<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking a bite out of climate data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back2Bat</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-194048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Back2Bat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-194048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Forth multiply go and&quot;?

Ok,  I might be rusty but Forth was fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forth multiply go and&#8221;?</p>
<p>Ok,  I might be rusty but Forth was fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; JER0ME (07:17:22) :

I have noticed this too. It is not insignificant that those with absolutely nothing to lose (in terms of income), and the most experience to boot, are the most ardent sceptics.&lt;/i&gt;

I see the very same thing with respect to the Drug War. The police officials publicly speaking out against it are  for the most part retired. We also saw this with the Drug Czar McCaffrey. Once he was retired he said he didn&#039;t care about adults smoking pot, he just wanted to keep it out of the hands of kids.

Or as the Chinese say: &quot;Honor dies where interest lies.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> JER0ME (07:17:22) :</p>
<p>I have noticed this too. It is not insignificant that those with absolutely nothing to lose (in terms of income), and the most experience to boot, are the most ardent sceptics.</i></p>
<p>I see the very same thing with respect to the Drug War. The police officials publicly speaking out against it are  for the most part retired. We also saw this with the Drug Czar McCaffrey. Once he was retired he said he didn&#8217;t care about adults smoking pot, he just wanted to keep it out of the hands of kids.</p>
<p>Or as the Chinese say: &#8220;Honor dies where interest lies.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Dodd (19:53:43),

Got a kick out of that!!! Another old FORTHer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Dodd (19:53:43),</p>
<p>Got a kick out of that!!! Another old FORTHer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graeme Rodaughan (17:29:22):

Simon&#039;s Law:
&lt;b&gt;It is unwise to attribute to malice alone that which can be attributed to malice and stupidity.&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graeme Rodaughan (17:29:22):</p>
<p>Simon&#8217;s Law:<br />
<b>It is unwise to attribute to malice alone that which can be attributed to malice and stupidity.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Jim</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;
psi (11:04:58) : 

This is outrageous, but not unpredictable for those who have been following this story. I support President Obama on many issues (as well as on his integrity and ability), 
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think we all do; but prior DRE has, I think, unalterably and permanently skewed his perception of all around him (reality: he sees it not).
.
.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i><br />
psi (11:04:58) : </p>
<p>This is outrageous, but not unpredictable for those who have been following this story. I support President Obama on many issues (as well as on his integrity and ability),<br />
</i></p></blockquote>
<p>I think we all do; but prior DRE has, I think, unalterably and permanently skewed his perception of all around him (reality: he sees it not).<br />
.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustPassing</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustPassing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The infighting and bickering begins regarding Europes CO2 emission agreements, even without any further proposed caps from this Decembers summit. 

&quot;The European Commission is considering pursuing a legal fight with the EU&#039;s top court over management of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).&quot;


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8273016.stm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The infighting and bickering begins regarding Europes CO2 emission agreements, even without any further proposed caps from this Decembers summit. </p>
<p>&#8220;The European Commission is considering pursuing a legal fight with the EU&#8217;s top court over management of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8273016.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8273016.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron de Haan</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron de Haan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sep 24, 2009
Chasing a More Accurate Global Century Scale Temperature Trend

By Joseph D’Aleo, CCM, AMS Fellow

&quot;The long term global temperature trends have been shown by numerous peer review papers to be exaggerated by 30%, 50% and in some cases much more by issues such as urbanization, land use changes, bad siting, bad instrumentation, and ocean measurement techniques that changed over time. NOAA made matters worse by removing the satellite ocean temperature measurement which provide more complete coverage and was not subject to the local issues except near the coastlines and islands. The result has been the absurd and bogus claims by NOAA and the alarmists that we are in the warmest decade in 100 or even a 1000 years or more and our oceans are warmest ever&quot;.

You can find the full article and download a PDF at www.icecap.us First column]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sep 24, 2009<br />
Chasing a More Accurate Global Century Scale Temperature Trend</p>
<p>By Joseph D’Aleo, CCM, AMS Fellow</p>
<p>&#8220;The long term global temperature trends have been shown by numerous peer review papers to be exaggerated by 30%, 50% and in some cases much more by issues such as urbanization, land use changes, bad siting, bad instrumentation, and ocean measurement techniques that changed over time. NOAA made matters worse by removing the satellite ocean temperature measurement which provide more complete coverage and was not subject to the local issues except near the coastlines and islands. The result has been the absurd and bogus claims by NOAA and the alarmists that we are in the warmest decade in 100 or even a 1000 years or more and our oceans are warmest ever&#8221;.</p>
<p>You can find the full article and download a PDF at <a href="http://www.icecap.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.icecap.us</a> First column</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Shapiro (10:10:42) : 

&lt;i&gt;Shrinking because of lack of snowfall certainly isn’t the same as melting. But, is this what they’re measuring when they say the sheets are melting?&lt;/i&gt;

Another question...how fast is Greenland sinking because of the amount of ice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Shapiro (10:10:42) : </p>
<p><i>Shrinking because of lack of snowfall certainly isn’t the same as melting. But, is this what they’re measuring when they say the sheets are melting?</i></p>
<p>Another question&#8230;how fast is Greenland sinking because of the amount of ice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed
temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT3_accepted.pdf

Worth a read as much info on corrections is described.

&lt;i&gt;For some stations both the adjusted and unadjusted time-series are archived at CRU and so the adjustments that have been made are known [Jones et al., 1985, Jones et al., 1986, Vincent &amp; Gullet, 1999], but for most stations only a single series is archived, so any adjustments that might have been made (e.g. by National Met. services or individual scientists) are unknown.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed<br />
temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT3_accepted.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT3_accepted.pdf</a></p>
<p>Worth a read as much info on corrections is described.</p>
<p><i>For some stations both the adjusted and unadjusted time-series are archived at CRU and so the adjustments that have been made are known [Jones et al., 1985, Jones et al., 1986, Vincent &amp; Gullet, 1999], but for most stations only a single series is archived, so any adjustments that might have been made (e.g. by National Met. services or individual scientists) are unknown.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;In the early 1980s, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, scientists at the United Kingdom’s University of East Anglia established the Climate Research Unit (CRU) to produce the world’s first comprehensive history of surface temperature.&lt;/i&gt;

Hold on ----- It was formed 10 years earlier.
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history/

History of the Climatic Research Unit
 The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was established in the School of Environmental Sciences (ENV) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich in 1972...
Since its inception in 1972 until 1994, the only scientist who had a guaranteed salary from ENV/UEA funding was the Director. Every other research scientist relied on &#039;soft money&#039; - grants and contracts - to continue his or her work. Since 1994, the situation has improved and now three of the senior staff are fully funded by ENV/UEA and two others have part of their salaries paid. The fact that CRU has and has had a number of long-standing research staff is testimony to the quality and relevance of our work. Such longevity in a research centre, dependent principally on soft money, in the UK university system is probably unprecedented. The number of CRU research staff as of the end of July 2007 is 15 (including those fully funded by ENV/UEA)...
The area of CRU&#039;s work that has probably had the largest international impact was started in 1978 and continues through to the present-day: the production of the world&#039;s land-based, gridded (currently using 5° by 5° latitude/longitude boxes) temperature data set. This involved many person-years of painstaking data collection, checking and homogenization. In 1986, this analysis was extended to the marine sector (in co-operation with the Hadley Centre, Met Office from 1989)

So the CRU was set up without US funding and the gridded set was begun before US funding  

I love accurate blogs!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In the early 1980s, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, scientists at the United Kingdom’s University of East Anglia established the Climate Research Unit (CRU) to produce the world’s first comprehensive history of surface temperature.</i></p>
<p>Hold on &#8212;&#8211; It was formed 10 years earlier.<br />
<a href="http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history/</a></p>
<p>History of the Climatic Research Unit<br />
 The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was established in the School of Environmental Sciences (ENV) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich in 1972&#8230;<br />
Since its inception in 1972 until 1994, the only scientist who had a guaranteed salary from ENV/UEA funding was the Director. Every other research scientist relied on &#8216;soft money&#8217; &#8211; grants and contracts &#8211; to continue his or her work. Since 1994, the situation has improved and now three of the senior staff are fully funded by ENV/UEA and two others have part of their salaries paid. The fact that CRU has and has had a number of long-standing research staff is testimony to the quality and relevance of our work. Such longevity in a research centre, dependent principally on soft money, in the UK university system is probably unprecedented. The number of CRU research staff as of the end of July 2007 is 15 (including those fully funded by ENV/UEA)&#8230;<br />
The area of CRU&#8217;s work that has probably had the largest international impact was started in 1978 and continues through to the present-day: the production of the world&#8217;s land-based, gridded (currently using 5° by 5° latitude/longitude boxes) temperature data set. This involved many person-years of painstaking data collection, checking and homogenization. In 1986, this analysis was extended to the marine sector (in co-operation with the Hadley Centre, Met Office from 1989)</p>
<p>So the CRU was set up without US funding and the gridded set was begun before US funding  </p>
<p>I love accurate blogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lansner</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Lansner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wsbriggs and Anthony:

A new work of getting UNadjusted temperature series from around the world, etc. From sound stations, yes its so obvious it should be done.
I will happily help and so will many many others.

K.R. Frank Lansner]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wsbriggs and Anthony:</p>
<p>A new work of getting UNadjusted temperature series from around the world, etc. From sound stations, yes its so obvious it should be done.<br />
I will happily help and so will many many others.</p>
<p>K.R. Frank Lansner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lansner</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Lansner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kaz and Geoff Sherington, could you share your findings with us?
Sound interesting.
You have UNadjusted rural stations from Australia?

Would very much like to see your work.

K.R. Frank Lansner, fel@nnit.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaz and Geoff Sherington, could you share your findings with us?<br />
Sound interesting.<br />
You have UNadjusted rural stations from Australia?</p>
<p>Would very much like to see your work.</p>
<p>K.R. Frank Lansner, <a href="mailto:fel@nnit.com">fel@nnit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bulldust</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bulldust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Age of Stupid on IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1300563/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Age of Stupid on IMDB:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1300563/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1300563/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Sherington (05:09:12)
“While on Australia, I have looked at the last 40 years of Tmax and Tmin of a few dozen stations that are really rural, before GISS got to them. About half of them show essentially no trend from zero. Some even fall. It’s almost enough to falsify the whole temperature rise theory”.  Sorry, not familiar with posting comments!  Geoff, I&#039;ve just done the same thing (albeit only one long record station - 1912 to present) and found as straight a trend line than you could possibly imagine, for both Tmax and Tmin.  It&#039;s a useful thing to do just to check what they are telling us.  Media reports about the &quot;worse than we predicted&quot; antartica melting were everywhere here in Australia yesterday however the report mentioned &quot;new&quot; satellite data to 2007!  The problem is that the headlines grab the attention and unless you know what is really happening (or are interested enough to find out) you accept what you are told.  The days of true journalism are gone and we are fed a constant roll-out of press releases with no investigation of the real facts.  The public broadcasters here are among the worst offenders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Sherington (05:09:12)<br />
“While on Australia, I have looked at the last 40 years of Tmax and Tmin of a few dozen stations that are really rural, before GISS got to them. About half of them show essentially no trend from zero. Some even fall. It’s almost enough to falsify the whole temperature rise theory”.  Sorry, not familiar with posting comments!  Geoff, I&#8217;ve just done the same thing (albeit only one long record station &#8211; 1912 to present) and found as straight a trend line than you could possibly imagine, for both Tmax and Tmin.  It&#8217;s a useful thing to do just to check what they are telling us.  Media reports about the &#8220;worse than we predicted&#8221; antartica melting were everywhere here in Australia yesterday however the report mentioned &#8220;new&#8221; satellite data to 2007!  The problem is that the headlines grab the attention and unless you know what is really happening (or are interested enough to find out) you accept what you are told.  The days of true journalism are gone and we are fed a constant roll-out of press releases with no investigation of the real facts.  The public broadcasters here are among the worst offenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/23/taking-a-bite-out-of-climate-data/#comment-193143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=11091#comment-193143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Sherington (05:09:12)
“While on Australia, I have looked at the last 40 years of Tmax and Tmin of a few dozen stations that are really rural, before GISS got to them. About half of them show essentially no trend from zero. Some even fall. It’s almost enough to falsify the whole temperature rise theory”.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Sherington (05:09:12)<br />
“While on Australia, I have looked at the last 40 years of Tmax and Tmin of a few dozen stations that are really rural, before GISS got to them. About half of them show essentially no trend from zero. Some even fall. It’s almost enough to falsify the whole temperature rise theory”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

