2018 lawsuit, which already revealed previously-denied memo, other emails, takes major step forward
RICHMOND, VA (April 20, 2022) — Virginia citizen Christopher Horner and the free-market public policy group Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) prevailed yet again yesterday in their lawsuit against Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares under Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act.
The suit was filed in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond in November 2018, then subsequently dragged out through various maneuvers by then-AG Mark Herring’s Office. It sought to get to the bottom of contradictory positions the Office of Attorney General (OAG) has taken regarding its effort to bring into the Office one or more privately hired “Special Assistant Attorneys General” (SAAGs) with salary and benefits are actually paid by a Center created by billionaire climate activist Michael Bloomberg, expressly to pursue issues of concern to Mr. Bloomberg. The suit also sought records relating to OAG’s review and determination of any ethical concerns in entering the unprecedented, highly conflicted arrangement which OAG applied for, via Bloomberg’s “Center for State Impacts”, on September 15, 2017.
In a memo written on that date, Herring’s Office pursued — then later struck an agreement, all in writing — to bring one or more privately hired activist lawyers in-house to do an activist group’s bidding, a pursuit which was abandoned over the telephone after the Office began receiving Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for correspondence and memos about the venture.
As the original Petition detailed, Virginia’s former Attorney General applied for, and was subsequently approved, for a privately funded special prosecutor for climate and renewable energy, to be paid $81,500 per year as an employee of Mr. Bloomberg’s “Center” established at New York University (NYU). The outfit was created for this purpose of placing employees in OAGs that commit to “advancing progressive clean energy, climate change, and environmental legal positions” favored by Mr. Bloomberg.
During discovery, the plaintiffs learned of the existence of a “GOLD Decision Memorandum” explaining the plans for these “SAAGs”, which Herring’s Office had denied existed. In another FOIA lawsuit by Horner after this revelation, and which sought to get around the stonewalling in this first suit, Herring’s Office has claimed the memo is privileged “working papers” that the public cannot see.
These revelations also played a role in the recent trial in the case decided yesterday. The Office will have to acknowledge that memo and other documents in a computer folder also revealed in discovery exist, and decide whether to at long last turn the memo and other records over, too, or keep litigating but now claiming this very narrow privilege.
The Petition also noted that as part of this application, but without citing to any specifics, OAG certified that it has the legal authority to bring in employees funded by Bloomberg, and that there are no gift or professional responsibility impediments. This not only contradicts Virginia law and raises questions relating to ethical obligations for attorneys paid by non-clients, but OAG claimed it had “no records” showing that it ever undertook any such analysis, opinion or conclusion on its legal assertions.
Horner and CEI detailed the arrangement, and Virginia’s effort to join in such a extensive and elaborate campaign using AG offices in coordination with major contributors and activist pressure groups to attain a policy agenda that failed through the democratic process, in a recent report, “Law Enforcement for Rent” and extensive appendix of source documents also available on ClimateLitigationWatch.org
Horner and CEI’s most recent victory is at least the third instance so far in which Virginia’s OAG has been defeated in the same case. The former Attorney General’s insistence that he did not have records to provide Mr. Horner and CEI was rejected initially at the motion to dismiss stage. Upon being ordered to file an answer, the Attorney General instead filed a “Plea of Nulla Bona,” in which the office again reiterated its position that no further records of its relationship with NYU and the Bloomberg-funded Center existed. When the Court rejected the Plea of Nulla Bona, the Attorney General at long last filed an answer, and the case was set for trial. Following trial, the Court has now ordered the Attorney General to search for and produce the documents it has long stated do not exist.
Horner said “We look forward to the results of a proper search and hope Virginia’s new Attorney General will put an end to three and a half years of stonewalling over how the state’s former top attorney come to make such a promise, and what led them to abandon the effort after we started asking questions. Hopefully, he’ll now turn over these public records that have been at issue since 2018.”
Local counsel Graven W. Craig represented the parties, joined by Matt Hardin, and Chris Horner pro hac vice.
Taking money from Bloomberg looks like a conflict of interest.
Don’t start counting your chickens just yet, this is only a Circuit Court decision and is still likely to go all the way to the Virginia State Supreme Court before enforcement can happen. Then, if it is multistate jurisdictional perhaps all the way to the SCOTUS
Unfortunately, they behave like rats & other vermin who won’t do the right thing & quietly
leave.
And lying about it to a Court of Law, looks like a crime of interest.
A clear abuse of power of office and trust.
Can contempt of court proceedings be far behind?
It is one of these rare instances where and when actually the intention and motivation tips the scales… I think.
cheers
Kpar
When also that stands proved indisputably standing, by actual actions, of a contempt towards and against a court order, by person(s) in position of power of office due and via common societal trust!
cheers
Indila – Parle à ta tête (Clip Officiel)
yes…far, far behind.
“lying about it to a Court of Law….”
Amounts to perjury, no?
Oddgeir
The use of Special Assistant Attorneys General allows the Attorney General to do more stuff. link That includes politically motivated prosecutions, which, obviously, they should not be allowed do.
The framers of the Constitution envisioned a system whose power, at every level, is circumscribed. In that light, the use of Special Attorneys General seems unconstitutional.
Spelling it out: if this kind of arrangement is used to promote “climate action”, the same arrangements are quietly being used to harness the state apparatus to advance other progressive causes too.
So start paying attention.
What other states have accepted this kind of deal with Bloomberg? Yet one more example of total corruption.
Unfortunately, my state, Oregon, is participating in this.
https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/ag-rosenblum-announces-appointment-of-steve-novick-as-nyu-state-impact-center-legal-fellow/
Question: How can you tell which billionaires are the bad guys and which are the good guys? (Actually fairly easy if you go by progressivism v. reason.)
Even better question: How did we get to government officials deciding which billionaire to collude with?
Mr. Springer; The answer to your even better question is, we become billionaires, then gov’t officials will come calling.
Yes. Way out here in Washington State, Bill Gates was quite apolitical, minding his own business, until he became wealthy. When the lefties in the other Washington became aware of Bill’s wealth, he was groomed to become one of them.
Wealth and intelligence do not always cohabit.
OH! So True!
Exhibit One: Bill Gates.
Exhibit Two: Jeff Bezos
But those two are both ruthless, don’t always play by the rule and have exhibited psychopathic tendencies.
> Wealth and intelligence do not always cohabit.
Wealth and intelligence rarely cohabit.
FIFY
One need only look at the fortunes of so many founding ancestors to see how long it takes to dissipate those riches. Three generations is a likely median.
All this despite repeated claims of “I will provide transparency, if elected.”
Should have known what that means, coming from the mouths of politicians and bureaucrats alike.
This is buying the judiciary. How is this not illegal? I wont hold my breath that anyone powerful or wealthy will be charged. That seems to have been banned in America long ago.
I’ve heard that O.J. is this/close to finding the real killer…
He;d find him a lot quicker if he’d simply stop averting his eyes every time he passes a mirror. 😉
LOL – one of the best cartoons was OJ looking for his golf ball in the water, with his reflection staring back at him. Caption reads “OJ finds the real killers.”
This is known as an oligarchy, where the rich and powerful become the “government”!
From Merriam-Webster:
“ government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes”
THe U.S. has been on this slippery slope for a number of years.
Dave: Actually much worse, they are buying the prosecutor not the judiciary. The Court can only decide cases brought to it- the prosecutor decides the cases brought, and can do far more damage. Courts don’t have investigation “tools”, prosecutors do and can use them to investigate any damn thing (Russian hoax). Or not investigate (a certain laptop). Bloomberg and Soros are onto something very dangerous, they are buying law enforcement power.
Thanks for the depressing correction!
“It was worse than I thought.”
Wouldn’t it be great to have laws outlining personal accountability and penalties for people in public office who abuse the resources and privileges of that office at the expense of taxpayers to defend their won corrupt practices. At present it seems that the total expense and accountability for this abuse is on the taxpayer and those citizens who bring suit. Same here in Canada. This is the political equivalent of academic tenure where, once appointed there is no accountability and all misbehaviour is at the cost of the public not the person committing th offence.
Jason Miyares is a supposedly conservative republican. Are you saying he’s still fighting on the side of the previous democrat administration?
Bureaucrats have a higher calling. It’s called “Paycheck Protection”.
If they play it right, they will achieve the “higher calling” of “Paycheck Enhancement”,
where they’ll have made political connections that will pay them more than they made at
the job where they reached their level of incompetency!
A lot of Republicans have this notion that as long as they aren’t openly socialist, they can call themselves conservative,
About damned time. Now, will it actually be enforced?
Thanks for this report about incremental meaningful progress resulting from skill, hard work, ethics and persistence. My gratitude is offered to Christopher Horner and associates who have endeavored to halt this political corruption of our legal system.
I look forward to reports of more sunlight upon the slimy maneuver by the state of Virginia.
Please tell me the judge ordered Virginia to pay the legal fees.
Only honest people comply with FOIA.
Sort of. Sometimes FOIA requests are made primarily for political reasons: to tie up a department with egregious amounts of paperwork or to search for, often accidental, “process crimes” like making a statement under oath that may have inadvertently misstated or excluded something that’s found in the unearthed documents but is used to paint the person or department as deliberately hiding some conspiracy. Sometimes just making the FOIA request for hundreds of thousands of pages of documents is done to make it appear as though the department is hiding something because it takes so long to gather the documents, or because they know the department will reject the request as unreasonable because they want hundreds of thousands of mostly completely irrelevant documents. And sometimes the requests are completely legitimate, like this one. The political gamesmanship in government bureaucracy is bloody.
Can we presume that Virginia will be the only state of the Union to have been infiltrated by special climate attorneys in the pay of Mr B?
No, unfortunately.
They won’t give up with the political lawyering if they’re too gutless to ban or tax consumer products democratically-
California takes on Big Plastic over recycling myths (msn.com)
You’ll notice with increased demand and lithium battery resource prices rising dramatically it’s beginning to dawn on the climate changers that their renewables fix is a fantasy so the mantra is beginning to change to rationing and restrictions-
The promise and peril of the electric car revolution | The Week
Net zero by 2050 will hit a major timing problem technology can’t solve. We need to talk about cutting consumption (theconversation.com)
No e-sprawl for the Teslerati and the deplorables can catch the bus-
Paris suspends electric bus fleet after fires (msn.com)
or cycle or walk.
And put your mouth where your money is Elon and resist the Ministry of Truth and green jackboots-
Lauren Boebert leads effort to defund Biden Administration’s ‘disinformation’ board (msn.com)
What the hell is a Republican AG doing perpetuating the work of a Marxist like Herring.