse Rached wannabe over the intercom. They gave us pajamas and a robe. There was nothing to do but watch crazy folks do their thing. And drool. Thorazine is great for drooling. I became an expert. I had been unfettered all my life, living on the road, singing my songs, free as a bird. Now I was locked up in a distinctly un-gilded cage. My brain was regularly pumped full of happy juice. I was unhappy and depressed. I drooled and stared at the wall. A day on Thorazine with nothing to do lasts about a week.

After a month there, moving in slow motion on good drugs, the Navy and the Army decided to ship me to Letterman Army Hospital in San Francisco. Nurse Rached read the orders and the names out over the intercom and had the orderlies bring out a bunch of stretchers. Instead of pills, they strapped us each to a stretcher and shot us each up with a mega-dose of Thorazine. Can’t have too much good drugs, I guess. Things got fuzzy. They stacked us like cordwood in a DC3, sliding the stretchers into special racks on the walls. I wanted to remember how close I was to the man on the stretcher above me. I found I could slide my hand on my chest in between us, but I was too close to the man above me to make a fist … and then the cotton wool closed in on my brain again. The trip took three days, with a different stop every night. They’d unstrap us, and we’d all stagger out like extras in a zombie movie.

That first night after they unstrapped me, I staggered into the bathroom and sat down on the toilet. I was bursting from the day on the plane. When I finished, I realized that although I’d remembered to drop my pajama bottoms, I hadn’t flipped up the back of my hospital robe. I’d sat on the flap instead and filled it with human waste. I looked down, shrugged, took my arms out of my robe, and I walked out and left it right there. I was loopy, half-crazed and half-dazed, tranked to the max and locked up 24/7 with men as far off the rails as I was, what did I care? I just went to bed and said nothing to anyone—being crazy means never having to say you’re sorry.

The next day, they gave me another robe. Then they shot us up again, and again we flew all day. I remembered this time about the toilet and the robe. Finally, on the third day, we staggered into a base somewhere near Sacramento. They propped us all up in a bus, where we all flopped around like gumbies on the way to the Letterman nuthouse.

The Letterman Army nuthouse on the Presidio Army Base in San Francisco was in a building previously used as a holding prison for Federal criminals headed to Alcatraz. They took us into this prison and shot us up with a bunch of other good drugs. They propped us up against the wall to wait for dinner … and from there things started getting weird.

First, I started feeling stiff. Then my neck started pulling my head back. I couldn’t lower my chin. My shoulder started to arch back. Then my legs gave out and I fell on the floor. My back arched further and further back in an insane contortion. I was sure my back was going to snap; my muscles were seizing and bowing me backward. I was screaming and begging for help. Orderlies came and shot me full of yet more good drugs. I woke up groggy and tied to a bed in the violent ward … this was getting to be a theme.

They explained slowly that I had spazzed out because they had given me bad drugs, but it was all OK because now they were giving me good drugs. Welcome to the Letterman Army nuthouse, where if you weren’t nuts before, you will be.

I spent almost six months there, while the prelude to the “Summer of Love” was going on outside the prison doors. They let us out little by little. At first, we could walk around the base for an hour with a visitor. After a while, they gave us day passes off of the base. I and my crazy friend Mel from the nuthouse would go to the Haight Ashbury. His girlfriend had a house there. His girlfriend also had a girlfriend, who became my girlfriend. After a while, the Army gave us weekend passes out of prison. So every weekend, we’d take off our Army robe and pajamas that we wore all week, nutters don’t wear regular clothes. We’d put on freak clothes, paisley shirts, and bell-bottom pants; we were unbearably cool. Except for our Army haircuts. We’d go with the ladies to the Haight, play music, get weird. We went to the First Human Be-In in Golden Gate Park and heard Timothy Leary rant, Allen Ginsberg emote, and the Grateful Dead and the Jefferson Airplane rock it to the max.

But every week we had to be back on the crazy ward by eight o’clock Monday morning. So we’d take LSD every Sunday night like clockwork, then turn ourselves back into the nuthouse with our eyes spinning like pinwheels on Monday morning, put on our robes and pajamas and watch the colors crawl up the wall and people’s faces change and melt … but it was worth it because it was more than a man could do to voluntarily return to that hole of lost humanity in a sane and sober state. You had to be crazy to turn yourself back in to the Letterman nuthouse.

That split life went on for months. More schizophrenia on the half-shell. The Army wasn’t much help. At the time, they were mostly doing a lot of shock therapy. But they never did any follow-up. Mel and I started doing what we could to help the people after shock therapy. I remember a guy who used to say “Well, they’re going to plug me into the wall today.”

Then in the afternoon, the men in white scrubs would take him out of the locked ward where we all lived, and bring him back with his memories scrubbed cleaner than clean, dump him on his bunk to stare at the wall, and walk away.

So Mel and I and some of the other walking wounded would pull out his wallet and show him the pictures. We’d tell him his name, and we’d say he’d been in an accident. We didn’t say a war. We’d tell him that the young woman in the picture was his wife and the boy was his son.

After a while, we’d tell him that he lived in Texas, and we all were in California. Eventually, we’d get round to the fact that he had been a soldier in a faraway war. That always seemed to surprise him. Even without his memories, he didn’t think of himself as a soldier, and I understood that perfectly.

After more time, we’d tell him that he’d been in a terrible situation in a distant country called Vietnam. We’d slowly work up to the fact that he was in a hospital. Then we’d let slip that it was not just any hospital, it was a nuthouse, because we’d learned by experience that he couldn’t cope with that information when he was straight out of the juice box. And so bit by bit he’d start remembering stuff, and for a while the balance was OK … but then after a week or so, he’d start remembering too much stuff. He started remembering seeing and doing and enduring things no man should ever have to even witness, much less bear the shame and guilt of having seen and done and endured, things beyond belief. And from there on he’d start to shut down a bit at a time, until one day they’d take him off and plug him in again.

And they’d bring back a memory-free rag doll, and we’d start the process over again. Don’t get me wrong. The shock therapy helped him. We knew him from the day he came in from Vietnam. Before the first shock therapy, he was catatonic and never spoke one word. So I’m not opposed to the use of electroconvulsive therapy, it can work when nothing else does … but dang, the Army could’ve done better than leave his recovery to me and Mel …

Finally, after an eternity, four months in the nuthouse, they said I could go, and Mel could go too. We were going to escape without getting plugged into the wall, get discharged! The doctor signed our discharge papers. The Lieutenant and the Captain signed them. Everyone signed them right up to the Commanding General of the Presidio.

He said Mel would be discharged, but not me. I was to be sent to Ford Ord to be trained as a company clerk.

Go figure. I saluted the guy who gave me the orders, walked out the door, and went AWOL. I spent a couple of weeks snorting speed, in this case, methedrine, and spending hours talking really, really fast to people about whatIshoulddo, shouldIgotoCanada, ormaybeturnmyselfin, noIshouldjuststayAWOLandhopeforthebest, I made up my mind dozens of times and unmade it again just as fast as my tongue could move.

Finally one day, after hours of listening to a record of Bob Dylan singing Memphis Blues Again, “Here I sit so patiently / Trying to find out what price / I have to pay to get out of / Going through all these things twice”, I took a massive dose of LSD and turned myself back in to Letterman Hospital to go through all these things twice. At the time I was dressed in Letterman hospital pajama bottoms and a tie-dyed shirt. The doctors just shook their heads and shot me full of happy juice; once again, it appeared I was off bad drugs and on good drugs. Then the good drugs took over, and I slept.

When I woke up, I was lashed down on a bunk in the locked ward. Only for 24 hours this time, and by then I was used to it. No weekend passes for the bad AWOL boy this go-round. In a couple of weeks, they decided I needed work therapy.

So I was put to work in a small room with three black guys wearing pajamas and robes like me but all styled out with colorful do-rags around their heads. All day long they listened to the blackest of Oakland radio stations, “KDIA Lucky Thirteen”. They were great, they welcomed me as one of their own, as only fellow lunatics can. We ironed iron-on patches onto teeny holes in operating room sheets all day long, all of us buzzed on Thorazine, all of us gently rocking and singing along with James Brown and the Shirelles and Etta James and Motown and all things black … great music education for your average white boy musician. Plus, I got to enjoy just hanging with the brothers and listening to and joining in with their endless jive and good spirits, bizarrely, a wonderful time.

Not only that, but I learned how to iron patches on operating room sheets at a rate of knots, what’s not to like?

Finally, nine months after taking a double handful of sleeping pills in Boston and not caring if I lived or died, having slipped between the Scylla of being plugged into the wall and the Charybdis of being sent back to the Army, and in a state both less crazy and more crazy than when I went entered the nuthouse, they let me go. I had outlasted them. I was given an Honorable Discharge as being “Unfit for Military Service” … like I say, I could have saved them a lot of work, I knew that from the start.

So I was free, finally free, out of prison free, no walls free, living in San Francisco in 1967 free. No more unbreakable steel bars dividing the sky into a demented solitaire tic-tac-toe game. No more grilles and locks on the door. No ironing tiny patches on sheets for eight hours a day, only to return to a locked ward full of fellow sufferers after work. No more waking up once again lashed to the damn bed. I moved in with my girlfriend. She was dancing in a topless bar on Broadway. I was twenty years old, I couldn’t even go into the bar to watch her dance … but I was free, and I swore a very big swear to unknown deities that I would remain that way.

And finally, to return to the theme, somewhere in the first months after I got out from behind bars, I made some rules of thumb for myself that eventually turned me into a generalist. One was that my motto would be “Retire Early … And Often”. Since then, I’ve never been unemployed. Instead, I’ve worked a while and then retired until the money ran out. Being retired is very different from being unemployed. It’s worry-free.

Another rule of thumb I took up was that given a choice between something I had done and something I had not done, I would always do the thing undone.

Another was that if I was offered security or adventure, I’d choose adventure. And curiously, that has led to perfect security.

Finally, I swore that I wouldn’t take any more jobs unless they had a fixed ending date. I was done with serving indeterminate sentences. The end of the season, the completion of the house, the end of the harvest, I swore not to be bound by unending work as I had been bound in the nuthouse, with no known end date in sight. Some prisoners in WWII German concentration camps said that worse than the cold, worse than the hunger and the beatings, the worst thing was the uncertainty of whether they’d ever get out. I can see why. I had faced that uncertainty in a cold concrete building with bars on the windows for three-quarters of a year, seeing men rotting away in a Thorazine daze in the Letterman nuthouse, sometimes they’d been there for years, watching some get shipped off to a more permanent lifelong nuthouse, not knowing if I would get out or if I’d get plugged into the wall.

Yes, I’d take a job, but this time I’d know when my sentence would be up, and I’d be waiting for that day so I could retire again.

I have mostly followed those guidelines for the rest of my life. Since then, I have worked at dozens of different jobs and trades around the world. I make as much money as I can as fast as I can until the bell rings, then I retire. I stay retired until I get called out of retirement by a great job offer. Or by an empty stomach. I have worked on all the continents but Antarctica. I lived on tropical South Pacific islands for seventeen years. I have made money by making and selling jewelry, as a commercial fisherman from LA to Alaska, as a psychotherapist, a refrigeration technician, a well driller, an auto mechanic, a computer programmer, a graphic artist, a construction manager on multi-million dollar projects, a sailboat deliveryman, a maker of stained-glass art, a project and program designer for USAID and the Peace Corps, a shipyard manager on a hundred acre remote island, an international renewable-energy trainer, a maker of fine custom cabinets, a multi-country health program manager, the Chief Financial Officer of a company with $40 million in annual sales, the Service Manager for an Apple Macintosh dealer, a high-end home builder, a sport salmon fishing guide on the Kenai River in Alaska, and a bunch more. I’m a surfer, a sailor, and a diver, with Open Water II and Rescue Diver tickets and an inshore Coast Guard Skipper’s License. I have my Ham Radio license, Hotel 44 Whiskey Echo. There’s a link to my full CV at down at the bottom.

All of this has given me all the tools needed to work in climate science. I understand tropical weather intimately because I’ve spent years observing it. I know the vertical temperature structure of the ocean’s nocturnal overturning because I’ve experienced it scuba diving at night down under the surface. I understand climate as a heat engine because I’ve dealt with heat engines and refrigerators and their mathematical analysis and concepts for years. I’ve watched underwater damage to coral reefs from bleaching as it happened, and I’ve watched them recover. I understand the computer models because I never stopped programming after 1963. I have spent hundreds and hundreds of hours writing all kinds of programs, including models of physical and business systems. I speak a half-dozen computer languages fluently and can read and write slowly in another half-dozen. I have also seen what the lack of inexpensive energy does to the desperately poor in Africa, I’ve shared their tables and listened to their stories. I know the vagaries of Arctic weather, not from books, but because I fished commercially in the Bering Sea and froze my guitar in Anchorage. I am not an expert in chemistry, or physics, or atmospheric dynamics, or oceanography, or computer models, or biology, or mathematics, or arctic ecosystems; I am self-taught in all of them. But I have a good solid practical working knowledge of every one of them, I have a deep understanding of various aspects of a number of them, and I have the ability to use the lessons from one field in another.

I became interested in climate science in the 1990s. My nose for numbers said that Hansen’s claims were way out of line. Here was my first and admittedly simple climate calculation. I figured half a kilowatt per square meter average global downwelling radiation (long-wave plus short-wave). People said doubling CO2 might be 4 watts per square meter. That’s less than 1%, and in a huge, ponderous, chaotic, constantly changing climate, my bad number detector said no way that a 1% variation in forcing would knock the Earth’s climate off the rails. I reckoned if it were that delicately balanced, it would have done the Humpty Dumpty long ago.

So I started reading the various climate science studies, but idly, as they came by, just to keep in touch with the field. The real change came in 1995, when we (me + wife + four year old daughter) moved off our houseboat in Fiji and back to the US, where I could connect to the internet … and opening the internet to a mathematically minded fact junkie like me was a heady drug. Suddenly, I could actually read the papers and go get the data and see what was going on. I wasn’t chained to other peoples’ opinions of the science, I could run the numbers myself.

Of course, all of this required an immense amount of study. But I’m real good at doing my homework. I once took a job to assemble, install, charge, and test a blast freezer on a sailboat in Fiji. I was hired along with my buddy who was a welder, he did the tricky soldering work and taught me to do it. At the time, I couldn’t have told you how a refrigerator worked, but I knew the job wouldn’t start for two months. So I bought a college refrigeration textbook and ate, breathed, and slept with that sucker. At the end of one month, I could recite it backward. The second month, I bought a refrigeration technician’s textbook, bought some gauges and tanks of Freon, and learned the practical end of the game.

At the end of two months, I figured I could build a refrigerator from scratch … which was fortunate, since what was supposed to be a full blast freezer kit with all the parts turned out to be a half kit, and Fiji is short on refrigeration parts. In the event, we got it built like we built things on the ranch, simply because I had to, so I figured out how to. The blast freezer worked perfectly; the wind came off it at minus 50 degrees F, about minus 46°C. It turned out to be an alchemical freezer, because when it was completed, it magically transmuted a half-dozen one-liter bottles of vodka chilled to -40° (C or F, your choice) into a two-day Fijian freezer boat party that led to a couple of divorces, one marriage, headaches all around, and a wallet or two that went swimming. I was so drunk I went to sleep on a nice soft pile of rope and woke up in pain to realize I was sleeping on the anchor chain … but I digress.

That is the kind of intensity I brought to my investigation of climate science in the nineties as once again I began yet another field of study. I don’t know how many this makes for me, I’ve done it for most new jobs, but this has been an obsession. I have spent literally thousands of hours learning about how the GCMs work and don’t work, about how the statistics of non-normal datasets differ from those of normal datasets, why polar albedo is less important than tropical albedo, how many populations of polar bears there are and what their populations are really doing (mostly increasing), how to program in R, the list never ends. The beauty of climate science is that it is a new science, there is still so much to learn, the opportunity to find out new things beckons because so much is unknown, I never get bored, and so I continue to study.

That’s why I think I am qualified to comment on climate science. I am one of a dying breed with a long and proud history and tradition, a self-educated amateur scientist. As the root of the word “amateur” suggests, an amateur scientist is someone who investigates things scientifically for love (Latin amare) rather than for money … which is fortunate, considering my profits on the venture to date have been approximately zero.

I am also one of the few amateur scientists who has published anything peer-reviewed in Nature Magazine in many years. Yes, it is a humble “Brief Communications Arising”. But it was assuredly peer-reviewed and strictly reviewed.

I also have published three pieces in Energy & Environment, the journal AGW supporters love to hate and slander because it dares to publish peer-reviewed non-AGW supporting science, a disgraceful flaunting of wanton public heresy. Two of those three pieces were peer-reviewed, and one was an opinion piece. And yes, E&E has published some peer-reviewed stuff that has turned out to be junk … quite unlike say Science or Nature Magazine …

However, at the end of the day, all of that is nothing but stories to tell around a campfire. None of it means anything about whether a particular claim of mine is true or false. I bring immense practical experience and thousands of hours of study and a very quick mind to the problem, and despite that, I can be not just wrong, but stupidly wrong, embarrassingly wrong, make me say very bad words wrong.

Because my hours of study mean nothing. My experience means nothing. It truly is not about me—the only thing that counts is whether my ideas can stand the test of time or not.

Anyhow, that’s my story of how I became a generalist, or at least a small and not real pretty part of it. It got more interesting after that. I tell it to encourage everyone to please cut me (and everyone who dares to post their ideas for public attack) some slack regarding the personal attacks. As my story shows, some of us have studied extensively and thought long and hard about the subjects in question even if we may not have credentials and diplomas and official positions. As my story also shows, you may not have a clue what a man knows and what he has done in his life and what he can do and what drives him to do it. Leave all of that speculation at home.

So those are my requests. Talk about the science, quote my words if you disagree with them, sign your work, and keep fighting the good scientific fight.

My regards to everyone, and to misquote Willie Nelson, “Mommas, don’t let your babies grow up to be generalists” …

w.

For those interested in a most curious job history, my CV is available here.

[UPDATE] I’d like to thank Claude for raising an issue in the comments that I actually thought would have come up long before.

Claude Harvey says: March 1, 2011 at 12:03 am

Willis,

Now that we’ve been treated to a litany of idolatrous responses to your personal story, let us hope that your clear analysis and “ideas” are, indeed, not confused with “who you are”. Your romanticized account of your stint in the military’s “Med-2″ program is the classic account of a fellow who “couldn’t (or, according to your account, wouldn’t) do the time for which he’d contracted”.

I too joined the military at a tender age and I too was appalled at having to “tuck it in” and take orders from lesser (in my opinion) mortals than myself. The difference between us is that I did what I had agreed to do and you did not. Twist and turn it any way you like, that is not a very admirable bottom line and it reflects an “elitist” attitude (you were ever so too smart for such mundane endeavors) that I find very unattractive.

I continue to admire your work, but I do not admire certain aspects of your history.

Claude, thanks for your comments. Here’s the problem. Let’s try looking at it from the other side.

What most didn’t understand at the time, and what many don’t understand now, is that to the Vietnamese it was always a war of independence. Fighting first against the invading Chinese, and then the French, then the Japanese, then the French again, the Vietnamese fought these foreign invaders all in succession. And when like fools and against the advice of De Gaulle the Americans invaded, we weren’t anyone special. We were just the latest contestant.

Here is a stunning fact. In 1963, when from the Vietnamese perspective America joined the endless parade of invading countries, Ho Chi Minh was already 73 years old. He had been fighting to throw first one foreign invading country, then another, then another out of his country for over fifty years before the first American soldier came to his country, and he gladly went forward with his unending war of independence.

Fifty years! Fifty years he’d been fighting the endless wars against foreign invaders!

And of course, he used his fifty years of war experience against the Americans. We totally misunderstood. We thought we were fighting Communism. We thought there was a civil war, North against South. It was nothing of the sort. By the time we stuck our hands in the buzz-saw, it was a fifty-year war of Vietnamese independence against country after country after country.

Ho Chi Minh knew that he was the good guy, fighting a lifelong fight against anyone trying to invade his country. We had no idea what we were up against. Most folks, both then and now, didn’t dream that we were the bad guys, the invaders.

And to return to my own story, I see what I did as escaping, in any way I could, from a lethally misdirected war. I see what you did as knuckling under to the tyrants who wanted to use you for cannon fodder in that unjust war.

Consider it in your own words:

“Twist and turn it any way you like”, knuckling under to thugs and going thousands of miles to kill people who just wanted you out of their country, merely so Claude’s precious ‘word’ can be true, “is not a very admirable bottom line”.

You see the problem? It’s far from a simple question. Honoring your word is important to you, just as it is to me. We agree. You think that you should honor the word you gave when you joined the military, that you keeping your word on that was more important than the life of some yellow-skinned guy halfway around the world fighting to drive you out of his homeland. Me, not so much … we disagree.

Now, obviously, this is something on which reasonable men can and do disagree. It is not a simple question, there’s no right answer. I wrestled with it myself, as did you.

But for you to come in and try to bust me because I didn’t make the choice you made, and then to claim that you have the moral high ground here?

Sorry … in that war, there was no moral high ground. There was no honorable path, no middle road. A friend of mine was a Captain in the Army who was going to be a lifer. He was stationed in Korea. He took leave to go to see what was happening in Vietnam because he was slated to be sent there. Having seen it, he resigned his commission, an option I did not have, so he would not have to participate in what he saw (and still sees) as the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time against the wrong people for the wrong reasons … you gonna tell us that he should have kept his word and not resigned and happily gone to “kill gooks” because LBJ said so? Because I’d advise against you telling him that, since he actually is a pretty noble and ethical warrior, and he wouldn’t be impressed …

I have friends who made the decision you made. But they don’t put on your airs. They’re not like you, insulting people by claiming that it was some moral crusade and that they made the right decision. They don’t blame me for the path I took, nor do I blame them (or you) for taking the path you took. They know what I know. Nobody came out of the Vietnam War unwounded, there were no right decisions. Nobody made the “moral choice” about Vietnam, Claude. Not you, not JFK, and certainly not me … the most moral act I’ve seen in the context of Vietnam was my friend resigning his commission.

My best wishes for you and your life,

w.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 7 votes
Article Rating
357 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 28, 2011 7:36 am

Willis,
Max Planck said, “There is nothing more practical than theory.”
You show that thorough and objective application of experience permits honest assessment of whether theory is practical.
Many thanks for persisting in doing that.

Pogo
February 28, 2011 7:40 am

F[snip]ing Hell Willis!! Respect, man! 🙂
And wasn’t Isaac Newton an amateur scientist? ISTR that he spent more time in the study of alchemy.

Stuart MacDonald
February 28, 2011 7:40 am

Willis Eschenbach says: I became interested in climate science in the 1990s. My nose for numbers said that Hansen’s claims were way out of line. Here was my first and admittedly simple climate calculation. I figured half a kilowatt per square metre average global downwelling radiation (long- plus short-wave). People said doubling CO2 might be 4 watts per square metre. That’s less than 1%, and in a huge, ponderous, chaotic, constantly changing climate, my bad number detector said no way that a 1% variation in forcing would knock the Earth’s climate off the rails. I reckoned if it were that delicately balanced, it would have done the Humpty Dumpty long ago.
In other words, despite complete ignorance of the facts, you formed an opinion about climate sensitivity and spent the next 15-20 years confirming it. There is a name for that and its not science.

Gary Swift
February 28, 2011 7:41 am

If they want to get caught up in accademic credentials they should look up the guy who helped Hubble discover the red shift/distance relationship. His name is Milton L. Humason, and he was the guy that tended the mules used to get supplies up and down the mountain for the Mount Wilson Observatory. He had only a grade school education but he would talk with the astronomers on the way up and down the mountain. He asked a lot of questions and people like Hubble would teach him things and let him help with simple things around the Observatory in his spare time. He is co-credited with Hubble for the red shift discovery as well as Hubble’s law.
He never got a high school diploma.
I’ve dealt with the problem of credentials in my own life. I am a self-taught computer programmer. I started with a BASIC book and a TI99-4A when I was about 9 years old. By the time I started taking actual computer classes in order to get certifications, I don’t think they ever taught me anything I didn’t already know. The classes were merely for the pupose of getting it on paper that I really did know all that suff I said I knew. Hardly anybody belives me when I say that I was writing relational database programs for money when I was 12 (under the table because I wasn’t legally old enough to work). Not exactly what a company is looking for on a resume, unfortunately, because I can make the average college grad look dumb with my eyes closed.
Keep up the good work Willis.

February 28, 2011 7:42 am

A great post Willis! And priveledge to read.
As an amateur scientist, (I like the term ‘autodidact’ better) and a generalist, myself. And with a similar life path, your story resonates in my soul.
A fully functional human should be able to do a little of everything, and do it well, from diapering a baby, to building a house, to singing a good song; even if it’s a bit off key.
“Specialization is for insects” ~Lazarus Long, from Robert Hienlien’s ‘Time Enough For Love’.

vigilantfish
February 28, 2011 7:43 am

I meant to just dip in to this article prior to getting back to work but was rivetted, as usual, by your amazing prose.
I still say you need to add ‘book author’ to your c.v. ! You could sell many times more copies in one day than my dry academic book has sold in 5 years, with an instant and eager readership here at WUWT who would be happy to have a compendium of your experiences and thoughts and essays on science.
Brian Finch commented that this entry, ‘As an ‘APOLOGIA PRO VITA SUA’… reads better than Newman.’ I was reminded of Newman when reading your instructions to Jerome Ravetz on how to write. Your writing style captures Newman’s dictum to stick to one theme or idea and make everything in an essay refer to that one thing: clear, brief and easy to understand.
As for your history, ‘amateur’ scientists include the likes of Charles Darwin (if accreditation in a discipline relies on obtaining a university degree in that specialization). It is very encouraging that amateurs have been re-engaged by science, even if unfortunately out of a felt need to examine what is going on in an attempt to keep some scientists honest.
Generalists rock!

Claude Harvey
February 28, 2011 7:44 am

Well Jeese, Willis! Now I’m disillusioned! I thought you were just another Harvard dilettante. Careful with that “nose for numbers” though. I got that one stuffed up my own nose in engineering college by a grizzled old triple-integral-calculus professor. I’d complained that some of the “pure math” transformations he had us doing were a waste of time for an engineer because a simple math mistake anywhere along the line could put your final answer off by several orders of magnitude and you’d never have any way of knowing it. My argument was that for any “real” problem an engineer might be working on he would know ahead of time what was and was not at least a possible outcome.
The old boy promptly popped me with the following “real world” thought problem:
You have this enormous ball of twine. You decide (don’t ask why) to drive a stake in the ground at the equator, tie the bitter end of that ball of twine to the stake, and roll that ball completely around the earth while keeping the unfurled line taut until you’re back at that stake in the ground where you began. When you get back to the stake you find you have three feet of twine left over. You hate the idea of wasting that three feet, so you tie the loose end to the stake and go all the way back around the world shimming up the radius of the circle with a series of spacers to take up that extra 3 feet of circumferential slack. How thick would those spacers have to be. A nose for numbers would tell an engineer that “a wrinkle here and a wrinkle there over the entire circumference of the earth and I’ve got 3 feet of circumferential slack out of my line”, so the required radial spacers must be infinitesimally small. Do the simple math and, if you haven’t seen this one before, you will probably be amazed at the answer.

Bernd Felsche
February 28, 2011 7:47 am

Thank you for sharing your journey. I’m glad that I didn’t have to live through that. Life’s been good to me, so far.
What generalists have is a sense of proportion.
A grip on magnitudes and relative importance.
I doubt that you’d ever have made a “good scientist” in the second half of the 20th century. The curiosity and diverse interests are not welcome in the institutions as they were a hundred years earlier. Your heretical tendencies would have been most un-welcome.
As a generalist myself, I acquired an Engineering degree which thankfully taught me that I knew nothing. Instead of learning what to think, I learnt how to think. Instead of learning to acquire knowledge, I learnt to gain a necessary understanding; usually motivated by having to solve a real-world problem.
Knowledge doesn’t solve problems. And nowadays, knowledge is easy to obtain but understanding remains a challenging pursuit, a hunt for that elusive creature in the woods, where knowledge may shine some light, but your increasing understanding helps you navigate to the prey eventually. Once you grasp it, all around you seems to illuminate and the pieces all fall into place.

Dave Springer
February 28, 2011 7:50 am

@Willis
A smart guy like you should have figured out the easiest way out of the military is to do your job and complete your tour. I figured that out in the first couple of weeks of boot camp. I enlisted in the USMC near the end of the Vietnam war and was able to choose what I wanted to do. I got the highest GCT score on record for that recruiting office and every military occupation was open to me. I chose avionics since that was longest most technical profession the Marine Corps offered. I was 17 years old and ditched an MIT scholarship just to take the road less traveled but I wasn’t rebellious enough to want to make a living humping a rifle through a jungle. After the first few hours of arriving at Paris Island Recruit Depot I realized I’d made a mistake but I also realized the best exit strategy was to keep a low profile and do the job I’d signed up for. So I did. Eighteen months later I finished all my military schools. From basic avionics I chose Meteorological Equipment Repair for a specialty because that was the longest toughest school on the menu and with a wide range of electronics; closed circuit television, weather radar, weather satellite receivers and facsimile machines, radiosonde tracking dishes and strip chart recorders, cloud height finders, visibility detectors, UHF and VHF radios, teletype machines, digital computers and displays, and probably some more I’ve forgotten. The next three years I spend in sunny southern California near the beach at MCAS El Toro. The booze and drugs flowed liberally, the women were beautiful, everyone young and fit, we surfed and went snow skiing, ran our dirt bikes through the mountains and deserts, and Mon-Fri 9-5 a secure job with great benefits. I wouldn’t change a thing if I had it to do all over again. By the time I was honorably discharged at the rank of sergeant when my four year hitch was up I had already completed several college classes at Pepperdine Business School. I then used the generous GI Bill and got paid $600/mo. (which is equivalent to about $1800/mo. now) as long I was enrolled and got a passing grade in college 12/units per semester. I enrolled in summer classes too to keep the checks coming all year long. I stayed right in southern California the whole time in the closest community college and since I didn’t need to declare a major I never did and just took all the BS general ed classes plus a bunch of extra science courses which happened to include microprocessor architecture and a few different programming languages. By the time I had exhausted community college I had 70 units, all the general education crap out of the way, and had found my niche in computer science. After enrolling in Cal State Fullerton and before I started the first semester I went looking for a job near the university. I’d been working either part or full time while going to college variously fixing TVs, industrial process controls, and broadcast video editing equipment. I’d also gotten into hobbyist computing and had done my college computer programming homework on a computer I built myself rather than the college’s computer thanks to some accomodating professors. Anyhow, when I went in for an interview at a small company making portable computers they were so impressed with me at the interview they offered me an entry level engineering position at a base salary higher than BCS graduates were getting. So I never finished school and the rest is history – 20 years later at the tender age of 43 and seven years at Dell Computer when it went from a $1B/yr company to a $40B/yr company I was able to retire and I did. The next 10 years I pretty much got back to my ancestral roots, bought some land, a tractor and chainsaw, cleared it, put in utilities, built a dock and restored a big houseboat, then built a house. A blogged and googled a lot in all kinds of subject areas from politics to religion and science. I love hard physical labor and building things but the 20 year stint in computer R&D didn’t leave me much time for anything else.

Dave Nash
February 28, 2011 7:50 am

Sorry Willis, but it IS about you and what you represent. We are judged by how we express our opinions and how we comport ourselves when others agree or disagree with our opinions. Each time you present an argument you are judged on your integrity before the content of your argument is even read or understood. I have judged you as one worth listening to (for the entertainment value of your prose, if nothing else) and one with a great deal of integrity. I tend to agree with your opinions more often than not, but even if I was solidly behind the CAGW camp I would read what you had to say solely based on how others attack you and the snide comments that are used to try to tear you down rather than disprove your arguments. When someone begins to rant on a subject – even if I agree with the gist of the rant – I tend to tune them out and move on to the more reasonable contributors to the argument. Many others live for the rants and even try to start them by being Trolls and contrarians. I judge them too and their points are seldom heard. I too have spent an inordinate amount of time studying the subject of AGW (and all name permutations thereof) and have had my questions ridiculed on other sites. The simple statement and question that “this doesn’t seem to be correct, can someone point me to the literature or explain this to me?” was derided to such a degree – and encouraged by the moderators – that I no longer even visit the sites. So, I judge what they have to say by the way that they act. If they acted more like you do I might listen to them more. Therefor Willis, it is about you as well as what you have to say. Please keep saying it as I’ve enjoyed the reading of it.

Flask
February 28, 2011 7:51 am

Willis,
I always read what you have to say since I first encountered your thermostat hypothesis, which seems to me to be entirely plausible. The geological record indicates that the atmosphere must limit climatic end-points somehow, your hypothesis suggests how it happens. The idea that current and projected CO2 emissions will force the climate into disastrous warming flies in the face of repeated paleontological evidence that suggests that a warm earth is better for life than a cold or frozen earth. Also that a changing environment ultimately leads to more species. It seems many of the warm-mongers believe the earth has been static and is meant to stay that way.
I have been proud to tell people that I started school in a one-room school house, which is an anomaly now, but most people did that before the midpoint of the 20th century. It gave me a head start in history and arithmetic, and helped me on the road to a generalist education, because I listened to the teacher explaining things to the higher grade students. There were disadvantages, most of which I was unconscious of, except having to endure the cold to get to school in the winter, which I didn’t suffer stoically, unlike my big brother, who had to drive the horse and start the fire in the morning.
Thanks, Willis, and keep thinking and writing about this climate stuff, OK?
Flask

pascvaks
February 28, 2011 7:52 am

Each of us is here to teach and learn. It starts at conception and lasts till our death. Some, who are remembered after death, teach for a while longer. You have touched and taught many, you have felt and learned much. The amazing thing about life is that there are countless similiar stories, and while each is remarkably similiar, they are also so very different too. Now that is something to wonder about. Nice to know more Willis. Thank you.

Editor
February 28, 2011 7:53 am

Willis, Thank you for that.

R.S.Brown
February 28, 2011 7:53 am

Willis,
Cut down on the caffine… it helps.

Oxonpool
February 28, 2011 7:57 am

In Germany the concept of the “Fachidiot” is well know. It describes the chap who knows more and more about less and less, to the point where he is incapable of functioning outside his own narrow field. In the English-speaking world, we recognise the expert as the person who avoids the small pitfalls as he sweeps on to the grand fallacy. The generalist, the person who has experience of diverse areas, and the man with insight are necessary counterbalances to Fachidiocy, for it’s not academic background or endless doctorates which are important in revealing scientific truth: the quality of the arguments is more more important.

Jared
February 28, 2011 7:57 am

Bill Gates = unqualified to create Microsoft – the guy is a college dropout
Steve Wozniak = unqualifed to create Apple Computer – the guy was a college dropout
Wright Brothers = unqualified to create airplanes – they didn’t even get simple High School Diplomas
Never trust an amateur scientist. [/sarc]

February 28, 2011 7:58 am

I recall but don’t have a link that a boy in UK with only a high school ed. some decades ago wrote extremely insightful papers on sociology and public policy and, without a degree at all was appointed as a perfessor of sociology at the esteemed London School of Economics – an institution with 16 Nobel Prize winners amongst alumni and current and former staff, as well as 34 world leaders and numerous Pulitzer Prize winners and fellows of the British Academy.
Probably this couldn’t happen again with the Templar attitude that pervades science around the world.

DJ
February 28, 2011 8:02 am

Willis, you say: …”I am one of a dying breed with a long and proud history and tradition, a self-educated amateur scientist…”
I cheerfully disagree with you that you’re part of a dying breed. I doubt that your breed is dying, and I truly hope it isn’t dying. Throughout history people with stories like yours have punctuated human legacy, and I’d be saddened to think your ilk won’t continue to bless us from time to time.
I too have rebelled in similar ways, but to lesser extent, and with an 80pt handicap on the IQ. I’ve made things all my life, and consider myself an idea person. I come up with the ideas, and someone else make’s ’em work. Only they usually end up making the money. Like the ripped-off patent that would have had me comfortably retired years ago… But back to you…..
If there’s odds to be taken, I’ll put my money on people with your background migrating to the “denier” camp, with far greater numbers here than in the AGW camp. One side smells like science (at least to me), and the other like religion.
Thank you for sharing, Willis, I have the utmost admiration for you.

Ben Palmer
February 28, 2011 8:09 am

It was nice sitting at the camp fire and holding my breath while listening to your story. Thanks for so much insight.

TimM
February 28, 2011 8:09 am

Epic. Just totally epic. You have done well just to survive much less thrive as you are doing. Cheers and keep up the good work.

February 28, 2011 8:11 am

Willis:
Very impressive. I am going to share your story with my 24 year old son who is working through a lot of stuff.
Your story about your back of the envelop assessment of the basic CAGW claim concretely captures my personal experience and, I suspect, that of many others here.
I look forward to your next scientific contribution.

jaypan
February 28, 2011 8:14 am

A bunch of über-arrogant people tells the rest of us to stop thinking?
WTF do they think they are?
Wonderful story and keep going, Willis.

Roger Longstaff
February 28, 2011 8:14 am

“Simon Wood says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:36 am
REPLY: I’d be happy to come, but like Willis points out, I’m broke but I’m not poor. Feel free to apply. – Anthony
I’m from the UK also, and would relish the opportunity to see you and Willis lecture. If you set up a donation fund, I’ll gladly contribute.”
Mods – can you pass my email to Simon Wood? Maybe we can get something going here.

bubbagyro
February 28, 2011 8:15 am

One either has logical reasoning or not. Maybe one is born with or without it. Your posts are always scientific and logical. You are a scientist, in my book. I am a professional physical chemist for 40+ years, and I know a scientist when I see one.
BTW, Zen is neither the moon NOR the finger. It is the planet Pluto, which is not a planet…

dp
February 28, 2011 8:18 am

I was a slow starter, too. When I was 12 I was told I had the highest IQ in my grade in the state of California. It’s hard to be different, but harder to conform. I also didn’t like Berkeley. Still don’t.