Virtually all of the flows to and from the atmosphere are photosynthesis flows. Volcanic,rock are not. If you eliminate fossil fuels , you immediately remove 7.8 PgC/yr of flows to the atmosphere, half of which accumulate in the atmosphere yearly . The 4 PgC/yr of accumulation ( actually 3.9 PgC/yr) would be eliminated and we would have a draw down of 3.9 PgC/yr . Present day 3 ppm CO2 increase /year would go to 3 ppm CO2 decrease. We will be down to 300 ppm CO2 in less than 35 years post fossil fuel elimination . Fossil fuel elimination to bring about a reduction of CO2 ppm to ZERO asap is the cornerstone of the PARIS ACCORD group’s plan. 98% of the flows to and from the atmosphere in the carbon flow diag will be non existent at ZERO CO2 PPM. Even better than that, they will be gone long before we get down to 150 ppm CO2 as PHOTOSYNTHESIS REACTION does not take place at 150 ppm CO2 and below. Half of our global food and oxygen supply is gone when we go to 300 ppm CO2 from 400 ppm CO2. Oxygen supply with 400 ppm today is declining due to our global population oxygen demands. MASSIVE STARVATION and OXYGEN DEPRIVATION DEATHS are where we are headed without PARIS ACCORD”S stupidity. Those for PARIS ACCORD will cause elimination of all lifeforms on Earth long before we have any global warming from increasing CO2 ppm levels. They say that they are going to save the world from rising ocean levels when in fact their plan guarantees the death of all living organisms on Earth pre 2100 AD!!!
Take a look at the red numbers for land and ocean flux. Much of the CO2 emitted that does not increase the atmospheric levels ends up in the ocean, as higher concentrations in the air increases the amount that is soluted in the ocean (which then reacts with water to form carbonic acid) Dalton’s law. Uptake to vegetation also increases with CO2 levels. These levels of uptake are high because the equilibrium of uptake to and emissions from the atmosphere for ocean and vegetation is disturbed. Just a more complex form of chemical equilibrium with reactions.
Even ignoring all that, the idea that fossil fuel elimination would reduce CO2 levels to zero ppm baffles me. Life existed long before fossil fuels were used, so how could fossil fuel use be required for life to exist?
PARIS ACCORD = elimination of fossil fuels. Their ultimate objective is take CO2 down to zero via the elimination of fossil fuels. When you remove 7.8 PgC of emissions you end up with a net drainage of CO2 from the atmosphere equal to 7.8 less 3.9( present day accumulation in the atmosphere) which results in 3.9 PgC of drainage per year. That works out to 3 ppm CO2 reduction in the atmosphere per year. The number of years to get to zero ppm is 420 divided by 3. We know that in the past, our CO2 ppm actually went down to 170 ppm. We know that the only life form that lived was sub microscopic bacteria. If you still do not comprehend why….you obviously are wondering why the PARIS ACCORD group are planning to use elimination of fossil fuels to create a 3 ppm drainage. If you support UN PARIS ACCORD without that comprehension,so be it. Even PA exec could not explain it to you. The issue would be your total lack to comprehend either side of the same coin.
Virtually all of the flows to and from the atmosphere are photosynthesis flows. Volcanic,rock are not. If you eliminate fossil fuels , you immediately remove 7.8 PgC/yr of flows to the atmosphere, half of which accumulate in the atmosphere yearly . The 4 PgC/yr of accumulation ( actually 3.9 PgC/yr) would be eliminated and we would have a draw down of 3.9 PgC/yr . Present day 3 ppm CO2 increase /year would go to 3 ppm CO2 decrease. We will be down to 300 ppm CO2 in less than 35 years post fossil fuel elimination . Fossil fuel elimination to bring about a reduction of CO2 ppm to ZERO asap is the cornerstone of the PARIS ACCORD group’s plan. 98% of the flows to and from the atmosphere in the carbon flow diag will be non existent at ZERO CO2 PPM. Even better than that, they will be gone long before we get down to 150 ppm CO2 as PHOTOSYNTHESIS REACTION does not take place at 150 ppm CO2 and below. Half of our global food and oxygen supply is gone when we go to 300 ppm CO2 from 400 ppm CO2. Oxygen supply with 400 ppm today is declining due to our global population oxygen demands. MASSIVE STARVATION and OXYGEN DEPRIVATION DEATHS are where we are headed without PARIS ACCORD”S stupidity. Those for PARIS ACCORD will cause elimination of all lifeforms on Earth long before we have any global warming from increasing CO2 ppm levels. They say that they are going to save the world from rising ocean levels when in fact their plan guarantees the death of all living organisms on Earth pre 2100 AD!!!
Take a look at the red numbers for land and ocean flux. Much of the CO2 emitted that does not increase the atmospheric levels ends up in the ocean, as higher concentrations in the air increases the amount that is soluted in the ocean (which then reacts with water to form carbonic acid) Dalton’s law. Uptake to vegetation also increases with CO2 levels. These levels of uptake are high because the equilibrium of uptake to and emissions from the atmosphere for ocean and vegetation is disturbed. Just a more complex form of chemical equilibrium with reactions.
Even ignoring all that, the idea that fossil fuel elimination would reduce CO2 levels to zero ppm baffles me. Life existed long before fossil fuels were used, so how could fossil fuel use be required for life to exist?
PARIS ACCORD = elimination of fossil fuels. Their ultimate objective is take CO2 down to zero via the elimination of fossil fuels. When you remove 7.8 PgC of emissions you end up with a net drainage of CO2 from the atmosphere equal to 7.8 less 3.9( present day accumulation in the atmosphere) which results in 3.9 PgC of drainage per year. That works out to 3 ppm CO2 reduction in the atmosphere per year. The number of years to get to zero ppm is 420 divided by 3. We know that in the past, our CO2 ppm actually went down to 170 ppm. We know that the only life form that lived was sub microscopic bacteria. If you still do not comprehend why….you obviously are wondering why the PARIS ACCORD group are planning to use elimination of fossil fuels to create a 3 ppm drainage. If you support UN PARIS ACCORD without that comprehension,so be it. Even PA exec could not explain it to you. The issue would be your total lack to comprehend either side of the same coin.