July Snow in New Hampshire

From the weather-is-not-climate department:

July snow on Mount Washington Observatory, New Hampshire
July snow on Mount Washington Observatory, New Hampshire. Credit: Mount Washington Observatory

By Jeff Fish, Globe Correspondent

Ignoring the calendar, which showed the beginning of the month of July, a dusting of snow fell Thursday on Mount Washington in New Hampshire, startling tourists and forcing the closure of the road to the top.

“It’s not extraordinary, but it’s definitely interesting,” said Stacey Kawecki, a meteorologist for the Mount Washington Observatory.

Mount Washington, the Northeast’s highest peak at 6,288 feet, has recorded snow in every month. The last time it was recorded in July was 2007.

more at boston.com

0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rbateman
July 3, 2010 10:51 am

Someone should take New Hampshire’s snowfall and rainfall data and sort it out like this:
http://www.robertb.darkhorizons.org/TempGr/WvPrecipSC.GIF
which is according to solar cycle length.
Then, we can see what is going on in New Hampshire, and what the future will be like with 2 long and shallow cycles in the forecast.

max
July 3, 2010 11:08 am

Summer snow on Mt. Washington is nothing new or even unexpected. It is kinda interesting the way the weather patterns often produce summer snow in the White Mountains, weather traveling all the way from the Rockies and down from Canada and weather coming up the East Coast coming inland all heading east and over the Berkshires and around the Green Mountains before being stopped by the White Mountains (especially Washington which is taller than any mountain the weather has hit since the Rockies). Interesting but not a sign of anything except that it gets cold above 6000ft.

RockyRoad
July 3, 2010 11:30 am

Well, had it been dry and hot, the warmers would have been claiming it as another indication of global warming. That it is wet and cold, a warmer claims it as “Interesing but not a sign of anything except that it gets cold above 6000ft”. Nice to see they like to have it both ways.
I just might have to cover my tomatoes tonight to keep them from getting hit with frost. What a way to celebrate the 4th of July!

HankHenry
July 3, 2010 12:05 pm

In the interest of balance. There is quite a bit of corn already tasseling in Northern Illinois. This will be the first I’ve ever seen corn tasseling by the fourth of July. Of course we all know that the age old gauge was “knee high by the fourth of July” so it is fair to say that this is part of a long term trend of improving corn growing conditions.

Layne Blanchard
July 3, 2010 12:11 pm

Must be that humid hot spot. 🙂

July 3, 2010 12:24 pm

No doubt NH snow in July is proof that AGW IS occurring.

July 3, 2010 12:57 pm

HankHenry,
That brings to mind Prof Freeman Dyson’s comment that growing corn uses up all the carbon dioxide available within five minutes if there is no wind.
If corn is growing that fast, maybe it’s something in the air.

Dennis Feindel
July 3, 2010 1:09 pm

Yes, it’s amazing how our Sun effects this Earth…I looking at an early fall this year in the Mid-West! My wild “Monk” Lilies came on three weeks early this year. When ever they do this, fall is coming early. Normally they bloom this week, the week of the 4th of July. Already the last three nights we’ve had low’s in the upper 40’s already! Too soon for me.. 😉

Douglas DC
July 3, 2010 1:10 pm

Timberati- I had a warmist I know tell me exactly that. He packs his “Inconvenient
Truth” next to his Bible..
I wish I was joking…

HankHenry
July 3, 2010 1:33 pm

Smokey “If corn is growing that fast, maybe it’s something in the air.”
Actually, what’s in the air is called progress – improved genetics (number one), improved chemicals, improved equipment, improved practices. Average corn yields are said to improve about 1 or 2 bushels per year, and the trend is accelerating.

Bruce Cobb
July 3, 2010 1:52 pm

No doubt though, in the not-too- distant future, snow on top of Mt. Washington will become “a very rare and exciting event”. Then, they will have to call the Presidentials the “Gray Mountains”. They will have to erect barriers to keep the hordes below from overrunning it in their desperate attempts to escape the boiling heat in the valleys.
Dibs on the movie rights.

Ed Murphy
July 3, 2010 1:54 pm

Has anyone ever been in a cornfield at sundown when the wind was still and quiet? You can actually hear the corn ears grow, stretching the silk and husks. Its a wonderful sound of nature.

Stephen Brown
July 3, 2010 2:09 pm

I’ve been busy in my garden here in Selsey in the very south of England, a place known previously for its benign climate.
My runner beans are at least a month late, my courgettes are also very late and the broad beans (which should be over by now) have only just started to produce pods. Its a really weird summer after a very cold winter. I’m hoping for an extended autumn so that crops which flourished by mid-summer five years ago can come to fruition.
It’s mid-summer and I’m wearing a fleece as I type this!

Dr. John M. Ware
July 3, 2010 2:10 pm

What was unusual here in central VA this year was (a) continuous snow cover from Dec 18 to Mar 5; (b) no killing freeze from Mar 1 on; (c) record hot June. Odd. I hope La Nina might moderate summer here: so far it’s been brutal, though obviously it’s been unusually cold elsewhere.

July 3, 2010 2:19 pm

Note for the reader:
University Of Colorado (128.138.135.120)
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Correlation for the AMO index is calculated.
( http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/AMOFz.htm )

July 3, 2010 2:31 pm
Robert of Ottawa
July 3, 2010 2:31 pm

rbateman
What is that inches of? I can testify that the inches important to me decrease with cold 😉

Henry chance
July 3, 2010 2:51 pm

Climate progress was making a big deal out of a little heat wave in D.C. last week.
A heat wave is not climate change. Record heat in the summer is not climate change.
Snow in the summer is rare, scarce and NOT a sign of warming.
How can Romm face himself on this?
They insist droughts and heat are permanent?
I also noted corn maturity while riding my mountain bike in the country this morning. Being a farmer, it is not unusual. The ground dry enough to plant let us plant early. It is raining today. We have plenty of moisture. I also don’t recall seeing corn tassels in June.

ShrNfr
July 3, 2010 3:40 pm

When I used to run, I ran the Mt. Washington Road Race (the race with only one hill) every year. It was always a challenge. It was run on Father’s Day weekend on saturday. Which also happened to be the bikers weekend down at Louden, NH. Made for some interesting stuff.
One of the biggest challenges of the road race was being able to change clothes on the fly as you went up the hill. It might be 70 at the base with sleet at the summit. Perfectly normal. You had to carry extra clothes to put on as you went up the hill when you were a moose like I was. They do not award first place in these kind of things to guys whose marathon weight was 190 lbs. The elevation is not all that much, but its the highest thing around for many miles and summer snow is by no means unusual. Despite the “one hill” name there is actually one small place where you go down hill at a slight grade for 100 feet or so. So technically its the race with only 2 hills.

biddyb
July 3, 2010 3:44 pm

Stephen Brown – Yup, I’m in the south-west, just, and everything is definitely a month late this year. The cold killed off my autumn sown broad beans and the lot I planted this year are just producing. My runner beans are only half way up the poles although I did notice a chap nearby had his in flower so perhaps he started his off in the greenhouse very early. Asparagus was also a month late and I probably could have continued cropping for a bit longer. Spuds nowhere to be seen – plenty of green on top, b***** all beneath the soil. It’s interesting, though, the unpredictability of it all.

rbateman
July 3, 2010 3:55 pm

Robert of Ottawa says:
July 3, 2010 at 2:31 pm
rbateman
What is that inches of? I can testify that the inches important to me decrease with cold 😉

That would be inches of rainfall. I only have this record because someone local made sure thier work was preserved. A lot of records for California were absconded with, and it’s a travesty. The poor slobs don’t know what’s coming next, what with their heads stuffed with AGW hysteria.

rbateman
July 3, 2010 4:01 pm

Mulberry trees 2 months late here in NW Calif. Cold killed 3 young trees, peach blossoms, and tomatoes think it’s fall (turning red already). The news from the S. Hemisphere says to expect another round of increasing cold winter.
And what is that silly Sun up there doing?

July 3, 2010 4:07 pm

The Mount Washington Observatory has a better description. From my note on Tips & Notes:
Ric Werme says:
July 1, 2010 at 9:10 pm
New Hampshire is in the midst of a few of those “rare days in June” with breezy, cool dry weather. We get a few each year, sort of makes up for the way too brief transition between chilly and hot. This year, they stretched into July and a couple days had a upper level low to provide some instability.
In fact, they had a little snow on top of Mt Washington. Not much, but enough to get the weather watchers in the observatory all excited. It has snowed in every month of the year up there, but snowfall in July and August is pretty scarce.
http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/comments/
Summer moves back Saturday, and what may be our first heatwave of the year may start Sunday. (Heatwave – 3 or more days with max temp > 90°F, about 32°C.)

July 3, 2010 4:24 pm

rbateman says:
July 3, 2010 at 10:51 am

Someone should take New Hampshire’s snowfall and rainfall data and sort it out like this:
http://www.robertb.darkhorizons.org/TempGr/WvPrecipSC.GIF
which is according to solar cycle length.
Then, we can see what is going on in New Hampshire, and what the future will be like with 2 long and shallow cycles in the forecast.

I suppose I could, though having grown up in the snow belt in northeastern Ohio I’m more interested in snow fall and snow depth. Especially the latter – if you sum the depths for every day in the snow season, you get “Snow Depth Days”, a handy figure to gauge how snowbound an area is.
The main thing I’ve learned is that the season-to-season and site-to-site differences are so big it would be tough to find any useful correlation.
I’d be reluctant to use rainfall data too – we get impacted by nor’easters (think broad tropical storm) and they often bring a wide range of rainfall to different areas.
Mark Twain was the first person to successfully describe New England weather, see http://wermenh.com/sdd/index.html and follw the link near the bottom.
“There is a sumptuous variety about the New England weather that compels the stranger’s admiration — and regret.” The “European” weather forecast model was predicting a high temperature in part of Massachusetts this coming Wednesday that would be above the all-time official high temp in the state. I think it’s backed off a bit, but it will be hot. NWS says 96°F, 10° below the all time record. A good day for the White Mountains – on a mountaintop.

July 3, 2010 4:44 pm

mikelorrey says:
July 3, 2010 at 11:22 am
> Mt Washington doesn’t get snow if the jet stream is north of the notch.
For non-New Englanders, a notch is basically just a mountain pass. The term annoyed me to no end until I realized that most of them really do look like notches.

July 3, 2010 4:52 pm

Mount Washington, the Northeast’s highest peak at 6,288 feet, has recorded snow in every month.
And so it’s remarked upon here… why, exactly?
[Reply: Ask these news agencies the same question. Newsworthy enough for them, should be newsworthy enough to discuss here. ~ mod]

Jimbo
July 3, 2010 5:17 pm

I hope you people realise that IF we were to enter into the usual, state of the norm ice age the Warmists would say, with a straight face:
this is just a short-lived ice age on the way to warming
or
the short-lived ice age is masking the warming trend
or
the ice age would have been much worse if it wasn’t for AGW
I kid you not as we are dealing with people who refuse to be rational about the weather.

Bill Hunter
July 3, 2010 5:56 pm

Yep! No warming here. Move along!

Rattus Norvegicus
July 3, 2010 6:27 pm

Co2Insanity,
You do realize that when there are ~20 feet of snow on the ground at 8000′ that it does take a while to melt?

Spector
July 3, 2010 6:39 pm

This June, I recall hearing recent forecasts on KHB60 Puget Sound area weather radio that the snow level in the mountains of Washington State would be around 6,000 feet.

July 3, 2010 6:45 pm

Global skiing in July: Overall great conditions!
http://www.ifyouski.com/snow.aspx

Regg
July 3, 2010 6:51 pm

That is all local weather – not related to climate at all – as the record warm winter for Canada. It’s still that way in the north east where everything is mostly 2-3 weeks in advance. Last week was relatively cold if i compare that to the previous 2 months (april and may), but other than that, it’s been a very mild spring and warm summer start – with the exception of the last few days.
Today everything went back to normal with temps high in the 80s – if not in the 90s.
So, i don’t make much of that event of snow on top of 6000+ feet of elevation. And i don’t make much of that single warm winter – as i’m quite sure it’ll be back way too soon. Still on the long run, it’s been awhile since we’ve had a -40 in our area – the last one i remember was early in the 90s. But it was a common thing prior than that. Things are changing.

Regg
July 3, 2010 7:00 pm

To Jimbo, most of the thing you said – have been told by people not believing in AGW. They say that AGW proponents are saying that, but i challenge you to find who really said that, and you’ll be surprised that it is coming from some of the most influent people – yet no scientist – in the anti-agw group.
If you look at the skeptical scientists, no one of them will deny the global warming situation we’re in for the last 150 years or so (with fluctuation – but still warming). So saying what you’ve said is only perpetuating lies, distortion, and does’nt serve any cause beside your own belly button.

899
July 3, 2010 7:05 pm

Timberati says:
July 3, 2010 at 12:24 pm
No doubt NH snow in July is proof that AGW IS occurring.
Timberati,
You neglected to employ the superlative adjective ‘Catastrophic’ when mentioning ‘AGW.’
You see? In order to freak people out, you’ve GOT to employ the most scary superlatives you might muster in order to have effect!
Now remember this: CAGW = Catastrophic Al Gore Wretchedness.
It’s ‘wretchedness’ because when he gets done with us, we’ll be living wretched lives.

Mike G
July 3, 2010 7:15 pm

@HankHenry
I don’t think old adages apply in the age of modern farming, hybrid, genetically modified, etc.

899
July 3, 2010 7:17 pm

Bruce Cobb says:
July 3, 2010 at 1:52 pm
No doubt though, in the not-too- distant future, snow on top of Mt. Washington will become “a very rare and exciting event”. Then, they will have to call the Presidentials the “Gray Mountains”. They will have to erect barriers to keep the hordes below from overrunning it in their desperate attempts to escape the boiling heat in the valleys.
Dibs on the movie rights.

“No doubt” you say?
Well, hey, get a load of this:
http://butnowyouknow.wordpress.com/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/
Or this:
http://newsbusters.org/node/11640
How about that, eh?
How does it feel to be tossed into a washing machine, stuck on the wash cycle?
You know: Back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, back and forth …
In virtually every decade of modern man, some jerk comes along and plays you people for the fools you are, and you buy it, hook, line, and sinker.

MattN
July 3, 2010 7:19 pm

56F this morning in Charlotte, NC. A new record for the day….

July 3, 2010 7:42 pm

“You do realize that when there are ~20 feet of snow on the ground at 8000′ that it does take a while to melt?”
Gee Rattus…no kidding? Such a genius to figure that one out you are.

rbateman
July 3, 2010 7:48 pm

Ric Werme says:
July 3, 2010 at 4:24 pm
What it should tell you is how a particular locale reacts to solar cycle length.
I was surprised to see that the rainfall records sorted nicely.
People around here ask me a lot about what the deep solar minimum means, and now I have an answer for them.

899
July 3, 2010 8:01 pm

rbateman says:
July 3, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Mulberry trees 2 months late here in NW Calif. Cold killed 3 young trees, peach blossoms, and tomatoes think it’s fall (turning red already). The news from the S. Hemisphere says to expect another round of increasing cold winter.
And what is that silly Sun up there doing?

And with all of the weather data pouring in, why the idiots in D.C. STILL want to shove their carbon-come slavery down our throats.
You’d think that by this time they’d have come to their senses. But no, they’ve been read the riot act by the wholly reluctant GOD-KING in the White House, and are determined to kill us off with taxes before we all die of starvation first.
Pull the teats on the cash cows just as hard as one can, before they croak.

Lawrie Ayres
July 3, 2010 8:54 pm

As an old retired corn grower I can empathise with the various statements about tasselling and being able to hear corn grow. The latter is true. You can hear it crackle on a hot humid day and it will grow up to six inches in the day.
The comments from many decribing the season set-backs eg broad beans a month later than normal, is very worrying. The growing season has been seriously reduced and should you have an early autumn some crops won’t reach maturity. No big deal for the home gardener but if translated to the commercial fruit and vegetable growers will mean shortages of summer produce. Unfortunately this will become common should SC24 and SC25 continue as predicted by the solar physicists.
It’s been well over thirty years since those cold winters and relatively short summers played havoc with world grain stocks. Current stocks rarely exceed 60 million tonnes which equates to 10 loaves of bread each; a very small buffer. Remember that Canada, the Ukraine, parts of China and grain areas in Northern Europe all increased production in the past warm cycle and will lose production over the next decade. We could be in for a tough time. The first thing to go will be grain for ethanol so any targets for non-oil fuels will have to be dropped. More food will be grown in greenhouses necessitating more power not less. Populations in poor countries will suffer.
There will be positives for the farm sector. More competition for grain should see price rises at the farm gate. Dearer grain will see a move away from feed lotting and a return to grass fed beef and sheep as the main means to provide protein from marginal lands.
There may even be a role for the alarmist scientists to use their knowledge of the carbon atom to help develop faster growing crops which use less water. The corrollary of cooling is less rain and more snow isn’t it. I seem to remember an American corn farmer from Iowa saying he only received 9 inches of rain but 9 feet of snow on which to grow his corn. That was in the sixties.
The most positive result will be the end of the AGW ridiculousness.

July 3, 2010 10:06 pm

Lawrie Ayres,
I value the opinion of an experienced farmer far more that the opinions of climate modelers sitting in their sterile cubicles, who never get out into the mud and the cold real world. Thanks for your perspective.

July 4, 2010 12:26 am

Darn cold in Sydney right now
This is several days old and the weather has not warmed up at all.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/30/2941227.htm
But ABC weather specialist Graham Creed says people’s complaints are justified.
“It’s definitely quite unusual to see such widespread cold weather in June, it would be more typical in July and August,” he said.
“So people are complaining about the cold for a good reason.”
Mr Creed says most areas across the south-east are experiencing temperatures well below average.
“Last weekend a cool change moved through and that introduced some significantly colder air across most of south-east Australia,” he said.
“Quickly in behind that we had a high pressure ridge move through, producing clear skies during both the day and the night, but it’s also helping to trap that cold air in.
“The clear skies mean we are losing what little daytime heating there is and overnight temperatures are dropping into the minuses through many of those states, producing widespread frosts.
“On top of that we’ve got quite a breeze in certain areas and the air is very dry so that’s producing very low wind chill, so not only is the sun not providing much warmth, you’ve also got the assistance of the wind making it feel colder than it actually is.”
He says Queensland is in for a particularly rough few days, as widespread rainfall will see the conditions change from cold and sunny to cold, cloudy and wet.
Yesterday, an icy blast through Adelaide brought enough rain to supply the city for a month, with a hail storm capping off the exceptionally wintry day.
Yesterday was also the coldest day in Melbourne in nearly two years, with the city not reaching its maximum temperature of 10.8 degrees Celsius until 7:55pm (AEST).
If the temperature in Melbourne fails to hit its forecast maximum today, it will be the first time in 14 years the city has recorded three consecutive days of temperatures below 12 degrees.
Last night Brisbane was coldest at 9:00pm (AEST), when the mercury dropped to below 8 degrees, but experts say it will be even cooler tonight.
Sydney recorded its coldest June morning today since 1949, with temperatures diving to 4.3 degrees just before 6:00am (AEST).

imran14826
July 4, 2010 12:27 am

“You do realize that when there are ~20 feet of snow on the ground at 8000′ that it does take a while to melt?”
Imran14826
http://www.livetv.pk

Ed Murphy
July 4, 2010 12:29 am

Its Déjà vu… I thought so… I could kind of remember the scary news about Iceland volcanoes toward the end of the 23-24 solar minimum. Katla didn’t blow then… I’m not saying it won’t now but, anyway. Refreshed my memory of some of the other 1998-1999 eruptions too! We had an El Nino switch to a La Nina then too, and much the same weather patterns we have now. A bit more intense this time though.
Global Volcanism Program | Eyjafjallajökull | Summary
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1702-02=
An intrusion beneath the south flank from July-December 1999 was accompanied by increased seismic activity and was constrained by tilt measurements, GPS-geodesy and InSAR.
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/find_eruptions.cfm
If the Sun is going to get going at all, the time to do it is within the next six months. We may be in for a number of VEI 3-4 volcano eruptions between now and through 2011 if history repeats. Heaven forbid those get worse like the weather.

bhanwara
July 4, 2010 1:04 am

Selsey Bill must be an octogenarian lizard.

Steve Garcia
July 4, 2010 1:28 am

– Glad someone else popped a mention of that 231 mph wind record on Mt Washington.
For all who love weather (as opposed to climate!) this is a great read about that day, in 1934 – which amazingly was the warmest year on record in the US (after Steve McIntyre got them to correct the data):
Record Wind
In 1971 I lived near Mt Washington, and the radio weather reports from up on top were a hoot to listen to, with the wind not just howling in the background, but ROARING. I laugh just thinking about it…

David Corcoran
July 4, 2010 2:19 am

Coolest summer I’ve experienced in my 50 years in SoCal so far. Everybody here’s talking about it. Sweater weather much of the day, with respite in the afternoon. It’s like an unusually cool spring. 15+ degrees under what I’d expect.

R. de Haan
July 4, 2010 3:25 am

Washington Governor requests federal farm disaster assistance. Reason: Crop failures due to abnormally cold, wet weather.
http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1528&newsType=1

Garry
July 4, 2010 4:00 am

From a strictly anecdotal perspective, 15 years ago I did a LOT of hiking around the Presidential Range (where Mt. Washington is located) and as an experienced White Mountains hiker one is *always* prepared for a sudden drop of temperatures into the 40’s and 30’s (Fahrenheit), and maybe a snow squall like this one.
Yes, even in July and August.
And so a July dusting in the Presidentials isn’t a big surprise, while on the opposite and of the scale, we often hiked in winter temperatures in the -20F to -30F range and I’ve been up on the Mt. Washington “Alpine Garden” with winds over 100MPH (we were crawling on hands and knees after coming out of the Huntington Ravine one nasty December day).
They don’t call it “the worst weather in the world” for nothing.

Garry
July 4, 2010 4:17 am

By the way, there is May and June skiing just below the summit of Mt. Washington, in the Tuckerman Ravine, almost every year without fail, and this has been ongoing for at least 80 or 90 years (since the 1920’s). No CAGW needed.
http://timefortuckerman.com/
And here is a live webcam of Mt Washington, with Tuckerman Ravine below and to the left, and Huntington Ravine below and to the right.
http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/cam/ravines/
The snow is gone by now but there are lots of photos posted on the web of snowfields lingering in the ravines right into late June.

Caleb
July 4, 2010 4:48 am

In southern New Hampshire June averaged about a degree above normal. I think it was mostly due to more sunshine than usual. We are having a mini-drought, as most of the rain is wrung from the air-masses out towards Indiana. I’m forsed to water my garden, but enjoy it, because June, 2009 was one of the rainiest ones I ever remember. After a June like that one, it’s hard to complain about this year’s glorious sunshine.
A brief cool shot is normal this far north. The recent one brought temperatures within five degrees of the record lows, but didn’t truely threaten us with frost. The record lows tend to be around 40 F. The average low is around 55. People from sweltering cities like to come up this way to get some sleep, and relax by cool lakes.
While looking at weather records I think I may have found a blunder in the Concord, New Hampshire records. The record low for June 30 in Concord was said to be 32 in 2005, but when I looked at the record for June 30, 2005 in Concord, New Hampshire, it said the high was 84 and the low was 61. Somebody goofed somewhere, unless it is just me.

Curious Yellow
July 4, 2010 5:43 am

Zorro says:
July 4, 2010 at 12:26 am
Is there a message here? You’re describing weather, so what’s new. I believe that not so long ago, there was a white X-mas in the Aussie Alps. The weather is getting more chaotic in terms of extreme events; heat, cold, rain, wind, cyclones, thunderstorms etc.
But the world is cooling, is it? What about trend, could it be less warming? A bit like answering the question How are you? with… Not too bad. What does it mean? Is it bad but it could be worse? Probably not, what people mean is that things are ok but could be better. On the other hand, the tone of voice and/or inflection may indicate that things are in fact quite good. Warming, cooling or warming less than previously? That is the question(s).

E.M.Smith
Editor
July 4, 2010 6:26 am

RockyRoad says:
I just might have to cover my tomatoes tonight to keep them from getting hit with frost. What a way to celebrate the 4th of July!

Ah, the Tomato Report. One of my most favorite and unimpeachable indicators.
I’ve finally got tomato set, though later than usual, and now have some nice sized fruit, all green… Usually I can count on at least one at the early edible stage for the 4th, and sometimes a whole basket in warm years. Not this year. Small hard green things that could perhaps be used for Fried Green Tomatoes, but not much else.
I’d estimate about 2 or 3 more weeks for ripe fruit. It’s definitely colder in California on the Tomato Index…
And per the folks sniping about it not being unusual to have snow there, then:
Sometimes is valuable to report the null case. Nothing unusual is happening.
IF we had the massive global warming we were promised, we would expect that places with marginal events (like occasional light snow in July) would stop having them. That it’s snowing shows it’s NOT abnormally warm. It’s quite normal. And showing that it’s quite normal is a very valuable thing when other folks are claiming the world is burning up…

July 4, 2010 6:43 am

Caleb says:
July 4, 2010 at 4:48 am

While looking at weather records I think I may have found a blunder in the Concord, New Hampshire records. The record low for June 30 in Concord was said to be 32 in 2005, but when I looked at the record for June 30, 2005 in Concord, New Hampshire, it said the high was 84 and the low was 61. Somebody goofed somewhere, unless it is just me.

One July 5th several years ago my father drove from Plymouth NH to Cambridge MA very early in the morning. The dew point was very low and conditions were ideal for radiational cooling. He noticed one low spot along I 93 where the grass looked lighter than all the rest and suspected it was frost.
However, the Concord ASOS wouldn’t see an effect like that, though it does get some decent radiational cooling. At my home less than 10 miles away I got:

mysql> select hi_temp, hi_temp_time, lo_temp, lo_temp_time from daily where dt='2005-6-30';
+---------+--------------+---------+--------------+
| hi_temp | hi_temp_time | lo_temp | lo_temp_time |
+---------+--------------+---------+--------------+
|    84.5 | 16:00:00     |    62.3 | 23:50:00     |
+---------+--------------+---------+--------------+

The data is graphed at
http://c-24-91-225-190.hsd1.ma.comcast.net/cgi-bin/wx_fetch?table=raw&year=2005&month=6&day=28&len=7&vars=out_temp&vars=dew_pt
(if you want to poke around, start at http://wermenh.com/wx/query.html )
So, the 32 is completely unbelievable and completely bogus. Is that data from the NWS at Gray ME or the NCDC? It would be an interesting project to try to get that fixed and document the effort.

Douglas DC
July 4, 2010 7:20 am

33 F at Meacham Or. 4200ft. or so elev. in the Blue Mtns of NE Oregon. Trouble is,
they had a high of 39F. Yesterday. Here in LaGrande, we had 7o/48, 10 below normal
for the High one Degree above for the low. Forecast is for summer-kind of-to be here
this week with near 90F by mid week-then it cools off…
My Purple Cherokee tomatoes are finally setting flowers,,,,

Ed Murphy
July 4, 2010 8:12 am

What I meant was I could remember the scary news about Iceland volcanoes toward the end of the 22-23 solar minimum, not the 23-24. Katla didn’t blow then…
I reposted it with the correction but I guess the moderator didn’t catch it, my oops.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 9:04 am

E.M.Smith says:
July 4, 2010 at 6:26 am
“[…]
Sometimes is valuable to report the null case. Nothing unusual is happening.
IF we had the massive global warming we were promised, we would expect that places with marginal events (like occasional light snow in July) would stop having them. That it’s snowing shows it’s NOT abnormally warm. […]”
I’m just exploring something along the same lines. The trick with the normal working of things is that nothing unusual happens, so even though they’re the pervasive normal case, they will not be reported nor researched in depth.
It occured to me that alarmist science, MSM and the wikipedia devote much more space in papers, articles and web texts to positive feedbacks and much less to negative feedbacks; the ratio ranges from 2:1 to 5:1.
Now, every dynamic system that sustains itself incorporates negative feedbacks; every living organism, for instance. It is what keeps the system stable. One example is the urge to breath.
We as animals are so tuned to direct our attention away from the normal and towards the special because this might warn us of possible dangers. It makes the ubiquitious normal working of stable systems invisible to most of us.
I think AGW science has fallen prey to this built-in perception bias.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 9:11 am

DirkH says:
July 4, 2010 at 9:04 am
“[…]
I think AGW science has fallen prey to this built-in perception bias.”
One might even say: A positive feedback is something very unlikely. It usually doesn’t happen. The professional slush fund climatologists have been spreading their tipping point writings so often that we’re all used to it now. In fact, most of the time nature has other things to do than crafting self-amplifying phenomena.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 9:32 am

DirkH says:
July 4, 2010 at 9:11 am
“[….]
point writings so often that we’re all used to it now. In fact, most of the time nature has other things to do than crafting self-amplifying phenomena”
Continuing this train of thought: A positive feedback runs its course, consumes some accumulated potential in the process and is over quickly. A dynamic system stabilized by negative feedbacks OTOH can continue over a long period of time. So the duration is much longer, and this explains the persistence and ubiquity of negative feedbacks in nature.
This does not show that the “tipping point scenarios” are impossible but it explains why so much attention is diverted to them even though they must be unlikely.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 10:05 am

DirkH says:
“[…] Continuing this train of thought: A positive feedback runs its course, consumes some accumulated potential in the process and is over quickly.”
from here, we can ask the question: What is the potential that the positive feedback posited by the AGW crowd is expected to exploit? Well, as the suggested mechanism is water vapour feedback, the potential exploited can only be the heat differential between air near the surface and surface waters, leading to a higher water vapour carrying capacity of the air and increased evaporation.
Needless to say, this potential must be used up in the process. Anybody already done the numbers or experiments? We should be able to observe the phenomenon on any hot day, anywhere except in very arid places.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 11:28 am

DirkH says:
July 4, 2010 at 10:05 am
“[…]
Needless to say, this potential must be used up in the process. Anybody already done the numbers or experiments? We should be able to observe the phenomenon on any hot day, anywhere except in very arid places.”
Yeah we did. Unfortunately the observations don’t really coincide with the models. Gavin Schmidt tries to explain it away:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/tropical-troposphere-trends/
but it doesn’t convince me. Actually his own argument doesn’t even convince Gavin if you read through his responses to readers of his post.

LarryOldtimer
July 4, 2010 12:51 pm

Averages when the differences are large have little to no meaning. Sometimes it is cold, sometimes it’s hot. Some people like it, others not.
Sometimes the temperature is highly variable over longer periods, sometimes not so. Neither makes any difference over the long haul.
The real meaning comes when outliers of weather and temperature happen at a time which causes widespread failure of crops.
A difference in temperature at the high end has few if any bad consequences. When there is widespread failure of crops is when the real hurt happens, and can be caused by too much rainfall, too little rainfall, much later than “usual” killing frosts in the spring or much earlier than “usual” killing frosts in autumn.
This “the weather is getting more violent, climate is changing” must be from people who haven’t read much history. Try the Great Drought (which is what it was called in 1930), throughout Midwestern states in the 1930s or the torrential rainfall in CA in the winter of 1862. http://www.redlandsfortnightly.org/papers/Taylor06.htm
A repeat of either would be a huge catastrophe for the US, however greater our present technology.
Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get.” ~ Mark Twain
Absurdities do occur in history when “convential” scientists get it completely wrong. As far as I am concerned, this is one of those times which will have future historians and scientists shaking their heads in wonderment.

Kay
July 4, 2010 1:01 pm

Smokey says:
July 3, 2010 at 12:57 pm
HankHenry,
That brings to mind Prof Freeman Dyson’s comment that growing corn uses up all the carbon dioxide available within five minutes if there is no wind.
If corn is growing that fast, maybe it’s something in the air.”
No, it’s because they’re using GM corn that’s specially bred to be ready by the 4th of July instead of early August.

David L
July 4, 2010 1:05 pm

Here in Philly, June was pretty warm and next week may top 100 a few days in a row. I remember similar weather in 1987 but I’m just waiting for the proclamations of global warming. Snow in July in NH means nothing, but a
typical heat streak in Philly will be proof of AGW.

DirkH
July 4, 2010 1:21 pm

Link to Freeman Dyson’s essay containing the corn quote:
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/dysonf07/dysonf07_index.html

Jack Simmons
July 4, 2010 2:05 pm

Douglas DC says:
July 3, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Timberati- I had a warmist I know tell me exactly that. He packs his “Inconvenient
Truth” next to his Bible..
I wish I was joking…

He has a Bible?

Frank Perdicaro
July 4, 2010 3:18 pm

Tomato? Lots of them here in SoCal since the June 20 timeframe.
I have been blanching, peeling and freezing them, and might do more
today.
Mt. Washington is special because of its very high height with respect to
the surrounding terrain. Wildcat is just across the street, and is 1/3 shorter.
Washington is deadly. Last time I hiked it, two bodies went past me in
stretchers: one was a heart attack, the other dead from exposure. We
turned around just above the headwall because it was a 60 mph whiteout. A few
years later, a friend of my father’s, a man that had hiked just about everything
but K2 and Everest, was killed in a slide off the top of Tuckerman’s.

Jimbo
July 4, 2010 5:26 pm

Regg says:
July 3, 2010 at 7:00 pm
To Jimbo, most of the thing you said – have been told by people not believing in AGW. They say that AGW proponents are saying that, but i challenge you to find who really said that, and you’ll be surprised that it is coming from some of the most influent people – yet no scientist – in the anti-agw group.

Regg, I was talking about a ‘hypothetical’ ice age and my speculated Warmist responses. We are not at an ice age yet, it’s about the possible future, so I cannot possibly meet your challenge. Sorry! ;o(

Jimbo
July 4, 2010 5:33 pm

Regg says:
July 3, 2010 at 7:00 pm
…..
If you look at the skeptical scientists, no one of them will deny the global warming situation we’re in for the last 150 years or so (with fluctuation – but still warming). So saying what you’ve said is only perpetuating lies, distortion, and does’nt serve any cause beside your own belly button.

I could try to convert you but I feel you have been totally brainwashed. However, over time at WUWT you may feel differently. I have a lot of peer reveiwed references for you but it may bore you silly and be a little inconvenient. Don’t accuse people of lying. I KNOW THAT THE PLANET WARMED IN THE LAST 30 DECADES OF THE 20TH CENTURY. Is that a lie? Can you convince me that the majority of the warming was caused by man as opposed to nature? Here is your forum to shine. Go ahead and provide the evidence. I’m waitingin…..

899
July 4, 2010 5:33 pm

R. de Haan says:
July 4, 2010 at 3:25 am
Washington Governor requests federal farm disaster assistance. Reason: Crop failures due to abnormally cold, wet weather.
http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1528&newsType=1

Meanwhile, Christine is giving Patty and Maria pats on their respective butts to go pass that ‘Cap and Trade’ legislation.
Talk about duplicitous …
Christine is salivating all over herself for a possible Federal appointment by the ‘Big ‘O.”

Jimbo
July 4, 2010 5:34 pm

Correction:
I KNOW THAT THE PLANET WARMED IN THE LAST [3] DECADES OF THE 20TH CENTURY.

Editor
July 4, 2010 6:05 pm

Hey, we’re finally getting a summer here in Southern New England that really feels like a summer. Don’t any of you guys go jinxing it.

JPeden
July 4, 2010 9:37 pm

Regg says:
July 3, 2010 at 7:00 pm:
If you look at the skeptical scientists, no one of them will deny the global warming situation we’re in for the last 150 years or so (with fluctuation – but still warming).
No one who is sceptical even needs to deny “the global warming situation”. Instead, what is demanded first from any real scientist is a reconstruction of what would be considered a truely scientifically reasonable record of the “world’s” temperature course, complete with the many caveats which will arise, including whether a GMT constructed from these surface and “oceanic” stations has any important physical meaning at all – something which so far has definitely not been presented by Climate Science.

JPeden
July 4, 2010 9:52 pm

addendum to my above post: What’s wrong with the idea that Climate Science should have started at the beginning?

Novareason
July 5, 2010 9:25 pm

I’ve climbed Mt Washington twice, both in the middle of the summer, and saw legitimately ALL kinds of weather (at one point in a 5 minute span, it went from clear to cloudy to rain to sleet to snow to hail to rain and then sunny). The weather there is not only highly variable, but often unrelated to surrounding conditions. It is the site of the highest recorded wind speed in history (231 mph), and as much as I like sticking it in the faces of people who say crazy weather is indicative of CAGW, this one is totally par for the course.

Novareason
July 5, 2010 9:27 pm

Actually scratch that, looks like it was broken in 1996, Barrow Island, Australia, having trouble finding a good citation, but the claim is that the record is now 253mph.

July 6, 2010 4:51 am

Novareason says:
July 5, 2010 at 9:27 pm

Actually scratch that, looks like it was broken in 1996, Barrow Island, Australia, having trouble finding a good citation, but the claim is that the record is now 253mph.

Links, notes, and reactions are at
http://www.mountwashington.org/forums/showthread.php?t=5789
113.2 m/s (253 mph; 220 kt)
The WMO didn’t send a copy of the release to the MWO, though some people did know that it was under review. I suggested that that the WMO change the classifications for wind records as the new record makes the existing structure a little awkward.

farah jaffar
July 6, 2010 7:56 pm

good