Timelapse video of 2013 Nenana Ice Classic breakup

This is a 5 frames per second timelapse taken from the webcam at 30 second intervals of the Nenana Ice Classic on May 20th, 2013 from 4PM to 5PM PDT (15:00-16:00 AKDT). Breakup started about 15:43 AKDT (about 16 seconds in this video) in and went very quickly. Notice the ice stopped flowing in the river at the end, suggesting an ice jam formed downstream.

Watch the video: 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
53 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GlynnMhor
May 20, 2013 7:05 pm

Cool…

Editor
May 20, 2013 7:07 pm

When it goes, it goes.

May 20, 2013 7:09 pm

In the end, it did go quite quickly…
Just one thing – it went 16 seconds into the 23 seconds total.

philincalifornia
May 20, 2013 7:10 pm

GlynnMhor says:
May 20, 2013 at 7:05 pm
Cool…
——————–
Way too “cool”. Is this the “anthropogenic carbon dioxide to cause next ice age” tipping point ??

Strick
May 20, 2013 7:13 pm

So this is a new record? The previous record was at 11:41 on May 20th…

May 20, 2013 7:14 pm

Nice.

TinyCO2
May 20, 2013 7:17 pm

Cool video…
and how apt that the break up prize was won by Warren and Yvonne Snow.

remmer01
May 20, 2013 7:18 pm

The previous record was in a leap year, so this one shouldn’t count as a record.

NeedleFactory
May 20, 2013 7:19 pm

Log jams?
Log jams could appear at various times and various places downstream, leading me to wonder how much the timing of the “melt” is a proxy for temperature, and how much the timing relates to chaotic ice/water flows downstream.

NeedleFactory
May 20, 2013 7:22 pm

“ice jams”, not log jams.

May 20, 2013 7:25 pm

Neither Strick nor remmer01 can read, nor comprehend.
This is a new record. Maybe things are different on their mother ship.
As Merrick points out in a related thread:

The vernal equinox in 1964 and 2013 both fell on 20 March. In 1964 it occurred at 1410Z and in 2013 is occurred at 1102Z. Those are, respectively, 0510AST and 0102AST.
The ice breakup on the Nenana river occurred on 20 March in both 1964 and 2013. In 1964 ice breakup occurred at 1141AST and in 2013 it occurred at 1441AST.
The total span of time between Vernal equinox in 1964 and ice breakup was 61 days, 6 hours, 31 minutes. The total span of time between Vernal equinox in 2013 and ice breakup was 61 days, 12 hours, 39 minutes.
So, like it or not, the ice breakup was more than six hours further into Spring in 2013 than it was in 1964, and 2013 is a record.

OssQss
May 20, 2013 7:41 pm

Ain’t modern tech wonderful?
I could almost feel the chill in the air !
Thanks for sharing effort Anthony

Leo Morgan
May 20, 2013 7:57 pm

@ dbstealy
This is an example of why it pays us to keep our words sweet.
Your point about the distance of the break-up (“Proxy”) from the Vernal Equinox is interesting, substantive, and novel to me. But of course we are talking about May, not March.

Master_Of_Puppets
May 20, 2013 8:02 pm

Nice ! Very nice ! To the responders above, 1964 was a leap year (julian day 141) whereas this year is not (julian day 140) !
http://landweb.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/calendar.html
Need to factor in 0.25 from 1964 to 2013, then re-calculate, with adjusting for the lunar position and taking into account the solar cycle 10.2 cm and sun spot counts and then checking the jack-rabit population of Australia and the mass of elephants in South Africa … .
Ha ha.

Frank K.
May 20, 2013 8:09 pm

Yes, indeed, it is a new record!! For all time! Unprecedented! A very ominous warning for global cooling. We must warn the world!!
/sarc
(Apparently, our warmist visitors can’t seem to enjoy nature without ascribing some CAGW B.S. nonsense reason for it…sheesh!).

Colorado Wellington
May 20, 2013 8:23 pm

Anthony,
Thanks for capturing the frames and sewing them together for our amusement and education (on top of everything else you do).
I watched a few real time videos of previous breakups—I think 1973, 2009 & 2011—and I was quite curious how this one would go down.
It will be interesting to see if anyone present on the river bank will post a real time video of this one.

kcom
May 20, 2013 8:25 pm

“leading me to wonder how much the timing of the “melt” is a proxy for temperature, and how much the timing relates to chaotic ice/water flows downstream”
So the real world is complicated and proxies are just that, proxies? Not gauges accurate to 1/100 of 1%? Next you’re going to try to tell me that tree ring widths might vary from a cause other than temperature. Noooooo….!!!

Larry Ledwick (hotrod)
May 20, 2013 8:31 pm

Breakup started about 15:43 AKDT (about 16 seconds in this video) in and went very quickly.

It was just slightly before that, I refreshed the image at 15:43:06 and the tripod was out of frame, I must have missed catching it in motion by just 30 seconds.

lateott
May 20, 2013 8:37 pm

Hi-resolution video here:
http://www.nenanaakiceclassic.com/IMG_0044.MOV
The wooden tripod was sitting on an ice sheet at the edge of an open channel when the ice broke off and floated down the river, triggering a siren in town to notify residents the tripod was moving.
“A big (ice) jam broke loose upriver by the railroad bridge and started moving down,” Ice Classic manager Cherrie Forness said, referring to the Alaska Railroad bridge about one-half mile upstream of where the tripod sat on the ice. “It just kind of took the whole sheet of ice the tripod was on with it.”
The tripod was still upright as it floated down the river on the ice but it eventually tipped over and the ice jammed up, she said.
Bystanders on shore could be seen on a webcam taking pictures of the tripod as it floated down the river. A crowd of about 25 people were on hand to witness the historic event, Forness said.
http://www.newsminer.com/news/local_news/it-s-over-kenai-couple-wins-nenana-ice-classic/article_68cd64e0-c1a7-11e2-b411-001a4bcf6878.html

May 20, 2013 8:50 pm

Trolls are such funny creatures. If the iceout didn’t happen until next month they would blame anything instead of their stupid warmist religion.
Get over it trolls – it is a record

Taphonomic
May 20, 2013 8:57 pm

Please everyone, this is just an example of extreme weather which proves climate change. Just ask John Cook, he took a survey in which a consensus of 97% of those surveyed agreed.

Colorado Wellington
May 20, 2013 9:00 pm

kcom says:
May 20, 2013 at 8:25 pm
So the real world is complicated and proxies are just that, proxies?

I must disagree, kcom. You got your science all wrong.
The Nenana Ice Classic data is clearly more than just a proxy. According to Dr. R. Sagarin and Dr. F. Micheli it is a “remarkably accurate record of global climate change”. I know it because they wrote a paper about Nenana in 2001 and got it published in the Science magazine. They used math in their paper.
Raphael Sagarin
Fiorenza Micheli
Climate Change in Nontraditional Data Sets
Science, sciencemag.org, volume 294, 26 Oct 2001

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2001/october31/alaskabet-1031.html

Berényi Péter
May 20, 2013 9:08 pm

A true hockey stick, it is.

Jantar
May 20, 2013 9:18 pm

How appropriate that the winners in guessing the time of the ice breakup are named Snow.

Kajajuk
May 20, 2013 10:23 pm

Beautiful vid; thanks.

Tenuc
May 20, 2013 10:26 pm

Curious that the 1964 previous record was almost spot on at the time of solar minimum, while the new 2013 record is at solar maximum, all be it cycle 24 is a very weak one.
Link to SSN chart…
http://www.shelios.com/sh2012/images/figure2.png

Lew Skannen
May 20, 2013 11:51 pm

I would have bet that it would move off to the right of the screen. I guess that is why I am not a betting man…

tty
May 20, 2013 11:58 pm

Actually ice breakup dates seem to be rather good temperature proxies. In Torne river in Sweden ice breakup tends to be violent and can cause large scale flooding, so records have been kept of it since the late seventeenth century. There is also a reasonably good temperature record from the same area since 1802, and the correlation between the breakup date and spring temperature is better than 0.8.

See - owe to Rich
May 21, 2013 12:28 am

Who says that lightning never strikes twice? The winners, named Snow, had previously won it in 2005, albeit shared with 46 people. They had bought $125 of tickets, so not allowing for their supreme skill it was less than a 1 in 2000 chance for them.
I’m glad that the event, at 1441 AKST, was a record not only against the vernal equinox (broken at 0833) but also against the calendar (broken at 1141). Of course, better still would have been on a later calendar date. How many years before that happens?
Rich.

Dave
May 21, 2013 1:34 am

Berényi Péter – Nice graph. I cant see any discernible trend line in the graph. Which is reassuring. Then again someone with better statistical skills than me might find something.

phlogiston
May 21, 2013 1:54 am

At the end of the video the ice plugs and stops again. Its still stopped. Has the ice-out really happened yet or not? Maybe we should wait until the river is continuously flowing.
Those pop-up ads at the bottom of the screen are damn irritating, covering the car park and people.

Alan Bates
May 21, 2013 2:29 am

Dave 1:34 am.
Blow statistics! If you can’t see it, it’s not there!!

John Marshall
May 21, 2013 2:58 am

All of a sudden!!!
I assume the Octopod is caught downstream for re-use.
Now we wait for the refreeze and I assume that there is a timed record sheet waiting.

May 21, 2013 4:02 am

Kind of like watching paint dry.
Then BOOM !!

May 21, 2013 4:30 am

On the link Colorado Wellington gave us Sagarin says:
“Phenology was pooh-poohed until recently, but now it’s recognized as important data, because ****climate change is a relatively recent phenomenon that has caught scientists by surprise****”
I almost choked on my lunch!

Beanodle
May 21, 2013 4:36 am

Master_Of_Puppets says:
May 20, 2013 at 8:02 pm
“checking the jack-rabit population of Australia.”
Best of luck doing that. Australia has European rabbits and European hares. A limited amount of American jack rabbits were introduced to try and propagate virus’s among the plague proportion of the introduced European species.

Editor
May 21, 2013 5:02 am

Berényi Péter says:
May 20, 2013 at 9:08 pm
> A true hockey stick, it is.
You might want to change the Y axis label to refer to the “vernal” equinox. 🙂

Strick
May 21, 2013 5:02 am

“Neither Strick nor remmer01 can read, nor comprehend.”
It was a simple question, not answered in this thread (wasn’t aware reading all the threads was a requirement of reading comprehension). Thanks for your reply.

Editor
May 21, 2013 5:09 am

John Marshall says:
May 21, 2013 at 2:58 am
> Now we wait for the refreeze and I assume that there is a timed record sheet waiting.
It’s a lot harder to accurately time refreeze with any reasonable definition of refreeze that I can think of, though with some study you might be able to define some point in the middle of the channel that when there’s motionless ice there, there’s likely ice from shore to shore.
It probably usually occurs in the middle of a cloudless night. The Ice Classic folks don’t seem to track it. Ice out per their definition is much more dramatic and easier to observe.

Julian in Wales
May 21, 2013 5:59 am

” @tty says:
May 20, 2013 at 11:58 pm
Actually ice breakup dates seem to be rather good temperature proxies. In Torne river in Sweden ice breakup tends to be violent and can cause large scale flooding, so records have been kept of it since the late seventeenth century. There is also a reasonably good temperature record from the same area since 1802, and the correlation between the breakup date and spring temperature is better than 0.8.”
Please don’t leave us in suspense; what is happening on the Torne river in Sweden this year?

phlogiston
May 21, 2013 7:10 am

No no no no nooooo!!! None of you understand at all! Has it gone or not? – you cant say just from seeing it move down the river. It all depends on your choice of baseline year! And which statistical model of tripod displacement you employ. And on your method of gridding of the ice on the river. Go figure

May 21, 2013 7:41 am

You fools! It isn’t “global warming’ that we’re worried about. It’s “climate change.” This is change! Change is bad! Silence = death! (rinse and repeat…)

May 21, 2013 8:25 am

You say nenana, I say banahnahs.

May 21, 2013 10:11 am

Next year’s classic June 20? I prefer a warmer climate myself, with more food for everyone. Another Maunder minimum would be good for no one, except for those who keep warm by laughing at the climate witch doctors.

Editor
May 21, 2013 12:01 pm

While the ice moved, it is still not out. This is visible at the end of Anthony’s time lapse, and check out the current ice cam:
http://www.nenanaakiceclassic.com/
That river is far from navigable. It is much more jammed up than it was. Have any records been kept on when the river becomes navigable? Does it usually become navigable after it first moves?
Would be interesting to know if this re-stick is an unusual event.

phlogiston
May 21, 2013 1:59 pm

Alec Rawls says:
May 21, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Good point. Its still stuck now.

george e. smith
May 21, 2013 2:33 pm

Struth !!! we’ve all been gypped, we have !
You could knock me over with a pyramidal quadruped ; ‘ere I was waiting for the bloody thing to go ripping off to the right; like, downstream you know; downstream is always to the right.
Never seen such a thing in me ‘ole life; icy rivers flowing to the left.
Bah ! Humbug !

May 21, 2013 2:46 pm

Anthony,
Could you please stop wrapping your video embeds? It’s really annoying.
REPLY: “wrapping” ??? explain – A

Mike Ozanne
May 21, 2013 5:30 pm

Rivers running clear now, looks inviting actually, though I fear that any man venturing a swim would quickly develop lumps behind the ears..

half tide rock
May 21, 2013 6:39 pm

As a poor geologist I am pretty much in awe of the intelligence that comes out of the group that WUWT attracts. It is a testament to what collaboration and instant communication with out borders can achieve. I believe that great wisdom rings the same in essence across many disciplines. Some people have the native ability to express that wisdom in such a way that no matter what we do the relevance becomes obvious. This quote is on the surface about rowing but it applies beautifully to scientific theory and perhaps says a lot about the modeling mess we have found ourselves in.
Enjoy .
“A good rower sets his course in relation to objects he is leaving
behind. Oh sure, there is the occasional glance over the shoulder ,
but the real work is done backwards, and the only way for the rower
to get to where he is going is to face squarely where he has been and
proceed as best as he can. There’s a good deal of loose talk about
“facing the future” , and it is all very inspirational so long as we
realize that anatomically and metaphysically it can’t be done. Like
the rower we face the past and back into the future….. Edward Ives

Karl
May 22, 2013 11:15 pm

Julian in Wales says:
May 21, 2013 at 5:59 am

Please don’t leave us in suspense; what is happening on the Torne river in Sweden this year?

The ice break up happened on Torne River on 6 May 2013. Satellite imagery provides the opportunity to follow the ice breaks up in the Torne River.
http://enveo-42.uibk.ac.at/projects/cryoland/index.php/cryolandnews/140-tornerivericebreakup052013

Brian H
May 25, 2013 11:21 pm

At the 0:15 mark, the tripod is exiting stage left, still erect.

Brian H
May 25, 2013 11:24 pm

Correction, 0:16 .