<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin takes a stand in WaPo &#8211; blasts cap and trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenbilen</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lenbilen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China has just passed us in CO2 emissions, and since they are building coal fired plants as fast as they can using low grade high sulphuric content coal, and expect to grow about 10% / year, why are they exempt from all controls? I thought the object was to save the planet, not just destroy America. As for Sarah being for cap and trade during the campaign - she still supported both ANWAR and offshore drilling, as well as solar, wind, nuclear and even wave-power. It seemed to me a balanced approach then, and it still does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has just passed us in CO2 emissions, and since they are building coal fired plants as fast as they can using low grade high sulphuric content coal, and expect to grow about 10% / year, why are they exempt from all controls? I thought the object was to save the planet, not just destroy America. As for Sarah being for cap and trade during the campaign &#8211; she still supported both ANWAR and offshore drilling, as well as solar, wind, nuclear and even wave-power. It seemed to me a balanced approach then, and it still does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paullm</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paullm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, some of Palin&#039;s campaign statements expressing some support for AGW hypothesis and a form of cap/tax are contradicted by her latest positions therefore making it very hard to have much faith in her &quot;actual&quot; positions, if any.  It appears, however, that her actions may provide for greater confidence that Palin really is more supportive of  climatological reality than the political opposition&#039;s &quot;religious&quot; beliefs supporting AGW hysteria.   

I would prefer a pragmatic climate/energy realist, as Palin appears to be (pin her down until she can&#039;t wiggle out of a position), to the climate/energy AGW ideologues who afford us no escape from suicide except after life threatening masochism.

Some people are teachable, some not.  Perfect politicians - perhaps in another solar system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, some of Palin&#8217;s campaign statements expressing some support for AGW hypothesis and a form of cap/tax are contradicted by her latest positions therefore making it very hard to have much faith in her &#8220;actual&#8221; positions, if any.  It appears, however, that her actions may provide for greater confidence that Palin really is more supportive of  climatological reality than the political opposition&#8217;s &#8220;religious&#8221; beliefs supporting AGW hysteria.   </p>
<p>I would prefer a pragmatic climate/energy realist, as Palin appears to be (pin her down until she can&#8217;t wiggle out of a position), to the climate/energy AGW ideologues who afford us no escape from suicide except after life threatening masochism.</p>
<p>Some people are teachable, some not.  Perfect politicians &#8211; perhaps in another solar system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An idea by Youtube account anoniab:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m not much into juvenile tactics, but this bill truly deserves some name calling; it came quite by accident, but it certainly is appropriate. Join me in re-baptizing the &quot;Waxman-Markey&quot; Bill as &lt;b&gt;the &quot;Whackey-Marxman&quot; Bill&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

youtube.com/watch?v=Vq5y-IURiBc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea by Youtube account anoniab:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m not much into juvenile tactics, but this bill truly deserves some name calling; it came quite by accident, but it certainly is appropriate. Join me in re-baptizing the &#8220;Waxman-Markey&#8221; Bill as <b>the &#8220;Whackey-Marxman&#8221; Bill</b></p></blockquote>
<p>youtube.com/watch?v=Vq5y-IURiBc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An idea by Youtube account anoniab:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m not much into juvenile tactics, but this bill truly deserves some name calling; it came quite by accident, but it certainly is appropriate. Join me in re-baptizing the &quot;Waxman-Markey&quot; Bill as &lt;b&gt;the &quot;Whackey-Marxman&quot; Bill&lt;/b&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;

youtube.com/watch?v=Vq5y-IURiBc&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea by Youtube account anoniab:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m not much into juvenile tactics, but this bill truly deserves some name calling; it came quite by accident, but it certainly is appropriate. Join me in re-baptizing the &#8220;Waxman-Markey&#8221; Bill as <b>the &#8220;Whackey-Marxman&#8221; Bill</b><br />
<blockquote>
<p>youtube.com/watch?v=Vq5y-IURiBc</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s quite a flip flop there Sarah from your earlier &quot;reduce carbon emissions and clean up the planet&quot; cap and trade policy while on the campaign trail.  Just goes to show that when in Washington, if you want to play, you have to use &quot;their&quot; playing pieces and talking points.  But now that you are not in the game you come out against it?  Hmmm.  You chicken?  Your position would have been the stronger now if you had come out against John&#039;s policy back then and gotten fired for it.  Trust me, I have learned a lesson about voting for someone who talks the talk of whoever is in power of purse or politics and agrees to play by the rules, be they liberal OR conservative, in order to get elected.  You are coming off as someone like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s quite a flip flop there Sarah from your earlier &#8220;reduce carbon emissions and clean up the planet&#8221; cap and trade policy while on the campaign trail.  Just goes to show that when in Washington, if you want to play, you have to use &#8220;their&#8221; playing pieces and talking points.  But now that you are not in the game you come out against it?  Hmmm.  You chicken?  Your position would have been the stronger now if you had come out against John&#8217;s policy back then and gotten fired for it.  Trust me, I have learned a lesson about voting for someone who talks the talk of whoever is in power of purse or politics and agrees to play by the rules, be they liberal OR conservative, in order to get elected.  You are coming off as someone like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary R</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Bart Nielsen:
&quot;Your attacks on people’s religious beliefs in a forum devoted to climate science and whatever else interests Anthony (and I have seen no posts in this fine blog addressing religion in any way) are obnoxious and unwelcome.&quot;

Very well put Mr. Neilsen, thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Bart Nielsen:<br />
&#8220;Your attacks on people’s religious beliefs in a forum devoted to climate science and whatever else interests Anthony (and I have seen no posts in this fine blog addressing religion in any way) are obnoxious and unwelcome.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well put Mr. Neilsen, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri Jackson(climatologist)</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-160088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terri Jackson(climatologist)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-160088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fully support Sara Palin in her position about cap and trade. It will destroy the US economy.  In fact the earth has been cooling for the past 8 years!.  CO2 levels are still rising thus proving that human carbon emissions are not the cause of climate change.  It is a natural phenomena that has been with us for hundreds of years with alterate warm cool warm cool periods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully support Sara Palin in her position about cap and trade. It will destroy the US economy.  In fact the earth has been cooling for the past 8 years!.  CO2 levels are still rising thus proving that human carbon emissions are not the cause of climate change.  It is a natural phenomena that has been with us for hundreds of years with alterate warm cool warm cool periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.M.Smith (19:56:32) :
The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom
by Gerald Schroeder

E.M., I am familiar with this book, since we do have a copy of it.  My husband has corresponded with the author, and sent him one of the chapters of his own book.  It is almost frightening when physicists become theologians, and start using mathematical formulas to describe the amount of energy which God used to create the universe, and what percent of God&#039;s total energy that was.  It involves starting with Einstein&#039;s equations for energy.

I&#039;m still coming to grips with 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2, so I don&#039;t pretend to actually understand it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.M.Smith (19:56:32) :<br />
The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom<br />
by Gerald Schroeder</p>
<p>E.M., I am familiar with this book, since we do have a copy of it.  My husband has corresponded with the author, and sent him one of the chapters of his own book.  It is almost frightening when physicists become theologians, and start using mathematical formulas to describe the amount of energy which God used to create the universe, and what percent of God&#8217;s total energy that was.  It involves starting with Einstein&#8217;s equations for energy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still coming to grips with 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2, so I don&#8217;t pretend to actually understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bart Nielsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ralph ellis:  Not to put too fine a point on this, but since I have a few pearls left I may as well cast them out before you.  When you say:


“”Yes, some people did actually, once-upon-a-time in a fairy-tale, believe in Creationism! Can you believe it, kids!! (wipes tear from eye) ho, ho, ho, ho….”&quot;

You make my point exactly.  You are so afraid that an honest investigation of the data will result in some people accepting a creationist framework that you must put your thumb on the scale and subject anything contrary to your beliefs with scorn and ridicule, rather than facts and logic.  This is of a piece with the AGW crowd, who will not engage in honest debate for fear that some people will disagree with them and shatter their &quot;consensus science.&quot;

To reiterate my original point, I believe that an honest, open examination of the data without recourse to ridicule, &lt;i&gt;ad hominen&lt;/i&gt;, poisoning the well, flooding the stage, appeals to authority, or straw man arguments is never a thing to be feared, whether the topic is the shape of the earth, its origins, the mechanisms driving its climate, the nature of tectonic mechanics, or the cause or causes of ulcers.  Your attacks on people&#039;s religious beliefs in a forum devoted to climate science and whatever else interests Anthony (and I have seen no posts in this fine blog addressing religion in any way) are obnoxious and unwelcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ralph ellis:  Not to put too fine a point on this, but since I have a few pearls left I may as well cast them out before you.  When you say:</p>
<p>“”Yes, some people did actually, once-upon-a-time in a fairy-tale, believe in Creationism! Can you believe it, kids!! (wipes tear from eye) ho, ho, ho, ho….”&#8221;</p>
<p>You make my point exactly.  You are so afraid that an honest investigation of the data will result in some people accepting a creationist framework that you must put your thumb on the scale and subject anything contrary to your beliefs with scorn and ridicule, rather than facts and logic.  This is of a piece with the AGW crowd, who will not engage in honest debate for fear that some people will disagree with them and shatter their &#8220;consensus science.&#8221;</p>
<p>To reiterate my original point, I believe that an honest, open examination of the data without recourse to ridicule, <i>ad hominen</i>, poisoning the well, flooding the stage, appeals to authority, or straw man arguments is never a thing to be feared, whether the topic is the shape of the earth, its origins, the mechanisms driving its climate, the nature of tectonic mechanics, or the cause or causes of ulcers.  Your attacks on people&#8217;s religious beliefs in a forum devoted to climate science and whatever else interests Anthony (and I have seen no posts in this fine blog addressing religion in any way) are obnoxious and unwelcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bart Nielsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ralph ellis:  In your &quot;response&quot; to my post, you clearly demonstrated that it is easier to snip someone&#039;s point and respond to a caricature of what they said than it is to actually engage their argument.  Not all that unusual...the blokes over at RealClimate do the same thing all the time.

&quot;But there is a much simpler answer to Genesis – it is simply a well-thumbed copy of the Hymn to the Aten, written circa 1340BC by Pharaoh Akhenaton, the monotheist heretic pharaoh of Egypt...As it happens, Pharaoh Akenaton’s brother was a high priest called called Moses…&quot;

That is quite a claim you make.  Of course there is not a shread of evidence for any of it, but it&#039;s something you accept by faith, so you need no evidence to support your claim.

Janice (07:30:27) :   Spot on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ralph ellis:  In your &#8220;response&#8221; to my post, you clearly demonstrated that it is easier to snip someone&#8217;s point and respond to a caricature of what they said than it is to actually engage their argument.  Not all that unusual&#8230;the blokes over at RealClimate do the same thing all the time.</p>
<p>&#8220;But there is a much simpler answer to Genesis – it is simply a well-thumbed copy of the Hymn to the Aten, written circa 1340BC by Pharaoh Akhenaton, the monotheist heretic pharaoh of Egypt&#8230;As it happens, Pharaoh Akenaton’s brother was a high priest called called Moses…&#8221;</p>
<p>That is quite a claim you make.  Of course there is not a shread of evidence for any of it, but it&#8217;s something you accept by faith, so you need no evidence to support your claim.</p>
<p>Janice (07:30:27) :   Spot on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyromancer76</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pyromancer76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.M. Smith, I&#039;d like you to run as Sarah Palin&#039;s VP.  I can think of numerous others at WUWT who would make fine Cabinet Secretaries and Assistants.  We could have a magnificent U.S. of A. that way -- in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.M. Smith, I&#8217;d like you to run as Sarah Palin&#8217;s VP.  I can think of numerous others at WUWT who would make fine Cabinet Secretaries and Assistants.  We could have a magnificent U.S. of A. that way &#8212; in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E. Smith</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot;&quot;   Juliana Smith (16:16:56) : 

Sarah Palin is just finishing up all her last minute concerns before leaving her office.
Interesting, Sarah decides to write about America’s unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing.
Sarah could of taken an opportunity to create jobs for Alaskans by participating to receive Obama’s Stimulus Relief to create JOBS.    &quot;&quot;&quot;

Well aren&#039;t you the generous one Juliana.   How much money did you personally contribute to  &quot;Obama’s Stimulus Relief to create JOBS.&quot; ?

How much did Obama himself contribute?  As for the money; it has all gone; but less than 10% of it has been spent; the rest went into peole&#039;s pockets, or is promised to future socialist programs; which will create zero jobs, and very little of the money that has been spent has created ANY jobs; we are still losing jobs at around a half million a month; so no jobs have been created by &quot;Obama&#039;s Stimulus Relief&quot;.

As for Alaskans; they would have plenty of jobs if the federal government just got out of the way, and let Alaskans run their own Sovereign Republic State.

I&#039;m sure Governor Palin would win a lot of friends by robbing people in other States to hand out money to unemployed Alaskans who are unemployed largely because of federal government interference in State affairs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"   Juliana Smith (16:16:56) : </p>
<p>Sarah Palin is just finishing up all her last minute concerns before leaving her office.<br />
Interesting, Sarah decides to write about America’s unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing.<br />
Sarah could of taken an opportunity to create jobs for Alaskans by participating to receive Obama’s Stimulus Relief to create JOBS.    &#8220;&#8221;"</p>
<p>Well aren&#8217;t you the generous one Juliana.   How much money did you personally contribute to  &#8220;Obama’s Stimulus Relief to create JOBS.&#8221; ?</p>
<p>How much did Obama himself contribute?  As for the money; it has all gone; but less than 10% of it has been spent; the rest went into peole&#8217;s pockets, or is promised to future socialist programs; which will create zero jobs, and very little of the money that has been spent has created ANY jobs; we are still losing jobs at around a half million a month; so no jobs have been created by &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Stimulus Relief&#8221;.</p>
<p>As for Alaskans; they would have plenty of jobs if the federal government just got out of the way, and let Alaskans run their own Sovereign Republic State.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Governor Palin would win a lot of friends by robbing people in other States to hand out money to unemployed Alaskans who are unemployed largely because of federal government interference in State affairs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJA</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TJA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The woman who tried to ruin a country with corner shop economics&quot;

I would be interested to see your version of UK economic growth and unemployment trends for the decade before and the decades after Thatcher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The woman who tried to ruin a country with corner shop economics&#8221;</p>
<p>I would be interested to see your version of UK economic growth and unemployment trends for the decade before and the decades after Thatcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJA</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TJA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Miners drink a lot of beer. I’ll take my wellies.&quot;

What is so funny about this politically correct hatred of Thatcher, is that so much of it comes from the very coal miners that the left are trying to completely devastate with things like Cap and Trade.  I saw Billy Elliot in Soho last winter, and the hatred for her expressed in that play approaches the hatred of Bush, and almost the hatred of Sarah Palin here. All the time, the irony of the absolute political incorrectness of the miner&#039;s cause, and the apparent doublethink by the mostly British was quite a source of amusement. That and the dream number the gay kid character did, which was worth the price of the show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Miners drink a lot of beer. I’ll take my wellies.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is so funny about this politically correct hatred of Thatcher, is that so much of it comes from the very coal miners that the left are trying to completely devastate with things like Cap and Trade.  I saw Billy Elliot in Soho last winter, and the hatred for her expressed in that play approaches the hatred of Bush, and almost the hatred of Sarah Palin here. All the time, the irony of the absolute political incorrectness of the miner&#8217;s cause, and the apparent doublethink by the mostly British was quite a source of amusement. That and the dream number the gay kid character did, which was worth the price of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallbloke</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/13/palin-takes-a-stand-in-wapo-blasts-cap-and-trade/#comment-159900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tallbloke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9336#comment-159900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;E.M.Smith (11:33:43) :
“Do I compromise my fundamental beliefs to get this law passed?” &lt;/i&gt;

How about &quot;Do I support cap and trade to get the Vice Presidency&quot;

Maybe a bit below the belt. Perhaps she thought she&#039;d be able to subvert from within.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>E.M.Smith (11:33:43) :<br />
“Do I compromise my fundamental beliefs to get this law passed?” </i></p>
<p>How about &#8220;Do I support cap and trade to get the Vice Presidency&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe a bit below the belt. Perhaps she thought she&#8217;d be able to subvert from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

