<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uh, oh &#8211; raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the &#8220;official&#8221; one.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 21:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juraj V.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-261163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juraj V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-261163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/web/de/klima/klima_heute/homogene_reihen.Par.0054.DownloadFile.tmp/vergleichoriginalhomogen.pdf

The same problem with Swiss temperature records. All have been made rising steeper by &quot;homogenization&quot;, by artificially decreasing the past anomalies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/web/de/klima/klima_heute/homogene_reihen.Par.0054.DownloadFile.tmp/vergleichoriginalhomogen.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/web/de/klima/klima_heute/homogene_reihen.Par.0054.DownloadFile.tmp/vergleichoriginalhomogen.pdf</a></p>
<p>The same problem with Swiss temperature records. All have been made rising steeper by &#8220;homogenization&#8221;, by artificially decreasing the past anomalies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ude Calvaire</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-251468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ude Calvaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-251468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big secret is: much of global warming has nothing to do with global warming at all.  In order for us to unveil the global warming scheme it will take critical thinking and research and a serious look at the real agenda behind global warming.    Mark Twain writes “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it’s time to pause and reflect.” (Samuel Clemens)  The first agenda behind groups like the bilderberg group, the Tri Latteral Commission, the Council on Foreign relations, the world Trade Organization and the worlds Banks is to create a state of emergency.  In fact, most of their members believe in order to push their agendas they must create a sense of danger and helplessness so the people will accept their ideas. The global warming idea is fear mongering to push for population control much like china.  The elites are pushing for global warming to enforce more taxes, cap and trade and eventually control the human population and destroy the middle class this will eventualy lead into a  TOTOLATARIAN GOVERNMENT OR THE NEW WORLD ORDER, WAKE UP AMERICA , it is already happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big secret is: much of global warming has nothing to do with global warming at all.  In order for us to unveil the global warming scheme it will take critical thinking and research and a serious look at the real agenda behind global warming.    Mark Twain writes “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it’s time to pause and reflect.” (Samuel Clemens)  The first agenda behind groups like the bilderberg group, the Tri Latteral Commission, the Council on Foreign relations, the world Trade Organization and the worlds Banks is to create a state of emergency.  In fact, most of their members believe in order to push their agendas they must create a sense of danger and helplessness so the people will accept their ideas. The global warming idea is fear mongering to push for population control much like china.  The elites are pushing for global warming to enforce more taxes, cap and trade and eventually control the human population and destroy the middle class this will eventualy lead into a  TOTOLATARIAN GOVERNMENT OR THE NEW WORLD ORDER, WAKE UP AMERICA , it is already happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan R.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-247222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-247222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You forgot to tell the glaciers of New Zealand that the warming has been exaggerated and they need not have melted so much.&quot; -- mspelto

Hmmm .... I guess maybe someone also forgot to tell the antarctic ice sheet, which has been in the process of INCREASING instead of decreasing for the past 30 years or so.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Global-Warming/Antarctic-ice-growing-not-shrinking-/articleshow/4418558.cms

Of course, the warming lobby has found a creative way to spin this as evidence of global warming too. &quot;Well of course the antarctic ice sheet is increasing! If the waters surrounding the antarcrtic are warmer, then that means more evaporation, which means more precipitation in the form of snow, which then means more ice on the antarctic ice sheet!&quot;  

OK, now I understand. If the amount of ice in the world is decreasing, then it&#039;s because of global warming. But if it&#039;s increasing instead, then it&#039;s because of global warming. 

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up, fellas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You forgot to tell the glaciers of New Zealand that the warming has been exaggerated and they need not have melted so much.&#8221; &#8212; mspelto</p>
<p>Hmmm &#8230;. I guess maybe someone also forgot to tell the antarctic ice sheet, which has been in the process of INCREASING instead of decreasing for the past 30 years or so.</p>
<p><a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Global-Warming/Antarctic-ice-growing-not-shrinking-/articleshow/4418558.cms" rel="nofollow">http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Global-Warming/Antarctic-ice-growing-not-shrinking-/articleshow/4418558.cms</a></p>
<p>Of course, the warming lobby has found a creative way to spin this as evidence of global warming too. &#8220;Well of course the antarctic ice sheet is increasing! If the waters surrounding the antarcrtic are warmer, then that means more evaporation, which means more precipitation in the form of snow, which then means more ice on the antarctic ice sheet!&#8221;  </p>
<p>OK, now I understand. If the amount of ice in the world is decreasing, then it&#8217;s because of global warming. But if it&#8217;s increasing instead, then it&#8217;s because of global warming. </p>
<p>Got it. Thanks for clearing that up, fellas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan R.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-247197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-247197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, Harpo ... You&#039;re exactly right. You know someone has been caught with their hand in the cookie jar when they start accusing others of &quot;smearing&quot; them rather than mounting an affirmative form of defense by opening up all of their work freely to the public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Harpo &#8230; You&#8217;re exactly right. You know someone has been caught with their hand in the cookie jar when they start accusing others of &#8220;smearing&#8221; them rather than mounting an affirmative form of defense by opening up all of their work freely to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-244453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-244453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, this story is based on an outright lie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, this story is based on an outright lie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ammonite</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-241921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ammonite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-241921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this what we all want from the pursuit of scientific  research ....


&quot;The improver of natural knowledge absolutely refuses to acknowledge authority, as such. For him, scepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the one unpardonable sin. And it cannot be otherwise, for every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority, the cherishing of the keenest scepticism, the annihilation of the spirit of blind faith; and the most ardent votary of science holds his firmest convictions, not because the men he most venerates hold them; not because their verity is testified by portents and wonders; but because his experience teaches him that whenever he chooses to bring these convictions into contact with their primary source, Nature — whenever he thinks fit to test them by appealing to experiment and to observation — Nature will confirm them. The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification.&quot;(Thomas Huxley)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this what we all want from the pursuit of scientific  research &#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;The improver of natural knowledge absolutely refuses to acknowledge authority, as such. For him, scepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the one unpardonable sin. And it cannot be otherwise, for every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority, the cherishing of the keenest scepticism, the annihilation of the spirit of blind faith; and the most ardent votary of science holds his firmest convictions, not because the men he most venerates hold them; not because their verity is testified by portents and wonders; but because his experience teaches him that whenever he chooses to bring these convictions into contact with their primary source, Nature — whenever he thinks fit to test them by appealing to experiment and to observation — Nature will confirm them. The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification.&#8221;(Thomas Huxley)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolan</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-241311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-241311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shout it from the rooftops!!!
A someone else pointed out, &quot;Two Down, Two to Go!&quot;
This is bigger than CRU because, as scientists are supposed to do, it VALIDATES!
out]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shout it from the rooftops!!!<br />
A someone else pointed out, &#8220;Two Down, Two to Go!&#8221;<br />
This is bigger than CRU because, as scientists are supposed to do, it VALIDATES!<br />
out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Werme</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-238256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ric Werme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-238256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mspelto (13:19:04) :

http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm


Good link, I&#039;ve been looking for one like this, but not very hard.

So I don&#039;t lose it, I&#039;ve added it to my page http://wermenh.com/climate/6000.html on the glacial retreat of 5,000-7,000 years ago.

&lt;i&gt;Semi off topic link. I hadn&#039;t looked hard, but I hadn&#039;t come across an information source for North American glaciers. I found Glacier Mass Balance in a blog entry. The site concentrates on the North America&#039;s North Cascades, but has links to mass balance information from wider areas. The data thins out going before 1980, so most of it covers the warming phase of a PDO cycle and no data is included from before 1890 or so. However it is a good source of modern glacier information.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mspelto (13:19:04) :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm</a></p>
<p>Good link, I&#8217;ve been looking for one like this, but not very hard.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t lose it, I&#8217;ve added it to my page <a href="http://wermenh.com/climate/6000.html" rel="nofollow">http://wermenh.com/climate/6000.html</a> on the glacial retreat of 5,000-7,000 years ago.</p>
<p><i>Semi off topic link. I hadn&#8217;t looked hard, but I hadn&#8217;t come across an information source for North American glaciers. I found Glacier Mass Balance in a blog entry. The site concentrates on the North America&#8217;s North Cascades, but has links to mass balance information from wider areas. The data thins out going before 1980, so most of it covers the warming phase of a PDO cycle and no data is included from before 1890 or so. However it is a good source of modern glacier information.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harpo</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harpo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And guys. They are in the sh*t up their necks in New Zealand over this. You can always judge how guilty somebody is by the way they respond to an accusation.

Real scientists would call a press conference and explain it all. They would open their records.

But NIWA are using cheap publica relations stunts and inlisting their spoin merchants with headlines like:-

&quot;NZ sceptics lie about temp records, try to smear top scientist&quot;

I can smell the pee in their pants. They are scared... KEEP AT &#039;EM...

P.S. I still want the raw data so I can see for myself, but the Climate Coalitions Report is pretty damming

&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And guys. They are in the sh*t up their necks in New Zealand over this. You can always judge how guilty somebody is by the way they respond to an accusation.</p>
<p>Real scientists would call a press conference and explain it all. They would open their records.</p>
<p>But NIWA are using cheap publica relations stunts and inlisting their spoin merchants with headlines like:-</p>
<p>&#8220;NZ sceptics lie about temp records, try to smear top scientist&#8221;</p>
<p>I can smell the pee in their pants. They are scared&#8230; KEEP AT &#8216;EM&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. I still want the raw data so I can see for myself, but the Climate Coalitions Report is pretty damming</p>
<p>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harpo</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harpo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi every body. I want to do a sun spot correlation against the raw NZ temperature data but I can&#039;t a temperature file to download. I went to NIWA but couldn&#039;t get it. (I&#039;m not suggesting that they don&#039;t have it or won&#039;t give it to me, I just can&#039;t find it)

I&#039;ve got the NZ Climate Coalition Report but that will take a lot of time to digitise the data.

Could anybody help with a URL? or similar]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi every body. I want to do a sun spot correlation against the raw NZ temperature data but I can&#8217;t a temperature file to download. I went to NIWA but couldn&#8217;t get it. (I&#8217;m not suggesting that they don&#8217;t have it or won&#8217;t give it to me, I just can&#8217;t find it)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got the NZ Climate Coalition Report but that will take a lot of time to digitise the data.</p>
<p>Could anybody help with a URL? or similar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JDougherty (00:43:29) :

Glenn (20:22:39) :
…

‘ “…Such site differences are significant and must be accounted for when analysing long-term changes in temperature. The Climate Science Coalition has not done this.”

Nor can they, unless measurements from the Kelburn site were also measured prior to 1928 that would provide a comparison for pre-1928 historical temps to be corrected. That the sites are an average .8c different in 2009 doesn’t mean they were prior to 1928.’

&quot;Actually it does. The difference that Reality_Check is discussing is a difference determined by physical law alone. The rule is that as altitude is gained, the atmosphere becomes physically cooler. Its why we head to the mountains in the summer for cooler weather. This has to do with the adiabatic lapse rate.&quot;...

Actually is doesn&#039;t. If it did we&#039;d only need one station in the world measuring temperature and only altitudes for all other points. This is discussed further in the more recent thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDougherty (00:43:29) :</p>
<p>Glenn (20:22:39) :<br />
…</p>
<p>‘ “…Such site differences are significant and must be accounted for when analysing long-term changes in temperature. The Climate Science Coalition has not done this.”</p>
<p>Nor can they, unless measurements from the Kelburn site were also measured prior to 1928 that would provide a comparison for pre-1928 historical temps to be corrected. That the sites are an average .8c different in 2009 doesn’t mean they were prior to 1928.’</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually it does. The difference that Reality_Check is discussing is a difference determined by physical law alone. The rule is that as altitude is gained, the atmosphere becomes physically cooler. Its why we head to the mountains in the summer for cooler weather. This has to do with the adiabatic lapse rate.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually is doesn&#8217;t. If it did we&#8217;d only need one station in the world measuring temperature and only altitudes for all other points. This is discussed further in the more recent thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Hultquist</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. Hultquist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[acementhead (21:06:22) :                ‘free speech’
Gary Wright (20:07:14) :  

Your point and counter-point are unrelated to “free speech” as the phrase is meant in the US legal arena.  See this:

 http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/30/on-climate-comedy-copyrights-and-cinematography/#more-9650

Therein, Anthony and others explain the concept and provide examples.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>acementhead (21:06:22) :                ‘free speech’<br />
Gary Wright (20:07:14) :  </p>
<p>Your point and counter-point are unrelated to “free speech” as the phrase is meant in the US legal arena.  See this:</p>
<p> <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/30/on-climate-comedy-copyrights-and-cinematography/#more-9650" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/30/on-climate-comedy-copyrights-and-cinematography/#more-9650</a></p>
<p>Therein, Anthony and others explain the concept and provide examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ammonite</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ammonite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am no expert, but have fought for the wild places where I live against almost unstoppable wind turbine developments on peatland in remote wildland. As one of nature&#039;s largest stores of Co2 the peatlands have been attacked by this industry&#039;s remorseless greed.  I have never completely understood how the government agencies who represented these reamarkable ecosystems at planning hearings and public enquiries ever commented on the release of Co2 when discussing their usual indifference to yet another catastrophic application. 

Now with this dam burst of information does this whole sorry mess show itself for what it is.

To use children in government TV adverts to engender fear, to bribe poorer affected communities into the acceptance of money and &#039;collective responsibity&#039; for global warming, to villify those who ask for more reliable and peer evaluated scrutiny on the basis of this new religion of sorts, wherever it might impact is now being tested by the people. At last.

Copenhagen was perfect as a destination, it is the country&#039;s main export - wind turbine technology. They fought to get the lion&#039;s share of R&amp;D grants in the UK, better, meaner and tougher than most. The concrete used in the building of the bases alone is in nightmarish quantities. The resultant Co2 colossal.

As a result, the hydro electric dams now serve as mere back up for the wind scam. The large generators replaced with smaller less productive ones owned by companies that run and own the wind farms.

No!  I am not drifting off the subject.  We have all been had, all of us. Some of us less than others. If the person who released this information is fearful or angry, he must too know that so many of us are grateful and relieved. 

Others too might have the courage now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am no expert, but have fought for the wild places where I live against almost unstoppable wind turbine developments on peatland in remote wildland. As one of nature&#8217;s largest stores of Co2 the peatlands have been attacked by this industry&#8217;s remorseless greed.  I have never completely understood how the government agencies who represented these reamarkable ecosystems at planning hearings and public enquiries ever commented on the release of Co2 when discussing their usual indifference to yet another catastrophic application. </p>
<p>Now with this dam burst of information does this whole sorry mess show itself for what it is.</p>
<p>To use children in government TV adverts to engender fear, to bribe poorer affected communities into the acceptance of money and &#8216;collective responsibity&#8217; for global warming, to villify those who ask for more reliable and peer evaluated scrutiny on the basis of this new religion of sorts, wherever it might impact is now being tested by the people. At last.</p>
<p>Copenhagen was perfect as a destination, it is the country&#8217;s main export &#8211; wind turbine technology. They fought to get the lion&#8217;s share of R&amp;D grants in the UK, better, meaner and tougher than most. The concrete used in the building of the bases alone is in nightmarish quantities. The resultant Co2 colossal.</p>
<p>As a result, the hydro electric dams now serve as mere back up for the wind scam. The large generators replaced with smaller less productive ones owned by companies that run and own the wind farms.</p>
<p>No!  I am not drifting off the subject.  We have all been had, all of us. Some of us less than others. If the person who released this information is fearful or angry, he must too know that so many of us are grateful and relieved. </p>
<p>Others too might have the courage now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mspelto</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mspelto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Cobb:  You are correct there are many factors.  However, we do gather sufficient information on the variable to know which is important. Soot levels have declined in ice cores in most the alpine mountain ranges, due to better emission controls so that is not the issue here.  In most of the cases where we measure glacier mass balance around the world we also have a climate station recording temperature.  This allows us to compare the weather records with the observed melting and conclude the cause, we are not guessing.  Our measurements have indicated that it is warmer summer conditions that is causing the melting, not more wind etc.  We also have noted in a few regions the increase of winter rain on snow events. Having measured the mass balance on the same glaciers, at the same sampling sites, at the same time each of the last 26 years in the North Cascades, we are not guessing, nor are the Norwegians or the Swiss.  We are not guessing that on the glaciers where these best measurements are made each year around the globe, 18 straight years have been negative.  If that was a company they would be bankrupt.   Note the image of the weather station on the Easton Glacier.  http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Cobb:  You are correct there are many factors.  However, we do gather sufficient information on the variable to know which is important. Soot levels have declined in ice cores in most the alpine mountain ranges, due to better emission controls so that is not the issue here.  In most of the cases where we measure glacier mass balance around the world we also have a climate station recording temperature.  This allows us to compare the weather records with the observed melting and conclude the cause, we are not guessing.  Our measurements have indicated that it is warmer summer conditions that is causing the melting, not more wind etc.  We also have noted in a few regions the increase of winter rain on snow events. Having measured the mass balance on the same glaciers, at the same sampling sites, at the same time each of the last 26 years in the North Cascades, we are not guessing, nor are the Norwegians or the Swiss.  We are not guessing that on the glaciers where these best measurements are made each year around the globe, 18 straight years have been negative.  If that was a company they would be bankrupt.   Note the image of the weather station on the Easton Glacier.  <a href="http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/mb.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazed</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#comment-237267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amazed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=13215#comment-237267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do half you plonkers believe everything you read? Or is it only when it confirms your prejudices?

Raw data have to be adjusted to correct for problems with the collection - like the fact that your new monitoring station isn&#039;&#039;t able to be placed at the same altitude as the old one, for example.

Just on the offchance that you *will* believe everything you read, try http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; see also the latest info on this issue on the main WUWT page - A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do half you plonkers believe everything you read? Or is it only when it confirms your prejudices?</p>
<p>Raw data have to be adjusted to correct for problems with the collection &#8211; like the fact that your new monitoring station isn&#8221;t able to be placed at the same altitude as the old one, for example.</p>
<p>Just on the offchance that you *will* believe everything you read, try <a href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/" rel="nofollow">http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/</a></p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> see also the latest info on this issue on the main WUWT page &#8211; A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

