By Erika Engelhaupt
None of the scientists in the room so much as blinked when David Keith suggested saving the world with spy planes spraying sulfuric acid.
Keith, a physicist at the University of Calgary in Canada, was facing an audience not likely to be shocked: nearly 200 other researchers, some of whom had their own radical ideas for fighting global warming. His concept was to spray a mist of sulfuric acid high in the stratosphere to form particles called sulfate aerosols, which would act like a sprinkling of tiny sunshades for the overheating Earth.
Keith’s idea may sound outrageous, but it is just one of many proposals for bumping the global thermostat down a couple of degrees by tinkering directly with the planet’s heating and cooling systems. Plans to cool the Earth range from shading it to fertilizing it, from seeding clouds to building massive supersuckers that filter greenhouse gases from the air. The schemes are all part of a growing field known as geoengineering: a subject once taboo for all but the scientific fringe, but now beginning to go mainstream.
So far the tinkering happens mainly in computer models, where researchers are trying to figure out geoengineering’s potential side effects. Yet some technologies are in the prototype stage, governments are starting to consider geoengineering seriously and budding geoengineers are working out how to proceed safely, and ethically, with real-world experiments.
“It truly is asking giant questions which nobody really knows the answers to,” Keith says — “like how we manage the whole Earth.”
In March, Keith and other experts met in a dimly lit chapel-turned-auditorium at the Asilomar resort near Monterey, Calif. In 1975, molecular biologists met at the same resort to write landmark guidelines to regulate DNA experiments. This time around, cloud physicists, legal scholars and government bureaucrats debated the relative merits of brightening clouds versus building artificial trees. In the end, the meeting-goers concluded that geoengineering research should cautiously proceed, in case Earth’s climate proves broken beyond the current means of repair: ratcheting down fossil fuel use.
Researchers have kicked around the idea of large-scale climate manipulation since at least the 1960s, when Soviet scientists suggested damming the Bering Strait as part of a scheme to warm Siberia and free shipping lanes of sea ice. But mainstream scientific attention began only about five years ago.
===================
read the rest at Science News Engineering a cooler Earth
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Jimbo says:
@May 31, 2010 at 9:24 am
@May 31, 2010 at 9:28 am
@May 31, 2010 at 9:56 am
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/15/hey-dude-where%E2%80%99s-my-solar-ramp-up/#comment-391414
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/30/the-fix-is-in/#comment-400848
@ur momisugly Jimbo says:
May 31, 2010 at 9:24 am
“Finally, do you agree with spraying “sulfuric acid high in the stratosphere” to help cool the Earth’s?”
you don`t believe that poop do you?
“…manage the planet” – Scary. In my experience a lot of the time “manage” means that someone with no understanding of a system starts setting targets which other people are expected to achieve at all costs, the result being gradual breakdown and failure of the system.
Please tell me these are college students being led on a brainstorm by some greeny wombat, I think real engineers are smarter than that.
BTW, aren’t we continuously being told that one of the main problems from increased atmospheric CO2 is ocean acidification? Now they want to pump suphuric acid into the system?
@Jimbo says:
May 31, 2010 at 10:14 am
“1810 to 1819 is regarded by scientists as the coldest on record for the past 500 years”
1810 to 1819 was 8.798°C yearly average on CET, 1688 to 1697 was 8.1°C yearly average, I wouldn`t regard them as scientists.
Fuuny how there was pretty skies from Krakatoa, but no cooling. With Laki, if you really knew the reason for 1783/4 winter being so cold, you would then begin to appreciate why 1784 summer was cool. El Chichon do much to cool the planet then?
I didn’t note mention of any real engineers in the group. It seems this new engineering is one of those “how-hard-can-it-be?” Scenarios of “scientists”. To contemplate such hazardly craziness and not go for nuclear energy to deal with their CO2 concerns is ridiculous. I know, I know. Many readers here, let alone the attitude of the socialist leaning blogs, fear this option because of the potential evil uses and radioactive waste problems. However,1) the genie is alresady out of the bottle 2)do we want to let the nutbars get better at this than we are? 3)engineering what to do with N waste is more readily solvable (heck shoot the stuff out on a million year journey like voyager 10 and 11)than knitting a blanket for Antarctia and G-land or spraying.acid in the stratosphere. For the latter the best alt. Is to turn off the SO2 scrubbers from coal-fired elect plants! And finally, 4) were going to go nuclear anyway eventually. We’ve wasted so much time and money.
Ulric –
Agreed. I don’t see any warming either in GISS or HadCrut in 1884.
(Of course, NO idea how reliable those old records may be.)
… spraying sulfuric acid into the upper atmosphere…
Have any of these dummies ever heard the phrase :
“What goes up, must come down.” ?!
Save us from ourselves…
Somebody.
Anybody.
Please !