Here’s that great story about Rock Hyrax urine as climate proxy you’ve always wanted to read.
From the University of Leicester news: Ancient urinary deposits provide a unique insight into Africa’s prehistoric climate change.
The Rock Hyrax is a remarkable animal. Native to dry, rocky environments throughout Africa, you would be forgiven for assuming that it is a large rodent, with its short legs, short neck, rounded ears and overall resemblance to a particularly large guinea pig or a coypu minus a tail.
And yet, in defiance of expectations, the creature’s nearest living relatives are elephants and manatees. This in itself should be enough to make any research involving Rock Hyraxes worth reading.
But these furry fellows have a distinctive behaviour which, by good fortune, enables climatologists to study the environmental history of rocky areas where traditional techniques – such as taking a core – are not viable. Rock Hyraxes, it seems, are very particular about where they urinate and defecate. They like specific locations underneath rocky overhangs and generation after generation of Hyraxes will use that same spot – called a midden – over and over again. For literally thousands of years.
Some of these middens can date back 30,000 years or more. That’s the Stone Age. That’s actually the Upper Palaeolithic period!
The urine crystallises and what you end up with is a block of solid, stratified material which provides the sort of historical record that is otherwise impossible to find in these dry, rocky parts of the world. Within the midden is a record of Hyrax metabolytes as well as particles which have passed undigested through their systems (and the occasional bit of organic material that just happened to get blown there). These can be accurately dated, giving an indication of how the vegetation – and hence the climate – has changed over the millenia. And that’s what some researchers in our Department of Geography are looking into.
Just to be completely unambiguous about this:
Geographers at the University of Leicester are studying the prehistoric climate of southern Africa by examining lumps of thousand-year-old crystallised wee from something that looks like a rat but is actually more closely related to the dugong.
How brilliant is that?
Dr Andrew Carr and Dr Arnoud Boom from Leicester are part of an international team led by Dr Brian Chase from the Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier. Funding for the research has been provided by the Leverhulme Trust and the European Research Council and papers on the topic have so far been published in Quaternary Research, in Geology and in the snappily named journal Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology.
Hyrax middens were first used by a South African palynologist named Louis Scott who naturally concentrated on their pollen content. The current team are the first scientists to study this extraordinary resource on a molecular level, examining animal metabolytes and plant biomarkers. Equipment at Leicester is being used to measure the bulk nitrogen and carbon isotope contents, and to identify individual plant and animal biomarkers. Colleagues in Belfast are able to accurately peg the age of a given sample using radiocarbon-dating techniques.

Hyraxes are common creatures; indeed in some areas they are considered pests. Their middens are however pretty smelly, and these ancient urinary deposits can be tricky to reach. Fortunately, Dr Chase is an experienced rock climber – that’s him in the picture equipped with angle-grinder and gas mask (cutting this stuff kicks up a lot of dust that you really don’t want to breathe in). Initially samples were knocked off with a hammer and chisel but once it was realised that cut and polished middens were finely laminated, more care was taken to extract neat samples using a micro-drill.
Paleaoenvironmental knowledge of southern Africa, which encompasses countries such as Botswana and Namibia, has always been very fragmentary and largely reliant on ocean core records. The data from the Hyrax middens open up a whole new realm of research into how some of these dynamic environments have changed over 30,000 years or so. The next step is to compare this data with established models of climate change.
Rock Hyraxes have always been interesting to anyone with a fascination for zoology, not least because of their elephantine link which is a staple of ‘interesting animal facts’-type books. But their excretory habits, or rather the potential use of what they excrete, is now raising them to a whole new level of interest.
- University press release
- The potential of plant biomarker evidence derived from rock hyrax middens as an indicator of palaeoenvironmental change. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.11.029
Perhaps I need to explain in more detail post I just made:
Renown australian solar scientist Dr. K.G. McCracken from the Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, in 2007 published paper:
Changes in the cosmic ray and heliomagnetic components of space climate, 1428–2005, including the variable occurrence of solar energetic particle events
McCracken 2007 paper
Major result of McCracken investigation based on 10Be dating is:
the estimated annual average heliospheric magnetic field strength near Earth, 1428–2005, based on the inter-calibrated cosmic ray record as shown in Fig. 2 on p. 1073 (4 of 8).
Initially, I compared his results to CET (Central England temperature) anomaly and got a rather a surprising correlation all the way up to 1950:
CET-McC
According to the prevailing science two variables should not be strongly correlated, and that is confirmed by post 1950 data, which is based on space measurements. However, the heliospheric magnetic field strength is closely correlated to the sunspont count number.
Since the CETs are also correlated to another indicator (North Atlantic Precursor – NAP, on which I am currently working and will have more to say in the near future), it is of some interest that McCracken data (which in final analysis is only inverted 10Be record, adjusted for geomagnetic dipole variation), contains as a strong component as shown in my calculations of the NAP, result of physical processes not related directly or as after fact of the galactic cosmic rays..
If this component is taken out with couple of dating uncertainties ‘corrected’ than we find that McCracken data now makes perfectly good sense, which originally did not.
SSN-McC
Consequence is serious: radioactive isotopes dating calculations need reassessment.
Very interesting!!
Can’t wait to see the results
I wonder if they can do the same for guano deposits and cesspits in human settlements.
this story reminds me of the lady anthropologist who went into a cave in the eastern United States (Kentucky, I believe) that had been a huge tourist attraction for almost 100 years, but nobody had noticed the human stools laying petrified along the cave walls. She found them, with a flashlight, and began examining them. Her research completely changed our picture of Stone Age Americans – their diet was completely different than previously believed, and lots of assumptions had been made on the basis of those previous assumptions. So the whole picture of prehistoric Americans changed because of a curious lady with a flashlight.
Whenever you think you know something, you better think again.
Well, Gareth, excavations in York have uncovered a fair amount of Viking faeces, so these may well be able to provide us with some insight into the MWP.
Juanita,
and then they discovered partially digested MacDonalds fries in the stools and decided that all those tourists were just being nasty.
I wonder if taxpayers’ hard earned money has been used to fund this piss-taking?
The question is how is Michael Mann going to turn rodent urine upside down?
Now this is what you call SCIENCE!!!! Hope they don’t find a computer program for it and stop all this healthy outdoor recreation. Serious, now isn’t this more interesting than tweeking some stupid computer program and pumping in a bunch of meaningless data and guessing what the climate in 2110 is going to be like? If someone says they’re a scientist and doesn’t have a tan, don’t believe them.
Thank you so much for this I haven’t laughed so much in a long time. Some of the comments then set me off again.
What do you tell your kids when they ask what you do at work/or can you please come into school to tell my class what you study?
As to what it could tell us of the ancient climate that won’t be as much fun!
vukcevic says:
October 13, 2010 at 7:56 am
Initially, I compared his results to CET (Central England temperature) anomaly and got a rather a surprising correlation all the way up to 1950:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/CET-McC.htm
“It’s the Sun…” then?
Your observation relates with the fact that when a “designated” (“we” love giving names) field changes it affects the other “designated” fields, as in the general equation of gases PV=nRT, where an increase in “temperature” (other fabulous “name”)decreases “density” (gravity in the end), and where interactions among these “designated” fields are intimately related among them, so as electricity with magnetism=90 degrees apart (Oersted law) and with Gravity= 180 degrees apart. Thus we should observed which “field” changed the first to know the “suspect”, as I think:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/10/13/klotzbach-and-gray-final-2010-two-week-hurricane-forecast/#comment-506296
PMSL…. :-))
juanita says: “…the whole picture of prehistoric Americans changed because of a curious lady with a flashlight.”
Was that implement a coprolight?
I wonder if they’ll find a medieval warm piss period?
I believe packrat middens were examined as a part of the environmental impact statement done for the Nuculear Waste Site.
Bless anyone who actually goes out into the field to collect data. We need more Johnny Number 5s and less CRU hall lurkers who are afraid of being seen in the sunlight.
INGSOC…
“It was one of Wilde’s”
Let’s hope the researchers don’t also discover that the poor hyraxes (or “hyraces.” Really, I looked it up!) also had a dose of the clap.
Have they produced any insights yet into what were the physical conditions/climate changes over that time?
If the urine cores show great variations, they also show the adaptability of the Rock Hyrax. The fact that they stay in one place long enough to have mineralized urine deposits suggests that things have stayed pretty much the same.
Scatology is not necessarily a joke. I think it is quite marvelous that science knows so much about the Rock Hyrax – whether or not its pee can tell us anything about climate.
These are not “proxies” but historical data:
“Precipitation variations of Longxi, northeast margin of Tibetan plateau since
AD 960 and its relationship with solar activity”
L. Tan , Y. Cai , L. Yi , Z. An , and L. Ai
http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/3/1037/2007/cpd-3-1037-2007.pdf
Anthony,
I haven’t laughed so hard in a while. The “pseudo-rodent piss” line was great!
I can see the paper title now, Piss off of Habitual Rodents Related to Elephants Vindicate Money Pissed Away in Tree Ring Studies. It will be difficult however to provide absolute confirmation of the Hockey Stick Graph since the Piss tends to flow downhill and find the lowest level. However, implementation of the “trick” will allow for multiple proxies to be spliced together. This will become problematic at the interface between the Piss and Rings. Adequate isolation will be needed possibly using deleted emails since by definition they are disposable.
“Palynologist”? I would have thought that was like the guy who moved into the house next to the ex-Alaskan Gov in order to do research for a book.
Enneagram says: October 13, 2010 at 8:49 am
…………..
Not with that particular correlation, 10Be data is only accurate since 1960s when satellite observations become available (and subsequent CET correlation fails), prior to then McCracken’s results needs correction
, as I have done for the Dalton minimum
Of course in everything there is a bit of alphabet soup: SSN, GCR, 10Be, C14, GMF, g (for gravity) etc, but also NAP.
To the authors of this “research”.
On my last fishing trip in Canadian wilderness, I’ve discovered old, abandoned cabin with the s..t house nearby. Because the location is only accessible by a float plane, I’m sure that the s..t is in undisturbed and pristine condition, thus can be used as proxy for temperature reconstruction ( I did not see any Stevenson’s screens in the area )
Fell free to use this info on the application for your next research grant
If you can assume that no researcher is going to put his name in the public arena for spelunking around inside a small animal’s toilet unless he really thinks there’s something to be learned, then I’ll give these folks the benefit of the doubt.
As long as they don’t try to come back and tell us that the hyrax changed its elimination habits since 1960 and they’re going to have to use kitty litter for the last fifty years instead…
This is really interesting research; more power to the adventurous Dr. Chase. What could be more welcome than new paleo-climatic and biological data from an area of the world where such information is scarce?
It is really a shame to couple this basic science to the politically-contentious debate over ‘climate change’. For one thing it leads otherwise rational folks to disparage the whole project with snarky comments and complaints about possible taxpayer funding. Lord knows there are many less worthy studies that our tax dollars are enabling!
Whether or not it happened here, it is perhaps more of a shame that researchers studying ancient environments have to make their work relevant to GCMs in order to get funding.
/Mr Lynn
This is not new. Packrat middens have been studied for decades in the US desert Southwest and hyrax middens have also been previously studied.
See the web page below for discussions of these studies and references to previous packrat and hyrax midden studies.
http://gec.cr.usgs.gov/data/midden/