How can anyone look at the unaltered satellite data and conclude anything other than there is nothing to suggest anthropogenic climate influence from greenhouse gases? Certainly no evidence of the increase of co2 being a driving force at all. Every projected climate model has failed, without the help of changed data after the fact. It has become apparent that the science has evolved into political science and the warming focus has evolved into any change whatsoever in climate is attributed to anthropogenic contributed CO2. It’s the perfect scam that is impossible to disprove and because the problem doesn’t represent reality the solution doesn’t have to either. So success is guaranteed and subject to and limited only the imagination of these politically motivated planet saviors.
The whole schmere violates Thermodynamics laws…
CO2 can not cause a greenhouse effect. GE is HEAT buildup (the inside of a greenhouse is warmer in the winter, thus plants grow… Ahem…).
CO2 cannot cause heat buildup as that implies it prevents heat from escaping to outer space, which is impossible as space is a vacuum (so is the space between AlGores ears) and cannot receive heat.
Just ask any engineer experienced with space electronics systems…”no place to reject heat to”
So the whole thing is a pack of lies pushed on utterly scientifically ignorant rabble, by scientifically ignorant rabble.
Here’s what really gets me HOT . . . if the fools get their way and soak everyone for hundreds of $billions in the name of saving the planet . . . when global warming doesn’t occur, they’ll get the credit!
Randy Dan
January 2, 2016 11:44 pm
Great points! I’ve wondered just how a gas which represents less than 1/2 of one percent of the atmosphere is supposed to trap heat? It’s like throwing a net over a roofless house and expecting it to keep the heat in.
I am absolutely convinced that Global Warming is Mann made.
How can anyone look at the unaltered satellite data and conclude anything other than there is nothing to suggest anthropogenic climate influence from greenhouse gases? Certainly no evidence of the increase of co2 being a driving force at all. Every projected climate model has failed, without the help of changed data after the fact. It has become apparent that the science has evolved into political science and the warming focus has evolved into any change whatsoever in climate is attributed to anthropogenic contributed CO2. It’s the perfect scam that is impossible to disprove and because the problem doesn’t represent reality the solution doesn’t have to either. So success is guaranteed and subject to and limited only the imagination of these politically motivated planet saviors.
The whole schmere violates Thermodynamics laws…
CO2 can not cause a greenhouse effect. GE is HEAT buildup (the inside of a greenhouse is warmer in the winter, thus plants grow… Ahem…).
CO2 cannot cause heat buildup as that implies it prevents heat from escaping to outer space, which is impossible as space is a vacuum (so is the space between AlGores ears) and cannot receive heat.
Just ask any engineer experienced with space electronics systems…”no place to reject heat to”
So the whole thing is a pack of lies pushed on utterly scientifically ignorant rabble, by scientifically ignorant rabble.
Here’s what really gets me HOT . . . if the fools get their way and soak everyone for hundreds of $billions in the name of saving the planet . . . when global warming doesn’t occur, they’ll get the credit!
Great points! I’ve wondered just how a gas which represents less than 1/2 of one percent of the atmosphere is supposed to trap heat? It’s like throwing a net over a roofless house and expecting it to keep the heat in.