JunkScience.com back up and running

Posted on June 8, 2008 by

After nearly a two week hiatus, www.junkscience.com is back online. Give Barry Hearn and Steve Milloy a visit, and maybe help out by buying a book or t-shirt or hit the tip jar. – Anthony

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to JunkScience.com back up and running

  1. David Walton says:
    June 8, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    Junk Science is an excellent and outstanding resource. I am pleased to see it referenced here.

  2. deadwood says:
    June 8, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    I noticed its absence. Malloy is an interesting writer and has a cool knack of cutting through the mumbo jumbo.

    Glad to the return of JunkScience. I hope the absence was related to his recent work against the climate bill and not because of hackers (like the CO2 science site).

  3. Roger Carr says:
    June 8, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    The problem with JunkScience being back is the compelling reason to make the time to read it; not to mention the need to survive the waves of depression which sweep over one as the sheer ornery stupidity and even malicious distortion of truth is exposed in its pages.
    Having just spent some time there I am off for a quiet smoke to settle me down some…

  4. timprosser says:
    June 9, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    The heavily slanted rhetoric used at JunkScience.com is just plain dumb, and detracts from any exposure of truth it may contain. I am so tired of the Gore-hating, divisive BS – I just want some good, scientific information on what is going on without having to wade through somebody’s knee-jerk far right enviro-bashing. I will not read junkscience, nor will I recommend it to anyone else, and I am discouraged that Anthony supports it.

    REPLY: Sorry, they have the distinction of being quite a large daily clearinghouse of information. Sometimes they throw a little humor.

  5. Dave says:
    June 9, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    The heavily slanted rhetoric used at JunkScience.com is just plain dumb, and detracts from any exposure of truth it may contain.….and they are different from the heavily “anthropogenic” biased IPCC how?

    I’m guessing you don’t believe them either?

  6. L Nettles says:
    June 10, 2008 at 6:38 am

    Junkscience published my letter on the Al Gore DSCC campaign letter today (6/10/08 ) under correspondence received

    REPLY: Congrats!

Comments are closed.