WaPo pundits the Goracle

This is not the sort of op-ed we are used to seeing in the Washington Post. But I found it funny nonetheless.  – Anthony

gore-congress-2009
Click to Launch Video

With Al Due Respect, We’re Doomed

By Dana Milbank, Washington Post

Thursday, January 29, 2009; Page A03

The lawmakers gazed in awe at the figure before them. The Goracle had seen the future, and he had come to tell them about it.

What the Goracle saw in the future was not good: temperature changes that “would bring a screeching halt to human civilization and threaten the fabric of life everywhere on the Earth — and this is within this century, if we don’t change.”

The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry (D-Mass.), appealed to hear more of the Goracle’s premonitions. “Share with us, if you would, sort of the immediate vision that you see in this transformative process as we move to this new economy,” he beseeched.

“Geothermal energy,” the Goracle prophesied. “This has great potential; it is not very far off.”

Another lawmaker asked about the future of nuclear power. “I have grown skeptical about the degree to which it will expand,” the Goracle spoke.

A third asked the legislative future — and here the Goracle spoke in riddle. “The road to Copenhagen has three steps to it,” he said.

Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho) begged the Goracle to look further into the future. “What does your modeling tell you about how long we’re going to be around as a species?” he inquired.

The Goracle chuckled. “I don’t claim the expertise to answer a question like that, Senator.”

It was a jarring reminder that the Goracle is, indeed, mortal. Once Al Gore was a mere vice president, but now he is a Nobel laureate and climate-change prophet. He repeats phrases such as “unified national smart grid” the way he once did “no controlling legal authority” — and the ridicule has been replaced by worship, even by his political foes.

“Tennessee,” gushed Sen. Bob Corker, a Republican from Gore’s home state, “has a legacy of having people here in the Senate and in public service that have been of major consequence and contributed in a major way to the public debate, and you no doubt have helped build that legacy.” If that wasn’t quite enough, Corker added: “Very much enjoyed your sense of humor, too.”

Humor? From Al Gore? “I benefit from low expectations,” he replied.

The Goracle’s powers seem to come from his ability to scare the bejesus out of people. “We must face up to this urgent and unprecedented threat to the existence of our civilization,” he said. And: “This is the most serious challenge the world has ever faced.” And: It “could completely end human civilization, and it is rushing at us with such speed and force.”

Though some lawmakers tangled with Gore on his last visit to Capitol Hill, none did on the Foreign Relations Committee yesterday. Dick Lugar (Ind.), the ranking Republican, agreed that there will be “an almost existential impact” from the climate changes Gore described.

As such, the Goracle, even when questioned, was shown great deference. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), challenging Gore over spent nuclear fuel, began by saying: “I stand to be corrected, and I defer to your position, you’re probably right, and I’m probably wrong.” He ended his question by saying: “I’m not questioning you; I’m questioning myself.”

Others sought to buy the Goracle’s favor by offering him gifts. “Thank you for your incredible leadership; you make this crystalline for those who don’t either understand it or want to understand it,” gushed Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), who went on to ask: “Will you join me this summer at the Jersey Shore?”

The chairman worried that the Goracle may have been offended by “naysayers” who thought it funny that Gore’s testimony before the committee came on a morning after a snow-and-ice storm in the capital. “The little snow in Washington does nothing to diminish the reality of the crisis,” Kerry said at the start of the hearing.

The climate was well controlled inside the hearing room, although Gore, suffering from a case of personal climate change, perspired heavily during his testimony. The Goracle presented the latest version of his climate-change slide show to the senators: a globe with yellow and red blotches, a house falling into water, and ones with obscure titles such as “Warming Impacts Ugandan Coffee Growing Region.” At one point he flashed a biblical passage on the screen, but he quickly removed it. “I’m not proselytizing,” he explained. A graphic showing a disappearing rain forest was accompanied by construction noises.

The Goracle supplied abundant metaphors to accompany his visuals. Oil demand: “This roller coaster is headed for a crash, and we’re in the front car.” Polar ice: “Like a beating heart, and the permanent ice looks almost like blood spilling out of a body along the eastern coast of Greenland.”

The lawmakers joined in. “There are a lot of ways to skin a cat,” contributed Isakson, who is unlikely to get the Humane Society endorsement. “And if we have the dire circumstances we’re facing, we need to find every way to skin every cat.”

Mostly, however, the lawmakers took turns asking the Goracle for advice, as if playing with a Magic 8 Ball.

Lugar, a 32-year veteran of the Senate, asked Gore, as a “practical politician,” how to get the votes for climate-change legislation. “I am a recovering politician. I’m on about Step 9,” the Goracle replied, before providing his vision.

Prospects for regulating a future carbon emissions market? “There’s a high degree of confidence.” The future of automobiles in China and India? “I wouldn’t give up on electric vehicles.” The potential of solar power in those countries? “I have no question about it at all.”

Of course not. He’s the Goracle.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
248 Comments
Craig Moore
February 3, 2009 7:10 am

Perhaps WaPo will lead the way to expose the propaganda techniques the likes of Dr. Spencer et al. have had to endure with the MSM enablization. See: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/01/al-gores-propaganda/

Adam Sullivan
February 3, 2009 7:20 am

“I am a recovering politician.” “I am on step 9”
From his Post-Politician actions, we can imagine steps 1 – 8 to be:
1) self pity
2) anger
3) hypochondria
4) preach
5) exaggerate
6) conceit
7) hypocrisy
8) smugness

Roger Knights
February 3, 2009 7:33 am

Here’s a link to a Bloomberg story today, “Environmentalists Press Democrats with “Non-Negotiable Demands”:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=awfEVQGtBzJo&refer=home

February 3, 2009 7:37 am

I had dinner with the Publisher of the WP about 60 days ago, she knew little about the global warming theory, so I had the chance to ramp her up on why it is not accurate, she genuinely seemed neutral on the subject and open to criticism of it.
You should watch Gores actual speach before the Senate. He seems to have new material.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY4g49Bdm_0
Gore compares Venus to earth, saying Earth could end up being hot like Venus at 850F. I did some basic research and found Venus’s atmosphere is 97 times larger than earths, that its CO2 is 97% of its atmosphere compared to earth’s .04%, and he is saying the two planets are very similar! I just dont see it but the Senators took it all in.
It is worth watching his testimony.

JimB
February 3, 2009 7:45 am

“D Johnson:
…Even my own Republican senator Richard Lugar apparently buys into the AGW story hook line and sinker.”
Wanna swap?…I’ve got Kerry.
JimB

JimB
February 3, 2009 7:49 am

“Steve Sloan (06:56:05) :
Rather than burning the Goracle, why not handcuff him to John Kerry in Barrow AK. Their cooing about each other would hasten the arrival of warmer weather.
And we wouldn’t have to listen to either of them in the lower 48.”
I’d much rather handcuff them both to a windmill off the Cape. Oh wait…Kerry opposes that.
Wouldn’t you love to hear the offshore windfarm debated between Kerry and Gore?
No hypocracy here, folks, move along, move along.
JimB

February 3, 2009 8:01 am

JimB (07:45:22) :
“D Johnson:
…Even my own Republican senator Richard Lugar apparently buys into the AGW story hook line and sinker.”
Wanna swap?…I’ve got Kerry.
JimB

Lol! Go fish!

Tamara
February 3, 2009 8:09 am

Re: Pamela Gray and Tony S
The WaPo story may not meet the level of civility expected from a scientific debate, but it is still useful. Satire has been a useful political tool for centuries because it has an impact in the court of public opinion. Let’s face it, if AGW were all about science, sceptics would have a much easier row to hoe. It is Al Gore’s popularity with Joe Public that has given him his power, and Joe Public isn’t likely to understand the complexity of the climate system. He does have a sense of humor, though. And lampooning Gore gives the public an easy out. They can laugh, and call him an idiot, as if they knew it all along, and were never taken in by his shenanigans. However petty you may think the article is, it probably has more impact than 20 scientific debates.

DaveE
February 3, 2009 8:13 am

Probably been posted before
Even the left now laughing at global warming.
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/40464
DaveE.

February 3, 2009 8:30 am

” Peter Hearnden (01:21:22) :
You people really hate ‘Gore’ don’t you. Burn him, burn him!”
No, I don’t hate Al Gore. He is quite an entertaining chap.
However, I do hate his lies, deceit and his gross hypocrisy and the massive amount of damage they cause.
I do not think he should be burned either. that is the kind of over reaction that the hysterical end of the alarmist camp would have against people who they disagree with. Please do not tar us with the same brush. The vast majority of people posting here are decent, reasonable people who seek truth, not retribution.
Most climate realists would rather Al Gore had the courage to debate with other real climate experts, admit his mistakes and then apologise for them.

EMH
February 3, 2009 8:30 am

On Sunday, Gordon Brown, again urging action on economy and climate change: “Global problems:Global institutions.” THAT is the agenda of the moneyed elite and a really interesting conglomeration of bed-fellows fueling the fire, and they won’t give up easily. Return carbon tax proceeds to the masses? Not likely!

Dennis Sharp
February 3, 2009 8:35 am

There are natural phenomenon like gravity or electricity, which everyone knows about and accepts. We make adjustments in our daily lives for these influences because we can feel them as they impinge on us.
When some knowledge is said to be real and I don’t feel it, see it, or smell it, then it takes some good priests, preachers, teachers, or scientists on a continuous campaign to convince me. It helps if I’m around a lot of people who believe the message.
The amount of lies in a message is inversely proportional to the time spent in examining the contrary points of the message

February 3, 2009 8:41 am

Perry Debell (04:46:38) : “12-35 p.m. NW London A beautiful sunny and cold day.”
Ditto here in West London. It has been just great on the main roads coming in to work – no school-run traffic, for a start. The ice has set hard, though, on some of the minor roads down my way – looks like slush, feels like lumpy concrete under the car wheels.
I expect we shall have some fun and games later on this week, when the 20% of the work force currently “resting” start to venture forth, also when the schools re-open.
And, of course, when it starts to thaw and we have all the pipes bursting and the floods! :o)

Burch Seymour
February 3, 2009 8:42 am

“Wanna swap?…I’ve got Kerry.”
And I live in Chicagoland, Illinois. I win 🙂
Every once in a while I feel compelled to mention that IMO everyone in the US should be required to read Atlas Shrugged (Ayn Rand). Very scary how much of what she wrote is happening today.
It’s a bit dated in style, but a darn good story, and given her personal history of growing up in the Soviet Union, a bit too real at times. OK it looks intimidatingly long, but give it a try and you too can say “Who is John Galt?”

February 3, 2009 8:48 am

“Geothermal Energy”
Besides being the answer to Senator Kerry’s request to “Share with us, if you would, sort of the immediate vision that you see in this transformative process as we move to this new economy”
Also probably answers the following question:
“Share with us, if you would, your personal investment strategy”

MartinGAtkins
February 3, 2009 8:50 am

Pamela Gray (06:48:44) :
“Okay folks, lets get down to debate. The snarky stuff is fun but it won’t fly in serious situations.”
Since when has being faced with a serious situation stopped people having fun?

February 3, 2009 9:05 am

Well he’s just launched Google Ocean along with Google

JimB
February 3, 2009 9:22 am

“Burch Seymour (08:42:25) :
“Wanna swap?…I’ve got Kerry.”
And I live in Chicagoland, Illinois. I win :-)”
Well…yeah…maybe.
Mine’s been around a lot longer?…and I bet maybe he’s got a higher hypocrisy score due to that?
Besides, Kerry windsurfs. C’mon…take him.
JimB

Robert Wood
February 3, 2009 9:24 am

Peter Hearnden (01:21:22) :
You people really hate ‘Gore’ don’t you. Burn him, burn him!
That’s because he is a post-modern Elmer Gantry

Gripegut
February 3, 2009 9:34 am

TomVonk, I could not agree more!
I am writing my Congressmen, and I am writing letters-to-the-editor for my local paper. I have also put together a power-point presentation and I am showing it to everyone I can. Every one of us that knows the truth must be active in fighting this hoax. The governments of the world see this as an excuse to take even more power and we must stop it or we deserve the consequences. We can only defeat the AGW sham by burying it with facts until everybody knows it for the boondoggle that it is.

Gaelan Clark
February 3, 2009 9:36 am

The scariest part that I take from this are the words, and implication of such, used by John Kerry, “…as we move into this new economy…”—-people, they haved moved on. Nothing like actual temperatures, invalidated stats nor models that don’t replicate reality will stand before this jaggernaut that has welled up over the last 5 months.
Cap and Trade is here with a vengence for two reasons—culpable deniability and a new source of revenue.

Paddy
February 3, 2009 9:37 am

Pamela (06:48:44): Now that Obama has been elected, will share with us your assessment of several of his key appointments, including Chu, Holdren, Browner, Jackson, and Sutley?

Arkansas
February 3, 2009 9:38 am

I had chimed in about the ice storm I just endured, but that article has been removed. I won’t recant all the woe, but I will reiterate a sentiment I’ve been reading in this thread:
I live in Arkansas (duh) and just endured a massive ice storm. I’d watched the forecast at http://www.weather.gov for days as it approached. The forecast repeatedly called for amounts under an inch of accumulation. It depended on when you looked – the forecast changed hourly for days in advance – but there was never a call for greater than an inch of accumulation. I have local papers from the days preceding the storm. They parroted the mainstream and did not anticipate the horror until the day it began. North Arkansas Electrical Cooperative has submitted visual evidence of 2.5 inches of ice on most of its power lines. I looked around and found areas where the ice was greater than 3 inches.
Why say all this? The forecasters repeatedly placated us, telling us the accumulation would be less than an inch. They were dead wrong. Dead wrong right up to the day the storm began. I would have been better off listening to psychics. AND I NEVER LISTEN TO PSYCHICS! Hey, I know there are meteorologists on this site, and I’m not want to cast insults, but if you can’t forecast an isolated tragedy that is one day away – how can anyone forecast calamity decades in the future?
Again, no offense is intended, and I’m sorry if there’s a hostile tone to this comment. I assure you I’m not at all that way. I’m well aware that most folks on this site are hip to what I’m saying. If I’m hostile towards anyone – it’s Al Gore (.etal).
The storm began a week ago on Monday. As of today (Tuesday) there are still thousands without power. There are tons and tons and tons and literal tons of branches on the ground. People’s houses burned to the ground. People were killed and paralyzed by falling limbs. No one here was unaffected. But this seems to have slipped under the radar? Is anyone even aware that we were just massacred by a major ice storm? It’s weird. I can’t see anything about us on the national news.
The joke about all this? FEMA is supposed to be on the way. 8 days after the storm began. Can I be sick now?

February 3, 2009 9:38 am

…It is Al Gore’s popularity with Joe Public that has given him his power,…
Popularity? He lost…. to George Freakin’ Bush. OK, you could debate that and say Gore lost because GW cheated, but had Gore been at least popular enough to at the very least win his home state of Tennessee, Florida would have been moot, and you wouldn’t have had Bush to knock around all these years. Al Gore is more popular to the media than he is to the public.

Pragmatist
February 3, 2009 9:41 am

HEADS UP Anthony!
And to add to the fun consider how the Goracle’s partner in grime, IPCC is faring these days:
“I have been forced to the conclusion that for significant parts of the work of the IPCC, the data collection and scientific methods employed are unsound. Resistance to all efforts to try and discuss or rectify these problems has convinced me that normal scientific procedures are not only rejected by the IPCC, but that this practice is endemic, and was part of the organisation from the very beginning. I therefore consider that the IPCC is fundamentally corrupt. The only “reform” I could envisage, would be its abolition.”
Dr Vincent Gray, a member of the UN IPCC Expert Reviewers Panel since its inception.
http://tinyurl.com/btbzgf