Here is just one more indication that despite what some would like you to believe, the MWP was not a regional “non event”.

From a University of Arizona press release,
Giant Sequoias Yield Longest Fire History from Tree Rings
California’s western Sierra Nevada had more frequent fires between 800 and 1300 than at any time in the past 3,000 years, according to a new study led by Thomas W. Swetnam, director of UA’s Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.

A 3,000-year record from 52 of the world’s oldest trees shows that California’s western Sierra Nevada was droughty and often fiery from 800 to 1300, according to a new study led by University of Arizona researchers.
Scientists reconstructed the 3,000-year history of fire by dating fire scars on ancient giant sequoia trees, Sequoiadendron giganteum, in the Giant Forest of Sequoia National Park. Individual giant sequoias can live more than 3,000 years.
“It’s the longest tree-ring fire history in the world, and it’s from this amazing place with these amazing trees.” said lead author Thomas W. Swetnam of the UA. “This is an epic collection of tree rings.”
The new research extends Swetnam’s previous tree-ring fire history for giant sequoias another 1,000 years into the past. In addition, he and his colleagues used tree-ring records from other species of trees to reconstruct the region’s past climate.
The scientists found the years from 800 to 1300, known as the Medieval Warm Period, had the most frequent fires in the 3,000 years studied. Other research has found that the period from 800 to 1300 was warm and dry.
“What’s not so well known about the Medieval Warm Period is how warm it was in the western U.S.,” Swetnam said. “This is one line of evidence that it was very fiery on the western slopes of the Sierra Nevada – and there’s a very strong relationship between drought and fire.”
Droughts are typically both warm and dry, he added.
Knowing how giant sequoia trees responded to a 500-year warm spell in the past is important because scientists predict that climate change will probably subject the trees to such a warm, dry environment again, said Swetnam, a UA professor of dendrochronology and director of UA’s Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.
During the Medieval Warm Period extensive fires burned through parts of the Giant Forest at intervals of about 3 to 10 years, he said. Any individual tree was probably in a fire about every 10 to 15 years.
The team also compared charcoal deposits in boggy meadows within the groves to the tree-ring fire history. The chronology of charcoal deposits closely matches the tree-ring chronology of fire scars.
The health of the giant sequoia forests seems to require those frequent, low-intensity fires, Swetnam said. He added that as the climate warms, carefully reintroducing low-intensity fires at frequencies similar to those of the Medieval Warm Period may be crucial for the survival of those magnificent forests, such as those in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.
Since 1860, human activity has greatly reduced the extent of fires. He and his colleagues commend the National Park Service for its recent work reintroducing fire into the giant sequoia groves.
The team’s report, “Multi-Millennial Fire History of the Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park, California, USA,” was published in the electronic journal Fire Ecology in February. A complete list of authors and funding sources is at the bottom of this story.
To study tree rings, researchers generally take a pencil-sized core from a tree. The oldest rings are those closest to the center of the tree. However, ancient giant sequoias can have trunks that are 30 feet in diameter – far too big to be sampled using even the longest coring tools, which are only three feet long.
To gather samples from the Giant Forest trees, the researchers were allowed to collect cross-sections of downed logs and standing dead trees, he said. It turned out to be a gargantuan undertaking that required many people and many field seasons.
“We were sampling with the largest chain saws we could find – a chain-saw bar of seven feet,” he said. “We were hauling these slabs of wood two meters on a side as far as two kilometers to the road. We were using wheeled litters – the emergency rescue equipment for people – and put a couple hundred pounds on them.”
To develop a separate chronology for past fires, co-authors R. Scott Anderson and Douglas J. Hallett looked for charcoal in sediment cores taken from meadows within the sequoia groves.
“We can compare the charcoal and tree-ring fire records. It confirms that the charcoal is a good indicator of past fires,” Swetnam said.
Such charcoal-based fire histories can extend much further into the past than most tree-ring-based fire histories, he said. The charcoal history of fire in the giant sequoia groves extends back more than 8,000 years.
Increasingly, researchers all over the world are using charcoal to reconstruct fire histories, Swetnam said. Many scientists are analyzing the global record of charcoal to study relationships between climate, fire and the resulting addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Swetnam’s co-authors are Christopher H. Baisan and Ramzi Touchan of the University of Arizona; Anthony C. Caprio of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks in Three Rivers, Calif.; Peter M. Brown of the Rocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research and Colorado State University in Fort Collins; R. Scott Anderson of Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff; and Douglas J. Hallett of the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada.
The National Park Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, Mountain Home Demonstration State Forest and Calaveras Big Trees State Park provided funding.
h/t to Dr. Leif Svalgaard
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Here are a few links about the global nature of the Meieval Warm Period. If it was global then it smashes the hockey stick and means the Earth does what it likes when it likes.
http://www.si.edu/about/documents/testimony_Soon_7-29-03.pdf
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/archive/pr0310.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/291/5508/1497
http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html
http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st279?pg=6
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/fraudulent-hockey-sticks-and-hidden-data/
http://tinyurl.com/ye4y73x
http://www.mnh.si.edu/vikings/voyage/subset/vinland/archeo.html
http://www.welt.de/print-welt/article177591/Steinzeitliche_Handelswege.html
http://climateaudit.org/2005/11/18/archaeological-finds-in-retreating-swiss-glacier/
This is exactly, what the global warming theory predicts…?
I know Three Rivers quite well as my brother and mother lived there for many years. Anyone who has been into the park and seen these incredibly large, ancient trees close up could not help but come away humbled and more than a bit awestruck. It’s comforting to know those magnificent forests can survive harsh changes in climate.
Those tree rings provide pretty hard evidence that the MWP extended at least as far as the western USA. Evidence that’s hard to refute, I should think.
I wonder what those same rings would say about temperatures over the past 25-30 centuries?
I wonder if it is possible to calibrate other long living trees like the bristle-cone pine with the sequoia.
Does anybody know if the sequoia tree diverges like bristle-cone pine trees do with respect to recent ground-based temperature readings, say for the past 30-year period?
The Ents are moving.
===========
“…carefully reintroducing low-intensity fires at frequencies similar to those of the Medieval Warm Period may be crucial for the survival of those magnificent forests, such as those in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.”
Yet the alarmists would blame more frequent fires in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks on global warming. I am all too aware that some plant species do better after they have been subjected to fire and some species are dependent on fire occuring at some time in their life cycles.
“America’s most-cherished legacy tree, the giant Sequoia, is known as a “fire-dependent” species because it requires the heat effects of fire in order to prepare the soil and release the seeds of the next generation of sequoias.”
http://www.fireecology.org/research/USFS_fire_dependent.html
More here:
http://www.nifc.gov/preved/comm_guide/wildfire/fire_6.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1016/is_2_108/ai_89023208/
I should have said:
“Yet the alarmists would blame more frequent fires in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks on man made global warming.”
Happy st. Patrick’s day all!
I must say that I believe the temperature record has been perverted for twisted anti-human reasons and considering the damage the aforementioned has done we should all be delighted that, our expense, the likes of the UN’s carbon-trading mastermind; the haggard Dr. Graciela “my head looked vaguely human until I had it horrifically cut up in bits at your expense” Cichilnisky had loads of our cash with which to deform their faces.
http://images.google.ie/images?um=1&hl=en&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=graciela+chichilnisky&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&start=0
Why grow old gracefully when you can spend other’s money making you look like something out of a horror movie?
Kim,
Perhaps the Kings Canyon National Parks is where the Entwives were lost.
But how did they know which trees were the “fire detector trees”? We know from the most famous tree ring studies that some trees are “temperature trees” and others are not. Researchers had to cull through thousands of tree ring records to find those 10 or 12 temperature trees that produced the hockey stick. Apparently, toward the end of the 20th century there were no longer ANY temperature trees. How can finding “fire detector trees” be so simple?
(I’ll save Andrew the trouble here and mark my comments as “sarcasm”)
They are not really thicker rings, nor is there any evidence of fire damage, after the data is adjusted it is quite clear that nothing happened until 1968.
Fascinating. Those trees are just magnificent.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
The odd thing is the periodicity of the fires, every 3-10 years for an average around 7. It’s also interesting that the EAST coast has intense rain and snow precipitation about every 7 years. So while the west coast dries out and burns up, the east coast gets dumped on and digs out. At least we have an idea where all that moisture went during the drought. At least one climate scientist, Judith Curry, understands its important to understand the ocean cycle’s affect on climate and weather.
The normal weather regime for California is wet winters and dry summers. Fires, by themselves are not an indication of drought. They could indicate an unusual amount of lightning. Even during wet years, summer lightning will cause significant fires. I am always a bit suspicious of the Hot-Dry / Cold-Wet view of weather and reports that try to support it. The usual pattern as indicated by the palaeoclimatological record, is Hot-Wet / Cold-Dry. But California, being a western coast, has a unique climate pattern. I would be interested in finding out what the evidence is for unusual drought conditions. Can anyone help educate me?
I thought that the AGW dogma wrote the MWP off as a northern hemisphere issue, not just a “regional” issue. If that is the case, then showing American data with a MWP doesn’t touch this claim. Am I wrong somewhere?
How would one region of the earth remain perpetually MUCH warmer than the rest for Centuries? Bulls..t!
Evidence of regional cooling during the MWP.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1755-1315/6/3/032013/pdf/ees9_6_032013.pdf?ejredirect=migration
If oxygen isotopes fractionate in the low energy processes when water evaporates, as is alleged, maybe carbon isotopes fractionate in the high energy processes of charcoal formation. Any references known?
4 billion (18:27:31) :
Evidence of regional cooling during the MWP.
“Medieval Warm Period Record of the Week
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data published by 811 individual scientists from 483 separate research institutions in 43 different countries … and counting! This issue’s Medieval Warm Period Record of the Week comes from Southwest Greenland. To access the entire Medieval Warm Period Project’s database, click here.”
http://co2science.org/
is anyone else to the point where seeing the hockey stick makes you nauseated?
Come on people now!!!!!!!
Human beings have been living in the Sierras for 10,000+ years. It is well-known and well-documented that human beings everywhere and in CA, too, set fires to modify the landscape for survival purposes. I venture that EVERY fire scar Swetnam et al looked is from an anthropogenic fire!!!!
Do you blame car accidents on climate change????? Number of baseball games?????
This is a human-mediated, human-caused phenomenon being investigated. It has nothing, zero, nada to do with climate. Sorry all you desperately seeking Medieval Warm Period evidence folks — this ain’t it.
The article says, “Since 1860, human activity has greatly reduced the extent of fires.” That’s just backasswards. Human activity, i.e. anthropogenic fire, has declined ever since those responsible for setting the fires were wiped out by Old World diseases and Euro-American invaders.
The Americas were not devoid of people when Columbus landed. Even he didn’t claim that. It is thought that ~50,000,000 humans lived in the Americas in 1492. Many were in CA, and like people everywhere, they controlled the fire regimes.
Look, I know it’s not what you were taught in the horrifically bad public school you attended. But it’s a fact, nonetheless. Setting fire is as much a part of being human as opposable thumbs. Chances are fires have been annual in the Sierras for thousands of years. Swetnam is a deluded racist historical revisionist cultural bigot crappy scientist if he doesn’t think that’s so.
Come on folks. Leif, tell ’em. You can’t take an anthropogenically caused phenomenon and detect micro climate change in it. That’s goofy. I’m not saying there was no MWP. All I’m saying is fire scars in a human-mediated cultural landscape are not climate proxies!!!!!!!!!
4 billion (18:27:31) :
The MWP was not warm the entire time.
Looking at the smoothed graph it would appear that it was. Do you know what smoothing is?
The raw data shows temps were up and down during those years.
But the data also shows the warm years were much warmer than warm years now in this two past decades—supposedly the warmest decades on the last 1000 years.
“Even less confidence can be placed in the original conclusions by Mann et al. (1999) that “the 1990s are likely the warmest decade, and 1998 the warmest year, in at least a millennium …””
Ian 18:04:30
Cherchez les femmes.
==========
Ian McLeod (17:55:06)
“I wonder if it is possible to calibrate other long living trees like the bristle-cone pine with the sequoia.”
Someone who knows more than me about this may correct me but…….As I understand it, bristle-cones are strip bark trees and cannot be used as temperature proxies because of the way they grow. They do not grow in concentric circles. One area will die and cause growth favorably in another area. That is why the trunk cross sections are so oddly shaped. There are simply to many covariants to tease a temperature signal out.
Kim…lol…double entendre