From the one less bureaucrat department and NCDC/NCEI comes this press release:
Tom Karl Retires After Nearly 41 Years of Service
After nearly 41 years, Tom Karl, NCEI’s Director, is retiring from Federal service. He’s come a long way from his first job as an 11 year old handing out advertisements for a TV repairman on Saturday mornings. But, he’s ready to transition into a new phase of his life. “I’m looking forward to slowing things down and taking some time to relax,” said Tom. “And, I won’t have to worry about staying up too late watching football,” he continued with a smile.
Even though Tom is now looking forward to relaxing, the passion for science he developed as a young man remains deeply rooted in him. In the early days of his childhood, Tom had his heart set on becoming a weather forecaster. And, he continued that educational path into college, obtaining his bachelor’s degree from Northern Illinois University and his master’s degree from the University of Wisconsin—both in meteorology.
After completing his master’s degree, Tom was ready to embark on a new phase in his career. He applied for several positions across the country, including one at what was then the Environmental Research Lab in Raleigh, North Carolina. With no word back from the Lab after several weeks, Tom moved to Norman, Oklahoma, and prepared to begin a PhD program and work as a teaching assistant at the University of Oklahoma. Then, a week before his first semester was set to begin, the Environmental Research Lab offered him a position.
“I think the overwhelming Oklahoma heat was what really led to my final decision,” Tom recalled of his decision to move to Raleigh. But, he was certain he’d made the right decision as he began researching the interactions of air pollution with Earth’s climate under his first boss, George Holzworth. “George pushed me to publish a lot of papers early on,” said Tom. “He was instrumental in helping me learn to better communicate my science.”
As much as Tom enjoyed climate and research, he still wanted to fulfill his childhood dream of becoming a weather forecaster. So, he took advantage of working for NOAA and found a job doing just that with the National Weather Service Office in Anchorage, Alaska. But, Tom found that rotating shifts weren’t for him, and he began to search for other opportunities.
Finally, in 1980, Tom found what he was looking for in the National Climate Center in Asheville, North Carolina. Since then, the National Climate Center transformed into the National Climatic Data Center. Throughout that time, Tom also worked his way up from a researcher to a Lab Chief to Senior Scientist to Director of the Center. And, when the National Climatic Data Center merged with its sister Data Centers in 2015, Tom took on the responsibility of serving as NCEI’s first Director and shepherding the former organizations through the transition period.
Of all of his accomplishments during his tenure, Tom reflects most fondly on some of the “ah ha” moments throughout his career. “It was great to use science to discover something we hadn’t realized before,” Tom said. “And, it was really rewarding to work with so many brilliant people toward a cause as rewarding as NOAA’s—helping protect lives and property and living marine resources.”
As Tom goes on to new adventures, he hopes that NCEI will continue to build off its strengths of providing authoritative data and information and being experts on what’s possible with that data. “We’ve built a great reputation from the standpoint of providing stewardship, science, and services,” Tom noted. “And, we’ve got many opportunities to integrate environmental data from different disciplines to help solve some really complex problems. What we’ve done and what NCEI will continue to do is really positive for the country and the world, and that’s worth quite a bit.”
Tom would like to thank all of NCEI’s employees for their dedication and hard work. He would also like to extend a special thanks to all those who encouraged and influenced him throughout his career.
We appreciate Tom’s many years of service at NOAA and wish him the best of luck in the future!
What this means is that Tom Peterson will likely succeed Karl as director, and Peterson is a rabid warmist, and holds the keys to the entire GHCN dataset and the WMO climate program. He was also a co-author (likely the one who did all the work since Karl is a policy wonk and not much of a scientist) in that sleight of hand that they pulled last year in adjusting past sea-surface temperatures in a highly criticized paper that made the slope of warmer higher. These two are so smug, they refused a congressional subpoena last year looking into the issue
If Peterson gets the nod, you can expect NCDC/NCEI to become even more alarmist and data adjusting than they are now.
UPDATE: Apparently I’m in error. Zeke notes in comments that Tom Peterson retired from NCDC last year in July 2015. I regret the error, but was unaware.
UPDATE2: Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. Notes in comments:
My experience with Tom Peterson in the last few years has not been pleasant. I will document some of them in this comment. Tom and I used to get along fine at CSU and I enjoyed my discussions with him. Somehow, this climate issue [has] distorted his objectivity and collegiality.
My largest concern is that when I was on the CCSP 1.1 committee (with Tom Karl as Chair) which was evaluating the surface and tropospheric temperature data trend analyses, Tom Peterson communicated to others, including members of the committee, behind my back. His comments were insulting. I only found out due to the Climategate e-mails. For a federal manager/employee to involve themselves so as to skew a report compromises the objectivity of such reports.
Here is some of the record on my experience (excerpts and links to where they came from)
1. https://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/tom-peterson-of-ncdc-and-climate-science-baloney/
“At 18:12 13/03/2008, Thomas C Peterson wrote:
Hi, David,
My first thought is well, we’ll just have to cut it way back. Then I pulled out Pielke’s paper and saw that mountain of baloney and thought where do we draw the line?
There is so much there that should be refuted.
To be pithy, we could just hit the central points with little elaboration:
1. Definition of global temperature (a) Roger gives a definition related heat content and climate feedback. We give this definition: the average temperature of the earth.”
“Conclusion: Roger is full of baloney.
There you go, David. Add in a few references and we have a paper!
Regards,
REDACTED Tom”
2. https://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/comment-on-the-post-enemies-caught-in-action-on-the-blackboard/
“From: “thomas.c.peterson” To: Phil Jones Subject: [Fwd: Marooned?] Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:10:02 -0500
Hi, Phil,
I thought you might enjoy the forwarded picture and related commentary below.
I read some of the USHCN/GISS/CRU brouhaha on web site you sent us. It is both interesting and sad. It reminds me of a talk that Fred Singer gave in which he impugned the climate record by saying he didn’t know how different parts were put together. During the question part, Bob Livzey said, if you don’t know how it is done you should read the papers that describe it in detail. So many of the comments on that web page could be completely addressed by pointing people to different papers. Ah well, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it think.
Warm regards,
Tom”
3. http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/enemies-caught-in-action/ {see Cartoon which ridicules me and others]. This behaviour would never have been known except for the hacking to obtain the Climategate e-mails.
Tom Peterson never apologized for this.
Thus, if he becomes head of NCDC, I assume he will continue to denigrate, behind their backs, those who disagree with him, but now in an even more senior position.
Roger Sr.
P.S. The CCSP 1.1 report was thus a biased assessment. I discuss this, for example, in
Pielke Sr., Roger A., 2005: Public Comment on CCSP Report “Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences”. 88 pp including appendices.http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/nr-143.pdf