Comments on: New WUWT milestone: 2 million hits this month

By: Steve M.

Steve M. — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:28:10 +0000

I’ve done a backcast with this data going back 2000 years. I see an unprecedented rise in the past few years…very hockey stick like. /sarc off

By: Feedback

Feedback — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:38:46 +0000

A late congrat from me – sure this is a fine and always interesting site that is… well, unprecedented.

Well Wrought Watts!

By: George E. Smith

George E. Smith — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:01:54 +0000

I see you must have worked at Fry’s some time Anthony. They employ somebody to stick their price labels over the top of the most important data on the box, so the potential purchaser, can’t tell what he is buying.

So why’d you stick your blasted label over the hockey stick part of your graph ?

Just don’t go back and start re-adjusting any of those earlier data points Anthony; we are all now educated to that skullduggery; Thanks to you.

Pretty soon you are going to need another digit on your abacus.

Good show Mate !

By: Tim Clark

Tim Clark — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:26:02 +0000

This site is………… HOT HOT HOT.
Congrats!

dearieme (06:40:21) :
Perhaps a new success? Christopher Booker’s column today reveals that Dr Gavin Smirk seems to be trying to disassociate himself from The Team.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6475667/Gavin-Schmidt-a-correction.html

I’m wondering if Gavin’s backpedaling has anything with E.M. Smith’s dissection of GISSTEMP code: http://chiefio.wordpress.com/

By: Bruce Cobb

Bruce Cobb — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:04:10 +0000

I believe the tipping point may have been Gore’s AIT, which backfired badly, as it caused people to actually start looking at the evidence, if nothing else than to answer the question “how scared should I be”? But there was also the claim that “the debate is over”. In 2007 I wasn’t aware of any debate whatsoever. Oh, there were a few Letters to the Editor by a few people who had to be nothing more than politically-motivated cranks, or so I thought. So, I decided to see what this supposed “debate” that I had apparently completely missed somehow was all about, and to confirm that yes, we really do need to be scared. The funny thing was, the more I learned, the more skeptical I became.
This site has become such a huge success for 2 reasons: Excellence, of course, but also an increasingly skeptical public, in part fueled by – you guessed it, this excellent site, with all of the good qualities mentioned by so many.
Keep up the good work, Anthony, and much- deserved congratulations on your continued, and increasing success.

By: Steve McIntyre

Steve McIntyre — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:04:56 +0000

Remarkable!! Well done.

By: Lance

Lance — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:24:32 +0000

Congrats dude, this is an excellent website!

By: Douglas DC

Douglas DC — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:21:03 +0000

Keep on being a beacon of sanity in an era of Political Science,like Galileo’s
era -even down to “indulgences”-and all we get is an engine overhaul on
Algore’s Gufstream-not the Sistine Chapel…

By: JP Miller

JP Miller — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:09:27 +0000

Anthony,

Thank you for your site. We can only hope some sense of scientific sanity can be brought to this field. It’s so sad that too many scientists look the other way because they do not want to get political blow-back on their grants. Eisenhower was a smarter guy than many gave him credit for being. Where is the leader we need now who can call the question seriously enough and publicly enough to make a difference. Richard Feynman, where are you when we need you?

Until then, this site has to be the beacon. Keep it shining!

By: Bulldust

Bulldust — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:50:42 +0000

There seems to be a lot of positive feedback in this tread… I expect the graph will spike even further… it is certainly better than we thought.

By: royfomr

royfomr — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:32:37 +0000

Thanks for providing a forum that, although allowing either side of the opinion-spectrum to post, attracts so many who have positive environmental aspirations coupled with common-sense and attention to the Scientific method that puts objectivity above transient passion!
I feel sorry for the many talented individuals on the other side of the debate who have found themselves supporting less and less credible colleagues. Gavin and Tamino, we need blokes with your intellect, to take us all forward to make for a better future.

By: Roger Sowell

Roger Sowell — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:56:34 +0000

Nice work, Anthony, moderators, and contributors. I enjoy reading this several times each week. Wish I had the time to read it all.

By: Tenuc

Tenuc — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:22:42 +0000

Well done Anthony and thanks for all the hard work you and your helpers have put into providing this forum. Without these places much of the evidence that the hypothesis of AGW is completely wrong would go unnoticed and the dark forces who run the warmist media hype would go unopposed.

Real science is about the facts – not the theories. Current climate science suffers from have poor quality data of insufficient granularity and I find this is a good place to find some gems of real information – the debate is not over yet.

Please keep up the good work – the truth always wins out in the end.

By: Ian Adnams

Ian Adnams — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:34:48 +0000

If you are on Twitter retweet the WUWT tweets on new items so the information reaches even more people. Do the same with new WUWT posts on Facebook. Harness the power of social media to spread the word!

By: Leon Brozyna

Leon Brozyna — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:36:49 +0000

Once again, congratulations.

Meanwhile, the lamestream media is still trying to figure out what it’s doing wrong as its figures keep dropping. Now that’s an interesting compare-and-contrast example for you.