“High Priests of Consensus Panic: The NYT’s Meltdown Over Scientific Skepticism”

The real story here is not the hiring of three scientists who are willing to question received wisdom. The real story is the media’s all-consuming need to delegitimize dissent, their relentless efforts to police the boundaries of acceptable thought, and the spectacle of credentialed “experts” howling in protest whenever their authority is challenged. That is the consensus the New York Times truly cares about: consensus as power, not as science.