Climate consensus research is the worst, most invalid research ever published in journals
…measuring consensus by having conflicted political activists read the abstracts of irrelevant journal articles from an amateur keyword search, followed by deranged arithmetic? Ours was supposed to be a scientific civilization, and this is tantamount to pulling out a Ouija board and crystals. This whole topic is begging for a massive epistemic and scientific upgrade.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed