My comments should precipitate, at a minimum, a revision to NY-CHAPPA to include 16 wind directions and a valid verification analysis of the modeling. I don’t expect NYSERDA to respond.  Instead, I expect that my comments will be ignored like all my previous submittals.  It is clear to me that NYSERDA established the public relation slogans for the goals of the program and then perverted the science to get answers to support those claims.  When I described this to one of my friends, he remarked that this is proof that science and NYSERDA cannot be used in the same science.