Meh, same old 'gloom and doom' from the IPCC over new climate report

“Richard Black, director of the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit”
Left the BBC two years ago? Same Richard Black? The same bloke who banged on and on about climate change on the BBC’s ‘Environment’ pages?
Ridiculous man.

“violent conflicts are among the likely risks if temperatures exceed 2C”
Cites can be 10 – 20 degrees warmer than the surrounding countryside, with half the world now living in cites, generally most people get along fine.

damn – cities!

Fossil fuels must be phased out by 2100 o r we are all doomed says UN.
Sorry no link but is BBC lead,story.
Raving mad

The delights of city life for a bee.
When asked, 9/10 bees expressed a preference for hotter city life, and are , or thinking of moving to a city.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jun/23/can-cities-save-bees
“Today, beehives are quietly buzzing in cities all over the globe: Chicago, Toronto, Paris, London and New York are cities where thousands of different species of plants are blossoming in the gardens and parks. Honey produced in the cities is of a better quality than that from the countryside. The cities are becoming a haven; they do not protect the bees from everything, but they offer them a break”
“But surprisingly, the industry has discovered that bees kept in urban areas are healthier and produce better honey”
“As a consequence, it is more and more common to see wild swarms finding refuge in cities, and beekeepers are regularly deciding to move their hives to city gardens and parks. Fewer pesticides and a greater biodiversity are helping bee colonies to thrive here”
Strange to think that at the knees up in Paris next year the temps in the city are between 4- 6 degrees C higher than the surrounding countryside. So with an expected two degrees rise over the next hundred years, the city is already 2-4 degrees hotter than the surrounding countryside will be in a 100 years – and the bees love it!!

Gosh the Guardian really do delete anything that is not pro AGW – I just asked a question about the pause in warming – asking could someone please explain it – very polite, no controversial tone and it lasted 5 minutes before it was disappeared……

“Richard Black, director of the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, said the key question for those finalising the IPCC report was “what to say about the elephant in the room… that if the computer model projections are right, keeping global warming below 2C basically means ending fossil fuel use well before today’s children start drawing their pensions”…
“…if the computer model projections are right…”
And world governments are going to base their energy policies and the life or death of their citizens on an “if”, from demonstably failed computer models, eh Richard?
‘Intelligence’ unit?

These people make me sick. Politicized weather and climate….ARGHH!! Weather and climate extreme’s that have always occurred, with a very large envelope of variability can now be blamed on our energy use. But the only saving grace is the majoriy of the public does not buy it and hopefully with a Republican sweep this week we can stem the Obama adminstrations idiotic climate control aspirations.

Look at this climate nonsense from the lying Canadian public broadcaster CBC. It’s like they are ramping up the hysteria in preparation for the end times. Their mendacious claims have reached an all time high.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/un-climate-change-report-offers-stark-warnings-hope-1.2821093

It’s clear this indoctrination has to continue to persuade the people the necessity of higher energy bills.
The last 5 years another scare issue was introduced , dependency on Russian oil and gas. Recently Europe declared no longer to depend on Russia and the Middle East. It’s now a battle between East and West.
This means support of the people at home is required

IPCC Report – SPM
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have increased since the pre-industrial era, driven largely by economic and population growth, and are now higher than ever. This has led to atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide that are unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years.

Oh crap, we are doomed.
http://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0277379113000553-gr7.jpg
http://notrickszone.com/2014/10/27/younger-dryas-analysis-no-evidence-at-all-co2-drives-temperature-paper-used-sloppy-data-methods/

A much easier solution, and one that does not take 75 years to achieve, is to get rid of Bon Ki Moon and the other cultists of doom (IPCC/IFCCC) from the UN and the White House/EPA/NOAA.
Perhaps we should look at the “Ban Fossil Fuels” movement as a latter-day version of the Temperance Movement from the 1800s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperance_movement
In today’s Ban Fossil Fuel movement, the latest “Accord” from Copenhagen has adopted Teetotalism (total abstinence) to cure the ills of the CO2 drunken world. Removing the cultists from the White House/EPA/NOAA we can avoid constitutional-level prohibition laws and the disruption to society that the 1919 prohibition law and others at the state-level caused.

I tried to make this comment twice with a source to the link, both times deleted.
The IPCC choses which science meets their agenda.
“(EDENHOFER): First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.”
They hate the truth

What would we do without those intellectuals who KNOW BETTER?
Below is what C.P. Snow wrote in 1959. Change “Industrialisation” to “access to affordable energy” and he could have posted it on todays blog.
………
“For, of course, one truth is straightforward. Industrialisation is the only hope of the poor. I use the word ‘hope’ in a crude and prosaic sense. I have not much use for the moral sensibility of anyone who is too refined to use it so. It is all very well for us, sitting pretty, to think that material standards of living don’t matter all that much. It is all very well for one, as a personal choice, to reject industrialisation—do a modern Walden, if you like, and if you go without much food, see most of your children die in infancy, despise the comforts of literacy, accept twenty years off your own life, then I respect you for the strength of your aesthetic revulsion. But I don’t respect you in the slightest if, even passively, you try to impose the same choice on others who are not free to choose. In fact, we know what their choice would be. For, with singular unanimity, in any country where they have had the chance, the poor have walked off the land into the factories as fast as the factories could take them.”
………
C.P. Snow THE TWO CULTURES (1959)

Folks have some fun and hop over to this site and add comments. The CBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, home of David Suzuki is very very biased in their climate reporting.

Former British MP, Ann Widdecombe, wrote a short piece in the Express newspaper last week about the Climate act passed some years ago…….a few ‘robust’ comments in such a short piece of writing.
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/ann-widdecombe/528569/Ann-Widdecombe-on-Climate-change-Ched-Evans-and-Fiona-Woolf
….ignore the items that follow it.

if I had to sum up this b.s report into two words, it would be:
We believe.
That’s how we should be interpreting this garbage. Its their opinion, that’s all. Its carefully written in a way that screams- WE BELIEVE!.
notice how many times they used “likely” in the freakin report.