Atlantic reversal

From Eurekalert: Earth’s climate change 20,000 years ago reversed the circulation of the Atlantic Ocean

Global warming today could have similar effects on ocean currents and could accelerate climate change

The Atlantic Ocean circulation (termed meridional overturning circulation, MOC) is an important component of the climate system. Warm currents, such as the Gulf Stream, transport energy from the tropics to the subpolar North Atlantic and influence regional weather and climate patterns. Once they arrive in the North the currents cool, their waters sink and with them they transfer carbon from the atmosphere to the abyss. These processes are important for climate but the way the Atlantic MOC responds to climate change is not well known yet.

An international team of investigators under the leadership of two researchers from the UAB now demonstrates the response of the Atlantic MOC to climate change in the past. The new research results will be published on 4 November 2010 in the international front-line journal NATURE. The research project was led by Rainer Zahn (ICREA researcher) and Pere Masque, both of the UAB at the Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA) and Department of Physics. With collaborators at the universities of Seville, Oxford and Cardiff (UK) they investigated the distribution of isotopes in the Atlantic Ocean that are generated from the natural decay of uranium in seawater and are distributed with the flow of deep waters across the Atlantic basin. The young investigator Cesar Negre studied the natural abundance of these isotopes in the seafloor sediments 2.5 km deep in the South Atlantic and achieved a PhD degree in the Environmental Science and Technology doctoral programme at ICTA.

The study shows that the ocean circulation was very different in the past and that there was a period when the flow of deep waters in the Atlantic was reversed. This happened when the climate of the North Atlantic region was substantially colder and deep convection was weakened. At that time the balance of seawater density between the North and South Atlantic was shifted in such a way that deep water convection was stronger in the South Polar Ocean. Recent computer models simulate a reversal of the deep Atlantic circulation under such conditions while it is only now with the new data generated by UAB scientists and their colleagues from Seville and the UK that the details of the circulation reversal become apparent. This situation occurred during the ice age 20,000 years ago.

Although this was far back in time the results are relevant for our climate today and in the near future. The new study shows that the Atlantic MOC in the past was very sensitive to changes in the salt balance of Atlantic Ocean currents. Similar changes in seawater salt concentration are expected to occur in the North Atlantic in the course of climate warming over the next 100 years. Therefore the data to be published in Nature offer the climate modelling community the opportunity to calibrate their models and improve their capacity to predict reliably future ocean and climate changes.

###

The research has been funded by the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation (MICINN).

======================================

This is just the usual press release with no link to the paper and no real scientific details to go with it, allowing compliant media minds to reprint it without questioning it. I’ll be interested to find out how they determined this reversal. If anybody locates a copy of the paper, please leave a note in comments.

I also think this headline could be true:

Atlantic Ocean ocean current reversal 20,000 years ago changed the Earth’s climate.

– Anthony

Advertisements

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Myron Mesecke

I also think this headline could be true:
Atlantic Ocean ocean current reversal 20,000 years ago changed the Earth’s climate.
But that headline would admit that what the ocean’s do have an effect on the climate and they can’t go around saying that!

This is a very interesting piece of information. The Greenland ice cores are full of rapid and significant changes in temperature that correspond to the meltwater pulses that happened during the warming phase from glacial to interglacial.
The same signal shows up throughout the entire NGRIP record. Such reversals or at least circulation shutdowns might happen more frequently than we think. I will have to follow up on this one.
Theinconvenientskeptic.com

mkelly

Several monthes ago I watched a National Geographic on the Sahara Desert showing fossils of crocs, clams, etc at various locations. It was shown that every 20,000 years the Sahara goes through a complete reversal from desert to a land of lakes and running rivers. It has done so several times and was last green 10000 or so years ago. They used layered sediment of dust off the coast of Africa to separate out desert from green eras. No mention of global warming or reversal of Atlantic currents.

Dougmanxx

” Recent computer models simulate a reversal of the deep Atlantic circulation under such conditions while it is only now with the new data generated by UAB scientists and their colleagues from Seville and the UK that the details of the circulation reversal become apparent.”
If it happened in a computer, it must be true!

Pascvaks

There is little doubt that the Global Ocean Conveyor was different at different times in geological history. Will be interesting to see the actual data (not simulations).

Mark Cooper

Sounds dodgy to me- did they mean that before 20k YBP the current flowed in the opposite direction!?
I guess they never saw this report from Nasa then:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2010-101

exNOAAman

Perhaps this is related? (Seen in Erosion Control Magazine yesterday)
link: http://www.erosioncontrol.com/the-latest/ieca-university-partners.aspx
Based more on melting glaciers, but similar idea for Atlantic flow.
quote: These Megafloods entered the Gulf, rapidly raising the water level and forcing the overflow out through the many smaller Florida/Cuba Straits. This Glacial overflow then spread across the lower lying area known as the Bahama Mega-Bank. 12,000yrs. ago, (with sea levels at least 300 ft. lower than today) the Bahama Mega-Bank was an exposed land mass larger than present day Florida.

Jarmo

The timeframe fits the known facts.
Here is a useful page about deglaciation and the potential causes:
http://web.me.com/uriarte/Earths_Climate/10._Deglaciation.html

TomRude

Talking about the tail that wags the dog…

Doug,
I am also skeptical about models as what you put in determines what you get out. In this case it is clear that meltwater pulses change things in Greenland. The signiture of that shows up frequently. This matches the observations.
It also helps show that orbital changes drive the climate. It is win for skeptics even if they don’t think so.

John Game

Here is the reference: Nature 468, 84-88 (4 November 2010)

kadaka (KD Knoebel)

Nature paywall:
Reversed flow of Atlantic deep water during the Last Glacial Maximum
Has abstract. Snippet:

Nutrient-based proxies (1, 2) and recent model simulations (3) indicate that during the Last Glacial Maximum the convective activity in the North Atlantic Ocean was much weaker than at present. In contrast, rate-sensitive radiogenic 231Pa/230Th isotope ratios from the North Atlantic have been interpreted to indicate only minor changes in MOC strength (4, 5, 6). Here we show that the basin-scale abyssal circulation of the Atlantic Ocean was probably reversed during the Last Glacial Maximum and was dominated by northward water flow from the Southern Ocean. These conclusions are based on new high-resolution data from the South Atlantic Ocean that establish the basin-scale north to south gradient in 231Pa/230Th, and thus the direction of the deep ocean circulation.

And other similar things where the assistance of anna v, Pamela Gray, E.M. Smith and the like is appreciated for translation and digestion.
Journal reference was found in the Science Daily post of the press release.

So, we’ve got basic data points collection, and the employment of extrapolations of same, to feed a computer model, from which an ‘interesting’ result is found.
Ok. Congrats on the PhD thesis.
A nice tidbit for the crowd that doesn’t handle the concept of change (in the midst of a constantly active and cyclic system) to begin squalling that we’re all going to die horrid deaths no later than next Wednesday or Thursday if we don’t enact Plan Z immediately, or am I reading too much into it?

And to think all this happened in the last glacial ice age. Conditions far different from current.
Just jumps out at you — “might it happen during every glaciation event”…. Why not?
And then why would you think the warm cycle would produce the same result. Not likely ehhh.

It’s worse than we thought.
Man’s excessive use of fossil fuels (Al Gore’s use excepted) must have CAUSED the reversal 20,000 years ago. After all, don’t the ice core studies demonstrate CO2 causing an increase of global temperature 500 to 800 years BEFORE natural increases in the level of CO2. Imagine how much more powerful anthropomorphic increases in CO2 are – perhaps orders of magnitude more powerful! What? You say an effect can’t happen before it’s cause? You are clearly a denier.
According to post modern science, cause and effect is an old fashion idea held by flat earthers and other such troglodytes. All you need to do is run a computer simulation and you create the past, present, and future without regard to anything outside of the computer. Next, you can assert “the science is settled” and get to call anyone who does not agree a “denier” or worse. Finally, you get to tax and regulate the deniers into extinction and get to feel good because you are saving the planet.

Something happened not 20,000 years ago but 10,000 thousand of years ago: Tradition say there was a big continent there…and, of course, that changed it all!.
Then, anyone of us here at WUWT can assure it, it happened that, on that ill fated continent, a group of people who called themselves the GREENS of the GAIA FOLLOWERS, or those who congregated in a then well known society, formed in Rome, called “The Club of Rome” where its members held the idea that the majority of mankind should be expeditiously sent to beyond the frontiers of the river of the death, so as they, the “chosen ones”, God’s favorites, could reestablish the Garden of Eden and live for ever, without those nasty and dirty working loving people .
Thus they managed to invent a new way to extract the energy from the Sun, however, as they all were sons and daughters of Mommy and Daddy, they ignored there were Laws in Nature which could not be interfered as it would risk the existent itself of the Planet or the portion of it where these laws would be violated. This new portentous and big, really gigantic fashioned “gadget”, was a big building with the shape of a pyramid, having on its most highest extreme a gem “crystal”, of a beautiful reddish color, then known as Ruby, which transmuted the sun’s rays into useful power, destined to power with inexhaustible energy their “Garden of Eden”. But….what really happened afterwards we all know it.
The problem is that in recent times, it seems that several of the then members of those secret societies, have reincarnated and are equally and stubbornly pursued to achieve their unforgotten and most stupid and contrary to universal laws, foolishness.

Nuke

Another model. Models are great at expressing an hypothesis, but do not prove it.
How about some real data that can support or disprove the hypothesis instead?

Espen

20000 years ago the last glaciation was still going strong, so the climate was very different and less stable: Climate during a glaciation is unstable climate. Climate during an interglacial is stable climate. Still these scare stories – that AGW may cause similar “disruptions” – pop up again and again.

Mike

“This is just the usual press release with no link to the paper and no real scientific details to go with it, allowing compliant media minds to reprint it without questioning it. I’ll be interested to find out how they determined this reversal. If anybody locates a copy of the paper, please leave a note in comments.”
Go to the nearest university library and look it up.

“The study shows that the ocean circulation was very different in the past and that there was a period when the flow of deep waters in the Atlantic was reversed. This happened when the climate of the North Atlantic region was substantially colder…”
So if the (currently warming) north pole gets colder again we get global warming, while the warming pole proves… global warming! I love theories that can never be falsified.

Bill Yarber

Mark
Thanks for article. Interesting that MOC appears to have increased in speed from ’93 to ’09. Did the speed increase because the Earth warmed, or the opposite? Just like temp vs. CO2 concentrations, cause and effect can be hard to determine.
Bill

Wind Rider says:
November 4, 2010 at 8:12 am
A story that Discovery, History,etc. and all the pathological and thanatophilic media will air ASAP for sure !

GaryM

Is it just me, or does
“The young investigator Cesar Negre studied the natural abundance of these isotopes in the seafloor sediments 2.5 km deep in the South Atlantic and achieved a PhD degree in the Environmental Science and Technology doctoral programme at ICTA.”
sound familiar? Wasn’t Mann a “young investigator” whose discovery of the hockey stick was in the course of getting his PhD?
A more detailed description of the paper seems to be here.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20101103/sc_livescience/atlanticoceanswatersreverseddirectionstudyfinds
“To reach these conclusions, scientists investigated a pillar of sediment roughly 128 feet (39 meters) long, extracted from the seafloor by use of a ship off the coast of the tip of Africa under about 8,000 feet (2,440 m) of water.”
I’m no scientist, so maybe the scientists here can explain: if this is an accurate description, can you really determine something on this scale from “a” (presumably single) pillar (apparently the ocean equivalenty of an ice core?)?

Bill Yarber says:
November 4, 2010 at 9:05 am
The “speed of the earth” what you call it is the Length of the Day=LOD, and its changes are absolutely cyclical and related to gravity/electromagnetic fields, so linked to sun’s activity.
See pdf #8th page 50, where you, comfortably siited, will see a scientific temperatues’ forecast to the year 2100, made of course by a real scientist.
Professor Leonid B. Klyashtorin, of the Federal Institute for Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow, Russian Federation (e-mail: Klyashtorin@mtu-net.ru)
ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/005/y2787e/
Document Archive: y2787e08.pdf pp.50
which shows a low at the year 2020, the same as WUWT regular, M.Vukcevic’s extrapolation of Sun’s polar fields:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/PF.gif

The relevance of this for climate change is not obvious to me. If you look at the NGRIP ice-cores in Greenland for the depth of the ice-age – say, between 50,000 and 30,000BP you can see 10 major cycles affecting the temperature at the surface of the ice-mass, and hence reflective of what is happening in the North Atlantic. The warming phase is very sudden and about 3C in magnitude. Then there is a gradual decline before the next cycle. One could average the cycle out at about 2000 years, but the pattern is obvious to the eye – a quasi-Fibonacci spiral series with each warm phase about half the duration of the previous – 8:5:3:1. It is as regular as a heartbeat, but then breaks down as the ice-age nears its end, with a much larger and still very steep rise at about 12,000BP.
Whatever causes these changes, I would think that the abyssal flow is a consequence, not a part of the cause. The abyssal currents already flow north in the eastern part of the basin, and south in the western, and the last time I looked at oceanographic models – which was some time ago in the 1980s’s when the UK was dumping radioactive waste off the Azores, the waters moved north and then turned south with no interchange with the surface. The northern zone is marked by downwelling of the Arctic waters which are cold and salty and this appears to entrain some of the Gulf Stream waters – but I am not convinced that this process affects the heat budget that much. The heat budget of the North Atlantic is much more likely dominated by the wind patterns, especially the tracking of low pressure heat extracting cyclones, and by the cloud cover that is induced, with the westerlies then taking that warmth to Europe.
We know that periodically during the more stable Holocene, there is a regular roughly 1000 year shift (but again, you can discern an 8:5:3:2:1 pattern and one where we are at the end of….with each peak being lower and the trough deeper (leaving out the big swings of the Younger Dryas because the transition from ice-age to Holocene involved some rapid oscillations and unusual events). And some research shows that the last such trough (Little Ice Age) coincided with low solar activity and shifts in the jetstream (as we have seen recently also). The jetstream directs the tracking of the cyclones.
When this shift occurs, high pressure builds over the Arctic (sending anticyclones across from Canada through Greenland to Fennoscandinavia) and the down-draught from these blocks the westerly air current and brings Arctic snows and deep frosts to Northern Europe. There are knock on effects across Eurasia into Mongolia and China. All of which are very bad news for food production – globally, the world relies on these regions for its current grain surplus.
Under these shifting wind regimes, the Gulf Stream, which is a surface current and wind-driven will flatten across the mid-Atantic and the North Atlantic will cool. This pattern may affect the deep water abyssal currents and perhaps this is the cause of the reversal of flow (they are very slow anyway) – but it is not clear from the news so far whether this reversal is a one-time unusual event toward the end of the ice-age. The shifts bring rain and storms to Iberia and cloudy cooler Mediterranean weather.
So – with the dominant driver being the jetstream, ‘global warming’ would have to cause that to move south, when the models predict it will move north. And in actuality, it now looks as if after 0.5 C of warming, it is still capable of moving south when the Sun’s UV output is low.

Katherine

To those complaining about modelling “yet again,” the team “investigated the distribution of isotopes in the Atlantic Ocean that are generated from the natural decay of uranium in seawater and are distributed with the flow of deep waters across the Atlantic basin…. Cesar Negre studied the natural abundance of these isotopes in the seafloor sediments 2.5 km deep in the South Atlantic….” That sounds like “real data” to me, not modelling.
The connection to modelling seems to come in at “Therefore the data to be published in Nature offer the climate modelling community the opportunity to calibrate their models and improve their capacity to predict reliably future ocean and climate changes.” Emphasis added. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems they’re saying, “Here’s real data. Check your models against it.” Isn’t this a Good Thing?

kadaka (KD Knoebel)

This page yields the following links for the study (as well as others for that issue of Nature):
First paragraph
Full text
PDF
Editor’s summary
I don’t know which are good or what they’ll yield, since as of this writing all they are giving me is nature.com technical errors. Their servers are crashing, apparently.

pat

Same question. You know that ocean currents were reverse of the present because?

Wasn’t able to find a free preprint. But let’s see. The title of the paper is “Reversed flow of Atlantic deep water during the Last Glacial Maximum.” The press release above states, “The study shows that the ocean circulation was very different in the past and that there was a period when the flow of deep waters in the Atlantic was reversed. This happened when the climate of the North Atlantic region was substantially colder and deep convection was weakened. At that time the balance of seawater density between the North and South Atlantic was shifted in such a way that deep water convection was stronger in the South Polar Ocean.”
Anything else that might be in the paper about changes in MOC during a warming period would then appear to be computer-modelled speculation.

As soon as I read “Gulf stream” it was immediately obvious this article was being very liberal with its terminology. The Gulf stream is the current from the Gulf of Mexico and it virtually disappears before it becomes the North Atlantic drift.
Both currents follow prevailing winds: the Gulf stream follows equatorial winds pushing into the Gulf of mexico which is then squeezed out like toothpaste between Cuba and Florida. The North Atlantic drift follows the SW trade winds that predominate in the North Atlantic.
Whilst I can’t be bothered to read an article which can’t even get basic things like nomenclature correct, I suspect it is this old chestnut of the Arctic current which is a very small current which is thought to be driven by evaporation and increasing salinity in the Arctic ocean … a current which is … I forget but 1/2000 of the North Atlantic drift in size springs to mind.
So basically, this whole “gulf stream” current thing is a great con. Rename a minuscule current going into the Arctic that never goes anywhere near the Gulf the: “gulf stream”, and then (probably correctly) say this current varies …. and then use the confusion over name to suggest the whole of the trade-wind driven current will switch off even though it’s driven by the trade winds which no one is suggesting is affected by global warming (but I could be wrong … perhaps mann even now has a paper … how mankind is stopping the world spinning)

rbateman

20,000 years is just about the average length for the Interglacials of the last 3-4 Ice Ages. They can also be as long as 30,000 and as short as 10,000 years, implying two circulations out-of-synch. Is the other one in the Pacific?

kadaka (KD Knoebel) says:
November 4, 2010 at 9:39 am
Tomorrow we’ll see them, Fridays are for cartoons here in WUWT.

higley7

“Therefore the data to be published in Nature offer the climate modelling community the opportunity to calibrate their models and improve their capacity to predict reliably future ocean and climate changes.”
Like this is going to happen. Tuning a broken instrument does not fix it – it will always sound bad.

Dave Springer

This can’t be right. Climate doesn’t change without anthropogenic CO2 emissions.

Summary:
o it was much colder 20,000 years ago
o it got steadily warmer since then
o glaciers melted and current reversed direction
o the climate was affected by the current reversal
DUH!
The climate has been warming for 20,000 years causing some current to change direction thus affecting the climate. Wow. Good thing all those processes stopped so that we could measure how we are affecting the climate to hundredths of a degree.

Tenuc

Yet more cargo cult science from our climatologists!
There are a couple of if’s here, and they are big if’s – (the use of a single proxy of) “radiogenic 231Pa/230Th isotope ratios from the North Atlantic have been interpreted to indicate only minor changes in MOC strength. Here we show that the basin-scale abyssal circulation of the Atlantic Ocean was probably reversed during the Last Glacial Maximum and was dominated by northward water flow from the Southern Ocean. “
Even if it did happen, the geography of the global, planetary orbit, solar radiation and a million other things have change over the last 20,000y. Why should this possible even be relevant to today?
Finally, even if it turns out to have significance, is it not more likely that the possible reversal happened because of the glaciation and the researcher is confusing cause and effect?
No wonder the general public no longer believe in climate science – from the press release, this paper would seem to be a FAIL.

Mike

@ GaryM
Other cores are discussed in the paper.

Anything is possible

Re-inventing the wheel with all this…..
Paleo-climatologists were proposing over 30 years ago that the Gulfstream was much weaker, and positioned further south, setting up a cold sub-polar gyre in the North Atlantic, during previous glaciations.
It was further proposed that a catastrophic outflow of freshwater melt into the North Atlantic from the disintegration of the Laurentide Ice Sheet again shut off the Gulfstream, causing European climate to regress into the cool phase known as the “Younger Dryas” (c.11K BP) which lasted about 1000 years.
Has the scientific community become so obsessed with the “CO2 causes everything” mantra, that anything which proposes otherwise is viewed as new and revolutionary science, even if the theories have been long-established?
Sheesh…….

Instead we would hope to see an IPCC reversal for the sake of humanity and for avoiding what will be a probable world conflict because of climate insanity/

John Kehr says: November 4, 2010 at 7:19 am
The same signal shows up throughout the entire NGRIP record.
Hi John
I would not, for time being, put to much money on the NGRIP record. I have mentioned it few times, but everyone ignored it except for Dr. Judith Curry who responded:
curryja | October 31, 2010 at 2:11 pm
I’ll flag this to look at later, I’m not all that familiar with this issue but it looks important
http://judithcurry.com/2010/10/29/uncertainty-and-the-ipcc-ar5/
Here is reason:
The 10Be deposits count matches pretty well the Central England temperatures.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/CET&10Be.htm
For more details see my post:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/03/a-profile-of-dr-judith-curry/#comment-523164

tty

“Here we show that the basin-scale abyssal circulation of the Atlantic Ocean was probably reversed during the Last Glacial Maximum and was dominated by northward water flow from the Southern Ocean. ”
If this is correct there must have been a major upwelling zone somewhere in the North Atlantic. The North Atlantic was closed to the north during the glaciation since there was no Bering Strait.

George E. Smith

Well I don’t see how that’s possible; no not the reversal; but that affecting the Climate. Water is water; and one piece of water is just like another so why would movement affect anything ?
But speaking of current reversal; I seem to have a vague recollection that back in the 2007-2008 time frame when there was talk of the “PDO switching to its cold phase”, I read some sort of non-peer reviewed science literature; or it could have been a T&V or radio bulletin that implied; at least that is how I interpreted it; that the direction of rotation of the current in the Arctic Ocean had actually reversed.
Does that make any sense; and do you arctic experts know if something like that did happen; I would expand the time scale to maybe 2006-2009.
I don’t make this stuff up; but I can be prone to misinterpreting what was said; but some story like that caught my interest back when that PDO went cold.
So Does the direction of Arctic Ocean circulation affect these cyclic events; perhaps I should add does maybe the Ocean cycle like say PDO cause an arctic ocean reversal.
I’ve always believed that the Gulf Stream would keep flowing, so long as the earth kept rotating; even to the point of wanting to reverse the earth rotation direction so we could get a warm gulf stream up the California Coast; and get rid of all those crummy salmon; and replace them with Tuna, Mahi-mahi, and other tropical game fishes.
So did I just dream about the AO reversing its rotation or does that really happen ?

John F. Hultquist

This study adds to the information. That’s nice.
20,000 years ago Earth had a much different appearance with lower ocean surface, exposed continential shelves, much ice-covered land in the Northern Hemisphere, lots of dust [ look up loess: Example: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUFM.H22B0899S ], and a few other issues.
I mention the dust because of the recent post about soot and the Greenland ice melting:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/03/greenland-ground-zero-for-global-soot-warming/
– – – – – – – Mike says: at 9:00 am
Go to the nearest university library and look it up.
Subscribers usually get copies a few weeks before publication date, so as this is a November issue someone likely has it. A university library is another thing all together. Depending on policy, staffing, and unknowns a new issue may be a bit slower to appear in the reading room.

Bill Illis

The ocean conveyor system one sees on the internet is a cartoon. The real ocean does not operate in one big free-flowing belt.
The currents are driven by the prevailing winds and the shapes of the continents.
Water generally flows from the hot equator to the cold poles, but it travels westward along the equator first and then piles up on the eastern side of the continents and then is directed north-or-south by the shape of the continent (more accurately by the shape of the mid-depth continental shelves).
When the warmer water reaches the mid-latitudes, the prevailing winds shift to eastward and the ocean currents are dragged along on eastward on their eventual journey to either the poles or to getting recycled equator-ward again by the shape of the continents on their western side.
So, the direction of the conveyor(s) could be changed if we reversed the rotation of the Earth, made the poles warmer than the equator or changed the shape of the continents. Easy.

woodNfish

This is just the usual press release with no link to the paper and no real scientific details to go with it, allowing compliant media minds to reprint it without questioning it.

The media wouldn’t question this nonsense even if it had the paper and data attached.

John F. Hultquist

tty says: at 11:01 am
The North Atlantic was closed to the north during the glaciation since there was no Bering Strait.
Please read Mike Haseler’s comment at 9:51.
Then give us an update.

John from CA

Influence of Bering Strait flow and North Atlantic circulation on glacial sea-level changes
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/publications/ngeo729.pdf
“As the rise of the boreal summer solar radiation above the mean of the past 130 kyr lags the ESL rise, solar radiation changes alone cannot explain the timing of the ESL oscillations observed at the beginning of the last glacial. However, these early ESL minima were all characterized by a closed—or nearly closed—Bering Strait. We propose and demonstrate that this nearly closed Bering Strait had an important role, leading to the ESL rise after those minima through modulation of the MOC strength. We show that the subsequent surface climate changes and the associated albedo–climate feedback processes provide the necessary conditions to initialize the melting of the ice sheets and produce an ESL rise.”
“The opening of the Bering Strait may also have wider implications on climate. For example, a recent study23 suggests that abrupt climate change events evident in the Greenland ice core record between 70 and 11 kyr bp (ref. 30) may be related to the closing of the Bering Strait. Although the Bering Strait itself may not directly control the surface climate change, the effect of the strait on the transport of the fresh Pacific water into the Arctic and North Atlantic does influence the MOC strength, and consequently can modulate Earth’s climate. Therefore, climate changes and the Bering Strait may well have been intimately linked throughout the Late Pleistocene ice age.”

M White

If the atmosphere was cooled and liquified then added to the worlds oceans, I’d be interested to know what fraction of the combined volume the atmosphere would be?
I can’t see it beeing much. This is why I would say it is the Oceans that have the biggest effect on our climate.
This statement just seems stupid “Global warming today could have similar effects on ocean currents and could accelerate climate change”

William

Interglacials have in the past lasted roughly 12,000 years, not 20,000 years as stated above. The past interglacials have ended abruptly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age
“It was conventional wisdom that “the typical interglacial period lasts about 12,000 years,”…
The wikipedia article was written by the AGW fan club and states that this interglacial period could last longer, ignoring the fact that past interglacial periods ended abruptly, due to some unknown forcing change. (i.e. A prediction of what will happen in the future requires an understand of what caused the past paleo climatic changes.)
As I have stated the paleo data shows there have been geomagnetic excursions at the same time as the termination of past interglacial periods. There is also an increase in volcanic activity at the time of the geomagnetic excursions. It appears the same forcing function causes the glacial period to end, the cyclic abrupt Bond events, and the end of the interglacial period. As Bond noted in his paper there are cosmogenic isotope changes at all of the Bond events including the Younger Dryas abrupt climate change that occurred 12,800 years ago. Bond tracked 22 of the cycles and found that they have a periodicity of 1470 years.
The geomagnetic field strengthens by a factor of 3 to 5 during the interglacial period. In the last 10 years, geomagnetic specialists have found “geomagnetic jerks” (abrupt changes in the inclination of the geomagnetic field and geomagnetic excursion appear to be occuring cyclically. What appears to drive the changes, is an interruption to the solar sunspot mechanism. (One theory for sunspot creation has the ropes that form sunspots created at the solar tachocline, which is the interface of radiative zone and the convection zone. The large planets move the sun and certain specific motions of the sun by the planets disturbs the tachocline such that sunspots are not produced. That explains the cyclic nature of the affects on the earth.)
When the sunspot cycle restarts there are very large CMEs that affects the geomagnetic field. The affects depend on the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit and the hemisphere where the strike occurs. The affects are also depend on the earth’s tilt. The South Atlantic geomagnetic anomaly appears to be evidence of the most recent strike.