The Week That Was: 2013-10-12 (October 12, 2013) Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org) The Science and Environmental Policy Project By Ken Haapala, Executive Vice President.
Quote of the Week: Political language “is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” — George Orwell [H/t Richard Lindzen]
Number of the Week: 6
THIS WEEK: Chartsmanship. Steve McIntyre has another post on how the UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change manipulated graphs from its Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) to the second order draft of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) to the final of AR5. The second order draft, the last one sent out to reviewers, clearly showed observations were running well below the uncertainty envelope for AR4 model projections. In the final version, the IPCC removed the uncertainty envelope for AR4, yet retained these envelopes for the previous three assessment reports. McIntyre estimates that the new range of uncertainty for AR4 is about twice that of what appeared in the original. In brief, between the second order draft of AR5 and the final version, the range of uncertainty approximately doubled. Yet, the IPCC expressed 95 to 100% confidence in its work. Also, McIntyre has not found any peer reviewed literature supporting the new graphic. For the discussion to include comments from IPCC defenders see links under Climategate Continued.
No Improvement: Last week, TWTW discussed the presentation by Nir Shaviv that showed that from 1979 to 2013 there has been no significant improvements in the estimates of the critical question of how sensitive are earth’s temperatures to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)? The IPCC estimated range of uncertainty actually increased from AR4 to AR5, with a lowering of the lower boundary. Yet, all the values are above the laboratory derived values of about 1.1 ºC. Shaviv suggests that the reason for no improvement in the science is that basic premise of the IPCC science is wrong. According to Shaviv, contrary to the IPCC, the climate is not very sensitive to increasing CO2 and that if one does not insist it was highly sensitivity, studies indicate the range of sensitivity is more in the order of 1 to 1.5 ºC.
His comments prompted a revisit to a 2008 paper by Richard Lindzen, “Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?” Lindzen points out that the procedures used by the IPCC and the Climate Establishment [John Christy’s term] avoid the intense conflict between observations and theory, whereby theory is continuously refined to explain the observations until a solid theory is established. Instead, the procedures by the Climate Establishment focus on computer simulation of nature and various large programs purportedly to observe nature, which never end. As a result, theory is not refined, but large science programs are created to accommodate political correct positions. The entire effort is driven by government funding. For the work of Shaviv see http://www.sciencebits.com/AR5-FirstImpressions and for the updated paper by Lindzen see http://globalresearch.ca/climate-science-is-it-currently-designed-to-answer-questions/16330.
Another Elephant? Last week, TWTW discussed two elephants in the room that the IPCC conveniently ignores in its grand pronouncements. One elephant is the failure of surface temperature to increase in a statistical significant way over the past 17 years even though atmospheric CO2 has increased by about 10%. The atmospheric temperatures have not increased for a decade. The second elephant is the composition of the warming as measured by satellites: Notable warming in the northern part of the Northern Hemisphere (roughly 30ºN Latitude), with little or no warming elsewhere.
In presenting their reasoning why they think the world is headed for a cooling period, German scientists Frank Bosse and Fritz Vahrenholt suggest a third elephant. Now that the IPCC has admitted the existence of the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age, the IPCC has no theoretical basis for explaining why these warming and cooling periods occurred. It certainly was not from changing CO2.
The authors bring up the concept of “missing heat” used in efforts to explain the failure of the globe to warm. Following a suggestion of Hans von Starch, they assert the heat was not missing, because it did not exist. They point out that the difference in surface temperatures from 1998 to 2012 northern Eurasia and from those in 1980 to 1997. The authors suggest that the strong decline in temperatures is the result of declining ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun, which can vary by 10%. UV radiation is unlike the full spectrum of solar radiation (mostly visible light) which varies little. See link under Science: Is the Sun Rising? and the study by Ermolli et al. that is linked therein.
Clouds: The solar-cosmic ray hypothesis for the formation of clouds advanced by Svensmark, et al. took a slight hit this week. Earlier, researchers at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, conducted experiments that seemed to support the hypothesis. This week they published further research on “solving a long-standing enigma in climate science: how do aerosols – tiny solid or liquid particles suspended in the air – form in the atmosphere, and which gases are responsible?” They made two discoveries. One, that small concentrations of amine vapors, similar to ammonia, combine with sulfuric acid to greatly accelerate the formation aerosols. And, two, that radiation has little effect on the process. As the press release asserts, this step forward in understanding how clouds are formed does not rule out a role of cosmic rays. See links under Science: Is the Sun Rising?
Other Mechanisms? One of the annoying arguments found in the UN IPCC reports such as the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) in AR5 is the claim that the human influence must be significant because the models cannot explain the temperature changes without a significant human influence. Although the SPM is still in a draft form, subject to revision, the report has a page with 18 graphs showing the difference between models using only natural forcings and models using both natural and anthropogenic (human caused) forcings. The entire thrust is an example of argument from ignorance. The assumption is that the models successfully include all the natural forcings, which is very doubtful.
In addition to solar UV radiation possibly having a significant effect on changing climate, as mentioned above, several other studies were published suggesting even other mechanisms. One study, by Lam et al, suggests that the solar magnetic field influences the earth’s climate by changing surface atmospheric pressure. Tim Ball has extensive commentary on this, suggesting the line of research should be taken further.
Judith Curry, co-author with Marcia Glaze-Wyatt, has a very interesting paper in Climate Dynamics discussing a possible mechanism for oscillation of climate over multiple decades. They liken it to the “stadium wave” often used at [American] football games, where the fans stand or sit in a coordinated pattern. They suggested that this wave pattern can be seen in records going at least as far back as 300 years.
Nicola Scafetta has a paper suggesting that a model based on the movement of the planets (planetary orbital oscillations) better explains climate variation than the General Circulation Models used by the UN IPCC. On her web site, Jo Nova has a good presentation of the paper and a number of useful comments. The descriptive power of the model may be just a statistical artifact, but it may promote useful discussion.
Now that it is becoming evident to many that IPCC science is failing, we may begin to see other directions of research. Of course, the government funding power to the IPCC makes it difficult to attract funding for research other than the standard claim that CO2 is the control knob for climate. Please see links under Science: Is the Sun Rising? and Challenging the Orthodoxy.
Failing Models: A group at the University of Hawaii used 39 models to forecast temperature trends in the tropics and elsewhere. They looked at temperatures of the period 1850 to 2005 as a base for climate variability and using the models projected the year when warming will exceed the historic monthly variability for many cities around the world. In general, they found that model output will exceed their calculated natural variability first in cities in the tropics, then elsewhere. They concluded that biodiversity will be highly vulnerable in the topics with the emergence of unprecedented climates
Although recognizing that all the models run too hot, Judith Curry saw merit in the approach. But that merit may be lost in the alarmist press.
As Roy Spencer and John Christy have pointed out, all 73 climate models are forecast higher temperature trends in the atmosphere above the tropics, than what is being observed. Many of the models forecast trends that are more than twice of what is observed. A further issue with the study is that the period coinciding with the ending of the Little Ice Age is hardly the proper place to start the base. See links under Communicating Better to the Public – Exaggerate, or be Vague? and http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/06/still-epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-measurements-running-5-year-means/
Sea Levels: The World Bank and the IMF have embraced the concept that human caused global warming will cause significant sea level rise. Judith Curry writes that this attitude may present a major danger to the population of Bangladesh. A recent study shows that Bangladesh’s sea level rise problem is not really driven by climate change, but by land subsidence. “…the risks here are that UN/WB adaptation solutions will be inadequate to help them deal with their sea level rise problem, or that Bangladesh will find itself ineligible for international climate adaptation funds.” As Curry suggests, Bangladesh may become a victim of IPCC over simplification of the climate change issue and its solutions. See link under Changing Seas.
Number of the Week: 6. Federal agencies announcing new regulations or proposing new regulations publish such regulations in the Federal Register. Typically, each day, the Register is hundreds of pages long. On day 9 of the very partial government shutdown, the length of the Register was 6 pages. Draw your own conclusions. See Article # 1
For the numbered articles below please see this week’s TWTW at: http://www.sepp.org. The articles are at the end of the pdf.
1. The Shutdown in Print
Number of pages in the Federal Register on October 9: six.
Editorial, WSJ, Oct 10, 2013
2. A Chemistry Breakthrough That Could Fuel a Revolution
Now methanol can be made from natural gas and captured carbon dioxide.
By George Olah and Chris Cox, WSJ, Oct 10, 2013
3. Honk if You Love the Mass-Produced Automobile
Critics note: Cars will soon use less energy and emit less pollution than public transit.
By Randal O’Toole, WSJ, Oct 4, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The 100 year anniversary of Henry Ford’s moving assembly line.]
4. Using ‘Sue and Settle’ to Thwart Oil and Gas Drillers The Endangered Species Act is being employed more than ever to block development.
By Stephen Moore, WSJ, Oct 4, 2013 [H/t Timothy Wise]
NEWS YOU CAN USE:
Science: Is the Sun Rising?
Current Sunspot Cycle Weakest In 190 Years – Recent Model Temperature Deviation Due To Solar Activity, Experts Say
The (tired) sun in September 2013 and spectral progress
By Frank Bosse and Fritz Vahrenholt, Trans. P. Gosselin, No Tricks Zone, Oct 7, 2013
Amine a minor setback for Svensmark
By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Oct 7, 2013
Link to press release: CERN’s CLOUD experiment shines new light on climate change
By Staff Writers, CERN, Oct 6, 2013
Link to paper: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere
By Almeida, et al, Nature, Oct 6, 2013
Paper suggests solar magnetic influence on Earth’s atmospheric pressure
By Jo Nova, Her Blog, Oct 10, 2013
Link to paper: The interplanetary magnetic field influences mid-latitude surface atmospheric pressure
By Lam et al. Environmental Research Letters, Oct 4, 2013
Commentary on the Article about the Interplanetary Magnetic Field influences
By Tim Ball, WUWT, Oct 9, 2013
Fixing the Facts 2
By Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, Oct 8, 2013
Suppressing Scientific Inquiry
On letters from climate-change deniers
By Paul Thornton, Editorial, Los Angeles Times, Oct 8, 2013
The BBC betrayed its values by giving Professor Carter this climate platform
How can letting a geologist appear as a legitimate climate scientist to ridicule the IPCC report be in the public interest?
By John Ashton, Guardian, Oct 1, 2013
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/01/bbc-betrayed-values-carter-scorn-ipcc [SEPP Comment: A call for censorship.]
Challenging the Orthodoxy
The stadium wave
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Oct 10, 2013
Scafetta 2013: Simple solar astronomical model beats IPCC climate models
By Jo Nova, Her Blog, Oct 11, 2013
Climate forecast: All’s well, despite what the IPCC says
Kesten Green, J. Scott Armstrong and Willie Soon, Financial Post, Oct 9, 2013
Lindzen: Understanding The IPCC AR5 Climate Assessment
By Richard Lindzen,, WUWT, Oct 8, 2013
Gross Scientific Negligence – IPCC Ignored Huge Body Of Peer-Reviewed Literature Showing Sun’s Clear Impact
By P. Gosselin, No Tricks Zone, Oct 11, 2013
[SEPP Comment: A list of papers on solar variation and climate variation.]
Defending the Orthodoxy
BBC gives too much weight to climate sceptics, minister claims
Greg Barker, the climate change minister, has criticised the BBC’s coverage of climate change claiming it gives undue weight to the opinions of sceptics.
By Nick Collins, Telegraph, UK, Oct 9, 2013
Climate change is real and denial is not about the science
By Andrew Dessler and Gerald North, My SA, Oct 6, 2013
Dessler & North Demonstrate Why Scientists Appear Clueless
By Roy Spencer, His Blog, Oct 8, 2013
[SEPP Comment: See link immediately above.]
Kerry: ‘Inviting catastrophe’ on climate
By Laura Barron-Lopez, The Hill, Oct 7, 2013
Questioning the Orthodoxy
Decision-Based Evidence-Making: More Disgrace From UN Panel on Climate Change
They claim more certainty than ever in dangerous warming, while their own report’s data contradict the statement.
By Tom Harris and Jay Lehr, PJ Media, Oct 11, 2013
Climate Guru Puts ‘Global Warming on Ice
Low sunspot activity means Earth chilling until at least 2030
Interview of Tim Ball, WND Radio, Oct 6, 2013
Confidence levels inside and outside an argument
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Oct 6, 2013
[SEPP Comment: A rather long post discussing IPCC’s use of the logical fallacy of appealing to the consequences of belief]
The Taxonomy of Climate Opinion
By Barry Brill, WUWT, Oct 8, 2013
Climate Models’ Tendency to Simulate Too Much Warming and the IPCC’s Attempt to Cover That Up
By Paul Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels, CATO, Oct 10, 2013
Does Global Warming Science Matter?
By Dennis Avery, Canada Free Press, Oct 11, 2013
Climate change ‘scientists’ are just another pressure group
The IPCC and its reports have been shaped by a close-knit group of scientists, all dedicated to the cause
By Christopher Booker, Telegraph, UK, Oct 5, 2013 [H/t Timothy Wise]
Climate change is dominated by the water cycle, not carbon dioxide
By Steve Goreham, Washington Times, Oct 7, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The headline is a bit much.]
Pay No Attention to the Bad Data
Behind the curtain at the IPCC.
By Steven Hayward, Weekly Standard, Oct 14, 2013
The climate alarmists have lost the debate: it’s time we stopped indulging their poisonous fantasy
By James Delingpole, Telegraph, UK, Oct 6, 2013 [H/t Sam Karnick]
The Media’s Collusion in the IPCC’s Irrational Fifth Assessment Conclusions
By Peter Glover, Energy Tribune, Oct 8, 2013
Problems in the Orthodoxy
Ball or aerosol?
By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Oct 7, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The public face of a high level of certainty disappears in private.]
Confidence, Doubt and Climate Change
By Nick Dunbar, His Blog, Oct 4, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
[SEPP Comment: The public announcements stress great certainty, the details of AR5 show greater uncertainty than in the AR4.]
Clouds of (slightly less) unknowing
Researchers are beginning to understand aerosols and clouds better. The result is to lower estimates of how much they cool the climate
By Staff Writer, Economist, Oct 5, 2013 [H/t Bishop Hill]
Seeking a Common Ground
The Danger of Hanging Your Hat on No Future Warming
By Roy Spencer, His Blog, Oct 11, 2013
Understanding multi-decadal climate changes
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Oct 8, 2013
[SEPP Comment: Reporting on a workshop hosted by the National Taiwan University]
Rising Sea Levels?
By Anthony Cox, NCTCS, Oct 9, 2013
Climate change sceptics aren’t all alike, so don’t tar them with the same brush
Denying the sceptics a voice on the IPCC report is surely bad for democracy and bad for science
By Ehsan Masood, Guardian, UK, Oct 8, 2013
The Economic Case for Climate Action
World Bank, IMF Joint Seminar, Oct 8, 2013 [H/t Bud Bromley]
Questioning European Green
Misguided energy policies have put Europe on a path to economic decline
By Larry Bell, City A.M., Oct 11, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
The tyranny of renewable energy targets
By Martin Livermore, Scientific Alliance, Oct 10, 2013
Crash boom bang
The smart money is starting to abandon the CO2 vessel
By Fred Mueller, WUWT, Oct 5, 2013
Electricity Prices To Skyrocket
By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Oct 10, 2013
Reign of madness
By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Oct 11, 2013
[SEPP Comment: See link immediately above.]
Axe green tax or energy bills will go up every year for a decade, says energy chief
Ministers are urged to initiate an immediate review of Britain’s entire green energy strategy or risk forcing household gas and electricity bills up every year for the rest of the decade
By Steve Hawkes, Telegraph, UK, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
The cost of climate
By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t Anne Debeil]
[SEPP Comment: How many preventable deaths from cold?]
German ‘Land of Industry’ Jeopardized by Green Push, Lobby Says
By Stefan Nicola, Bloomberg, Oct 9, 2013
Questioning Green Elsewhere
Will Cooling Temperature And Economic Climates Finally Take The Wind Out Of Failed Energy Policies?
By Larry Bell, Forbes, Oct 8, 2013
Green Climate Fund meets amid cash problems
By Staff Writer, EurActiv, Oct 11, 2013
Communicating Better to the Public – Exaggerate, or be Vague?
D.C. climate will shift in 2047, researchers say; tropics will feel unprecedented change first
By Lenny Bernstein, Washington Post, Oct 9, 2013
Link to paper: The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability
By Mora, et al. Nature, No Date
Time of emergence of a warming signal
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Oct 9, 2013
[SEPP Comment: Curry gives partially favorable review of the study immediately above.]
Get ready to adapt: Climate goes off the charts by 2047
By Alister Doyle, Reuters, MSN News, Oct 9, 2013 [H/t Clyde Spencer]
End Of The World Set For 2047. Plan Accordingly
By William Briggs, His Blog, Oct 10, 2013
[SEPP Comment: See links immediately above.]
Just in Time for Halloween Come Some Scary Global Warming Predictions
By Paul Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels, CATO, Oct 10, 2013
[SEPP Comment: See links above.]
By Gernot Wagner and Martin Weitzman, Op-Ed, NYT, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t Clyde Spencer]
Terrestrial ecosystems at risk of major shifts as temperatures increase
By Barbara Ferreira, Eurek Altert, Oct 8, 2013
[The scientist] hopes the new results can help inform the ongoing negotiations on climate mitigation targets, “as well as planning adaptation to unavoidable change.”
Communicating Better to the Public – Make things up.
Lord Deben: Climate change science is ‘akin to evidence linking cigarettes to cancer’
Chairman of the Committee on Climate Change warns some sceptics are being given too much coverage in the media
By Heather Saul, Independent, Oct 9, 2013
Metaphorical climate monsters
By Peter Foster, Financial Post, Oct 4, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
Schellnhuber Warns: Ocean Belch Would “Shock-Heat” Lower Troposhere Another 36°C Celsius (To Over 122°F)!
By P. Gosselin, No Tricks Zone, Oct 10, 2013
Why the media has gone silent on climate change
Climate change deniers have been waging a PR war on scientists who promote a path towards a post carbon economy.
By Hilal Elver, Al Jazeera, Oct 10, 2013
Hilal Elver is Research Professor in Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and Co-Director of the Climate Change Project.
[SEPP Comment: No discussion about the failure of Nature to obey her thoughts.]
“Most Severe Winter Start In 200 Years!” + Euro Municipalities Now Ignoring Foolish Predictions Of Warm Winters
By P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone, Oct 12, 2013
[SEPP Comment: One storm does not make a winter.]
Medieval Warm Period in Other Asian Countries (Not including China, Russian or Japan)
By Staff Writers, SPPI and CO2 Science, Oct 9, 2013
Bangladesh sea level rise
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Oct 7, 2013
Rising Sea Levels?
By Anthony Cox, NCTCS, Oct 9, 2013
Changing Cryosphere – Land / Sea Ice
Global Sea Ice Overview, Walrus Gathering and Northern Regional Sea Ice Retrospective
By Just the Facts, WUWT, Oct 6, 2013
Giant channels discovered beneath Antarctic ice shelf
By Staff Writers, Exeter, UK (SPX), Oct 09, 2013
Oceans are unprecedentedly alkaline
By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Oct 7, 2013
Ocean Acidification and Northwest Shellfish: Did the Seattle Times Get the Story Right?
By Cliff Mass, Weather Blog, Oct 9, 2013
[SEPP Comment: An explanation of why enhanced atmospheric CO2 probably did not cause recent shellfish problems from someone who is concerned about atmospheric CO2. Mass also explains that oceans are not becoming an acid.]
How will shellfish fare as ocean conditions shift?
By Elizabeth Halliday, Oceanus, Oct 9, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The test appears to be manipulative. Why not grow different sets of scallops in tanks with different pH levels? Transferring the scallops among tanks with different pH levels may be the cause of the found abnormalities.]
Agriculture Issues & Fear of Famine
Bt sweet corn can reduce insecticide use
By Staff Writers, Washington DC (SPX), Oct 09, 2013
Hawaii takes hypocrisy to new level
By Staff Writers, ACSH, Oct 9, 2013
Norway’s wheat production impacted by Climate Change
By David Archibald, WUWT, Oct 5, 2013
[SEPP Comment: A cooling climate can be dangerous.]
Review of Recent Scientific Articles by NIPCC
For a full list of articles see www.NIPCCreport.org
Measuring and Modeling Global Vegetation Growth: 1982-2009
Reference: Mao, J., Shi, X., Thornton, P.E., Hoffman, F.M., Zhu, Z. and Myneni, R.B. 2013. Global latitudinal-asymmetric vegetation growth trends and their driving mechanisms: 1982-2009. Remote Sensing 5: 1484-1497.
The CO2 fertilization effect of the carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere by mankind’s burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, gas and oil, is beginning to assume its vaulted position of being a tremendous boon to the biosphere, as all of humanity and the entirety of the world’s animal life depend ultimately upon having a sufficient supply of plant life to sustain themselves.
The Impact of Global-Warming-Induced Diurnal Temperature Range Reduction on Hospital Emergency Room Admissions in Beijing, China
Reference: Wang, M-z., Zheng, S., He, S-l., Li, B., Teng, H-j., Wang, S-g., Yin, L., Shang, K-z. and Li, T-s. 2013. The association between diurnal temperature range and emergency room admissions for cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive and genitourinary disease among the elderly: A time series study. Science of the Total Environment 456-457: 370-375.
The results of Wang et al., combined with those of Karl et al. (1984, 1991), make it clear that the diurnal nature of the global warming of the past century or so has helped to reduce the incidence of many life-threating health problems of the elderly in Beijing, China, just as it has also done for many people, both old and young, in a number of other countries – including Australia (Xu et al., 2013), Hong Kong (Tam et al., 2009) and Korea (Lim et al., 2012) – as well as other parts of China (Kan et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2013).
Tropical Tree Seedlings Exposed to Elevated Nighttime Air Temperatures
Reference: Krause, G.H., Cheesman, A.W., Winter, K., Krause, B. and Virgo, A. 2013. Thermal tolerance, net CO2 exchange and growth of a tropical tree species, Ficus insipida, cultivated at elevated daytime and nighttime temperatures. Journal of Plant Physiology 170: 822-827.
Krause et al. write that their most striking result was “the profound increase in biomass accumulation of plants under elevated nighttime temperature,” which “contrasts with the widely assumed negative impact of increased nighttime temperature upon tropical tree growth and the general paradigm that warmer temperatures reduce tree growth in the tropics.”
The Fate of Boreal Peatland Carbon in a Warming World
Reference: Loisel, J. and Yu, Z. 2013. Recent acceleration of carbon accumulation in a boreal peatland, south central Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research (Biogeosciences) 118: 41-53.
In the concluding words of the two researchers, “these results are contrary to the widespread notion that higher temperature will increase peat decay and associated carbon dioxide release from peatlands to the atmosphere, contributing to the positive carbon cycle-climate feedback to global warming.” Indeed, just the opposite appears to be the case in the real world of nature.
Supreme Court to Review Federal Court Decision Vacating CSAPR
By Sonal Patel, Power Mag, Oct 10, 2013
Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Taxes
Report: Carbon taxes, trading bring most cost-effective pollution cuts
By Ben Geman, The Hill, Oct 9, 2013
Link to report; climate and Carbon: Aligning Prices and Policies
By Staff Writers, OECD, Oct, 2013
Subsidies and Mandates Forever
Let the wind PTC die down immediately
By Nicolas Loris, Heritage Foundation, Oct 8, 2013
The diseconomy of the production tax credit
By Lisa Linowes, Wind Action, Oct 10, 2013
EPA and other Regulators on the March
An Uncritical View Of EPA: Why I Agree With Obama
By Larry Bell, Forbes, Oct 10, 2013
[SEPP Comment: Clever!]
EPA power grab threatens Chesapeake Bay farmers
Editorial, Washington Examiner, Oct 11, 2013
Industry pans low-sulfur gas regulations as costly, unneeded
By Ben Goad, The Hill, Oct 10, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The research on the supposed health benefits should be made public.]
UK fracking ambitions threatened by EU warning over methane emissions
The EU authorities have opened a new front in efforts to clamp down on shale gas, warning that the carbon footprint from methane emissions may be high enough to call into question the whole future of fracking in Europe.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Telegraph, UK, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
Energy Issues – Non-US
How Much Power Does Power Africa Really Need?
By Todd Moss and Madeleine Gleave, Center for Global Development, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t Roger Pielke, Jr.]
[SEPP Comment: Significant numbers.]
Western Europe consumes less natural gas, more coal
By Staff Writers, PennEnergy Oct 8, 2013 [H/t GWPF]
[SEPP Comment: The indicated European landed price of LNG is about $10.00 per million BTUs. If the transportation cost (including compression, etc.) is $6 per million BTUs, and the US price for gas is about $4 per million BTU, there is not much of a profit in shipping LNG from the US to Europe.]
Beijing aims to switch from coal to natural gas
By Staff Writers, Beijing (UPI), Oct 7, 2013
[SEPP Comment: Replace some coal-fired power plants with natural gas ones.]
Indonesia’s Increased Gasoline Demand Casts Shadow Over its Energy Planners
By Tim Daiss, Energy Tribune, Oct 14, 2013
Energy Issues — US
A Threat to Texas’ World-Class Energy Market
By Staff Writers, NCPA, Oct 9, 2013
Link to study: A Texas Capacity Market: The Push for Subsidies
By Kathleen Hunker, Texas Public Policy Foundation, September 2013
[SEPP Comment: Replace that which works well, but has a few imperfections, with that which works poorly, but it yields great profits to special interest groups.]
New England’s Largest Coal and Oil Power Plant to Close
By Aaron Larson, Power Mag, Oct 10, 2013
Washington’s Control of Energy
Top Obama climate aide stepping down
By Ben Geman, the Hill Oct 7, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The day after Sen. Vitter specifically requested that she testify before a Senate committee hearing. See link immediately below.]
Vitter asks Obama for federal witnesses at climate change hearing
By Julian Hattem, The Hill, Oct 7, 2013
AEA’s tactic: If you can’t win, delay
By Margo Thorning, Washington (UPI), Sep 30, 2013
Is the US Falling Behind Canada in Exporting LNG to Japan?
By Michael Economides, Energy Tribune, Oct 9, 2013
No Keystone XL pipeline approval this year: company
By Staff Writers, Ottawa (AFP), Oct 02, 2013
Oil and Natural Gas – the Future or the Past?
Good News About Fracking
By Donn Dears, Power for USA, Oct 8, 2013
U.S. expected to be largest producer of petroleum and natural gas hydrocarbons in 2013
By Hannah Breul, Linda Doman, et al. EIA, Oct 4, 2013
Return of King Coal?
Coal is the proven path to elevating the human condition.
By Frank Clemente, Energy Facts Weekly, Oct 7, 2013
World Coal Association Promotes Practical Steps to Combat Climate Change
By Aaron Larson, Power Mag, Oct 10, 2013
Oil Spills, Gas Leaks & Consequences
Can bacteria combat oil spill disasters?
By Staff Writers, Leipzig, Germany (SPX) Oct 01, 2013
Methane seeps of the deep sea: A bacteria feast for lithodid crabs
By Staff Writers, Potsdam, Germany (SPX), Oct 10, 2013
Link to paper: Methane-Carbon Flow into the Benthic Food Web at Cold Seeps – A Case Study from the Costa Rica Subduction Zone
By Niemann, et al. Plos One, Oct 7, 2013
E. coli found in Colorado flood zones, but no oil, gas contamination
By Staff Writers, Denver Post, Oct 8, 2013
North Dakota Oil Spill: Tesoro Corp. Pipeline Breaks Near Tioga; Dumps More Than 20,000 Barrels Of Crude
By James MacPherson, AP, Oct 10, 2013
Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Solar and Wind
First U.S. Concentrating Solar Power Plant with Thermal Storage Begins Operations
By Thomas Overton, Power Mag, Oct 9, 2013
Gulf Coast beckons wind farms when West Texas gusts fade
By Staff Writers, Bloomberg, Oct 11, 2013
Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Energy — Other
Fallacious Claims Prop Up Ethanol
By Paul Driessen, Townhall, Oct 6, 2013
Forty Years After OPEC Embargo, U.S. Is Energy Giant
By Robert Bryce, Bloomberg, Oct 10, 2013 [H/t Cooler Heads]
[SEPP Comment: A mindset formed 40 years ago continues to paralyze US energy policy. Yet, Washington prevents development of US energy resources on US government controlled property.]
Industry sues EPA over Renewable Fuel Standard
By Ben Goad, The Hill, Oct 8, 2013
Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Vehicles
Reasons For Developing Electric Vehicles
By Donn Dears, Power for USA, Oct 11, 2013
[SEPP Comment: They are weak.]
All Fired Up About Tesla
By Eric Peters, American Spectator, Oct 9, 2013
[SEPP Comment: The high performance of the Tesla is unsustainable.]
Carbon Capture and Sequestration Falling Further Behind Demand
By Thomas Overton, Power Mag, Oct 10, 2013
Russia charges all 30 Greenpeace activists with piracy
By Staff Writers, Moscow (AFP), Oct 03, 2013
Other Scientific News
Animal mission to space gives clues to astronauts’ vision problems
By Staff Writers, Moscow (UPI), Oct 4, 2013
Englert And Higgs Awarded Nobel Prize In Physics For 2013
By Staff Writers, Stockholm, Sweden (SPX), Oct 08, 2013
Early spring warming has greatest effect on breaking bud
By Staff Writers, Durham NC (SPX), Oct 09, 2013
Other News that May Be of Interest
3-D printed microscopic cages confine bacteria in tiny zoos for the study of infections
By Staff Writers, Austin TX (SPX), Oct 09, 2013
The inexorable nature of technological progress
By Matt Ridley, Rational Optimist, Oct 7, 2013
[SEPP Comment: Moore’s law coming to an end? Ridley errs on the labor-wage cost of electric lighting in 1880. Thomas Edison did not open the Pearl Street Power Station until 1882.]
BELOW THE BOTTOM LINE:
Airy fairy theory
By John Brignell, Number Watch, Oct 6, 2013
An implication of the verbiage here is that the further modelling is based on guessed coefficients or, even worse, coefficients obtained from a computer model based on guessed coefficients.
[SEPP Comment: Dismissing the claim by the US National Center for Atmospheric Research that it “developed a global electric circuit model by adding an additional layer to a climate model.”]
Due to travel commitments there will be no TWTW next week (Oct 19)