This is not the sort of op-ed we are used to seeing in the Washington Post. But I found it funny nonetheless. – Anthony

With Al Due Respect, We’re Doomed
By Dana Milbank, Washington Post
Thursday, January 29, 2009; Page A03
The lawmakers gazed in awe at the figure before them. The Goracle had seen the future, and he had come to tell them about it.
What the Goracle saw in the future was not good: temperature changes that “would bring a screeching halt to human civilization and threaten the fabric of life everywhere on the Earth — and this is within this century, if we don’t change.”
The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry (D-Mass.), appealed to hear more of the Goracle’s premonitions. “Share with us, if you would, sort of the immediate vision that you see in this transformative process as we move to this new economy,” he beseeched.
“Geothermal energy,” the Goracle prophesied. “This has great potential; it is not very far off.”
Another lawmaker asked about the future of nuclear power. “I have grown skeptical about the degree to which it will expand,” the Goracle spoke.
A third asked the legislative future — and here the Goracle spoke in riddle. “The road to Copenhagen has three steps to it,” he said.
Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho) begged the Goracle to look further into the future. “What does your modeling tell you about how long we’re going to be around as a species?” he inquired.
The Goracle chuckled. “I don’t claim the expertise to answer a question like that, Senator.”
It was a jarring reminder that the Goracle is, indeed, mortal. Once Al Gore was a mere vice president, but now he is a Nobel laureate and climate-change prophet. He repeats phrases such as “unified national smart grid” the way he once did “no controlling legal authority” — and the ridicule has been replaced by worship, even by his political foes.
“Tennessee,” gushed Sen. Bob Corker, a Republican from Gore’s home state, “has a legacy of having people here in the Senate and in public service that have been of major consequence and contributed in a major way to the public debate, and you no doubt have helped build that legacy.” If that wasn’t quite enough, Corker added: “Very much enjoyed your sense of humor, too.”
Humor? From Al Gore? “I benefit from low expectations,” he replied.
The Goracle’s powers seem to come from his ability to scare the bejesus out of people. “We must face up to this urgent and unprecedented threat to the existence of our civilization,” he said. And: “This is the most serious challenge the world has ever faced.” And: It “could completely end human civilization, and it is rushing at us with such speed and force.”
Though some lawmakers tangled with Gore on his last visit to Capitol Hill, none did on the Foreign Relations Committee yesterday. Dick Lugar (Ind.), the ranking Republican, agreed that there will be “an almost existential impact” from the climate changes Gore described.
As such, the Goracle, even when questioned, was shown great deference. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), challenging Gore over spent nuclear fuel, began by saying: “I stand to be corrected, and I defer to your position, you’re probably right, and I’m probably wrong.” He ended his question by saying: “I’m not questioning you; I’m questioning myself.”
Others sought to buy the Goracle’s favor by offering him gifts. “Thank you for your incredible leadership; you make this crystalline for those who don’t either understand it or want to understand it,” gushed Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), who went on to ask: “Will you join me this summer at the Jersey Shore?”
The chairman worried that the Goracle may have been offended by “naysayers” who thought it funny that Gore’s testimony before the committee came on a morning after a snow-and-ice storm in the capital. “The little snow in Washington does nothing to diminish the reality of the crisis,” Kerry said at the start of the hearing.
The climate was well controlled inside the hearing room, although Gore, suffering from a case of personal climate change, perspired heavily during his testimony. The Goracle presented the latest version of his climate-change slide show to the senators: a globe with yellow and red blotches, a house falling into water, and ones with obscure titles such as “Warming Impacts Ugandan Coffee Growing Region.” At one point he flashed a biblical passage on the screen, but he quickly removed it. “I’m not proselytizing,” he explained. A graphic showing a disappearing rain forest was accompanied by construction noises.
The Goracle supplied abundant metaphors to accompany his visuals. Oil demand: “This roller coaster is headed for a crash, and we’re in the front car.” Polar ice: “Like a beating heart, and the permanent ice looks almost like blood spilling out of a body along the eastern coast of Greenland.”
The lawmakers joined in. “There are a lot of ways to skin a cat,” contributed Isakson, who is unlikely to get the Humane Society endorsement. “And if we have the dire circumstances we’re facing, we need to find every way to skin every cat.”
Mostly, however, the lawmakers took turns asking the Goracle for advice, as if playing with a Magic 8 Ball.
Lugar, a 32-year veteran of the Senate, asked Gore, as a “practical politician,” how to get the votes for climate-change legislation. “I am a recovering politician. I’m on about Step 9,” the Goracle replied, before providing his vision.
Prospects for regulating a future carbon emissions market? “There’s a high degree of confidence.” The future of automobiles in China and India? “I wouldn’t give up on electric vehicles.” The potential of solar power in those countries? “I have no question about it at all.”
Of course not. He’s the Goracle.
Gore is advocating geothermal energy for domestic use. Is he referring to groundwater heat pumps? Does that mean that water (lake, river or saltwater bodies) are aquathermal and air sourced are atmosthermal energy sources?
Look at the tilt of his head, eyes gazing at a distant vision on a far horizon.
Save me from politicians with a vision — their vision, my wallet.
“Al Gore is more popular to the media than he is to the public.”
Well, he did win the popular vote (though not mine). And I would argue that his popularity has grown since then, maybe partly from pity. You and I may not like him, but I can’t tell you how many otherwise rational people I hear talk about how they like Gore, because he “really seems to care.” That means more to some people than all the facts in the world, so it isn’t surpising that so many politicians want to ride his coattails.
Pragmatist (09:41:09) :
HEADS UP Anthony!
……Dr Vincent Gray, a member of the UN IPCC Expert Reviewers Panel since its inception.
I take it you do know what very little being an ‘Expert Reviewer’ amounts to? He asked to see the draft report and was able to make comments. He was not invited to do so by the IPCC. You might as well say I’m an ‘Expert Reviewer’ for this blog!
Still, if you’d like to cite any scientific points he has to make then go ahead. He claims that Ernst Georg Beck’s ‘90,000 measurements’ have been “suppressed”, for example – an odd idea, given that Beck’s paper was published in E&E (perhaps he meant ‘ignored’ rather than ‘suppressed’?).
I think he’s referring to the use of the natural temperature gradient there is between the underground and the surface. Typically extracted by circulating water in a closed circuit. We already have a lot of these in Europe.
BTW, do you know that there are more and more houses in our “old” continent that are completely energetically independent? Take a house, with thermal and photovoltaic panels, and geothermic pumps, and tadaaaa! You don’t pay any gas or electricity anymore! Full freedom! Not depending on some profit-eager company!
Just great, you should try it, really…
I shook his hand in 1999, then…
…I voted for Gore in 2000…
…I liked the guy while most people found him really boring…
The problem is he assumes the scientists he talks to are right, and is so far into this thing, he can not back out without destroying his legacy. He ends up being a Williams Jennings Bryan with the theory of global warming turning into a monkey trial waterloo
A challenge/poll: When you first see Al Gore, what is the first word that goes through your mind? Do you smile or frown? For me, it is KOOK, and I smile.
Is Green No Longer Chic?
From Houston’s Chronicle online, an analysis of Super Bowl ads shows very few had a “green theme.” Interesting…very interesting!
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2009/02/is_green_no_lon.html
Roger E. Sowell
Marina del Rey, California…where it is 80 F at 10:30 a.m.
Simon Evans (10:06:41) :
“He asked to see the draft report and was able to make comments. He was not invited to do so by the IPCC.”
Invited or not, this is yet another nail in the mainstay of Climate Change. The current action to reform IPCC and its unsound practices HAS invited Dr. Gray’s comment. Diversion to discuss science claims cannot refute the statements made by Dr. Gray and their implications for the demise of IPCC and its agenda.
Whatever this guy’s been smoking, it’s just got to be illegal 😉
The comments here are the most disturbing thing I have read in a while. There are a thousand pieces of concrete data, from carbonized oceans, dramatically melting ice caps, methane chimneys rising from the melting permafrost in the arctic, and increased drought and flood around the world to show that global warming is a catastrophically deadly reality, yet most of those making comments would prefer to mock Al Gore, and point out single pieces of data they don’t understand. (Global warming science does not predict that every place on the planet gets uniformly warmer, but that we will have more and more frequent extreme weather events, including colder than usual temps in some places, such as the snow they experienced in Baghdad last winter – or is that a good thing too?)
But hey, let’s just all make jokes and mock the people trying to do something about it….
Pragmatist:
The link you provided on Dr. Gray doesn’t work.
(It was
http://tinyurl.com/btbzgf )
Pragmatist (10:37:51) :
Simon Evans (10:06:41) :
“He asked to see the draft report and was able to make comments. He was not invited to do so by the IPCC.”
Invited or not, this is yet another nail in the mainstay of Climate Change. The current action to reform IPCC and its unsound practices HAS invited Dr. Gray’s comment. Diversion to discuss science claims cannot refute the statements made by Dr. Gray and their implications for the demise of IPCC and its agenda.
Dr Gray is a founder member of the ‘New Zealand Climate Science Coalition’, which has lobbied government in recent years against mitigation strategies, so he has hardly just broken out as a ‘sceptic’. Describing himself as an IPCC ‘Expert Reviewer’ suggests an authority which is actually meaningless. He’s entitled to his views, of course, just as you and I are to ours. I’m puzzled that you think discussing what he has to say about the science is a diversion, but suit yourself.
“Can I be sick now?”
Please do. Thank you for your witness. Indeed, we only began to hear of the deaths and anguish yesterday or the day before.
“You might as well say I’m an ‘Expert Reviewer’ for this blog!”
Now that really is over the top. Have a care, will you?
Jae,
I have thought Gore is deeply disturbed for several years now.
When I see video of him talking, he just does not seem *right in the head*.
His voice and speaking cadences are off.
His speech patterns seem very evasive.
Since the article names one of my Senators, Richard Lugar, by name, I took the occasion to send Senator Lugar the following email:
Pragmatist (09:41:09) :
HEADS UP Anthony
Dr Vincent Gray, a member of the UN IPCC Expert Reviewers Panel since its inception.
http://tinyurl.com/btbzgf
Unfortunately the link you gave does not work (atleast for me).
Geothermal really is an excellent type of power.
Instead of polluting our environment by burning coal or tearing atoms apart to generate heat to make steam to run turbines… we could be taking advantage of the pretty much inexhaustible supply of heat from within the Earth itself.
DOOMED, SHMOOMED
He’s desperate to get laws passed before people realize temps are dropping and his gloomndoom scenario is a crock. He can’t cash in on the warming snake oil bonanza if he can’t get laws passed that require people to buy his phony solution.
link
DOOMED, SHMOOMED
arrrgggg
link
DOOMED, SHMOOMED
I don’t know if anyone else has commented on this, but the ‘Antartic warming after all’ idea has blown up in realclimate’s face big-time http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=5054 Wonder if the world’s media (hello BBC, are you watching?) will report the fact that the scare was based on wrong data?
@ur momisugly gordonsclark (10:57:41) :
One of those concrete evidences is the march of Malaria to the north, Right?
Wrong, i live in the Netherlands and here Malaria was known as the “Zeeland” Fever in the 17th century when it first was diagnosed in or about 1640, it was an endemic disease until 1956, it took the WHO another 14 years to declare the Netherland Malaria free in 1970, the Netherlands where one of the last countries in Northern Europe to be declared Malaria free.
I only recently found out that my father suffered from Malaria as a child.
Are you sure that emitting less CO2 will stop Malaria in its track?
Because i think otherwise, good use of pesticides, good health care and sufficient food, clean drinking water and energy will do much more stopping Malaria, and above will be a hell of a lot cheaper, especially for developing countries.
Gripegut (09:34:09) :
“TomVonk, I could not agree more!
I am writing my Congressmen, and I am writing letters-to-the-editor for my local paper. I have also put together a power-point presentation and I am showing it to everyone I can.”
Hey – how about this as an idea – that we colectively assemble some documents like this. A wiki project of sorts, but broken into easily digested chuncks that could be sent out via email – either as pdf’s or ppt’s. Maybe a big picture one to start with but follow ups with smaller sub-sections, such as geologic perspective, influence of oceans, influence of the sun, etc. Nice concise documents , but with key data plots and tons of links to follow up material. Send them to your friends, family & govt representatives. They can fwd on to others. Could educate a lot of people.
A problem I have found is that if you dont have a passion for the subject matter, you probably aren’t going to spend the time to learn about it, but people will spend 5 minutes looking at a pre-digested version sent to them via email & will hit the fwd button to send it to others. Problem is having that nice condensed version to send out.
It would be nice to keep the documents evergreen – so as new data & research become available they can be linked in.
Any ideas of how to make something like this happen?
My guess would be a black hole … out of which no useful information can be got.