From the Washington University in St. Louis
Its heat may increase the rate of ice loss from one of the continent’s major ice streams

It wasn’t what they were looking for but that only made the discovery all the more exciting.
In January 2010 a team of scientists had set up two crossing lines of seismographs across Marie Byrd Land in West Antarctica. It was the first time the scientists had deployed many instruments in the interior of the continent that could operate year-round even in the coldest parts of Antarctica.
Like a giant CT machine, the seismograph array used disturbances created by distant earthquakes to make images of the ice and rock deep within West Antarctica.
There were big questions to be asked and answered. The goal, says Doug Wiens, professor of earth and planetary science at Washington University in St. Louis and one of the project’s principle investigators, was essentially to weigh the ice sheet to help reconstruct Antarctica’s climate history. But to do this accurately the scientists had to know how the earth’s mantle would respond to an ice burden, and that depended on whether it was hot and fluid or cool and viscous. The seismic data would allow them to map the mantle’s properties.
In the meantime, automated-event-detection software was put to work to comb the data for anything unusual.
When it found two bursts of seismic events between January 2010 and March 2011, Wiens’ PhD student Amanda Lough looked more closely to see what was rattling the continent’s bones.
Was it rock grinding on rock, ice groaning over ice, or, perhaps, hot gases and liquid rock forcing their way through cracks in a volcanic complex?
Uncertain at first, the more Lough and her colleagues looked, the more convinced they became that a new volcano was forming a kilometer beneath the ice.
The discovery of the new as yet unnamed volcano is announced in the Nov. 17 advanced online issue of Nature Geoscience.
Following the trail of clues
The teams that install seismographs in Antarctica are given first crack at the data. Lough had done her bit as part of the WUSTL team, traveling to East Antarctica three times to install or remove stations in East Antarctica.
In 2010 many of the instruments were moved to West Antarctica and Wiens asked Lough to look at the seismic data coming in, the first large-scale dataset from this part of the continent.
“I started seeing events that kept occurring at the same location, which was odd, “Lough said. “Then I realized they were close to some mountains–but not right on top of them.”
“My first thought was, ‘Okay, maybe its just coincidence.’ But then I looked more closely and realized that the mountains were actually volcanoes and there was an age progression to the range. The volcanoes closest to the seismic events were the youngest ones.”
The events were weak and very low frequency, which strongly suggested they weren’t tectonic in origin. While low-magnitude seismic events of tectonic origin typically have frequencies of 10 to 20 cycles per second, this shaking was dominated by frequencies of 2 to 4 cycles per second.
Ruling out ice
But glacial processes can generate low-frequency events. If the events weren’t tectonic could they be glacial?
To probe farther, Lough used a global computer model of seismic velocities to “relocate” the hypocenters of the events to account for the known seismic velocities along different paths through the Earth. This procedure collapsed the swarm clusters to a third their original size.
It also showed that almost all of the events had occurred at depths of 25 to 40 kilometers (15 to 25 miles below the surface). This is extraordinarily deep—deep enough to be near the boundary between the earth’s crust and mantle, called the Moho, and more or less rules out a glacial origin.
It also casts doubt on a tectonic one. “A tectonic event might have a hypocenter 10 to 15 kilometers (6 to 9 miles) deep, but at 25 to 40 kilometers, these were way too deep,” Lough says.
A colleague suggested that the event waveforms looked like Deep Long Period earthquakes, or DPLs, which occur in volcanic areas, have the same frequency characteristics and are as deep. “Everything matches up,” Lough says.
An ash layer encased in ice
The seismologists also talked to Duncan Young and Don Blankenship of the University of Texas who fly airborne radar over Antarctica to produce topographic maps of the bedrock. “In these maps, you can see that there’s elevation in the bed topography at the same location as the seismic events,” Lough says.
The radar images also showed a layer of ash buried under the ice. “They see this layer all around our group of earthquakes and only in this area,” Lough says.
“Their best guess is that it came from Mount Waesche, an existing volcano near Mt Sidley. But that is also interesting because scientists had no idea when Mount Waesche was last active, and the ash layer is sets the age of the eruption at 8,000 years ago. ”
What’s up down there?
The case for volcanic origin has been made. But what exactly is causing the seismic activity?
“Most mountains in Antarctica are not volcanic,” Wiens says, “but most in this area are. Is it because East and West Antarctica are slowly rifting apart? We don’t know exactly. But we think there is probably a hot spot in the mantle here producing magma far beneath the surface.”
“People aren’t really sure what causes DPLs,” Lough says. “It seems to vary by volcanic complex, but most people think it’s the movement of magma and other fluids that leads to pressure-induced vibrations in cracks within volcanic and hydrothermal systems.”
Will the new volcano erupt?
“Definitely,” Lough says. “In fact because of the radar shows a mountain beneath the ice I think it has erupted in the past, before the rumblings we recorded.
Will the eruptions punch through a kilometer or more of ice above it?
The scientists calculated that an enormous eruption, one that released a thousand times more energy than the typical eruption, would be necessary to breach the ice above the volcano.
On the other hand a subglacial eruption and the accompanying heat flow will melt a lot of ice. “The volcano will create millions of gallons of water beneath the ice—many lakes full,” says Wiens. This water will rush beneath the ice towards the sea and feed into the hydrological catchment of the MacAyeal Ice Stream, one of several major ice streams draining ice from Marie Byrd Land into the Ross Ice Shelf.
By lubricating the bedrock, it will speed the flow of the overlying ice, perhaps increasing the rate of ice-mass loss in West Antarctica.
“We weren’t expecting to find anything like this,” Wiens says
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Division of Polar Programs.
=======================================
Some imagery to help you locate it. Top view shows the “Executive Range” of volcanic mountains, including Mt. Sidley (with visible crater), bottom shows Mt. Sidley in relation to Antarctic continent.
Here is the paper:
Seismic detection of an active subglacial magmatic complex in Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica
Lough et al. November 17th, Nature Geoscience doi:10.1038/ngeo1992
Numerous volcanoes exist in Marie Byrd Land, a highland region of West Antarctica. High heat flow through the crust in this region may influence the stability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet1, 2, 3, 4. Volcanic activity progressed from north to south in the Executive Committee mountain range between the Miocene and Holocene epochs, but there has been no evidence for recent magmatic activity5, 6, 7. Here we use a recently deployed seismic network to show that in 2010 and 2011, two swarms of seismic activity occurred at 25–40 km depth beneath subglacial topographic and magnetic highs, located 55 km south of the youngest subaerial volcano in the Executive Committee Range. We interpret the swarm events as deep long-period earthquakes based on their unusual frequency content. Such earthquakes occur beneath active volcanoes, are caused by deep magmatic activity and, in some cases, precede eruptions8, 9, 10, 11. We also use radar profiles to identify a prominent ash layer in the ice overlying the seismic swarm. Located at 1,400 m depth, the ash layer is about 8,000 years old and was probably sourced from the nearby Mount Waesche volcano. Together, these observations provide strong evidence for ongoing magmatic activity and demonstrate that volcanism continues to migrate southwards along the Executive Committee Range. Eruptions at this site are unlikely to penetrate the 1.2 to 2-km-thick overlying ice, but would generate large volumes of melt water that could significantly affect ice stream flow.
==================================
The SI is here:
Click to access ngeo1992-s1.pdf
And contains the calculations on heat generations of many volcanic events for comparison.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


$20,000 question: How much ice melt is occurring due to the volcano outgassing CO2?
/flees
The climos tell us our activities are melting the ice…so how come there’s still a kilometre of ice over a volcano?
Any carbon dioxide outgassing under that thickness of ice would be in liquid form and would therefore increase the ice flow to the Ross Ice Shelf.
If newly discovered volcanoes are to be found, above sea level, just imagine the untold number yet to be discovered at the ocean floors, especially in the Pacific Ocean. Is there anyone still refusing to believe that the heat from within is not influencing the ocean temperatures, which rise and later transfer this heat energy to the atmosphere?
The volcano will blast ice into the stratosphere, where it will fall on us. We’ll freeze! Oh noes!
Contour map of Sidley, Waesche.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MountSidleyWaescheMap.jpg
John L says: November 17, 2013 at 6:32 pm
“If newly discovered volcanoes are to be found, above sea level, just imagine the untold number yet to be discovered at the ocean floors, especially in the Pacific Ocean.”
There are new discoveries. The quantities are still small. But anyway, there is no reason to suppose that volcanoes, newly spotted or not, are doing anything different now from what they have been doing for millions of years.
I don’t doubt the existence of a smoldering volcano. What surprises me is that this seems to be the first detected under the ice. I figured that was old hat. It is said that we know more about the back side of the moon than we know of the deep ocean. In the age of 3D siesmic that might or might not be true anymore. But it seems we know less of the earth-deep-ice environment of Antarctica than we do of the deep ocean.
This paragraph caught my eye:
Ahem… Tectonic events in subduction zones are in the hundreds of km. Sure,it is probably volcanic because it is part of a volcanic range. It might be part of a rifting ridge. But ‘ “way too deep” to be tectonic’ is a blunder by the researcher or the writer.
The Mars Trilogoy by Kim Stanley Robinson, which gained a number of accolades as a literary work, hypothosised that the big cataclysm that would disrupt Earth’s society would be due to volcanoes erupting in Antartica.
This quote is from Wikipedia summary of “Green Mars” the second in the trilogy …
“The book ends on a major event which is a sudden, catastrophic rise in Earth’s global sea levels not caused primarily by any greenhouse effect but by the eruption of a chain of volcanoes underneath the ice of west Antarctica, disintegrating the ice sheet and displacing the fragments into the ocean.”
Panic stations everyone!
That image straight under ” Some imagery to help you locate it ” seems 90° out.
See https://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=mt+sidley+antarctica&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&channel=np&ie=UTF-8&ei=LXuJUsSGGIqeiAenxoDoBA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAg
The volcanism does seem to be North South.
Dos this have any effect on the ‘warm spot’ in West Antarctica, I wonder? I suppose under kms of ice it would not.
@Nick Stokes 6:42pm
there is no reason to suppose that volcanoes, newly spotted or not, are doing anything different now from what they have been doing for millions of years.
Which could include ending or starting interglacial periods and raising and lower sea level by melting ice or dropping temperatures. I’m not saying these Antarctic volcanos can start/stop ice ages. I’m not saying they cannot. I’m open to either possibility.
Nick Stokes;
But anyway, there is no reason to suppose that volcanoes, newly spotted or not, are doing anything different now from what they have been doing for millions of years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No Nick, this is climate science on this site. You take the total number of volcanoes we knew about yesterday, add one today, draw a linear trend through two days of data, and conclude that in X years time the entire surface of earth will be covered with volcanoes.
Man, I don’t know…
Sounds a little like some of the techniques that those petroleum exploration seismologists use to find evil hydrocarbon deposits.
/SARC
The observations of long period, low frequency events reminded me of Bernard Chouet’s papers on harmonic tremors associated with volcanism.
If only all those TFLOPs and PFLOPs spent running climate models had been spent on 3D seismic reconstruction of interesting areas we might more insight in to what effect temperatures at the poles.
Would also be nice to tap the decades of acoustic data accumulated by the British, US and Russian navies.
Stephen Rasey says: November 17, 2013 at 6:50 pm
“I don’t doubt the existence of a smoldering volcano. What surprises me is that this seems to be the first detected under the ice. I figured that was old hat”
It is. Here is a similar post from five years ago.
How much Volcanic activity do we actually observe, let alone measure, under the icecaps?
I remember a plethora of articles related to that subject in 2008, but not much since ?
WUWT?
What would a Pinatubu do under there anyhow?
Do major volcanic eruptions happen at the poles?
More importantly, do we have any way of knowing?
Executive Committee range….strange
“By lubricating the bedrock, it will speed the flow of the overlying ice, perhaps increasing the rate of ice-mass loss in West Antarctica.”
================
That’s what I always tend to bet my future on…a “perhaps”.
“OH LOOK!! the missing heat…………damn”
The Big Ben volcano on Heard Island, Antarctica is in the Australian Territorial governance. It is always erupting. There is another one too and of course in New Zealand. But the biggest is Yellow Stone National park, has the largest underground mass of molten magma, bubbling away looking for a weak point to explode into the atmosphere. I have mentioned before, there are more submarine volcanoes and vents in the world than terrestrial ones. There are parts of the deep ocean where there are volcanic vents and life is existing there using chemosynthesis instead of photosynthesis. Baby Krakatoa is rumbling too and poses a threat like its once parent caused in the 19th century. It is those that sit dormant for years like Vesuvius did in the first century AD and people thought it was a hill or mountain that create the most potential danger. But earthquakes often proceed an eruption. And there is little we can do about it, other than give adequate warnings to evacuate the area ASAP. If dust settles on the ice and snow, the heat no longer reflected will create an ice melt but not for long.
Like climate science, plate tectonics is ripe for some serious evolution. Antarctica is circumscribed with spreading ridges, yet it has no known trenches. I am imagining a new kind of low angle subduction and some kind of bathtub drain to the mantle that keeps continents anchored down there.
http://geosciencebigpicture.com/2013/01/08/ring-around-antarctica/
And still this dependency on models to qualify the educated guess.
Errrr how exactly is west Antarctica defined? It seems to me that since the centre of Antarctica is the pole if you keep going west you will end up in East Antactica.
Anyhoo……….. that would probably explain why west Antarctica is melting and East Antarctica is not.
“Antarctica is circumscribed with spreading ridges, yet it has no known trenches.”
So is Africa. The amount of newly created crust must balance the amount subducted globally, but not for each tectonic plate. Some plates are growing, others are shrinking.
And now somebody needs to do the same study in the Arctic..There is so much potential there for hot hydrothermal, mineral bearing, fluids pulsing out from deep ocean vents, accompanied by the occasional earthquake.
This phenomenon has the potential to explain most/much/all of the recent decline (2013 excepted, of course) of the extent of the late summer Arctic ice cap.
I was intrigued to recently find this map of global methane concentrations. The area over the Arctic shows the highest concentrations – is the cause: i) industrial activity in the northern hemisphere, and/or ii) the alarmist wet dream of methane hydrates evaporating off the ocean floor, and/or iii) methane venting out of hydrothermal vents on the Arctic ocean floor?
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AWxUh2zX_qU/T7yzrDJ2VoI/AAAAAAAAC2o/UpBVkxq-S-Y/s1600/5365876976764761.jpg