It's official: Al Gore is a prophet

Tim Blair of the Telegraph catches this little slip, which is rather telling. He writes:

Jeff Young interviews Maggie Fox, President and CEO of Al Gore’s latest scam, the Climate Reality Project:

FOX: I think the notion of Vice President Gore as a divisive figure is a bit of a hoax, just like the people who are denying climate change. It’s a pre-frame, it’s a fabrication that suits those who want to keep the status quo. So if you have a prophet, if you have someone who has woken up to a particular challenge in the world and that person speaks, if that disrupts things, who is going to be and what are the voices going to be that say that person doesn’t have credibility? Those voices that don’t want that change … There are so many more voices clamoring to hear what he has to say that his right to speak and need to speak is more than made clear virtually every day.

YOUNG: Did you just refer to him as a prophet?

FOX: I think he is a prophet on climate change. I think he woke up to this issue in his earliest years, expected as other people learned about it that they would also wake up to its significance … His presumption as a young man was that once you heard the information the world would shift and start getting its act together, and that hasn’t happened.

==========================================================

Here’s an “inconvenient truth”:

Traffic rank: lower is better. Alexa doesn't track ranks below 100,000

Source: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/climaterealityproject.org+wattsupwiththat.com#

NOTE: Since some commenters misunderstand the above graph, here’s an explanation. It is traffic rank, not hits. WUWT is in the top most visited websites of the world, AlGore’s CRP is not.

Advertisements

142 thoughts on “It's official: Al Gore is a prophet

  1. I believe Al Gore also blamed the Dinosaurs for global warming in prehistoric times, and the monks for the Middle Ages warm-up. Now the Tea Party is causing the sun to burn us to a crisp!.

  2. I assume this was a telephone interview, and Young must simply have misheard her. Perhaps Maggie Fox was simply referring to all the “profit” that Gore makes from the climate change scare.
    “So if you have a profit…”
    “I think he has a profit from climate change.”
    That would make more sense.

  3. I think you flipped the scales on your semi-log plot, unless WUWT really is only 20,000 hits per day!
    REPLY: I think you don’t know how to read graphs. Traffic rank, not hits. WUWT is in the top most visited websites of the world, AlGore is not. – Anthony

  4. How much is he paying her? Mind you she is CEO of a mindless organisation.
    “Prophet:one who utters divinely inspired revelations!”
    That is not Al Gore in any conceivable way!
    Maggie Fox – You’re fired!

  5. 1. I don’t think the word “official” means what you think it means.
    2. How does traffic rank play into this? Scientific truth is not determined by the popularity of its view.
    3. For all the grandstanding that’s being done here about improper scientific method, misleading numbers, and so on, it raises some eyebrows that you’d use a traffic rank system that’s widely considered irrelevant and inaccurate.
    REPLY: I don’t think you know how to read tags – Anthony

  6. “I think he woke up to this issue in his earliest years,”
    And the wise men came to visit the infant Al in his crib, bringing gifts of carbon tax credits, nobel prizes and vice presidencies.

  7. Yeah, yeah – and my goldfish was a centrefold last month!
    Gore is a prophet ? – Oh FFS! – can someone really be that clueless?

  8. His earliest years were when he was in his 40s. He also grew, harvested etc. tobacco earlier than that. But Christ has a missing first 30 years; Gore is a little bit slower coming to his special connection with God and the universe, but we can probably forgive him that.
    Prophet or false prophet both have their detractors. When the prophet claims that HE is the prophet, we know he is the false one. The real ones deny it, claiming only that they have figured out something worth thinking about.
    What is the first rule about finding the Buddha on the road, according to the Buddha himself? You are supposed to “kill” him, as no one who was the Buddha would have the foolishness to claim that he was one.

  9. “WUWT is in the top most visited websites of the world, AlGore’s CRP is not.”
    Just insert an ‘A’ into CRP and you will have what spews forth from Al Gores mouth most of the time.

  10. The “paint by the numbers” pic is priceless! Back in the old days, you weren’t Catholic unless you had done a paint by the numbers pic of a notable Bible or Pope-ish character displayed in your living room. That was back in the day when, on their way out the door to attend Mass, the females would grab a doily off the coffee table, shake off the dust, and affix it on top of their heads with two crossed bobby pins.

  11. I’ve watch American films before, powerful man, devout follow, sweaty bodies (yep that’s an image).
    Although my definition of prophet in American would have something to do with Koolaid.

  12. The first thing that came to mind when I read the title was profiteer. then I went scrolling down to read the comments and realised that many had beat me to it.
    So, the church of Gore has a prophet (himself of course), a godess Gaia, for whom we have to sacrifies ourselves, our children and forfeit all our luxuries and even basic needs such as electricity for heating There is also salvation, which is the higher ground where one goes to be saved from drowning because of raised ocean levels. There is also a heaven, which is Antarctica, the only place to remain habitable after the planet has burnt out due to global warming. There are the bishops (Hansen, Mann….) and acolytes, these being the journalists telling us how we are all gonna die if we do not repent…..
    And then there’s damnation for all those who don’t drive a Prius or a donkey.

  13. Wouter says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:32 am
    2. How does traffic rank play into this? Scientific truth is not determined by the popularity of its view.
    So the consensus is wrong? This CAGW alarmist dedication to the numbers game has been a central feature of the fabricated consensus. Oh I get it now, its populism when sceptics try the numbers game and consensus when the CAGW cult tries it.
    Populism Vs the consensus. The war between the CAGW fraud and the truth, a bit like the good the bad and the ugly. The ugly being Al Gore of course.

  14. Anthony Watts Writes: “WUWT is in the top most visited websites of the world, AlGore’s CRP is not.”
    LOL,
    My mind interpreted CRP as CRaP.
    I thought that was amusing.

  15. Reminds me of David Icke, well known British footballer and TV personality who thought he was a messiah. Google him if you want a laugh.

  16. Doug Proctor says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:38 am
    “Prophet or false prophet both have their detractors. When the prophet claims that HE is the prophet, we know he is the false one. The real ones deny it, claiming only that they have figured out something worth thinking about.”
    I do hope that you meant “/sarc” somewhere.

  17. Wouter says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:32 am
    Scientific truth is not determined by the popularity of its view.
    ======================================================
    97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real ………
    woops

  18. Alex the skeptic says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:52 am
    The first thing that came to mind when I read the title was profiteer. then I went scrolling down to read the comments and realised that many had beat me to it.
    So, the church of Gore has a prophet (himself of course), a godess Gaia, for whom we have to sacrifies ourselves, our children and forfeit all our luxuries and even basic needs such as electricity for heating There is also salvation, which is the higher ground where one goes to be saved from drowning because of raised ocean levels. There is also a heaven, which is Antarctica, the only place to remain habitable after the planet has burnt out due to global warming. There are the bishops (Hansen, Mann….) and acolytes, these being the journalists telling us how we are all gonna die if we do not repent…..
    And then there’s damnation for all those who don’t drive a Prius or a donkey.

    Don’t forget, there is also a Devil, which is our modern lifestyle that makes life easier. Where there is a devil, there are also demons. The demons are the people who dare question the goddess and her prophets and bishops. The sacrifices that we have to make to obtain salvation are simony.

  19. Wouter says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:32 am
    2. How does traffic rank play into this? Scientific truth is not determined by the popularity of its view.
    Ergo a consensus (which only represents the popularity of a given view) is meaningless in science. Guess what? That’s one of the things sceptics have been saying for a very long time!

  20. And as readers of Dan Gardner’s book ‘Future Babble’ will know, the predictive power of most prophets is a big fat zero.
    On the other hand he must have some supernatural powers. How else can you explain the climate-changing ‘Gore Effect’?

  21. Google for “Green Prophet”; it seems to be commonplace for the green/environmentalist movement to call their leaders prophets.

  22. Remember, Al Gore’s prophecy is pushed using the idea that skeptic scientists are corrupt and untrustworthy. Nobody in the mainstream media has questioned this, and as I pointed out in my guest post here at WUWT ( http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/06/25/the-end-is-near-for-faith-in-agw/ ), Gore can’t keep his accusation story straight. He again altered his long-term accusation narrative in his latest profanity-filled diatribe at the Aspen Institute a couple of days ago, citing the infamous Naomi Oreskes about the corruption of skeptic scientists. As I pointed in another of my pieces, Oreskes is also tied to the same old central smear of skeptic scientists, please see: “Circuitous attempts to smear AGW skeptic scientists” http://climatechangedispatch.com/editorials/7568-circuitous-attempts-to-smear-agw-skeptic-scientists

  23. I’m looking forward to the moment when the “prophet” sojourns in the wilderness for forty days and forty nights. Real prophets don’t take their Blackberry with them, so we can expect almost a month of silence from “Al Gorezeera” or “The Voice of the Prophet”. Any suggestions for the location of his sojourn?
    I’ve heard Australia’s great prophet Tim Flannery is planning a sojourn, though I don’t think he’ll pick a spot just below the Wivenhoe dam in Queensland. I’ve heard it’s nice there in January, if sometimes a trifle wet.

  24. A prophet? Consider the source (clueless, unreliable, gold digger (for a story), “journalist” (or wanna-be)).
    Besides, for a prophet to be considered one, he should have a track record. What has Gore predicted that’s come to pass? His record regarding the climate is dismal. And what happens to the weather when Gore travels someplace–it turns into a deep freeze (relatively speaking). I’d say he’s a jinx.
    No, Gore is no prophet. He’s a profitess (meaning he stands to make money by his pronouncements), but any which way you cut it, he’s not a prophet.

  25. Naomi Oreskes being completely backwards in her analogy about business perverting the message is one of the more amusing ironies of this whole mess.
    She gets a roomful of mirrors all to herself in my museum.
    ============

  26. While I don’t claim to be a biblical scholar, doesn’t one false prophesy make a false prophet?
    “If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD [Gaia] does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD [Gaia] has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him.” Deuteronomy 18:20-22

  27. DanZee says:
    “I believe Al Gore also blamed the Dinosaurs for global warming in prehistoric times, and the monks for the Middle Ages warm-up. Now the Tea Party is causing the sun to burn us to a crisp!.”
    Well, in that case Gore must indeed be a prophet; the Dinosaurs got their just reward for all that global warming, didn’t they?

  28. The response that many people have to “Global Warming” is of a religious nature. They want to believe, they want to do the right thing (most of them anyway) but they do not understand the nature of science. Perhaps here in the US it confirmation that we are falling way behind in graduating Engineers and Scientists. Interesting that of the developing nations that ARE producing technical people, they are not falling into this religious trap. People will have to be taught Science and this will have to begin with the young school age kids today.

  29. @Alex the skeptic says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:52 am
    “And then there’s damnation for all those who don’t drive a Prius or a donkey.”
    ============================================================
    I’m not sure you’re off the hook with just a Prius. Stick with a donkey just to be on the safe side. I know his followers are sticking with a jack@$$.
    ;o)

  30. Doesn’t matter whether Gore’s a prophet or not. He’s just plain wrong about the end of the world will be caused by slightly highter amounts of CO2 — besides, he’s a hypocrite to boot.

  31. NOTE: Since some commenters misunderstand the above graph, here’s an explanation. It is traffic rank, not hits.
    ===============================================================
    lol, I think you should lobby Alexa to change its graph format. Every time!!! lol

  32. YOUNG: Did you just refer to him as a prophet?
    FOX: I think he is a prophet on climate change. I think he woke up to this issue in his earliest years, expected as other people learned about it that they would also wake up to its significance … His presumption as a young man was that once you heard the information the world would shift and start getting its act together, and that hasn’t happened.

    I would like to note, for the record, that that is completely contrary to how science works. You don’t simply learn something and that’s the end of it. You don’t simply absorb a book and the questioning stops. That bolded sentence right there says that Gore expected all of us to simply ‘hear the information’ and believe
    THAT IS RELIGION.

  33. Latitude says:
    August 8, 2011 at 10:05 am
    “97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real ……… woops”
    Try to get some facts straight. A master’s thesis by a student at the University of Illinois, Chicago did a poll that tortured the data until it came up with a value of 97%. This did NOT represent the the views of 97% of scientists or even 97% of those polled.
    It disgusts me that UIC is giving away MS degrees for doing a poll.

  34. Is the alexa rank determined by averaging? The graph shows three spikes in ranking for July, the biggest being in the week of July 11th, which could have been generated by the article posted on WUWT on Tuesday July 12th., and, strangely, two smaller spikes on the following Tuesdays. Without those spikes, Climaterealityproject would not break the 100,000 threshold.

  35. He is a prophet. The prophet of the coming of the 1/2 man, 1/2 bear, 1/2 pig….manbearpig. I’m super cereal.

  36. I have a profoundly benevolent view of the universe. And since man is a natural part of the universe, I have a profoundly benevolent view of mankind as a whole. However, the human condition does have some temporary, periodic and localized malevolency.
    I leave it to the philosophical enthusiast to comment on the uncertainty involved in the possibility of detecting any benevolence in the ideology of Mr. Gore.
    Good news for Al baby, I think any seriously malevolent group would heartily welcome Al baby. After all even upper class malevolent people need entertainment from someone like Al, who they would surely consider a malevolent jester and buffoon.
    Prophet? Yes, definitely. He is a prophet for the nihilists and fawning/clueless journalists.
    John

  37. Al Gore, the prophet, is standing on a cyber street corner shouting, “Repent! Repent! The end is near! The fires of Hell are upon us! Get your carbon-credit indulgences now while they’re half off.”

  38. Wouter says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:32 am
    1. I don’t think the word “official” means what you think it means.
    of·fi·cial
    adjective /əˈfiSHəl/
    4.Emanating from or attributable to a person in office; properly authorized
    In this case, from Maggie Fox, President and CEO of the Climate Reality Project.
    So, yes, it in fact does mean what he thinks it does.

  39. The only thing more incredible than having Al Gore described as a ‘prophet” is the face-palmingly unbelievable idea that the High Priestess Maggie Fox herself would say so in so many words, publicly and unashamedly.
    Unless she is a “completed” idiot, she HAS to know that this degree of sycophantic adoration of the Gore can not do her credibility any good.

  40. I think there’s an ‘a’ missing from the acronym CRP. Perhaps it was originally called Climate Reality Awareness Project?

  41. HarryD says:
    August 8, 2011 at 11:29 am
    He is a prophet. The prophet of the coming of the 1/2 man, 1/2 bear, 1/2 pig….manbearpig. I’m super cereal.
    ————-
    HarryD,
    “super cereal” . . . LOL!
    This is better than the good early days of Saturday Night Live.
    Ahhh, you all are tearing me up with laughter.
    Thanks Anthony for bringing us this moment.
    John

  42. Used to be rough to be a prophet; You know, stones for pillows, hair shirts, eating honey and locusts, getting around on a donkey. Al’s been looking mighty properous these days, living large even. But in the spirit of generosity I propose that we all limit our carbon footprint to no more than prophet Gore. Can I hear an amen?

  43. Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are savage wolves.
    Matthew 7: 15
    Friends:
    I gave a parody of a ‘H*ll Fire’ sermon as the introduction to one of my presentations at the first Heartland Climate Conference. It was delivered with full fervour and I know was enjoyed by several so I copy its text below.
    I hope at least some of you are amused by it.
    Richard
    ****************
    We all know that the books of the IPCC are the Bible of man-made global climate change. And – according to the books of scientific revelation in that Bible – the atmosphere was in a state of Eden before human industrial civilization. Then humans began to consume the forbidden fruit of fossil fuels, so the atmosphere became contaminated with an excess of carbon dioxide. Humans continue to practice the sin of industrial civilization and, therefore, the contamination of the atmosphere continues to increase. As a result, our civilization is doomed by our sin as surely as Soddom and Gommorah.
    The world will warm with the result that the Four Horsemen of the Apacalypse are set to roam the world spreading pestilence, war, famine, and death. We can stop them from destroying the world as we know it by turning from our sin of industrial civilization. But the sins of the fathers are weighed upon their children even unto the seventh generation because our sin has already added carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and it will continue to wreak its havoc for centuries to come. We must repent and turn from our consumption of the forbidden fruit to avoid its worst effects on our children and our children’s children.
    That is the prevailing faith which is being spread by many proselytes and has been adopted as the State Religion in many places, notably the European Union.
    But I am here to proclaim the message in the song. “The things that you’re liable to read in the Bible; it ain’t necessarily so.”

  44. Al Gore is only a prophet of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. There is zero danger or need to spend a single dollar based on the feeble predictions Gore puts forth when compared with empirical evidence. No one is listening because everyone can see there is no emergency. None at all.

  45. “…if you have someone who has woken up to a particular challenge in the world and that person speaks, if that disrupts things, who is going to be and what are the voices going to be that say that person doesn’t have credibility? Those voices that don’t want that change…”: Is there nobody left in the world, like, able to formulate a simple English sentence, I mean, like, one that is grammar, you know, has grammar, I mean, correct. And preferably one that makes sense, too.

  46. He’s NOT the Messiah – he’s a very naughty boy!
    (Actually Brian’s mum was shouting, but I didn’t want to upset anyone here)

  47. John Whitman says:
    August 8, 2011 at 11:30 am
    Very well said. It says a lot about our liberal elite that reference to a nasty jester is necessary when explaining what they are about.

  48. Taphonomic says:
    August 8, 2011 at 11:21 am
    Try to get some facts straight.
    ===========================================
    I didn’t think there was one person left on the face of this earth that wouldn’t recognize that as a joke…………………………..woops

  49. Now you stand with your thief, you’re on his parole
    With your holy medallion which your fingertips fold
    And your saintlike face and your ghostlike soul
    Oh, who among them do you think could destroy you?
    Sad-eyed lady of the lowlands
    Where the sad-eyed prophet says that no man comes
    My warehouse eyes, my Arabian drums
    Should I leave them by your gate
    Or, sad-eyed lady, should I wait?

  50. John Whitman says:
    August 8, 2011 at 11:40 am
    [snip]
    —————-
    Moderators,
    This a unique day in my wonderful life. After 1000s of comments on WUWT and pushing 3 years commenting on WUWT, I had my very first snip here. Does anyone want to go out for a beer or martinis?
    I don’t feel sad. . . . . but snipping me for a comment with no foul language nor violence which we all read about in the MSM regarding Mr. Gore . . . . surely reconsider. I think WUWT even had a post on it.
    What if I get a quote from the MSM supporting my comment or a very similar quote from a previous WUWT comment on an Al Gore thread that wasn’t snipped . . . will you then reconsider and reinstate my comment?
    Thank you.
    John
    REPLY: it was the imagery it invoked, and too far OT – Anthony

  51. Latitude says: “97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real”
    You’ve come to the wrong place to quote fake statistics.
    Your 97% is actually only 75 scientists.
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/04/lawrence-solomon-on-consensus-statistics/
    “The two researchers obtained their results by conducting a survey of 10,257 Earth scientists. The survey results must have deeply disappointed the researchers — in the end, they chose to highlight the views of a subgroup of just 77 scientists, 75 of whom thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produces the 97% figure that pundits now tout.”

  52. I think you should drop your obsession with Al Gore. The science which he reports speaks for itself, and the evidence is beyond dispute. Focussing on Gore simply serves to distract your many readers from the facts revealed in a vast and growing body of knowledge.I think it would be wise for all of us in these turbulent times, to speak the truth clearly, without recourse to PR tactics which serve only to distract and clutter the conversation. Contrarian views are important, but only if they are intended to complete the picture being portrayed by disciplined scientists and others around the world.
    REPLY: I think you should get your own blog and that way you can run it any way you want instead of trying to constantly tell us what we should and should not be doing here. – Anthony

  53. jaymam says:
    August 8, 2011 at 1:56 pm
    =========
    Latitude says: “97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real”
    =====================
    You’ve come to the wrong place to quote fake statistics.
    Your 97% is actually only 75 scientists.
    ===========================================
    and now for the severely reading impaired……………….
    It was a joke Jay……………………………and you left out the “woops” on the end
    Re-read Anthony’s post….see if you can make any connection as to why it’s a joke

  54. “Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    I think you should drop your obsession with Al Gore. ”
    No I don’t think so Hugh. No person has been so utterly a self serving liar while defrauding the world of money, good science and ease of mind. He is a devil to science. He is a cheat to the business world and an antagonist to calm. All to promote is ego, his wealth and his political world view… at expense of others who are honest, hardworking truth seekers.
    What great accomplishments we have missed as a human race because of one big fat lying jerk who derailed millions of well-intentioned people.
    He needs to be remembered for all eternity for what he is… a liar and the epitome of an abuser of the word “SCIENCE”.

  55. REPLY: it was the imagery it invoked, and too far OT – Anthony
    ————–
    Anthony,
    Thanks for the courtesy of a quick explanation. I will make no such allusions to such imagery ever again here @ WUWT.
    Tu casa es tu casa. [hope I didn’t butcher the Spanish too much]
    So it is written, and so it shall be. [which is appropriate prophet-like phrasing since we are discussing prophets]
    John

  56. So, essentially, now he’ll be wanting to marry 71 virgins? That’d be a dirty old douch.

  57. Hugh Pepper
    ‘The science which he reports speaks for itself, and the evidence is beyond dispute.’
    Really , remind us again how many millions of degrees he claimed the earth core was ?

  58. Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    “I think it would be wise for all of us in these turbulent times, to speak the truth clearly, without recourse to PR tactics which serve only to distract and clutter the conversation. Contrarian views are important, but only if they are intended to complete the picture being portrayed by disciplined scientists and others around the world.”
    I hope this video speaks the truth clearly, and i hope it complements the picture being portrayed by disciplined, peer-reviewing-each-other scientists. You said “complement”, right?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWEu4Yz76Ro&feature=player_embedded

  59. ‘You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD?” If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.’
    That would work nicely as an opening blurb for a infographic listing a timeline of failed predictions and models.

  60. Some of the ironic Australian humor in the comments on the Telegraph article on “Fat Al, the Prophet} are quite hilarious;
    eg; A fatex VP is a Prophet……a current President is a Mesiah…..
    And the USA is still broke?
    How could this happen whith so much divine intervention? Americans had a brighter future with sex maniacs running their country!

  61. Definition: prophet- a person who advocates or speaks in a visionary way about a new belief or cause.
    Inasmuch as AGW is a belief or cause Al Gore is indeed a prophet and based on the above definition, so was Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.

  62. [[[ Michael J Alexander says:
    August 8, 2011 at 5:15 pm
    If you squint real hard, you can almost see a hockey stick! ]]]
    I see a frying pan and a cheese sandwich…

  63. He can’t be a prophet, he’s been wrong too many times. He can’t be a samaritan, he put his light out. Must be a devil in disguise, sure does lie alot. Or, he’s a politician. Duh.

  64. Monty Python could make hay out of this. They already did one of the most hilarious versions of prophets and salvation I have ever seen. This is running a very close second. Can we get that painting of Gore to move its mouth Monty Python style?

  65. If big Al is the prophet then who exactly is the God of this particular religion? Speaking of religions if y’all want a laugh have a read about the “Flying Spagetti Monster”. Especially the hoops he went through to get the administration to accept wearing a colander headpiece was part of his religious beliefs.

  66. Back to the concensus. What were those other 7111 earth scientists thinking when they didn’t answer the key questions? Also – I kind of disagree with the emphasis put on Gore. This wasn’t Gore – it was one of his misguided minions.

  67. Based on the stats, CRP viewers are middle age unmarried females browsing from work.
    Since most folks are busy when at work, I presume that they are civil servants.
    Call me presumptuous.

  68. Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    “I think you should drop your obsession with Al Gore. The science which he reports speaks for itself, and the evidence is beyond dispute. ”
    Nice one Hugh! Coffee all over another keyboard!
    A UK high court judge found that his crap film had nine serious errors:
    The errors included:
    “Mr Gore’s assertion that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be caused by melting of ice in either West Antarctica or Greenland “in the near future”. The judge said this was “distinctly alarmist” and it was common ground that if Greenland’s ice melted it would release this amount of water – “but only after, and over, millennia”.
    Mr Gore’s assertion that the disappearance of snow on Mount Kilimanjaro in East Africa was expressly attributable to global warming – the court heard the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established the snow recession is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.
    Mr Gore’s reference to a new scientific study showing that, for the first time, polar bears had actually drowned “swimming long distances – up to 60 miles – to find the ice”. The judge said: “The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm.”
    Even the biased BBC reported it!
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7037671.stm
    Now promise me to type a ” save keyboard warning” before your next drivel post!

  69. By the way Hugh Pepper, you said, ” but only if they are intended to complete the picture being portrayed by disciplined scientists “.
    Are you referring to the likes of Michael Mann, Gavin Schmidt, Phill Jones, Ray Bradley, Malcolm Hughes, Keith Briffa, Casper Ammann, Rosanne D’Arrigo, Gabriele Hergerl, Tom Crowley, Scot Sutherland, to name but a few?
    Sorry about the list but I am wondering what your definition of “disciplined” is.

  70. Doug Proctor says:
    August 8, 2011 at 9:38 am
    “Prophet or false prophet both have their detractors. When the prophet claims that HE is the prophet, we know he is the false one. The real ones deny it, claiming only that they have figured out something worth thinking about.”
    Alright I AM the Messiah! Now F*** OFF!
    h/t Monty Python

  71. Where would we be if big Al had become president?
    Notice how when Obama has spoken in the last several weeks the markets have sharply plummeted immediately afterward? But Dubya’s speeches often had the same result.

  72. I still don’t think it’s appropriate for WUWT to compare its internet traffic with a billboard.

  73. Is Al Gore a Democrat? Yes? Well that’s all I need to know!
    Man Made Climate Change is REAL, Al Gore is a prophet and Co2 is a pollutant!!
    Cap And Trade!! Cap And Trade!!
    /JK

  74. WUWT would absolutely be the top shelf blog in the world if we could maybe do a little more light political wrangling imho. Oh, and more Pamela Gray… have her do some articles…

  75. Blood and Thunder Prophet: [screaming] … and the bezan shall be huge and black, and the eyes thereof red with the blood of living creatures, and the whore of Babylon shall ride forth on a three-headed serpent, and throughout the lands, there will be a great rubbing of parts. Yeeah…
    Life of Brian
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079470/quotes

  76. I bet you the people responsible for the ‘Hide the decline’ Utubes, surely will come up with something about this Al Gore debacle. What these alarmists use is language that can be misinterpretated. If you are asked ‘Do You Believe in Climate Change’ say yes, but not AGW
    Gore style.

  77. Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    I think you should drop your obsession with Al Gore. The science which he reports speaks for itself, and the evidence is beyond dispute.
    Aha, Hugh, so you now faithfully report from The Prophet that he himself hath settled that “The science is settled”? Indeed, what greater obsession scientific proof can there be?

  78. Al Gore has enough dollars to rough out this storm of dissent and his fraudulent view of AGW, all to make a profit by investing in carbon trading (failing) or green energy. But I bet you the James
    Hansen, Stephen Schneider, Michael Mann, Phil Jones, et al, are including the chairman of the IPCC are knocking their knees. I wonder if they will get any work when the real convenient truth is aired internationally. Remember Durban is due at the end of the year? Like Copenhagen 2009 it looks like this will be a non event, as America, China, Canada, Japan and another large country will not be signing any Kyoto 2012 renewal. It’s a carbon bubble eh? Well it is going flat folks.

  79. Moira [August 8, 2011 at 9:21 am] says:
    A propheteer?

    Instant classic. I am so stealing that!
    Al Gore, Climate Propheteer. He went to divinity school you know. We just weren’t told that it was Climate divinity school.

  80. THE PROBLEM WITH AL GORE IS HE IS LOSING THE PLOT PLUS HIS MONEY WHICH HE THINKS OF MORE THAN ANYTHING .

  81. I have to hand it to Gore: He sure knows how to name his organizations.
    Al Gores CRP.
    Prophetic, Al. A total zinger.

  82. I can’t believe that Gore actually called his website CRP! Either he is completely unaware, or the whole thing is a big joke.
    Incidentally, is Al Jewish? I understand that Hebrew does not have written vowels – perhaps he is the Messiah after all?

  83. Prophet of doom….. Or Profit from doom?
    … anyway, I think that popping sound we heard on the stock market might have been Al’s profit ascending to heavens knows where…..;-)

  84. I can somewhat understand people’s dislike of Gore even though I think it’s ashame that people want to shoot the messenger. But James Hansen? Does this really seem like a money hungry person:

  85. I’m amazed how you manage to close your eyes, not seeing what happens in the world. Our consuming deprives our children, or grandchildren, air to breathe or water to drink. But you can’t see that coming, because the major changes happens where you cant see them, outside the US.
    Listen to Mr Gore, and try to be proud of the work he does. After all, he got the Nobel Peace price, and that has to mean something, right?
    And yes, you can make money by by living an environmentalfriendly life! Go, Gore, Go!!!!

  86. Latitude, please use /sarc if you intend to mean the opposite of what you are saying. Otherwise you look like just another troll.

  87. Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    ……Contrarian views are important, but only if they are intended to complete the picture being portrayed by disciplined scientists……
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Disciplined scientists? Are you referring to those scientists who have been disciplined to always say yes to their paymasters?
    Do you realise that great scientific dicoveries have mostly been made by the undisciplined ones? Think about it.

  88. To know him is to not trust him. All Gore would have won the 2000 presidential election (even without winning Florida) if he could have carried his home state of Tennessee. The state he served as a Senator knew him too well. That pretty much says it all. He’s a snake oil salesman and as they say, “Once bitten, twice shy”.

  89. #
    #
    Hugh Pepper says:
    August 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
    . The science which he reports speaks for itself, and the evidence is beyond dispute. ================roflmao.
    yeah it is beyond dispute..sad and an epic FAIL

  90. I looked him up on the definitive website but couldn’t find any mention of the bloke-
    http://www.fatprophets.com/
    Maybe that Einstein bloke left a tribute for him and the Team –
    “Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today’s events.”

  91. Best of luck. Al Gore is a fraud. Simple as that. Carbon emissions nor CO2 relate to climate change. However investing in carbon trading did for a time bring in dollars for some. Green or clean energy is under some doubt. WA has suspended their project to provide geo thermal
    because it doesn’t work. Well he may have invested in this, and if he has he is barking up the wrong money tree. The fissures close up under gravity. As found in Cornwall and other places
    in the world.
    Nite folks, still keep fighting for the truth and as we say ‘It only takes a few good men (or women) to do nothing, to let evil prevail’ or something like that?
    Good nite from Australia.

  92. Brian says:
    August 9, 2011 at 2:37 am
    I can somewhat understand people’s dislike of Gore even though I think it’s ashame that people want to shoot the messenger. But James Hansen? Does this really seem like a money hungry person:
    Hansen? Surely you jest. He’s also a Warmist prophet, just a different sect of the same Warmist Religion. His pretense of being a real scientist still manages to convince the more gullible crowd which, happily is thinning. Warmism is his career, though, not science.

  93. As far as Gore’s CRP, I don’t know which is funnier – the idea that Gore knows anything about climate, or the idea that he knows the difference between reality and fantasy.

  94. I don’t know if this has been posted up yet, but AspenJournalism.Orghad just released a article titled:
    “Al Gore calls “bullshit” on climate propaganda”
    By Brent Gardner-Smith, Aspen Journalism
    I only brought this link up because they have a audio recording of Al ranting.
    Thought you guys might want to hear it if you hadn’t already.
    [soundcloud width="100%" height="81" params="g=1&show_comments=true" url="http://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/20738016"]

  95. Brian says on August 9, 2011 at 2:37 am
    I can somewhat understand people’s dislike of Gore even though I think it’s ashame that people want to shoot the messenger. But James Hansen? Does this really seem like a money hungry person …

    Ahhh … the naivety of the young and stupid*; Hansen is a grand deceiver (is the traditional devil a ‘money hungry’ person?)
    The following is from: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/06/25/bring-it-mr-wirth-a-challenge/

    … back to June 1988. Dr. James Hansen is getting ready to testify before the Senate on what he thinks is a serious problem, global warming. …
    If we left it there, there would really be nothing to say beyond the fact that he’s the guy [Wirth] who put Hansen in front of the Senate and launched the [AGW] cause. But Senator Wirth was culpable in foisting stagecraft onto the Senate to make them “feel” the problem in the form of a well crafted lie [during Hansen’s testimony].
    If any of you have ever been in Washington DC during the summertime, you’ll be able to relate to this. Senator Timothy Wirth made sure that room was “steamy”. This transcript excerpt is from PBS series Frontline which aired a special in April 2007. Here he admits his stagecraft in his own words:
    TIMOTHY WIRTH: We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. Well, it was June 6th or June 9th or whatever it was. So we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it.
    DEBORAH AMOS: [on camera] Did you also alter the temperature in the hearing room that day?
    TIMOTHY WIRTH: What we did is that we went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right, so that the air conditioning wasn’t working inside the room. And so when the- when the hearing occurred, there was not only bliss, which is television cameras and double figures, but it was really hot.[Shot of witnesses at hearing]
    So it goes without saying, that if the case Dr. Hansen was to make before the Senate was so strong, why did Senator Wirth need to make use of cheap stage tricks?
    And, why would anybody trust this man’s opinion on climate today, knowing this?

    .
    .
    (* Learning handicaps aside)

  96. ‎”During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet” Gore said. Now he’s a prophet as well….

  97. Marisol writes: “And yes, you can make money by by living an environmentalfriendly life! Go, Gore, Go!!!!”
    Are you being deliberately sarcastic?
    His servant’s quarters are bigger than most people’s entire houses.

  98. His hindsight, however, is better than his foresight:
    “It is not a good policy to have these massive subsidies for first-generation ethanol. One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president.”

  99. SSam says:
    August 8, 2011 at 10:42 pm
    ‘http://i51.tinypic.com/nqpypv.gif’
    I’m most grateful to you SSam. I watched this while listening to the highlights of his blathering on the Gore recording thread. Perfect accompaniment to the wooden and vapid drivel.

Comments are closed.