STEVE MILLOY: Biden Uses His First Veto to Sacrifice Americans’ Retirement Savings at The Altar Of ESG

From the Daily Caller

STEVE MILLOY

CONTRIBUTOR

In America’s hour of need, a call for help went out. Capitol Hill answered, but it went straight to voicemail at the White House. In his first-ever veto, President Joe Biden rejected a bipartisan resolution approved by the House and Senate that would have overturned a Department of Labor directive that greased the skids for ESG (environmental, social, governance) policies.

Elected by no one, activist retirement fund managers are wielding ESG policies as a stealthy means of imposing left-wing political objectives on the private sector economy. Frequently, ESG as a rating system to measure a company’s commitment to climate alarmist goals such as choking off oil and gas producers’ access to capital, and “social justice” policies that prioritize C-suite diversity over merit and embrace corporate-funded abortions, to name a few. Compliance is hammered into place through coercive investment and shareholder rights decisions, such as through proxy voting. (RELATED: SUZANNE DOWNING: Biden’s Interior Secretary Dishes Out Icy Revenge On Alaskans)

In aligning with the left’s environmental extremism, the ESG strategy promotes solar and wind energy investments, which are intermittent and unreliable forms of energy. Ultimately, a large portion of that American investment flows to China, which has a near-stranglehold on the raw component materials.

Simultaneously, misguided ESG policies are blocking investment in oil and gas production, driving inflation yet higher by causing the cost of heating our homes and fueling our cars and trucks to soar. Higher fuel prices translate into additional strains on the supply chain, and add costs to agricultural production that is being reflected in spiraling grocery store prices with which consumers are being forced to contend.

But don’t think for a moment that Biden is troubled with any of the suffering he is causing American families to endure. He has made the political calculation that his delusional aspiration of winning a second term would require that he bow before the false green gods of ESG and offer up the economy in sacrifice.

The real cherry on the woke ESG cupcake is that retirement investment funds’ adherence to leftist policy goals are prioritized above maximizing financial returns — often without shareholders’ knowledge.

Employer-sponsored retirement plans, such as 401(k)s and traditional pensions are subject to Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) standards, including the requirement that retirement plan fiduciaries act “solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries” for the “exclusive purpose” of “providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries” and “defraying reasonable expenses.”

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 2014 that ERISA “benefits” must be of a “financial” nature rather than a collateral benefit, that would include advancing an ideological agenda.

But this past December, Biden’s DOL rule dismantled safeguards for retirement savers that had required retirement plan fiduciaries to evaluate investments and exercise shareholder rights based solely on the financial benefits to the plan and participants. The new Biden rule permits retirement savings to be placed into an ESG investment vehicle, without consent from the employee.

If a fiduciary finds that two investments are equal, the rule allows the fiduciary to use collateral ESG factors to break the tie without documenting the decision. The rule removes transparency tools that allowed plan participants to monitor how their savings are being used in proxy voting.

The irresponsibility of Biden’s rule is compounded by the fact that ESG products typically charge higher fees than traditional investment funds, which can significantly reduce participants’ retirement savings over time. And the kicker is that ESG funds have been underperforming for years. Additionally, ESG investments also expose investors to additional financial risk.

While responsibility has not been a hallmark of the Biden administration, officials on the state level have recognized this wide-scale violation and have taken action. Several state treasurers have sought to remove proxy voting power from activist asset managers.

Others have pushed back against the use of ESG factors in determining states’ credit ratings. Six major banks were subject of a probe launched in October by 19 state attorneys general, investigating their involvement in the “Net-Zero Banking Alliance,” an adopted ESG policy that, in effect, is a coordinated effort to kill energy companies by denying them access to financial resources.

In wielding his veto power for the first time to preserve a rule that puts investors at risk to advance an inflationary, ideologically driven agenda is irresponsible and serves as a glaring example of how out of touch President Biden is with ordinary Americans.

Steve Milloy is a Senior Legal Fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute. He previously served as an EPA transition team adviser for the Trump administration.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

4.8 23 votes
Article Rating
35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
March 21, 2023 10:07 am

I posted this at my blog a few days ago: Joe Biden Song

This seems appropriate for the times:
(Sung to the tune of Dennis Moore by Monty Python)

Joe Biden, Joe Biden, sleeping through the night.

Joe Biden, Joe Biden, sleeping through the day.

Takes from the poor.

Gives to the Rich.

Let’s go Brandon.

Regards,
Bob

Bryan A
March 21, 2023 10:18 am

With ANY luck, this will make it to the Supreme Court and be overturned before it can do any real damage

Reply to  Bryan A
March 21, 2023 11:02 am

??? Not sure why you would think a veto would go to the supreme court. Either it gets overridden by congress or it doesn’t. Since democrats support ESG, not much chance of that.

pillageidiot
Reply to  doonman
March 21, 2023 11:36 am

I think ESG investing is awesome – for some bulldog, non-woke, class action attorneys!

If your retirement fund switched to ESG funds that underperformed (they did), then sue the management entity for breach of fiduciary duty.

The investors should be made whole in that situation. The attorneys should rake off some massive fees. The fund managers should go to jail for fraud, or be stripped of their certifications due to breach of fiduciary duty.

Sommer
Reply to  pillageidiot
March 21, 2023 2:21 pm

https://www.cppinvestments.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/cpp-investments-ocean-press-release-08-May-2020-EN-v2.pdf

So, is this what could happen in Canada as well if the industrial wind projects the CCP has invested in in Europe fail? Could the managers go to jail for fraud or be stripped of their certifications due to breach of fiduciary duty?

Scissor
Reply to  doonman
March 21, 2023 12:48 pm

Lawsuits.

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  doonman
March 21, 2023 1:17 pm

Not the veto that would land it in the SCOTUS. The DOL overreach in contradiction to law and SCOTUS decision should put it on their plate, hopefully.

Reply to  doonman
March 21, 2023 2:43 pm

There is nothing in The Constitution that says SCOTUS must wait for a lawsuit to reach them through the lower courts.
They could rule on this if they wanted.
Does the Federal Government, via a Law or a Veto or an Executive Order, have the Constitutional authority to tell the States or the Private Sector how and what retirement funds can invest those funds in?

JamesB_684
Reply to  Bryan A
March 21, 2023 1:15 pm

The SCOTUS (currently) only reviews cases that have already been through the lower courts and received conflicting rulings at the Federal Applellat courts. That only happens after the legislation becomes law.

Ron Long
March 21, 2023 10:23 am

Interesting, but not funny, to watch this veto play itself out. One of the really positive aspects of this was the vehement reaction of Senator Joe Manchin, D, West Virginia. He went totally ballistic railing against Biden and his WOKE associates. HIs tirade was sufficiently brutal that there will not be any kissing and makeup. Progress often comes in fits and starts.

March 21, 2023 10:28 am

Phony bipartisanship. Democrats in closely contested states were allowed to vote for the Bill to impress the low information votes back home. ff there really was bipartisanship they would overturn the veto.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Dennis Gerald Sandberg
March 21, 2023 11:51 am

That’s exactly how it works.

Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 21, 2023 1:32 pm

Yes, I worked as a full-time registered State lobbyist for a couple years. Very insightful.

Reply to  Dennis Gerald Sandberg
March 21, 2023 7:13 pm

Aka: They who speak with forked tongue

March 21, 2023 10:35 am

They want to take everything everyone has so that the government can dole stipends as they see fit. (provided you have a good social credit score)

Coeur de Lion
March 21, 2023 10:46 am

Sue

KevinM
Reply to  Coeur de Lion
March 21, 2023 11:18 am

Is the legal system a tax on cooperation?

insufficientlysensitive
March 21, 2023 11:04 am

<i>The new Biden rule permits retirement savings to be placed into an ESG investment vehicle, without consent from the employee.</i>

And for Biden to veto the ESG ripoffs, without consent from our elected representatives.

So it’s a double-ripoff of retirees, for the benefit of the fat cats pushing global warming. Let the wild rumpus start!

mleskovarsocalrrcom
March 21, 2023 11:05 am

Biden is just doing what those that coordinated cheating the vote are telling him to do. He doesn’t have a clue. Perfect useful idiot.

ResourceGuy
March 21, 2023 11:08 am

Ask not what your fiduciary duty can do for you-ask what you can do (sacrifice) for the Climate Crusades and political agents.

ResourceGuy
March 21, 2023 11:12 am
KevinM
March 21, 2023 11:14 am

The real cherry on the woke ESG cupcake is that retirement investment funds’ adherence to leftist policy goals are prioritized above maximizing financial returns — often without shareholders’ knowledge.
Tempting to say it starts turning private retirement savings into taxation, but that won’t be true unless retirement-age withdrawal rules are made much more restrictive. Seems not part of ESG. Temporary underinvestment in profitable sectors seems like an opportunity.

Bob
March 21, 2023 11:27 am

Did Silicon Valley bank follow the ESG plan?

MarkW
Reply to  Bob
March 21, 2023 2:33 pm

Yes, they did.

SteveE
March 21, 2023 11:28 am

What does Joe care about retirement funds?
Isn’t his fully funded thanks to Hunter and friends?

pillageidiot
Reply to  SteveE
March 21, 2023 11:42 am

The Left loves to spin Orwell in his grave with their re-definition of words.

“Retirement fund” to me and you has one meaning. “Retirement fund” to people with the surname Biden, means a completely different thing.

Scissor
Reply to  pillageidiot
March 21, 2023 1:07 pm

I will celebrate Biden’s retirement.

strativarius
March 21, 2023 12:40 pm

Easily
Satisfied
Greed

atticman
Reply to  strativarius
March 21, 2023 3:19 pm

And there was me thinking that it meant “Energy Shortages Guaranteed”. Oh, well…

MarkW
March 21, 2023 2:27 pm

The left wants the private retirement system to collapse. That way everyone will be forced to rely on government for their retirement. And of course anyone who fails to toe the government line will suddenly find that their retirement checks have been lost in the mail.

March 21, 2023 3:06 pm

Might this do Americans some good? Haven’t wr had it too good for too long?

/sarc

Many of us have warned in the past — the government wants our retirement money.

First, they changed the laws to encourage individual retirement accounts over company pensions. Now they want that retirement money. Since they can’t get away with taxing our accounts more, they instead enlist like-minded investment managers to spend our money in ways the government can’t get away with monet.

BTW -‘ Did you know individual retirement accounts/401Ks were originally designed to supplement, not replace, pensions?

Reply to  More Soylent Green!
March 21, 2023 7:21 pm

I think that 401Ks were designed to replace traditional defined benefit pensions with gambling in the financial markets.

heme212
March 21, 2023 6:01 pm

which part of “equity” did you not understand?

Michael S. Kelly
March 21, 2023 9:01 pm

This is the first opportunity for the emergence of a federal government employee revolt (at the polls) against the Left and the Democrat party. Federal employees’ equivalent of a 401K is in the form of the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), which consists of a number of different stock-related funds, and one government securities fund. I was – sadly – a federal employee for 10 years, and have some of my retirement savings in my TSP, so I pay attention to it.

The TSP is managed by Blackrock, leader of the ESG movement. When I saw what they were doing, I quickly moved everything I had into government securities, thought not before having lost almost 20% of my savings. What’s left is at least not losing dollars, though it isn’t earning enough interest to keep up with inflation. Of the other funds, all have plummeted, the worst having lost over 26% just this year.

Being retired, I don’t hear much from active civil servants. They may not even be paying attention to their TSPs. But one of these days, they will. Republicans should expedite that awakening. It’s our best hope of turning the tide against the Left.

boydconklin
March 22, 2023 9:49 am

What a waste of time in the house, probably a waste of time trying to do anything, because it is all smoke and mirrors. I would be surprised if they tried to pass this with Trump in, because he would not have vetoed it and then it would become law to most of the republicans chagrin too.