It’s Not About Me

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

One response to Christopher Booker graciously mentioning my climate research in the Telegraph is the predictable increase in the usual personal attacks on me, as opposed to attacking my ideas and claims. People are rehashing Tim Lambert calling me a liar because he disagreed with my methods, as though that meant something about me rather than simply revealing something about Tim. They point out that I am an amateur scientist (as though that were other than a badge of honor). I’m told that I’m out of my depth. I am constantly assured that I am not qualified to offer a scientific opinion on climate, because of my lack of academic qualifications (BA in Psychology), and because of the shortness of my scientific publications list. The supply of reasons given to try to convince people to ignore my work is seemingly endless. To hear people tell it, I’m not fit to kiss the boots of a true scientist.

My point is that none of that matters. Either my scientific claims are correct, or they are not. It’s not about me. Period. End of story.

Photo Source

When I was younger, for decades I was a Zen Buddhist. There is an important saying that Zen is not the moon, it is just the finger pointing at the moon. Complaints, arguments, and discussions about the finger miss the point – the subject of importance, the subject worthy of discussion, is the moon.

That’s the ultimate egalitarianism of science. Doesn’t matter if the person who made a scientific claim is a world-renowned expert or a semi-literate ditch digger. They are just the finger pointing at the moon. All that matters is, can the claim be falsified? What are the facts that support the claim? What are the facts that falsify the claim? Is the logic correct? Is the mathematics solidly based? Does it agree with other understandings?

Whether I lie (I don’t), or whether I have peer-reviewed publications (yes, three with a fourth currently in peer-review) is immaterial. All that matters is, are my ideas right or wrong? That’s why I put my ideas up here in the public square, so someone can falsify them. That’s the game called science. I make scientific claims, and you try to poke holes in my claims. Or you make scientific claims, and I try to poke holes in your claims. I play the game from both sides, falsifying the claims of others as well as publishing original and falsifiable claims of my own for people to attack.

So, attack is the very nature and essence of the science game. But it is supposed to be an attack on my SCIENTIFIC IDEAS. Not an attack on me, not an attack on my qualifications, not an attack on my occasionally rough cowboy nature, not an attack on my honesty, not an attack on what I have chosen to study. Truly, it’s not about me.

Now, having said that this is not about me, enough people have questioned my fitness to comment on climate science that I would like to give an answer as to why I am qualified to do so. However, as with many things in my life, it’s kinda complicated, and involves a number of misunderstandings and coincidences. Pour yourself a cup of coffee, it’s a sea-dog’s tale of military madness.

The main strength that I bring to the analysis of the climate, curiously, is that I am a generalist. In a field like climate science, which is far broader than it is deep and encompasses a host of scientific disciplines, this is a huge advantage.

How does one get to be a generalist? In my case, it was a combination of being a freak of nature, of growing up on a very remote and isolated cattle ranch surrounded by virgin forest, and of my curious interaction with the US Army.

I went to a two-room country grade school. There were 21 kids in eight grades, and seven of them were me, my three brothers, and my three cousins. For the last four years of grade school, I was the only kid in my grade. I loved math and wordplay and puzzles of any kind, I sopped up knowledge and read everything I could lay hands on. In grade school, my Dad hauled me and my older brother off to Stanford University, where a guy who actually wore a white scientist coat gave us some version of the Sanford-Binet IQ test. They said my IQ was over 180, his was over 160. They didn’t believe it the first time, so they tested us again with different questions and got the same result. Freaks of nature.

My brother focused on electronics, was in charge of one of the two Hewlett-Packard Research Labs, invented the first civilian version of the GPS, and was a Discover Magazine Scientist Of The Year.

Me, I became a generalist.

The grade school teacher said I could skip two grades. My mom said no, so the school let me go at my own speed. I finished eighth-grade spelling in sixth grade. In seventh grade, I studied Spanish on my own. In eighth grade, the entire school district introduced Spanish education via TV. All the teachers in the county went to Spanish class one night a week so they could teach the kids and support the TV lessons with in-class training. My teacher couldn’t make it to the weekly teacher’s training, so they sent me instead. As a result, when I was in eighth grade, I was already in my second year of studying and first year of teaching Spanish … I also completed a year of high school algebra while in grade school, which let me take college calculus in high school.

My mother was a single mom who raised four sons and ran a 280 acre cattle ranch. She was both a wise and a well-educated woman with a binge drinking problem, working for months without a drop and then going on a one-week bender. We never had much money. After some years of seeing other kids who always had better clothes and newer toys, one day I screwed up my courage and asked my mom if we were poor. “No,” she said angrily, “we’re not poor, and we’ll never be poor. Poor is a state of mind.” She sighed and relaxed, rubbed her work-hardened hands, looked wistfully at the summer sky, and added “I admit we’ve been broke for a while now, but we’re not poor …”

Growing up broke on a remote cattle ranch surrounded by wild forest means that if something has to get fixed, you have to fix it. If something has to get made, you have to make it. If you have to learn something to do that, you learn it. Growing up like that is a huge advantage to a future generalist. I came away with Leonardo da Vinci and George Washington Carver and Jim Bridger as my heroes, with the ability to do most practical things with my hands, and with the blind, wildly incorrect, but fervently-held belief that whatever needed to be done, somehow, someway, I could do it even if I had nothing but baling wire and a balky Crescent wrench.

In high school, I was the kid who carried a circular slide rule in his pocket and knew how to use all of the scales on both sides. Not a nerd, I was class president, but eccentric, obsessed with math and music and science. I ascribe my nose for bad numbers to the use of the slide rule. A slide rule doesn’t have a decimal point. So if you are say multiplying 3.14 times 118, you have to mentally estimate the size of the answer to decide where the decimal point goes. To this day, this sense of the right size for a number still serves me well. I often see a numerical value describing some natural phenomenon and correctly say “No way, that answer’s out of scale, something’s wrong”, even though I’m not familiar with the subject.

I started working as soon as I was old enough to legally work, the summer after my freshman year in high school.  That summer was spent bucking hay, six ten-hour days a week, 30 cents an hour. I was fourteen. I was a Boy Scout. I got my Merit Badge for Weather, I found it fascinating. The next summer I worked as a bicycle messenger in San Francisco. I rode a one-speed bike loaded with blueprints up and down the hills of San Francisco.

The summer after that (1963) I went to a National Science Foundation special summer school for mathematicians in Oregon. We learned how to program computers. I was in heaven. I had read about computers, and I had heard about them, but to see one taking up an entire room, with its relays clicking and vacuum tubes humming, was my science fiction dream come true. And they let us write programs and run them! I was hooked, hooked bad, but of course, there were no desktop computers or work in computing for me then.

Just before my last year of high school we moved into town. I worked a 20-hour week, running the photo lathe and the Fairchild machine at the local newspaper past midnight into the small hours of the morning, and then coming in on Saturday to proofread the legal notices. Oh, plus washing dishes in the high school cafeteria to pay for my school lunches like I did every year for four years.

Then, without warning of any kind, in my senior year of high school, my mom ran away from home.

I was 16. I woke up one morning to find a thousand bucks and a note saying she wasn’t coming back, and could I take care of my two younger brothers. And just like on the ranch, what I had to do, I did. I ran the house, made sure they had food and did their studies, and with the invaluable help of my 20-year-old cousin, bless her, we kept the home together for the rest of the school year. At the end of the school year, I graduated as the class valedictorian, my brothers went to live with my dad, and when the money ran out I took a job as a cowboy on a cattle ranch up by the Oregon Border.

Now in my senior year, I’d won a $1,000 award from Bank of America as the most outstanding high school student in the state. That’s about $9,700 in today’s 2024 money … of course, I’d used it to buy a Honda 90 motorcycle and a guitar and a sleeping bag, and wasted the rest. So at the end of that job as a cowhand, I took my Honda 90, strapped my guitar to one side and my sleeping bag to the other, and took it from California to Portland, up the Columbia to Yellowstone, back through Utah to Las Vegas and LA, and back north again. I had very little money, of course. Mostly I lived by singing for my supper in restaurants and sleeping under the stars. I was 17.

In the fall of 1964, I started college at the University of California at Berkeley, but I hated it. I lasted one year, and then I went to Alaska to seek my fortune. Instead, mostly I starved. I worked as a short-order cook. I worked in a floating crab cannery. I worked emptying boats of rotten stinking crabs. I worked as a longshoreman horsing 300-pound bales of pulp around a ship’s hold. And mostly I made my living singing folk songs and playing my guitar in saloons and coffeehouses. When it got cold I fled down the Alcan highway to Greenwich Village, New York in November, still singing. There, through the usual coincidences and misunderstandings, I lost everything I owned but my guitar and the clothes I had on. I slept in the streets. I learned before going to sleep to wrap newspapers around my arms and legs under my clothing to keep warm. And as soon as I could, I hooked a ride to Coconut Grove in Florida because it was warm and I was freezing. I played music.

Then the Army sent me a draft notice. 1966, something about a little conflict in Southeast Asia, they wanted cannon fodder. But if I enlisted, I could choose my specialty. I enlisted and chose, ironically, weather observer. But I barely made it through Basic Training. Halfway through, I’d had enough. I didn’t go postal, I just quit taking orders. I calmly told the Sergeant that I couldn’t blindly take orders from someone I didn’t know, because they might order me to do something I didn’t believe in … his eyes bugged out and he took me to the Captain. I told him the same story. The Captain scratched his head, stuck me in front of a typewriter, and gave me a stack of papers to deal with. God bless my high school typing class where I was the only boy among 25 or so girls …

I graduated with my company, but I never marched or trained with them again. They’d roll out at five-thirty AM for reveille. I got up at seven, walked over to the Company HQ, did company paperwork all day, filled out the forms the Captain hated to fill out, then went to the mess hall and had dinner with the guys. I desperately wanted the Army to let me out. Instead, they just went around me. Go figure.

After Basic, they sent me to Weather Observer’s school in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, near New York City. I learned how the Army categorizes clouds and what an “octa” is, how to use a wet bulb thermometer, weather theory, what a cold front looks like on a weather map and what it means, the usual stuff, and mostly, how to fill out US Army weather reporting forms. And I was going slowly nuts. They wouldn’t let us off base at all. So I stole a Class A pass from the Company safe.

The safe was in the Sergeant’s office. I timed his morning breaks for a couple of weeks. Never shorter than 8 minutes, and he left the safe open rather than relock it/unlock it. Easy.

With my stolen pass, every weekend I snuck out with my guitar and went into Greenwich Village. I played music in the clubs and hung out with the beatniks and the people I knew from the year before and slept on the streets or in Central Park. For a couple Sundays, I was playing in a club on one side of the street, and the Loving Spoonful was playing on the other side. But at eight on Monday morning, they were sleeping in, and I had to be back in my fatigues waiting for the other soldiers to catch up to the instructor’s slowly explained ideas about the weather. That split lifestyle went on for three months or so, half beatnik, half GI. I hated the Army. I hated the war. I constantly risked arrest for being AWOL or for my stolen pass. I developed an uncontrollable tic in my eye. That eye twitched like a demon, I couldn’t stop it. I was losing the plot—my dreams were of endless wandering in strange landscapes, I found myself lashing out in random anger at strangers, or brooding in my room for hours. After a while the plot was lost entirely.

Finally, one weekend I had gone up to Boston, and through the usual misunderstandings and coincidences I couldn’t make it back to the base in New Jersey on time. That meant I was headed for real trouble when I returned because I was AWOL, my Class A Pass was stolen. I was mondo depressed. I decided I had to get out. I ate a double fistful of sleeping pills and told someone to call the ambulance when I passed out. I didn’t care if I lived or died.

I passed out.

I woke up with the docs pumping the bad drugs out of my stomach in some emergency room and the cops questioning me about what happened. Then to counteract the bad drugs, they shot me full of good drugs.

I passed out.

I woke up firmly lashed to a bed. They told me I was in the Terminal Heart and Cancer Patient Ward of the Bethesda Naval Hospital. They gave me more of what they said were good drugs.

OK.

I passed out.

I stayed lashed hand and foot to the bed for several days. Couldn’t feed myself. They fed me through a tube in my arm. I watched people die around me every day. They wouldn’t move the corpses during the day to avoid upsetting the others. So I’d wake up at two am, sleeping on my back because I couldn’t turn over, each arm tied to the bedrail, and watch them carry out yet another body.

One day, a man with kind eyes walked through the ward. He told the orderly to untie me and bring me to his office. He looked at me and said, “Son, you don’t belong in the military.”

I could have cried. I could have told him I knew that. I didn’t belong there in any sense. But I stayed silent. He said, “This is a Navy hospital, I don’t even know why you’re here. The Army wants me to send you right back to your unit. I’m not comfortable with that. I’m putting you in the Bethesda Navy Mental Hospital.” I can’t remember if I offered to kiss his feet. After what I’d been through, I wasn’t tracking all that well.

In 1966, the US Navy’s idea of what constituted a nuthouse might misleadingly be described as nautical and quaint. It was a Quonset hut divided in half crossways from floor to ceiling by a chain link fence. Half was for violent contestants, half for non-violent. Plus, in the violent half was the rubber room, where they’d put you so you could bounce off the walls as much as you wanted. They stuck all of us new contestants into the violent half, packed us full of Thorazine pills (a very heavy tranquilizer that they said was good drugs). They watched us nod out.

Most of us were too sleepy to be attentive, much less violent, so we were let out into the other half of the nuthouse in a few days. There was no therapy. There was no radio, no books, just announcements from some Nurse Rached wannabe over the intercom. They gave us pajamas and a robe. There was nothing to do but watch crazy folks do their thing. And drool. Thorazine is great for drooling. I became an expert. I had been unfettered all my life, living on the road, singing my songs, free as a bird. Now I was locked up in a distinctly un-gilded cage. My brain was regularly pumped full of happy juice. I was unhappy and depressed. I drooled and stared at the wall. A day on Thorazine with nothing to do lasts about a week.

After a month there, moving in slow motion on good drugs, the Navy and the Army decided to ship me to Letterman Army Hospital in San Francisco. Nurse Rached read the orders and the names out over the intercom and had the orderlies bring out a bunch of stretchers. Instead of pills, they strapped us each to a stretcher and shot us each up with a mega-dose of Thorazine. Can’t have too much good drugs, I guess. Things got fuzzy. They stacked us like cordwood in a DC3, sliding the stretchers into special racks on the walls. I wanted to remember how close I was to the man on the stretcher above me. I found I could slide my hand on my chest in between us, but I was too close to the man above me to make a fist … and then the cotton wool closed in on my brain again. The trip took three days, with a different stop every night. They’d unstrap us, and we’d all stagger out like extras in a zombie movie.

That first night after they unstrapped me, I staggered into the bathroom and sat down on the toilet. I was bursting from the day on the plane. When I finished, I realized that although I’d remembered to drop my pajama bottoms, I hadn’t flipped up the back of my hospital robe. I’d sat on the flap instead and filled it with human waste. I looked down, shrugged, took my arms out of my robe, and I walked out and left it right there. I was loopy, half-crazed and half-dazed, tranked to the max and locked up 24/7 with men as far off the rails as I was, what did I care? I just went to bed and said nothing to anyone—being crazy means never having to say you’re sorry.

The next day, they gave me another robe. Then they shot us up again, and again we flew all day. I remembered this time about the toilet and the robe. Finally, on the third day, we staggered into a base somewhere near Sacramento. They propped us all up in a bus, where we all flopped around like gumbies on the way to the Letterman nuthouse.

The Letterman Army nuthouse on the Presidio Army Base in San Francisco was in a building previously used as a holding prison for Federal criminals headed to Alcatraz. They took us into this prison and shot us up with a bunch of other good drugs. They propped us up against the wall to wait for dinner … and from there things started getting weird.

First, I started feeling stiff. Then my neck started pulling my head back. I couldn’t lower my chin. My shoulder started to arch back. Then my legs gave out and I fell on the floor. My back arched further and further back in an insane contortion. I was sure my back was going to snap; my muscles were seizing and bowing me backward. I was screaming and begging for help. Orderlies came and shot me full of yet more good drugs. I woke up groggy and tied to a bed in the violent ward … this was getting to be a theme.

They explained slowly that I had spazzed out because they had given me bad drugs, but it was all OK because now they were giving me good drugs. Welcome to the Letterman Army nuthouse, where if you weren’t nuts before, you will be.

I spent almost six months there, while the prelude to the “Summer of Love” was going on outside the prison doors. They let us out little by little. At first, we could walk around the base for an hour with a visitor. After a while, they gave us day passes off of the base. I and my crazy friend Mel from the nuthouse would go to the Haight Ashbury. His girlfriend had a house there. His girlfriend also had a girlfriend, who became my girlfriend. After a while, the Army gave us weekend passes out of prison. So every weekend, we’d take off our Army robe and pajamas that we wore all week, nutters don’t wear regular clothes. We’d put on freak clothes, paisley shirts, and bell-bottom pants; we were unbearably cool. Except for our Army haircuts. We’d go with the ladies to the Haight, play music, get weird. We went to the First Human Be-In in Golden Gate Park and heard Timothy Leary rant, Allen Ginsberg emote, and the Grateful Dead and the Jefferson Airplane rock it to the max.

But every week we had to be back on the crazy ward by eight o’clock Monday morning. So we’d take LSD every Sunday night like clockwork, then turn ourselves back into the nuthouse with our eyes spinning like pinwheels on Monday morning, put on our robes and pajamas and watch the colors crawl up the wall and people’s faces change and melt … but it was worth it because it was more than a man could do to voluntarily return to that hole of lost humanity in a sane and sober state. You had to be crazy to turn yourself back in to the Letterman nuthouse.

That split life went on for months. More schizophrenia on the half-shell. The Army wasn’t much help. At the time, they were mostly doing a lot of shock therapy. But they never did any follow-up. Mel and I started doing what we could to help the people after shock therapy. I remember a guy who used to say “Well, they’re going to plug me into the wall today.”

Then in the afternoon, the men in white scrubs would take him out of the locked ward where we all lived, and bring him back with his memories scrubbed cleaner than clean, dump him on his bunk to stare at the wall, and walk away.

So Mel and I and some of the other walking wounded would pull out his wallet and show him the pictures. We’d tell him his name, and we’d say he’d been in an accident. We didn’t say a war. We’d tell him that the young woman in the picture was his wife and the boy was his son.

After a while, we’d tell him that he lived in Texas, and we all were in California. Eventually, we’d get round to the fact that he had been a soldier in a faraway war. That always seemed to surprise him. Even without his memories, he didn’t think of himself as a soldier, and I understood that perfectly.

After more time, we’d tell him that he’d been in a terrible situation in a distant country called Vietnam. We’d slowly work up to the fact that he was in a hospital. Then we’d let slip that it was not just any hospital, it was a nuthouse, because we’d learned by experience that he couldn’t cope with that information when he was straight out of the juice box. And so bit by bit he’d start remembering stuff, and for a while the balance was OK … but then after a week or so, he’d start remembering too much stuff. He started remembering seeing and doing and enduring things no man should ever have to even witness, much less bear the shame and guilt of having seen and done and endured, things beyond belief. And from there on he’d start to shut down a bit at a time, until one day they’d take him off and plug him in again.

And they’d bring back a memory-free rag doll, and we’d start the process over again. Don’t get me wrong. The shock therapy helped him. We knew him from the day he came in from Vietnam. Before the first shock therapy, he was catatonic and never spoke one word. So I’m not opposed to the use of electroconvulsive therapy, it can work when nothing else does … but dang, the Army could’ve done better than leave his recovery to me and Mel …

Finally, after an eternity, four months in the nuthouse, they said I could go, and Mel could go too. We were going to escape without getting plugged into the wall, get discharged! The doctor signed our discharge papers. The Lieutenant and the Captain signed them. Everyone signed them right up to the Commanding General of the Presidio.

He said Mel would be discharged, but not me. I was to be sent to Ford Ord to be trained as a company clerk.

Go figure. I saluted the guy who gave me the orders, walked out the door, and went AWOL. I spent a couple of weeks snorting speed, in this case, methedrine, and spending hours talking really, really fast to people about whatIshoulddo, shouldIgotoCanada, ormaybeturnmyselfin, noIshouldjuststayAWOLandhopeforthebest, I made up my mind dozens of times and unmade it again just as fast as my tongue could move.

Finally one day, after hours of listening to a record of Bob Dylan singing Memphis Blues Again, “Here I sit so patiently / Trying to find out what price / I have to pay to get out of / Going through all these things twice”, I took a massive dose of LSD and turned myself back in to Letterman Hospital to go through all these things twice. At the time I was dressed in Letterman hospital pajama bottoms and a tie-dyed shirt. The doctors just shook their heads and shot me full of happy juice; once again, it appeared I was off bad drugs and on good drugs. Then the good drugs took over, and I slept.

When I woke up, I was lashed down on a bunk in the locked ward. Only for 24 hours this time, and by then I was used to it. No weekend passes for the bad AWOL boy this go-round. In a couple of weeks, they decided I needed work therapy.

So I was put to work in a small room with three black guys wearing pajamas and robes like me but all styled out with colorful do-rags around their heads. All day long they listened to the blackest of Oakland radio stations, “KDIA Lucky Thirteen”. They were great, they welcomed me as one of their own, as only fellow lunatics can. We ironed iron-on patches onto teeny holes in operating room sheets all day long, all of us buzzed on Thorazine, all of us gently rocking and singing along with James Brown and the Shirelles and Etta James and Motown and all things black … great music education for your average white boy musician. Plus, I got to enjoy just hanging with the brothers and listening to and joining in with their endless jive and good spirits, bizarrely, a wonderful time.

Not only that, but I learned how to iron patches on operating room sheets at a rate of knots, what’s not to like?

Finally, nine months after taking a double handful of sleeping pills in Boston and not caring if I lived or died, having slipped between the Scylla of being plugged into the wall and the Charybdis of being sent back to the Army, and in a state both less crazy and more crazy than when I went entered the nuthouse, they let me go. I had outlasted them. I was given an Honorable Discharge as being “Unfit for Military Service” … like I say, I could have saved them a lot of work, I knew that from the start.

So I was free, finally free, out of prison free, no walls free, living in San Francisco in 1967 free. No more unbreakable steel bars dividing the sky into a demented solitaire tic-tac-toe game. No more grilles and locks on the door. No ironing tiny patches on sheets for eight hours a day, only to return to a locked ward full of fellow sufferers after work. No more waking up once again lashed to the damn bed. I moved in with my girlfriend. She was dancing in a topless bar on Broadway. I was twenty years old, I couldn’t even go into the bar to watch her dance … but I was free, and I swore a very big swear to unknown deities that I would remain that way.

And finally, to return to the theme, somewhere in the first months after I got out from behind bars, I made some rules of thumb for myself that eventually turned me into a generalist. One was that my motto would be “Retire Early … And Often”. Since then, I’ve never been unemployed. Instead, I’ve worked a while and then retired until the money ran out. Being retired is very different from being unemployed. It’s worry-free.

Another rule of thumb I took up was that given a choice between something I had done and something I had not done, I would always do the thing undone.

Another was that if I was offered security or adventure, I’d choose adventure. And curiously, that has led to perfect security.

Finally, I swore that I wouldn’t take any more jobs unless they had a fixed ending date. I was done with serving indeterminate sentences. The end of the season, the completion of the house, the end of the harvest, I swore not to be bound by unending work as I had been bound in the nuthouse, with no known end date in sight. Some prisoners in WWII German concentration camps said that worse than the cold, worse than the hunger and the beatings, the worst thing was the uncertainty of whether they’d ever get out. I can see why. I had faced that uncertainty in a cold concrete building with bars on the windows for three-quarters of a year, seeing men rotting away in a Thorazine daze in the Letterman nuthouse, sometimes they’d been there for years, watching some get shipped off to a more permanent lifelong nuthouse, not knowing if I would get out or if I’d get plugged into the wall.

Yes, I’d take a job, but this time I’d know when my sentence would be up, and I’d be waiting for that day so I could retire again.

I have mostly followed those guidelines for the rest of my life. Since then, I have worked at dozens of different jobs and trades around the world. I make as much money as I can as fast as I can until the bell rings, then I retire. I stay retired until I get called out of retirement by a great job offer. Or by an empty stomach. I have worked on all the continents but Antarctica. I lived on tropical South Pacific islands for seventeen years. I have made money by making and selling jewelry, as a commercial fisherman from LA to Alaska, as a psychotherapist, a refrigeration technician, a well driller, an auto mechanic, a computer programmer, a graphic artist, a construction manager on multi-million dollar projects, a sailboat deliveryman, a maker of stained-glass art, a project and program designer for USAID and the Peace Corps, a shipyard manager on a hundred acre remote island, an international renewable-energy trainer, a maker of fine custom cabinets, a multi-country health program manager, the Chief Financial Officer of a company with $40 million in annual sales, the Service Manager for an Apple Macintosh dealer, a high-end home builder, a sport salmon fishing guide on the Kenai River in Alaska, and a bunch more. I’m a surfer, a sailor, and a diver, with Open Water II and Rescue Diver tickets and an inshore Coast Guard Skipper’s License. I have my Ham Radio license, Hotel 44 Whiskey Echo. There’s a link to my full CV at down at the bottom.

All of this has given me all the tools needed to work in climate science. I understand tropical weather intimately because I’ve spent years observing it. I know the vertical temperature structure of the ocean’s nocturnal overturning because I’ve experienced it scuba diving at night down under the surface. I understand climate as a heat engine because I’ve dealt with heat engines and refrigerators and their mathematical analysis and concepts for years. I’ve watched underwater damage to coral reefs from bleaching as it happened, and I’ve watched them recover. I understand the computer models because I never stopped programming after 1963. I have spent hundreds and hundreds of hours writing all kinds of programs, including models of physical and business systems. I speak a half-dozen computer languages fluently and can read and write slowly in another half-dozen. I have also seen what the lack of inexpensive energy does to the desperately poor in Africa, I’ve shared their tables and listened to their stories. I know the vagaries of Arctic weather, not from books, but because I fished commercially in the Bering Sea and froze my guitar in Anchorage. I am not an expert in chemistry, or physics, or atmospheric dynamics, or oceanography, or computer models, or biology, or mathematics, or arctic ecosystems; I am self-taught in all of them. But I have a good solid practical working knowledge of every one of them, I have a deep understanding of various aspects of a number of them, and I have the ability to use the lessons from one field in another.

I became interested in climate science in the 1990s. My nose for numbers said that Hansen’s claims were way out of line. Here was my first and admittedly simple climate calculation. I figured half a kilowatt per square meter average global downwelling radiation (long-wave plus short-wave). People said doubling CO2 might be 4 watts per square meter. That’s less than 1%, and in a huge, ponderous, chaotic, constantly changing climate, my bad number detector said no way that a 1% variation in forcing would knock the Earth’s climate off the rails. I reckoned if it were that delicately balanced, it would have done the Humpty Dumpty long ago.

So I started reading the various climate science studies, but idly, as they came by, just to keep in touch with the field. The real change came in 1995, when we (me + wife + four year old daughter) moved off our houseboat in Fiji and back to the US, where I could connect to the internet … and opening the internet to a mathematically minded fact junkie like me was a heady drug. Suddenly, I could actually read the papers and go get the data and see what was going on. I wasn’t chained to other peoples’ opinions of the science, I could run the numbers myself.

Of course, all of this required an immense amount of study. But I’m real good at doing my homework. I once took a job to assemble, install, charge, and test a blast freezer on a sailboat in Fiji. I was hired along with my buddy who was a welder, he did the tricky soldering work and taught me to do it. At the time, I couldn’t have told you how a refrigerator worked, but I knew the job wouldn’t start for two months. So I bought a college refrigeration textbook and ate, breathed, and slept with that sucker. At the end of one month, I could recite it backward. The second month, I bought a refrigeration technician’s textbook, bought some gauges and tanks of Freon, and learned the practical end of the game.

At the end of two months, I figured I could build a refrigerator from scratch … which was fortunate, since what was supposed to be a full blast freezer kit with all the parts turned out to be a half kit, and Fiji is short on refrigeration parts. In the event, we got it built like we built things on the ranch, simply because I had to, so I figured out how to. The blast freezer worked perfectly; the wind came off it at minus 50 degrees F, about minus 46°C. It turned out to be an alchemical freezer, because when it was completed, it magically transmuted a half-dozen one-liter bottles of vodka chilled to -40° (C or F, your choice) into a two-day Fijian freezer boat party that led to a couple of divorces, one marriage, headaches all around, and a wallet or two that went swimming. I was so drunk I went to sleep on a nice soft pile of rope and woke up in pain to realize I was sleeping on the anchor chain … but I digress.

That is the kind of intensity I brought to my investigation of climate science in the nineties as once again I began yet another field of study. I don’t know how many this makes for me, I’ve done it for most new jobs, but this has been an obsession. I have spent literally thousands of hours learning about how the GCMs work and don’t work, about how the statistics of non-normal datasets differ from those of normal datasets, why polar albedo is less important than tropical albedo, how many populations of polar bears there are and what their populations are really doing (mostly increasing), how to program in R, the list never ends. The beauty of climate science is that it is a new science, there is still so much to learn, the opportunity to find out new things beckons because so much is unknown, I never get bored, and so I continue to study.

That’s why I think I am qualified to comment on climate science. I am one of a dying breed with a long and proud history and tradition, a self-educated amateur scientist. As the root of the word “amateur” suggests, an amateur scientist is someone who investigates things scientifically for love (Latin amare) rather than for money … which is fortunate, considering my profits on the venture to date have been approximately zero.

I am also one of the few amateur scientists who has published anything peer-reviewed in Nature Magazine in many years. Yes, it is a humble “Brief Communications Arising”. But it was assuredly peer-reviewed and strictly reviewed.

I also have published three pieces in Energy & Environment, the journal AGW supporters love to hate and slander because it dares to publish peer-reviewed non-AGW supporting science, a disgraceful flaunting of wanton public heresy. Two of those three pieces were peer-reviewed, and one was an opinion piece. And yes, E&E has published some peer-reviewed stuff that has turned out to be junk … quite unlike say Science or Nature Magazine …

However, at the end of the day, all of that is nothing but stories to tell around a campfire. None of it means anything about whether a particular claim of mine is true or false. I bring immense practical experience and thousands of hours of study and a very quick mind to the problem, and despite that, I can be not just wrong, but stupidly wrong, embarrassingly wrong, make me say very bad words wrong.

Because my hours of study mean nothing. My experience means nothing. It truly is not about me—the only thing that counts is whether my ideas can stand the test of time or not.

Anyhow, that’s my story of how I became a generalist, or at least a small and not real pretty part of it. It got more interesting after that. I tell it to encourage everyone to please cut me (and everyone who dares to post their ideas for public attack) some slack regarding the personal attacks. As my story shows, some of us have studied extensively and thought long and hard about the subjects in question even if we may not have credentials and diplomas and official positions. As my story also shows, you may not have a clue what a man knows and what he has done in his life and what he can do and what drives him to do it. Leave all of that speculation at home.

So those are my requests. Talk about the science, quote my words if you disagree with them, sign your work, and keep fighting the good scientific fight.

My regards to everyone, and to misquote Willie Nelson, “Mommas, don’t let your babies grow up to be generalists” …

w.

For those interested in a most curious job history, my CV is available here.

[UPDATE] I’d like to thank Claude for raising an issue in the comments that I actually thought would have come up long before.

Claude Harvey says: March 1, 2011 at 12:03 am

Willis,

Now that we’ve been treated to a litany of idolatrous responses to your personal story, let us hope that your clear analysis and “ideas” are, indeed, not confused with “who you are”. Your romanticized account of your stint in the military’s “Med-2″ program is the classic account of a fellow who “couldn’t (or, according to your account, wouldn’t) do the time for which he’d contracted”.

I too joined the military at a tender age and I too was appalled at having to “tuck it in” and take orders from lesser (in my opinion) mortals than myself. The difference between us is that I did what I had agreed to do and you did not. Twist and turn it any way you like, that is not a very admirable bottom line and it reflects an “elitist” attitude (you were ever so too smart for such mundane endeavors) that I find very unattractive.

I continue to admire your work, but I do not admire certain aspects of your history.

Claude, thanks for your comments. Here’s the problem. Let’s try looking at it from the other side.

What most didn’t understand at the time, and what many don’t understand now, is that to the Vietnamese it was always a war of independence. Fighting first against the invading Chinese, and then the French, then the Japanese, then the French again, the Vietnamese fought these foreign invaders all in succession. And when like fools and against the advice of De Gaulle the Americans invaded, we weren’t anyone special. We were just the latest contestant.

Here is a stunning fact. In 1963, when from the Vietnamese perspective America joined the endless parade of invading countries, Ho Chi Minh was already 73 years old. He had been fighting to throw first one foreign invading country, then another, then another out of his country for over fifty years before the first American soldier came to his country, and he gladly went forward with his unending war of independence.

Fifty years! Fifty years he’d been fighting the endless wars against foreign invaders!

And of course, he used his fifty years of war experience against the Americans. We totally misunderstood. We thought we were fighting Communism. We thought there was a civil war, North against South. It was nothing of the sort. By the time we stuck our hands in the buzz-saw, it was a fifty-year war of Vietnamese independence against country after country after country.

Ho Chi Minh knew that he was the good guy, fighting a lifelong fight against anyone trying to invade his country. We had no idea what we were up against. Most folks, both then and now, didn’t dream that we were the bad guys, the invaders.

And to return to my own story, I see what I did as escaping, in any way I could, from a lethally misdirected war. I see what you did as knuckling under to the tyrants who wanted to use you for cannon fodder in that unjust war.

Consider it in your own words:

“Twist and turn it any way you like”, knuckling under to thugs and going thousands of miles to kill people who just wanted you out of their country, merely so Claude’s precious ‘word’ can be true, “is not a very admirable bottom line”.

You see the problem? It’s far from a simple question. Honoring your word is important to you, just as it is to me. We agree. You think that you should honor the word you gave when you joined the military, that you keeping your word on that was more important than the life of some yellow-skinned guy halfway around the world fighting to drive you out of his homeland. Me, not so much … we disagree.

Now, obviously, this is something on which reasonable men can and do disagree. It is not a simple question, there’s no right answer. I wrestled with it myself, as did you.

But for you to come in and try to bust me because I didn’t make the choice you made, and then to claim that you have the moral high ground here?

Sorry … in that war, there was no moral high ground. There was no honorable path, no middle road. A friend of mine was a Captain in the Army who was going to be a lifer. He was stationed in Korea. He took leave to go to see what was happening in Vietnam because he was slated to be sent there. Having seen it, he resigned his commission, an option I did not have, so he would not have to participate in what he saw (and still sees) as the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time against the wrong people for the wrong reasons … you gonna tell us that he should have kept his word and not resigned and happily gone to “kill gooks” because LBJ said so? Because I’d advise against you telling him that, since he actually is a pretty noble and ethical warrior, and he wouldn’t be impressed …

I have friends who made the decision you made. But they don’t put on your airs. They’re not like you, insulting people by claiming that it was some moral crusade and that they made the right decision. They don’t blame me for the path I took, nor do I blame them (or you) for taking the path you took. They know what I know. Nobody came out of the Vietnam War unwounded, there were no right decisions. Nobody made the “moral choice” about Vietnam, Claude. Not you, not JFK, and certainly not me … the most moral act I’ve seen in the context of Vietnam was my friend resigning his commission.

My best wishes for you and your life,

w.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 7 votes
Article Rating
357 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Douglas
February 28, 2011 3:13 pm

Willis Eschenbach says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:10 am
Alex says:
February 28, 2011 at 8:47 am
[IQ of 180, sorry but I doubt it, above 140 sure, but 180? You will get attacked on this claim, it’s only a matter of time—-]
[Don’t know what to tell you, Alex. The guy who told me that wore a white scientist’s lab coat and worked at Stanford University and I was a kid maybe ten years old,—-
My older brother was tested at the same time, they said his IQ was over 160, unlike he truly retired ten years ago as a millionaire on the strength of being the inventor of the first civilian version of the GPS and his long list of patents and inventions. Meanwhile … well, I’m a thousandaire ..] w.
———————————————————————————–
I love the thousandaire bit! But – Whatever the actual number was re you IQ it is a bit academic right now. What I do know from reading your posts here Willis is that you sure have the ‘horsepower’ in that cranium of yours. You never cease to amaze me with the clarity and erudition of your posts – plus the added bonus of your wicked humour – that alone makes them worth while. Your story is also quite moving and extraordinary. You sure have packed a lot into your life – makes me feel indolent inadequate and complacent. But in the end your message is so very clear – and it is apparent from all your posts that you truly are a scientist. Also FTR I like the way that you suffer fools!
Thanks again
Douglas

Dave Springer
February 28, 2011 3:14 pm

Roger Knights says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:57 am
“Even if that’s true, they were the first to be able to take the next step: flying a round trip back to their starting point. They had developed, along with an advanced wing profile based on a great deal of “lab” work, the crucial means of turning the plane, with “wing warping.” ”
An aircraft in a bank turn is less efficient than flying straight and level. When making a turn you must either add power or lose airspeed and/or lose altitude. Neither power nor airspeed nor altitude were available in any significant excess in the first powered flights.
In order to maintain the best efficiency in a banked turn two control surfaces are required, the ailerons and the rudder. Ailerons are all that are strictly required as they change the bank angle and hence the lift vector out of the vertical into the diagonal which pulls (or pushes depending on your POV) in the direction of the turn. This however leaves the vertical stabilizer(s) with a horizontal wind blowing against them. Use of rudder, called a coordinated turn, brings the vertical stabilizers parallel with the wind stream and increases efficiency.
I’m surprised the goofy wing-warping of the Wright aircraft was good enough given they were flying at the edge of the performance envelope in just straight level flight.

February 28, 2011 3:32 pm

There is a danger in anti-intellectualism if taken too far- Mao sent Chinese graduates to work as peasants in the Cultural revolution, and it didn’t do a lot of good. Not all PhDs are head-in-the-clouds types incapable of changing a tap washer. Not all ditch diggers are Einsteins. While many of the great advances and innovations are due to gifted amateurs, the present technological civilization is being maintained by millions of university trained specialists quietly going about their work ensuring our electricity flows, our planes fly, our crops are productive- and tradesmen and labourers too.
The issue with many areas of expertise at the moment is that we have lost sight of the need for any claim generated through intellectual thought or discourse to be tested against the real world, i.e. fact. And the need to show respect for both the messenger and the message.
Well done Willis. As one who has been slimed only a little at Deltoid, you give me heart.
Ken

February 28, 2011 3:32 pm

@Willis directly.
I was moved by your post to the point where there was something I was going to say to contradict your plea to drop anonymity in postings but on reflection, I feel compelled to say it anyway.
Like you I’ve been speaking my thoughts about the whole AGW thing for a number of years. Like you, my background talent is mathematics and I just knew modelling non-linear systems was simply idiotic, irrespective of the technology. It simply can’t be programmed.
In the beginning I used my real name. I wasn’t offensive or aggressive; I was just asking questions which didn’t have pat answers. What happened was threatening letters started appearing at my home. My home.
My home where my woman and my children live. Some of them were addressed to her, not me.
Thinking about it, I had three options; shut up, persist in commenting under my own name or go anonymous. I wasn’t going to be silenced but I would never put the ones I love in harm’s way just for my opinions.
I chose anonymity and will continue to do so. On balance, it was a liberating experience.
Pointman

Marcus
February 28, 2011 3:33 pm

What a lovely story. Good luck.

Jimbo
February 28, 2011 3:36 pm

WUWT would have had a harder time winning the 2011 best science Weblog award without your numerous contributions. As I said before when they attack YOU instead of your claims then you must realise that you are RIGHT OVER THE TARGET. Warmists have lost the scientific argument and have resorted to desperation and ever more shrill personal attacks. Sad!

John Whitman
February 28, 2011 3:40 pm

To all of the commenters on anonymity;

willis in main post
professor bob ryan says:
February 28, 2011 at 5:37 am
SunSword says:
February 28, 2011 at 6:01 am
Coldish says:
February 28, 2011 at 6:22 am
Alexander K says:
February 28, 2011 at 6:51 am
Roger Longstaff says:
February 28, 2011 at 6:59 am
Jeff Carlson says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:20 am
Nylo says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:25 am
Nano Pope says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:34 am
johanna says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:35 am
Joshua says:
February 28, 2011 at 8:22 am
1DandyTroll says:
February 28, 2011 at 8:41 am
Sonicfrog says:
February 28, 2011 at 9:05 am
Robert Clemenzi says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:02 am
JPeden says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:06 am
Myrrh says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:07 am
Blade says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:20 am
Mark says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:45 am
Philip Peake (aka PJP) says:
February 28, 2011 at 11:45 a
David L says:
February 28, 2011 at 12:23 pm

This anonymity topic has miles to go on many future threads before it sleeps. I enjoyed it.
I have always found discussion of ideas to be the most meaningful and enjoyable aspect of human life. I can not imagine not arguing openly in my own name everywhere with anyone. Great fun.
NOTE: But don’t bait the totalitarian dragon in its den. I was in P.R.C. recently. I consciously avoided walking up to conspicuous chinese secret police surveillance personnel and screaming “JASMINE”
John

Phil M2.
February 28, 2011 3:49 pm

This one made me smile Willis.
I’m sitting here on a sailboat with a box in the corner filled with vacuum pump various gauges and gases etc and a book on refrigeration which I have yet to read. I also have another box with a TIG welder and a book on welding which I need to master soon. I also had a book on carpentry and marine electrics/electronics but would consider myself a dab hand now.
You have had a very interesting life and I see now why I always find your posts so compelling. I never doubt that I can solve any problem that I set myself as well and always manage just fine. It is a state of mind that is sadly lacking in recent years.
Excellent article.

February 28, 2011 3:49 pm

@Willis.
I’ve just typed in a rather long comment which appears to have disappeared so here goes again from memory.
I was moved by the bravery and honesty of your post not to raise a dissenting voice but on reflection I’m going to do so. It’s about the anonymity thing.
Like yourself, I’ve been commenting for a number of years about AGW. Like you, my background is Math and I simply knew that non-linear systems simply can’t be modelled, irrespecive of the software or the power of the computer used.
I originally commented under my real name and essentially asked awkward questions. What happened was I started receiving threatening letters at my home. My home.
My home where my woman and my children lived. Some of the letters had been sent directly to my wife by the cowards. I had three choices; shut up, persist in commenting under my real name or go anonymous. I was never going to be intimidated but I was never going to put the people I love in harm’s way.
I went the anonymous route and have never regretted it. There’s a freedom there which I never abuse because it allows me to speak my mind totally freely.
Pointman

Hans H
February 28, 2011 3:52 pm

Many thanks to Anthony Watts, Willis Eschenbach and all the good commentators here. I thoroughly enjoy the time I spend at this website in the good, intelligent and
learned company you provide. I come here almost every day.

Jimbo
February 28, 2011 4:08 pm

Nano Pope says:
February 28, 2011 at 7:34 am
You have an amazing story and a great future as a scientist. I can’t really comment much on that though, but I would like to speak (as others have) about pseudonyms.
…………..I know that the dialogue can become higly vitriolic in online debates, but this is the main reason for pseudonyms, to seperate the arguments from the person. This has its downside, but the alternative is worse. Allowing only real names won’t encourage civility, it will encourage silence.

Agreed! Also some people who use pseudonyms might be climate scientists who are closet sceptics!!!!! People have their own reasons for doing what they do (protect innocent family members?) and IF WUWT insisted on people using their real names then WUWT, being the winner of the 2011 Weblog awards, might not have happened. I might be wrong though but please take this on board – silence is easy.
*There is a multi-billion Dollar machine out to crush sceptics. Trillions of Dollars are at stake in insurance profits, BBC pension funds, government taxes, biofuels……………………. I will use a pseudonym for the meantime as I am not oil funded.

February 28, 2011 4:10 pm

Willis,
What can I say apart from this is a classic post as it is always great to understand where someone has come from and the path that they have walked.
I read the story of your life, so far, from start to finish in one go and I am glad that I am not the only one who has trodden a crazy path.
At 13 I had already decided to join the Military to get out of where I lived and the crap we had. I was brought up in one of the poorest areas of Glasgow, Scotland.
In secondary school I was constantly first in class in all of my chosen subjects and my parents wanted me to go to university but I rebelled, being a rebel is more fun! They wanted me to go and study medicine but I declined and at 17 I legged it and joined the French Foreign Legion, it was more appealing than any stuffy university. I loved it and it taught me a lot about life, nationalities and how to interact with people.
I then joined the British Parachute Regiment, hey I liked guns! This again taught me a lot. I won’t go on any further with my career history as most don’t want nor need to know.
I used to be an adamant warmist, arghhh we are all gonna die type of person. This was after watching AL Gore speak that cost me 700 quid to attend; my table was way, way at the back! I went to see the clown after watching an inconvenient tax scam he he.
I was IQ tested by the Legion and I scored 20/20 in what is known as noveau generale. It didn’t allow you to score more than 20! I have completed Mensa and they state I am a poor 127, however it gets better.
I wrote my own code and produced my own model. I have now factored in the annual increase in my brain’s capacity to inhale brain farts at 0.5 degrees per annum and height increase of the average child at 4cm per year. I now have no fear of impending sea level rises as I will either be too tall for it to matter or hey, I can still build a boat! Please note that this model is only a prediction, but it is settled that my Science is correct and my coding skills are awesome, so don’t dare disagree or call me names. Deal with the Science and not me as a person!
My model “proves” that in only 16 years my IQ will usurp yours, so read it and weep!
I have not factored in the increased carbon taxation which will rob me of my income, so the boat might not be an option. I will just have to learn to swim a tad better, or learn how to steal the materials.
On a serious note.
I loved this post and thank you for being so honest and frank, it is so refreshing.
If you do come to the UK then forget England, Scotland is nicer and we are full of global warming, climate change, horizontal rain and snow when it closes the whole country and wind turbines are all shut down!
Our climate changes every ten minutes and even the weather people cannot predict what is going to happen. We always carry an umbrella, T-shirt, shorts, sun screen, snow shoes, sledge, few reindeer, spare socks, copy of hockey stick graph (just in case we meet a “denier”), spare boxer shorts and kilt just in case we poop our pants when we have sunshine and last but not least an outboard for my 3 litre V6 car!
I own a site that deals in statistics, real provable stats, not something made up or modelled. You can check the link on my name and this is the first time I have ever posted it here as I normally leave website field blank when posting a comment. The site deals with website analytics in real time, so what has this got to do with climate change?
Well if I can build a site to data capture real time site analytics then why is it not possible to create a medium for real time temperature analytics? This could be easily done whereby we have site members all recording data on termps in millions of locations, not just the stations used by the IPCC and they log the data.
I may not be a Scientist or a Gynaecologist but, I will have a good fraikin look!
Pete Laird
Head Numpty
To the spelling Police. If I have made any errors please remember that I did not ask you to pees (not a typo, don’t pees on my back and tell me it’s raining) review me!
If you don’t like my post then tough, as Achmed the dead terrorist says, Willis will keel your models!

Jim Barker
February 28, 2011 4:34 pm

Thank you, Willis.
Just one thought to some of the others. Free speech may be a right, but it can only be used in the open. You must acknowledge your own identity to use the right.
Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. John Milton

JimF
February 28, 2011 4:47 pm

Once more, Willis: BRAVO! When I first really got interested in opera I bought a series of inexpensive CDs put together by Luciano Pavarotti. One was titled “Showstoppers” in which he explained, in the cover notes, that sometimes a performance of an aria simply brings the house to a stop, as the patrons rise in acclamation and won’t sit until it is performed again. You’ve given us a showstopper here. And several times before.
As an aside, one of my close buddies when I was in grad school was a clerk in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals who – so he says, proudly – wrote judge Peckham’s infamous decision overturning the use of IQ tests in student placements. He of course was a “Marxist” and though a genius in some ways, had nothing to compare with your upbringing. If he had, I’m sure he would have taken a more sensible approach to this decision. But, bright folk raised with golden spoons in their mouths may, as on this occasion, make some pretty stupid but far-reaching conclusions. I haven’t seen him in a good while, but I believe he probably was a confidante and advisor to one B.H. Obama back in Chicago.
Best to you
Jim Finley

JAE
February 28, 2011 4:52 pm

WOW. Again.

Steve Atherton
February 28, 2011 5:17 pm

Interesting chronology. The man is pretty darn smart. I would also note that the original thinkers of the world who figured out the more basic relationships of natural science and mathematics were similarly motivated, and not formally educated as we would describe it today. A degree does not make you smart, it just shows you have passed a few tests and know some of the more accepted theories and constructs. I especially agree with the admonition that we have barely begun to understand climate, this is truly the beginning of the beginning.

Julian in Wales
February 28, 2011 5:19 pm

Surely scince is the application of common sense. To be good at it you need to have common sense and if you don’t have common sense no amount of qualifications will ever make you a scientist.
I speak as a non scientist.

Bulldust
February 28, 2011 5:20 pm

Thanks Willis.
BTW Bulldust is not really an anonymous tag … it is a real nickname and many people who don’t know my mundane name know me as Bulldust, including many folks in the US. My real name is so common that it would better serve as an anonymous handle… ironic.
I would like to consider myself somewhat of a generalist, but not in your league by many a country mile.

February 28, 2011 5:21 pm

Finally got to the end of the comments, Willis I have traveled a lot of the same roads, met many of the same type of people, changed jobs so often out of boredom, feeling constricted, or just expanding into new areas. Always to expand the diversity of knowledge and skills, to feed my curiosity of where it goes from here. Never sought the big bucks just the fastest learning rates, when choosing new jobs into areas I wanted to know more about.
Never worried about who knew who I was, but always wanted to keep the same ID so any valid ideas I did come up with would stay indexed to the same referenced name.
Truth will out in the end, I would prefer to keep all of the good eggs in the same basket. Good to read about others on parallel paths, (on ninth street), one mustn’t get muddy to fed pigs, nor to catch them, if the food can be used as a good lure.
If I could write half as well as you, this would be readable. Kudos on walking the walk, just because it is the only thing that gets you the right place at the right time to be able to do what needs to be done.
Props from another always broke but never poor, lost wanderer still finding his own way into the light of reason, in dark times.

Bob Highland
February 28, 2011 5:58 pm

What a great story. What a great life.
It is supremely ironic that bookstore shelves are cluttered with so many (ghost-written) autobiographies of half-talented showbiz folk to whom nothing much has happened, while real stories like your own, Willis, are lost forever unless they’re written down and shared.
So you don’t have a scroll with curlicued script that claims you’re an expert?
You don’t need one. You come from the School of Hard Knocks, followed by the University of Life, and I’m delighted to inform you that you have graduated Summa Cum Laude.
Arise, Doctor Eschenbach!

Lynn Clark
February 28, 2011 6:03 pm

Willis Eschenbach said: “Doesn’t matter if the person who made a scientific claim is a world-renowned expert or a semi-literate ditch digger.
* * * * *
Or an assistant patent examiner.
When I first started reading your essays, I found myself wondering, “Who is this guy?” and was frustrated that I couldn’t seem to find out. Thanks for lifting a corner of the tent a little.

mike g
February 28, 2011 6:18 pm

A
What do you think a book on refrigeration is?

H.R.
February 28, 2011 6:41 pm

Willis… a) I value your contributions and enjoy your style, and b) what SunSword said at 6:01 am.
My e-mail address works if there are ever any questions from Anthony or The Mods. There are a few people in a certain corporation (not climate related) who would be interested to know who I am. There are also a few loonies who would be a bit too interested. I believe I’m justifiably paranoid.
In the climate bloggin’ world, no one gives a rat’s patootie about who I am and I wouldn’t lose a nickel at my job over anything I’ve written here. People are always polite and answer me as best they can when I ask questions here. That’s why I like it here at WUWT.

Ali Baba
February 28, 2011 6:52 pm

“That’s the ultimate egalitarianism of science. ”
You’re not doing science. You’re annotating someone else’s science, appealing entirely to your own authority for its understanding. You are quite ridiculous.

1 8 9 10 11 12 15