From Fox News:
Sean Hannity will have a special report:
Controlling your carbon footprint has become a global fad, but is it all just a con job? And how much green is it costing you? Sean investigates the truth behind the billion dollar industry!
9PM Eastern, 6PM Pacific, repeated 3 hours later on the same channel.
Channel 360 on DirecTV, 205 on Dish Network, check your local cable and satellite listings.
Sponsored IT training links:
We offer guaranteed 70-680 study materials including 646-205 questions and answers to help you competently prepare for 642-813 exams.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Anyone finds this online (youtube, newsgroups, torrent), please let us know!
Thanx from the peeps outside the US without access to US tv.
Regards,
Wijnand
As far as the UK is concerned, the GW appear to be over and on the way down for at least a decade to come.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/CETnd.htm
thanks for the heads up Anthony, I’ll be there………
I kind of wish this wasn’t being done by Hannity. He’s seen as a whack-job by everyone I know, and will not be helpful for the cause.
In Massachusetts, most people will feel that if Hannity says it’s false?…it MUST be true. They won’t even watch the show.
JimB
Wijnand says:
August 27, 2010 at 2:08 pm
On http://www.foxnews.com , after the program has been transmitted.
OMG! Hannity is actually going to investigate something?! Where in the world did he find the time?
I am with JimB in cringing. Sean is not well known for his logical arguments.
It was a billion dollar industry many years ago.
Thanx a million Enneagram!
JimB – What do you expect from a populace who repeatedly send the likes of Frank , Markey and Kerry to Washington ?
JimB says:
August 27, 2010 at 2:24 pm
I agree there. The FoxNews coverage, especially from Beck, on CAGW tends to reduce the scepticism and increase the anger of the liberal people I know.
-Scott
JimB
August 27, 2010 at 2:24 pm
Most people who think Hannity is a whack-job are themselves are a little off themselves. He might be a bit of a meat-head, but hes least honest, and is defiantly smarter then any lying liberal newscaster that the Hannity haters love so much.
oops thats what I get for trying to cram in a post while on break…
… at least he is honest …
OY
yeah hannity is wackjob but occasionally a speck of truth gets through on these shows
and i don’t have tv but i will take a look once it’s online…i hope it’s worth watching!
i suppose i shouln’t hold my breath for “war, the great swindle”, and “debt money, the greatest swindle!”
Well –
some friends are worse for you than the worst enemy can ever be.
Beware Sean Hannity, I say.
I’d rather wear a pullover knit from barbed wire than get associated with him.
Well for us out here in Clinger country we’ll bee watchin’. Ah’l be cleanin’ the squirrel
rifle and ma will be puttin’ a possum roast in the cookstove.
Sarc/off.
Yes it’s Hannity, but I don’t expect Olbermann or Crissy Matthews to even attempt this.
It will get it out in to the general public. Good for him…
“”” JimB says:
August 27, 2010 at 2:24 pm
I kind of wish this wasn’t being done by Hannity. He’s seen as a whack-job by everyone I know, and will not be helpful for the cause.
In Massachusetts, most people will feel that if Hannity says it’s false?…it MUST be true. They won’t even watch the show.
JimB I presume that the people in Massachussetts don’t think Jean Kerrie is; how you say it; a Whack job ?
Hannity is no whack job; not by a long way; but his voice is quite a bit of an irritant. I don’t listen to him for that reason; and fortunately I can’t pick up his T&V show.
I have at times listened to that whole spectrum of radio personalities; and unfortunately; there really isn’t one of them who gets to the crux of the story. Most of them are from the modern generation who bypassed learning problem solving skills at school.
And I gave up a long time ago trying to educate them. Some of them are far more capable of obfuscation, than revelation, and they don’t seem to know the difference. But they have the microphone; and if they just stimulate one person to think for themselves, it is probably a step forward.
Well one purpose that Hannity fills is to be a lightning rod for the venom from all the people who are sleepless at nights over the TEA Party phenomenon.
Try as the might; they can’t unearth any villains among the tea partiers; who are just ordinary folks who feel they are taxed enough already; for whatever unconstitutional reason their representatives want to reach deeper into their pockets.
So they need a focal point to lash out at. Last election season they found Sarah Palin, and her designer glasses; good enough to go off on. So now they have a DB named Levi to keep up the needling. Anyone notice the strategy; in debating 101 textbooks it is called the ad hominem attack; and it is guaranteed to lose you more debating points than the strawman argument.
So SH has a stainless steel hide so he can take it; and he gets his kicks from taking it from those who can dish it out, but don’t want to put their own heads up to collect the response. So pay no attetion to that man behind the curtain; he’s just the place to clean your boots on.
Unfortunately, Hannity is too stupid to do this right. He’ll make it a political slugfest not an open examination of the statistical basis for the global warming statements he’s attempting to refute.
Oh, come on. ALL of the media are “Whack-Jobs”. It is that simple fact that things are as screwed up with the “MSM” as we see today. If those “leftist” are evil and wrong, then the “rightist” are guilty of the same. If you asked ANY of these guys (Inhofe, Boehne, Hannity, etc) what a strip bark, or a pine-cone proxy was, you would be embarrassed. They are the same POLITICIANS that Markey, Boxer and Kerry. They do not know anything. Yes, Markey, Boxer and Kerry should be removed, not for their position in the past, but for the same thing that we deplore of the current NAS and other “clubs” that seem to be under the impression that they can not be wrong.
More of these silly reports will come out in the future, not because of any form of journalism, just that they are ethical wrong, and the “greenpeace types” so over-extended their capability.
Hannity…
Sometimes it’s the cracked ones that let in the light.
Of course, here in Canuckistan, we don’t get Fox News… Might upset the social order.
By the way, up here we got a few feet of snow above 5000 feet last night. I think this will be remembered as a “recovery summer” for other reasons than intended.
Good. All of the people viewing who don’t normally pay any attention to this blobal-warming and black-carbon-footprints will get of a view, on MSM no doubt, of what this is really all about: their pocketbook.
LOL! People calling Hannity a whack job re-elect the likes of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry over and over and over.
Gee, if only MSNBC would do a GW special; that would surely make the lefties happy in Taxxachusetts and the dozen or so people that actually watch MSNBC.
Scott says: “I agree there. The FoxNews coverage, especially from Beck, on CAGW tends to reduce the scepticism and increase the anger of the liberal people I know.”
Liberals have mostly already drunk the Kook-Aid.
Scott, too late, the left made it a political slugfest a long time ago.
Hannity has the second highest rated cable news show, I don’t think he’ll listen to any of you guys telling him he’s doing it wrong………..and obviously most of the cable news viewers won’t either.
Hannity’s rating is higher than the other three stations (CNN, MSNBC, HLN) added together.
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/