<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An odd day in solar science, it&#8217;s mostly a waiting game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron PE</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-182137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron PE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-182137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slightly related topic: 
Telegraphs Ran on Electric Air in Crazy 1859 Magnetic Storm 
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/telegraphs-ran-on-electric-air-in-crazy-magnetic-storm-150-years-ago/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly related topic:<br />
Telegraphs Ran on Electric Air in Crazy 1859 Magnetic Storm<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/telegraphs-ran-on-electric-air-in-crazy-magnetic-storm-150-years-ago/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/telegraphs-ran-on-electric-air-in-crazy-magnetic-storm-150-years-ago/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schaper</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-182105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Schaper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-182105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I see a tiny little plaque in the lower left equatorial region (thus Cycle 23?). Either than or its a stuck pixel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I see a tiny little plaque in the lower left equatorial region (thus Cycle 23?). Either than or its a stuck pixel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron de Haan</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron de Haan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article about the sun and Global Warming from the LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-goldberg1-2009sep01,0,2797425.column]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article about the sun and Global Warming from the LA Times:<br />
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-goldberg1-2009sep01,0,2797425.column" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-goldberg1-2009sep01,0,2797425.column</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I find strange about the sunspects we saw is that the visible spects were seen before anything on the magnetogram... was it conveniently off line?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find strange about the sunspects we saw is that the visible spects were seen before anything on the magnetogram&#8230; was it conveniently off line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob uk</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob uk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Sharp (18:49:05) :
Layman’s sunspots. 

Why not just run a 200 year repro telescope along side the latest gear, if you can`t see the speck with the repro don`t count it, apples with apples.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Sharp (18:49:05) :<br />
Layman’s sunspots. </p>
<p>Why not just run a 200 year repro telescope along side the latest gear, if you can`t see the speck with the repro don`t count it, apples with apples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invisible as it may be, NOAA is sticking with the SSN-12 speck on Sept 1.  See http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/sept/swcenter/sunspot.html

I guess even a speck momentarily visible in just the last hour of August and the first hour of September would count for both days by NOAA&#039;s present method of reckoning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invisible as it may be, NOAA is sticking with the SSN-12 speck on Sept 1.  See <a href="http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/sept/swcenter/sunspot.html" rel="nofollow">http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/sept/swcenter/sunspot.html</a></p>
<p>I guess even a speck momentarily visible in just the last hour of August and the first hour of September would count for both days by NOAA&#8217;s present method of reckoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbateman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rbateman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Alex (07:47:33) : 

The Sun was blank when it rose yesterday on the Pacific Coast.  It&#039;s been blank ever since then, but today has a SSN value of 12.

Jimmy Haigh (04:09:45) : 

Maybe they need to go to AAA (Astronomer-Alcoholics Anonymous)??

Geoff Sharp (02:48:36) : 

Not a bad idea.  Who has actually seen Catania?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Alex (07:47:33) : </p>
<p>The Sun was blank when it rose yesterday on the Pacific Coast.  It&#8217;s been blank ever since then, but today has a SSN value of 12.</p>
<p>Jimmy Haigh (04:09:45) : </p>
<p>Maybe they need to go to AAA (Astronomer-Alcoholics Anonymous)??</p>
<p>Geoff Sharp (02:48:36) : </p>
<p>Not a bad idea.  Who has actually seen Catania?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Alex</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the sun is blank and the sunspot number is 12.
August was blank, no spots see : http://www.solen.info/solar/
Scroll down, the International Sunspot Number for August 2009 is : 0.0
The Average solar flux at Earth for August 2009 is 67.3

Shouldn&#039;t the candidate month of sunspot minimum move to January 2009 now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the sun is blank and the sunspot number is 12.<br />
August was blank, no spots see : <a href="http://www.solen.info/solar/" rel="nofollow">http://www.solen.info/solar/</a><br />
Scroll down, the International Sunspot Number for August 2009 is : 0.0<br />
The Average solar flux at Earth for August 2009 is 67.3</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the candidate month of sunspot minimum move to January 2009 now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Coppin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Coppin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; Bill H (18:22:39) :

How has the observatory fared? anyone know? &lt;/i&gt;

Good, so far.  They&#039;ve managed to reduce the Station fire enough to give them an edge.
The webcam went off yesterday afternoon, believed to be due to backfires set to create a firebreak burning up a phone line.  The fire dept has made saving the obs a priority now that they can re-allocate fighters.   There&#039;s a log of sorts being maintained at http://www.chara.gsu.edu/CHARA/fire.php and Fox has live web coverage going on here: http://media.myfoxla.com/live/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Bill H (18:22:39) :</p>
<p>How has the observatory fared? anyone know? </i></p>
<p>Good, so far.  They&#8217;ve managed to reduce the Station fire enough to give them an edge.<br />
The webcam went off yesterday afternoon, believed to be due to backfires set to create a firebreak burning up a phone line.  The fire dept has made saving the obs a priority now that they can re-allocate fighters.   There&#8217;s a log of sorts being maintained at <a href="http://www.chara.gsu.edu/CHARA/fire.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.chara.gsu.edu/CHARA/fire.php</a> and Fox has live web coverage going on here: <a href="http://media.myfoxla.com/live/" rel="nofollow">http://media.myfoxla.com/live/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Haigh</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Haigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Sharp (02:48:36) : 

rbateman (01:21:18) :


I get spots before my eyes the morning after I&#039;ve drunk too much.  Maybe the guys in Catania have been on the old vino?...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Sharp (02:48:36) : </p>
<p>rbateman (01:21:18) :</p>
<p>I get spots before my eyes the morning after I&#8217;ve drunk too much.  Maybe the guys in Catania have been on the old vino?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sharp</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Sharp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rbateman (01:21:18) :

&lt;i&gt;Catania manages to count both the 1st and the 2nd of September with a spot that did not last 24 hours, slapping up thier AR report with Day 2.
DSD.txt shows up with Sept 1 &amp; 2nd.
SOHO shows nothing but noise in the images for 19:01 UT and 23:03 UT Sept 1st. 03:08 UT Sept 2 is likewise blank.
This is not the 1st time this sort of thing has come up, and if I recall correctly it’s happened more than once.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe a few of us could send them an email...ask them to explain why they are so different from the other 62 stations?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rbateman (01:21:18) :</p>
<p><i>Catania manages to count both the 1st and the 2nd of September with a spot that did not last 24 hours, slapping up thier AR report with Day 2.<br />
DSD.txt shows up with Sept 1 &amp; 2nd.<br />
SOHO shows nothing but noise in the images for 19:01 UT and 23:03 UT Sept 1st. 03:08 UT Sept 2 is likewise blank.<br />
This is not the 1st time this sort of thing has come up, and if I recall correctly it’s happened more than once.</i></p>
<p>Maybe a few of us could send them an email&#8230;ask them to explain why they are so different from the other 62 stations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbateman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rbateman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catania manages to count both the 1st and the 2nd of September with a spot that did not last 24 hours, slapping up thier AR report with Day 2.
DSD.txt shows up with Sept 1 &amp; 2nd.
SOHO shows nothing but noise in the images for 19:01 UT and 23:03 UT Sept 1st.  03:08 UT Sept 2 is likewise blank.
This is not the 1st time this sort of thing has come up, and if I recall correctly it&#039;s happened more than once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catania manages to count both the 1st and the 2nd of September with a spot that did not last 24 hours, slapping up thier AR report with Day 2.<br />
DSD.txt shows up with Sept 1 &amp; 2nd.<br />
SOHO shows nothing but noise in the images for 19:01 UT and 23:03 UT Sept 1st.  03:08 UT Sept 2 is likewise blank.<br />
This is not the 1st time this sort of thing has come up, and if I recall correctly it&#8217;s happened more than once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Zuiderwijk</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Zuiderwijk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The magnetogram of today (Sep 2) is quite interesting. The fading current attempt to a spot is clearly visible and of cycle 24. However at the equator some structures are discernable with the polarity of cycle 23. Perhaps another C23 spot is in the offing? (If so, should we call that an EZ effect ? :-) )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The magnetogram of today (Sep 2) is quite interesting. The fading current attempt to a spot is clearly visible and of cycle 24. However at the equator some structures are discernable with the polarity of cycle 23. Perhaps another C23 spot is in the offing? (If so, should we call that an EZ effect ? :-) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lorrey</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Lorrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The community in which the Mt Wilson fire started was, prior to the fire, discussing laying off firefighters to save on the budget. Funny that the biggest wildfire in state history should pop up then to save firemens jobs.... almost as if someone set the fire for job security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The community in which the Mt Wilson fire started was, prior to the fire, discussing laying off firefighters to save on the budget. Funny that the biggest wildfire in state history should pop up then to save firemens jobs&#8230;. almost as if someone set the fire for job security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill H</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/31/an-odd-day-in-solar-science-its-mostly-a-waiting-game/#comment-181164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=10427#comment-181164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Sharp (23:02:52) :

Bill H (22:48:22) :

SIDC doesn’t give NOAA 1025 a number …

Only commented on the anomaly….

http://sidc.oma.be/products/meu/index.php

SO is the spotless count still running?

We are in an interesting position. SIDC have all month to think about it, and as they are considered the standard (?) do we stop racking up the days and wait until the end of the month? If so and the result is negative it will be quite a bombshell, something like 82 days spotless if we continue the current trend.



Well..... IF they fail to count it we have just set a new record TODAY! and then every day we continue spotless.... will they let this fester or will they pop the pimple?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Sharp (23:02:52) :</p>
<p>Bill H (22:48:22) :</p>
<p>SIDC doesn’t give NOAA 1025 a number …</p>
<p>Only commented on the anomaly….</p>
<p><a href="http://sidc.oma.be/products/meu/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sidc.oma.be/products/meu/index.php</a></p>
<p>SO is the spotless count still running?</p>
<p>We are in an interesting position. SIDC have all month to think about it, and as they are considered the standard (?) do we stop racking up the days and wait until the end of the month? If so and the result is negative it will be quite a bombshell, something like 82 days spotless if we continue the current trend.</p>
<p>Well&#8230;.. IF they fail to count it we have just set a new record TODAY! and then every day we continue spotless&#8230;. will they let this fester or will they pop the pimple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

