Findings could open up a whole new chapter in climate science and help identify subsurface locations to safely store hydrogen for carbon-free energy
DOE/PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY

RICHLAND, Wash.—Trapped for millennia, the tiniest liquid remnants of an ancient inland sea have now been revealed. The surprising discovery of seawater sealed in what is now North America for 390 million years opens up a new avenue for understanding how oceans change and adapt with the changing climate. The method may also be useful in understanding how hydrogen can be safely stored underground and transported for use as a carbon-free fuel source.
“We discovered we can actually dig out information from these mineral features that could help inform geologic studies, such as the seawater chemistry from ancient times,” said Sandra Taylor, first author of the study and a scientist at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Taylor worked with PNNL colleagues Daniel Perea, John Cliff, and Libor Kovarik to perform the analyses in collaboration with geochemists Daniel Gregory of the University of Toronto and Timothy Lyons of the University of California, Riverside. The research team reported their discovery in the December 2022 issue of Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
Ancient seas; modern tools
Many types of minerals and gems contain small pockets of trapped liquid. Indeed, some gemstones are prized for their light-catching bubbles of liquid trapped within. What’s different in this study is that scientists were able to reveal what was inside the tiniest water pockets, using advanced microscopy and chemical analyses.
The findings of the study confirmed that the water trapped inside the rock fit the chemistry profile of the ancient inland saltwater sea that once occupied upstate New York, where the rock originated. During the Middle Devonian period, this inland sea stretched from present day Michigan to Ontario, Canada. It harbored a coral reef to rival Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Sea scorpions the size of a pickup truck patrolled waters that harbored now-extinct creatures like trilobites, and the earliest examples of horseshoe crabs.
But eventually the climate changed, and along with that change, most of the creatures and the sea itself disappeared, leaving behind only fossil remains embedded in sediments that eventually became the pyrite rock sample used in the current experiment.
Clues to an ancient climate and to climate change
Scientists use rock samples as evidence to piece together how the climate has changed over the long span of geologic time.
“We use mineral deposits to estimate the temperature of the ancient oceans,” said Gregory, a geologist at the University of Toronto, and one of the study leaders. But there are relatively few useful examples in the geological record.
“Salt deposits from trapped seawater [halite] are relatively rare in the rock record, so there are millions of years missing in the records and what we currently know is based on a few localities where there is halite found,” Gregory said. By contrast, pyrite is found everywhere. “Sampling with this technique could open up millions of years of the geologic record and lead to new understanding of changing climate.”
Seawater surprise
The research team was trying to understand another environmental issue—toxic arsenic leaching from rock—when they noticed the tiny defects. Scientists describe the appearance of these particular pyrite minerals as framboids—derived from the French word for raspberry—because they look like clusters of raspberry segments under the microscope.
“We looked at these samples through the electron microscope first, and we saw these kind of mini bubbles or mini features within the framboid and wondered what they were,” Taylor said.
Using the precise and sensitive detection techniques of atom probe tomography and mass spectrometry—which can detect minuscule amounts of elements or impurities in minerals—the team worked out that the bubbles indeed contained water and their salt chemistry matched that of ancient seas.
From ancient sea to modern energy storage
These types of studies also have the potential to provide interesting insights into how to safely store hydrogen or other gases underground.
“Hydrogen is being explored as a low-carbon fuel source for various energy applications. This requires being able to safely retrieve and store large-amounts of hydrogen in underground geologic reservoirs. So it’s important to understand how hydrogen interacts with rocks,” said Taylor. “Atom probe tomography is one of the few techniques where you can not only measure atoms of hydrogen, but you can actually see where it goes in the mineral. This study suggests that tiny defects in minerals might be potential traps for hydrogen. So by using this technique we could figure out what’s going on at the atomic level, which would then help in evaluating and optimizing strategies for hydrogen storage in the subsurface.”
This research was conducted at EMSL, the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science user facility at PNNL. Lyons and Gregory applied to use the facility through a competitive application process. The research was also supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
JOURNAL
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
DOI
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Experimental study
SUBJECT OF RESEARCH
Not applicable
ARTICLE TITLE
Pushing the limits: Resolving paleoseawater signatures in nanoscale fluid inclusions by atom probe tomography
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
1-Dec-2022
I do not understand how leaching from surrounding rock has not altered the water beyond any resemblance to when it was laid down. 390 million years is a long enough interval for a slow process to cause major changes.
Diagenesis!
There are at least three problems with this paper.
They don’t call it ‘fool’s gold’ for nothing.
They don’t call it ‘fool’s gold’ for nothing.
So, how much do they charge ??
Ain’t English expressions funny?
You mean you don’t know? Climate change is everything!
Quote:”But eventually the climate changed, and along with that change, most of the creatures and the sea itself disappeared,
Deliberate and misleading wrongness. Cause & Effect totally mangled.
The sea disappeared first because maybe one or more of:
The Significant Point being that Climate did not cause the appearance nor disappearance of The Sea.
The presence of The Sea caused the local climate to be as it was and when the sea died, disappeared, drained and went away, so did the climate as it was – and a new climate came to prevail.
iow; Tectonics, volcanism and or vegetation changes (in turn caused by soil erosion) changed The Sea and climate followed suit
Quote:”The method may also be useful in understanding how hydrogen can be safely stored underground and transported for use as a carbon-free fuel source.
Fantastical and wild speculation based on what?
Apart from being a thinly veiled request for more funding for more research – which all falls apart because of the error (deliberate or not?) made above.
If a relatively huge atom like Arsenic can come and go as it pleases (like you say), how exactly is this going to contain/trap/store Hydrogen?
Yeah, they lost me with the hydrogen storage baloney. Pure grant fishing.
Yes, that really does look like a heap of bullshit.
The entire problem with hydrogen is that it is so small that it leaks from in between the atoms of any enclosing material.
It seems likely these numbskulls confuse water with hydrogen.
Fun fact: even if you could magically extract hydrogen directly from water – you’d have to carry around 35 gallons of water in order to get enough hydrogen to equal the energy in 1 gallon of gasoline.
Water is almost all oxygen…
See “Noah’s Flood” for a fascinating theory about how this all occurred.
Do you mean the very interesting book by the two chaps at Lamont-Doherty, Ryan and Pitman? I agree it’s fascinating.
Ah ha, a stable form of hydrogen that is easily stored and transported via pipeline: H2O
All you need is a little electricity to release it.
And if you put that hydrogen into a Fuelcell or Gas-turbine, you can get electricity to make more hydrogen; &
if you put that hydrogen into a Fuelcell or Gas-turbine, you can get electricity to make more hydrogen; &
if you put that hydrogen into a Fuelcell or Gas-turbine, you can get electricity to make more hydrogen; &
if you put that hydrogen into a Fuelcell or Gas-turbine, you can get electricity to make more hydrogen; & …
Simples
So, can I have a grant now .
BTW; I also have some bridges for sale (;-))
I find the science part interesting.
The “sciencey” bit – not so much.
The search goes on for Dilithium crystals.
I’m betting on the quantum singularity, the Romulans had it nailed.
Are these people utter loons – looking at 360 million year old water to find clues about global warming today. Storing man made hydrogen in subterrain structures? Pass me what they are smoking.
“Many types of minerals and gems contain small pockets of trapped liquid. Indeed, some gemstones are prized for their light-catching bubbles of liquid trapped within.”
Oh migosh! Those bubbles in gemstones are not fossil seawater at all. Hydrothermal mineral deposits universally contain what are known as fluid inclusions that got there from mineral and metal-bearing supercritical water (hotter than 384°C) from deep in the crust under pressures of several kilobars. Even quartz in huge granite batholiths contain an abundance of fluid inclusions.
They do contain salt water, usually about one third of the void because ‘critical’ water is 0.32 the density of water at STP (standard temperature and pressure). They also contain other things like F, CO2, anhydrite, lithium carbonate (in hardrock lithium deposits, …).
Indeed, the relation is the other way around. The seas’ salt accumulated from a couple of billion years of weathering under the hydrological cycle. Quartz, the second most abundant mineral on earth is typically loaded with these inclusions.
Even Wiki knows this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_inclusion
Scroll down for a beautiful example.
It’s ‘peer-reviewed’ from EurekAlert so that tells you it’s probably junk ( & not to disappoint ) it is junk … at all levels.
It is a bridge too far to assume that inclusions with free water are simply derived from seawater of the times. There is abundant literature about hydrothermal processes, where the sources of the water are poorly known. There is water of crystallization in natural hydrated minerals that can be released in metamorphism, sources of water again poorly known.
The authors might have special insights that allow them to hypothesis about water origins, but if not then their paper is mere fanciful nonsense claiming, for example, to be able to calculate ocean temperatures hundreds of millions of years ago. Geoff S (geochemist).
Thank you for another refreshing and interesting article
Did you forget the /Snark tag?
How do I do one of those?
Other than some kind of emoji, there really isn’t a way to get snarky except to use /snark or /s for sarcastic. See the TEST page for other examples.
Quote:”The method may also be useful in understanding how hydrogen can be safely stored underground and transported for use as a carbon-free fuel source.
Transported? Do they want us to start throwing even more rocks at each other?
No, the worms do it for them
YouTube has many videos of geodes, crystals and agates with ancient water inside.
Quite fascinating to consider what an analysis would show. Or it’s just water?
These clear crystals are amazing https://youtu.be/kdz-R89GfTg
—–
The safety of pressurized cylinders is a concern, especially in highly populated regions. It is envisaged that future pressure vessels will consist of three layers: an inner polymer liner over-wrapped with a carbon-fiber composite (which is the stress-bearing component) and an outer layer of an aramid-material capable of withstanding mechanical and corrosion damage.
—–
All of those are carbon intensive materials.
The article specifically refers to these pyrite framboids as having formed in an “ancient inland sea”.
So what can they possibly deduce about ocean chemistry from an “inland sea”. Even assuming that nanometer-scale fluid inclusions haven’t exchanged chemistry with the host mineral during later diagenesis. Not saying it’s all nonsense, but it does sound a bit shaky to me.
BTW the hydrogen storage thing is absent from the actual abstract, snippets and conclusions that are not behind the paywall. I suspect this was teased out of a phone conversation with an author by the eureka alert “journalist” fishing for topical relevance.