Snow has thinned on Arctic sea ice

From the University of Washington

From research stations drifting on ice floes to high-tech aircraft radar, scientists have been tracking the depth of snow that accumulates on Arctic sea ice for almost a century. Now that people are more concerned than ever about what is happening at the poles, research led by the University of Washington and NASA confirms that snow has thinned significantly in the Arctic, particularly on sea ice in western waters near Alaska.

A new study, accepted for publication in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, a publication of the American Geophysical Union, combines data collected by ice buoys and NASA aircraft with historic data from ice floes staffed by Soviet scientists from the late 1950s through the early 1990s to track changes over decades.

Historically, Soviets on drifting sea ice used meter sticks and handwritten logs to record snow depth. Today, researchers on the ground use an automated probe similar to a ski pole to verify the accuracy of airborne measurements.

“When you stab it into the ground, the basket move up, and it records the distance between the magnet and the end of the probe,” said first author Melinda Webster, a UW graduate student in oceanography. “You can take a lot of measurements very quickly. It’s a pretty big difference from the Soviet field stations.”

Webster verified the accuracy of airborne data taken during a March 15, 2012 NASA flight over the sea ice near Barrow, Alaska. The following day Webster followed the same track in minus 30-degree temperatures while stabbing through the snow every two to three steps.

The authors compared data from NASA airborne surveys, collected between 2009 and 2013, with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers buoys frozen into the sea ice, and earlier data from Soviet drifting ice stations in 1937 and from 1954 through 1991. Results showed that snowpack has thinned from 14 inches to 9 inches (35 cm to 22 cm) in the western Arctic, and from 13 inches to 6 inches (33 cm to 14.5 cm) in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, west and north of Alaska.

Change in springtime Arctic snow depth compared to the average. The data come from Soviet drifting ice stations (1950-1987), US Ice Mass Balance buoys (1993-2013), and the NASA IceBridge airborne project (2009-2013). For measurements in the western Arctic only, the trend was a decline of 0.27 cm per year (about 1 inch less per decade) with 99 percent significance. Credit: M. Webster / Univ. of Washington

That’s a decline in the western Arctic of about a third, and snowpack in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas less than half as thick in spring in recent years compared to the average Soviet-era records for that time of year.

“Knowing exactly the error between the airborne and the ground measurements, we’re able to say with confidence, Yes, the snow is decreasing in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas,” said co-author Ignatius Rigor, an oceanographer at the UW’s Applied Physics Laboratory.

The authors speculate the reason for the thinner snow, especially in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, may be that the surface freeze-up is happening later in the fall so the year’s heaviest snowfalls, in September and October, mostly fall into the open ocean.

What thinner snow will mean for the ice is not certain. Deeper snow actually shields ice from cold air, so a thinner blanket may allow the ice to grow thicker during the winter. On the other hand, thinner snow cover may allow the ice to melt earlier in the springtime.

Thinner snow has other effects, Webster said, for animals that use the snow to make dens, and for low-light microscopic plants that grow underneath the sea ice and form the base of the Arctic food web.

The new results support a 15-year-old UW-led study in which Russian and American scientists first analyzed the historic Arctic Ocean snow measurements. That paper detected a slight decline in spring snow depth that the authors believed, even then, was due to a shorter ice-covered season.

“This confirms and extends the results of that earlier work, showing that we continue to see thinning snow on the Arctic sea ice,” said Rigor, who was also a co-author on the earlier paper.

The recent fieldwork was part of NASA’s Operation IceBridge program, which is using aircraft to track changes while NASA prepares to launch a new ice-monitoring satellite in 2017. The team conducted research flights in spring 2012 as part of a larger program to monitor changes in the Arctic.

###

The research was supported by NASA and the U.S. Interagency Arctic Buoy Program. Co-authors are Son Nghiem at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Nathan Kurtz at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Sinead Farrell at the University of Maryland, Don Perovich at the federal Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory and Matthew Sturm at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
111 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 14, 2014 6:23 am

Every snowmobiler knows that heavy snow means thin ice, and wind determines where the snow goes, it is not an “even coat” on any ice surface for very long. Considering that there are no natural wind breaks for 100’s of kilometers, and the arctic is a desert, and that ice covered water restricts “lake effect” type of storms, I am not suprised the snow pack varies greatly, like everything in nature, it is only suprising when it is constant.

ferdberple
August 14, 2014 7:08 am

Confirms the decrease in specific humidity
===============
AGW predicts increasing humidity

RoHa
August 14, 2014 7:37 am

Er… So does thinner snow mean we are slightly more doomed or slightly less?

mjc
August 14, 2014 7:54 am

goldminor says:
August 13, 2014 at 11:10 pm
Joseph Bastardi says:
August 13, 2014 at 12:54 pm
What next, size of snowflakes?
==========================================
The next study will show how the shape and flavor of snowflakes has been changing since the rise in co2.

Just avoid the yellow ones…

Unmentionable
August 14, 2014 9:50 am

Don’t the polar bears clean themselves by pushing snow through their fur? Are they supposed to just get stinky and live with it if this situation deteriorates further? Shouldn’t we develop a bear deodorant in-line with the precautionary principle, as things could get rather woofie up there if we were to neglect our duty of care. The top of the world might begin to smell like the bottom of the world, an unfortunate sort of pole reversal.

August 14, 2014 11:00 am

mjc says:
August 14, 2014 at 7:54 am
Just avoid the yellow ones…
=============================================
Are you suggesting that those were not lemon flavored?

August 14, 2014 11:44 am

ferdberple says:
AGW predicts increasing humidity.
Exactly. The alarmist prediction was that in a warming world there would be more evaporation, which would raise relative and specific hujmidity levels.
Didn’t happen. They have been declining for decades. Makes you wonder if global temperatures are being recorded honestly.

higley7
August 14, 2014 9:47 pm

“thinner snow cover may allow the ice to melt earlier in the springtime”
It is not really the air that does most of the melting in the Arctic summer. It is the water from below that is much more efficient at melting water, being much denser.

August 15, 2014 12:01 pm

Mosher says:
“This is the typical “thinking” that pervades skeptical sites.
They never question their own beliefs. They can’t even document what others say.”
+++++++++++
I read this as saying skeptical sites have a problem, whereas AGW sites do not.
You also suggest that AGW sites do question their own beliefs. Although evidence suggest the opposite.

August 15, 2014 12:32 pm

Steven Mosher says:
August 13, 2014 at 9:38 am
“dbstealey says:
August 13, 2014 at 9:33 am
Changing precipitation patterns, that’s all. A regional effect.”
############
note that skeptics merely assert claims. no data. no analysis. just assertion.
no uncertainty. no doubt. no acknowledgement that they might be wrong.
no critical assessment of prior work. no citations.
read climate science. say no and throw up a reason
++++++++++++
Mosher, you would do well to learn by what dbstealey writes. Instead, you lob misleading words attempting to distract people from being able to find truth. I come here to find truth by reading opposing views and then researching. I want to be wrong –because by being wrong one learns something they did not know.
It’s apparent that your statements are agenda driven. You do what disingenuous people often do. That is, you accuse people of what you are guilty of. That’s how I and many others see you –and I think people like you are obstacles to truth.
I’ve read many of your posts – which seem crafted to take people down the rabbit hole of deceit. Perhaps it’s to stoke your work, which is one sided. This includes your work with BEST. It’s sad that someone with your brilliance uses knowledge the way you do.

Keitho
Editor
August 16, 2014 2:23 am

Interesting. Now what causes this, what will the consequences be and will the trend continue, stall or reverse?

1 3 4 5