TOMB: Latest RGGI Lawsuit Highlights Increases in Electricity Prices

by Gordon Tomb

Already struggling to cope with higher energy bills, Pennsylvanians are now experiencing double-digit rate hikes this fall. In September, some suppliers increased electricity prices another 19 percent, citing inflation and energy costs. Pennsylvanians need relief, but Gov. Tom Wolf’s unilateral action will drive energy bills even higher. Worse yet, a new lawsuit highlights how Wolf’s plan—while claiming to help the environment—will, in reality, increase emissions.

Despite a majority opposition from the state legislature, Wolf is forcing Pennsylvania to participate in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)—a compact in which member states impose a carbon tax on energy production. By discouraging energy production in Pennsylvania, the carbon tax would shut down some of the most efficient coal and natural gas operations in the world, and a new lawsuit argues that the governor’s plan will lead to an increase in CO2 emissions.

The petitioners, all of whom operate gas-fired power plants in Bucks, York, and Westmoreland Counties, are among the dozens of businesses, labor unions, trade organizations, and politicians asking the court to stop Pennsylvania’s participation in RGGI.

Pennsylvania natural gas producers are among the cleanest in the world, as measured by methane emissions from their operations. Of the top nine hydrocarbon-producing basins in the United States, the Appalachian Basin, which includes Pennsylvania, emits the least methane per unit of energy produced.

And while U.S. coal-fired plants are among the least polluting worldwide, Pennsylvania operators have invested billions of dollars in equipment to further reduce water and air pollution. The Homer City power plant, for example, spent $750 million over the past decade on reducing pollutants.

But RGGI would undo our progress toward cleaner energy by imposing prohibitive costs on Pennsylvania energy producers.

RGGI requires power plants to purchase carbon allowances, and those have more than quadrupled in recent months. For just a portion of 2022, estimated allowance costs have risen to $847 million from the Wolf administration’s original forecast of $198 million.

“The (administration’s) modeling of the price of CO2 allowances…was wildly off base,” wrote the petitioners. “Among other failures, the (administration) did not adequately consider the impact of speculative traders, like hedge funds, purchasing CO2 allowances as an investment.”

Costs imposed by RGGI will force Pennsylvania plants to decrease energy production, opening the door for less efficient plants in non-RGGI states to replace them. Overall emissions will increase because less efficient plants must burn more fuel to produce the same amount of electricity—generating higher emissions of carbon dioxide and pollutants like sulfur dioxide.

The petitioners note that “most of the benefits…arising from Pennsylvania joining RGGI will be lost or shifted to other areas due to increased emissions in other states.”

Prior studies have confirmed that transfer of emissions from RGGI states to non-RGGI states.

Quadrupling carbon allowance prices also means that RGGI will further inflate electricity costs. Energy producers will have to pass the increase in costs to consumers.

Moderate estimates see RGGI increasing consumer electricity prices by roughly $2 billion over nine years. This is a “best-case” scenario that Pennsylvanian families cannot afford.

RGGI is currently on hold thanks to a preliminary injunction, and the petitioners are integrating their lawsuit with other cases aimed at stopping the state’s participation. Due to pending court action, it is unlikely that companies will need to purchase carbon allowances until the next governor’s term.

But Pennsylvania’s participation in RGGI—with its far-reaching consequences—shouldn’t rely on lone-wolf tactics. The state legislature has taken the first step toward introducing a constitutional amendment that would prevent any governor from unilaterally imposing regulations, like RGGI, despite legislative disapproval.

If approved by the legislature and a majority of Pennsylvania voters, this constitutional amendment could safeguard families from ineffective and expensive regulations like RGGI.

This commentary was first published in Delaware Valley Journal on October 21, 2022 and can be accessed here.

CO2 Coalition Senior Advisor Gordon Tomb is a senior fellow with the Commonwealth Foundation, a Pennsylvania-based free-market think tank.

5 17 votes
Article Rating
38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 25, 2022 2:19 am

Maybe someone should ask Wolf to prove that the GG part of RGGI is actually dangerous in any way.

If that happens buy lots of popcorn.

Old Man Winter
Reply to  Oldseadog
October 25, 2022 5:36 am

failpre3.jpg
Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Old Man Winter
October 25, 2022 2:19 pm

Illiterate people shouldn’t make memes.

MarkW
Reply to  Oldseadog
October 25, 2022 7:49 am

That’s easy, all the scientists that agree with Wolf, agree that CO2 is gonna kill us all.
Any scientist that doesn’t agree with Wolf has been bought off by oil companies and must be ignored, if not jailed.

Ron Long
October 25, 2022 2:23 am

If the Governor went against the wishes of the Legislature isn’t this a case of “Taxation Without Representation”? Once again we see that Elections Have Consequences.

Carbon Bigfoot
Reply to  Ron Long
October 25, 2022 7:13 am

Our voters allowed agendized Demon-crats get elected to the PA Supreme Court which is a rubber stamp for the Wolf-pact. Shapiro is pat of that stupidity—vote Republican Keystoners and stop RGGI.

Sean
October 25, 2022 3:01 am

Increasing the cost of carbon leads to export of production? That’s the hallmark of going green. China’s economy has profited handsomely from squeezing this balloon. At least PA will only have to go to WV or OH for power.

Tom Halla
October 25, 2022 3:13 am

This is a violation of the First Amendment, being an Establishment of Religion. Wolf is evidently a True Believer in climate change.

n.n
Reply to  Tom Halla
October 25, 2022 3:43 am

Faith, specifically Twilight fringe or conflation of logical domains. It’s a “Choice” that is a source of diverse mischief in secular societies.

Reply to  Tom Halla
October 25, 2022 10:05 am

While I doubt it would succeed, that would be an amusing argument to see made!

fretslider
October 25, 2022 3:16 am

They measure their success these days by the amount of discomfort and disturbance they can cause people – they also have effective soup and mashed potato launchers at their disposal, too.

There’s the clear hypocrisy on comedy. A straight comic getting his manhood out at the Edinburgh fringe is upsetting and he gets cancelled, but when a transwoman gets his manhood out on TV they celebrate – I kid you not…

Sexist comedy is back – spiked (spiked-online.com)

The smaller the raving lunatic group is, the greater its influence seems to be.

Dave Fair
Reply to  fretslider
October 25, 2022 11:41 am

3% of the U.S. population is LGB and 0.3% is trans. Talk about the tail wagging the dog!

Dave Fair
Reply to  Dave Fair
October 25, 2022 2:03 pm

Oops! Old information. According to a 2/17/22 Gallup poll the numbers now are about 6.4% LGB (7.1% minus 0.7%) and 0.7% trans (10% of 7.1%).

“The percent of U.S. adults who identify as something other than heterosexual has doubled over the last 10 years, from 3.5 percent in 2012 to 7.1 percent, according to a Gallup poll released Thursday.
Gallup found that the increase is due to ​​”high LGBT self-identification, particularly as bisexual, among Generation Z adults,” who are 18 to 25.”

“Bisexuality is the most common identifier used among LGBTQ Americans, which is in line with a Gallup report released last year. More than half of LGBTQ Americans, at 57 percent, are bisexual.”

So bisexuals are driving the numbers since it appears the percentage of lesbian and gays is staying about constant in the 3.6% range over long periods of time. Bisexuals are not lesbian, gay nor trans since they bounce between all but the trans practitioners. It seems they are jumping on the bandwagon because of the excitement an attention. At least they can provide some help in keeping up the population that is in decline. Lesbians, gays and trans (at least the percentage that are not males getting pregnant) can’t help reverse the population decline. Thank God for immigration! Look at Japan’s problems.

Gen Zs seem very confused. That’s not surprising since it is the youth that generally follow the fads.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Dave Fair
October 25, 2022 2:21 pm

The increase is all about narcissism, and wanting to feel special, and, of course, victim mentality.

MarkW
Reply to  Dave Fair
October 25, 2022 8:02 pm

I wonder how much being able to shower with the girls will influence teenage boys to discover their feminine side?

Dave Fair
Reply to  MarkW
October 26, 2022 4:02 pm

I’d wear a skirt for that.

n.n
October 25, 2022 3:47 am

The dark sarcasm of unqualified monotonic change: one step forward, two steps backward.

AGW is Not Science
October 25, 2022 3:52 am

“Most of the BENEFITS?!”

THERE ARE NO BENEFITS. Stop playing their game.

Old Man Winter
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
October 25, 2022 5:34 am

greenpov.jpg
Richard Page
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
October 25, 2022 8:13 am

Of course there are benefits, just not for the plebs – a select few are making a lot of money out of a multitude of supposedly ‘green’ schemes. The renewables con game will keep squeezing the money out of the citizens until they have nothing left to take.

October 25, 2022 4:57 am

Sad to say Wolf is my Governor. He is an outright liar. PA has to be one of the most corrupt states in the nation.

Reply to  Nelson
October 25, 2022 5:16 am

It’s almost as bad as my state, Massachusetts.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 25, 2022 8:09 pm

Any state that has been run by Democrats exclusively for the last 10 years or more.

H.R.
Reply to  Nelson
October 25, 2022 6:52 am

You have a lot of competition, Nelson. What about Illinois, New Jersey, Louisiana, Delaware… …and number 49, Alaska?

Reply to  Nelson
October 25, 2022 12:57 pm

one out of 40 or so?

MarkW
Reply to  Nelson
October 25, 2022 8:08 pm

A lot of Democrats seem to feel sticking with the truth is no longer necessary.
The governor of Michigan recently declared that schools were only closed for 3 months during the COVID pandemic.
What’s his name running for Senate from Pennsylvania in a recent debate declared that he has always supported frakking, despite the fact that he’s been a well known opponent of frakking for over a decade.
Down in Florida, Crist recently declared that DeSantis ruined education in the state by closing schools, despite the fact that Crist recently declared that DeSantis was too slow to close schools and too quick to reopen them.
And last but certainly not least, Biden declared that his Tuition load give away was passed by congress with just a few votes to declare, when in fact the tuition forgiveness plan was done through executive orders and never presented to congress to vote on.

John Endicott
Reply to  MarkW
November 1, 2022 9:06 am

What’s his name running for Senate from Pennsylvania”

Fetterman. And while I know his garbled answer was partly a result of his stoke, the thrust of his answer was still to tell a lie about his record of opposing to fracking.

I do support fracking. And I don’t, I don’t. I support fracking, and I stand and I do support fracking.” — Fetterman when asked to reconcile his past statements in opposition to facking with his claims during the debate of supporting fracking.

John Endicott
Reply to  Nelson
November 1, 2022 9:10 am

It’s right up there in corruption with: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia (IE all the other stated whose idiot Demonrat Governors signed their states up to RGGI).

Doug S
October 25, 2022 6:29 am

The science is settled and the results are right in front of us now. The CLIMATE movement is a religion.

“RGGI requires power plants to purchase carbon allowances, and those have more than quadrupled in recent months.”

John_C
Reply to  Doug S
October 25, 2022 6:30 pm

I think the term is “indulgences,” but it amounts to the same nothing either way.

chadb
October 25, 2022 7:18 am

But at least the bankers and traders will make money.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  chadb
October 25, 2022 2:22 pm

Don’t forget the lawyers.

MarkW
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
October 25, 2022 8:10 pm

I wish we could.

Olen
October 25, 2022 7:22 am

Wolf knows people don’t want it and does it anyway. It is obvious what is in it for the people, but what is in it for Wolf setting himself apart.

Richard Page
Reply to  Olen
October 25, 2022 8:15 am

Has anyone had a look at his accounts lately? Or offshore accounts, perhaps?

October 25, 2022 10:32 am

Given that Wolf picked Fetterman for his lieutenant governor, we know what sort of commie idiot he is.

Dave Fair
October 25, 2022 1:21 pm

Keep asking the powers that be:

Show how much Nut Zero will cost the U.S. by calculating the NPV of all expenditures, public and private, at discount rates of 5% and 7%. — None of this B.S. about jobs created and externality savings; we are only talking about reducing CO2. Calculate the NPV of savings from Nut Zero to only the U.S. by avoiding possible damages identified by use of RCP 4.5, discounted at 5% and 7% (No B.S. about the Precautionary Principle.).

Address the true economic impacts on and lifestyle changes required of U.S. citizens to reach Nut Zero. Address the availability and costs of minerals required to reach Nut Zero. Address the practical feasibility of converting all U.S. activities and industrial processes to all-electric.

Quantify the uncertainties in all of this.

Bob
October 25, 2022 4:44 pm

It should be the law that everyone who signs on to RGGI should not be allowed the use of dispatchable energy no matter where it was generated. Individuals should be allowed to opt out of RGGI no matter what their politicians, administrators and bureaucrats agree to. They need to pay for their ignorance.