<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The success penalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyB</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-156151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TonyB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-156151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ann&#039;s New Friend (15:59:27) : said

&quot;Johnny Honda is onto something. Perhaps we should turn it into a “pledge.” “I pledge to keep my carbon footprint smaller than Al Gore’s.” 


I hereby volunteer to keep my carbon footprint below that of Sting and Bono.
Obviously we are setting ourselves tough targets but someone needs to take a lead.     :)

Tonyb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann&#8217;s New Friend (15:59:27) : said</p>
<p>&#8220;Johnny Honda is onto something. Perhaps we should turn it into a “pledge.” “I pledge to keep my carbon footprint smaller than Al Gore’s.” </p>
<p>I hereby volunteer to keep my carbon footprint below that of Sting and Bono.<br />
Obviously we are setting ourselves tough targets but someone needs to take a lead.     :)</p>
<p>Tonyb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-156089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-156089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is that a GL320 SUV that Sheryl is driving? It&#039;s EPA rating is 17/23 MPG.  About the same as my 99 Ford Taurus ... whoop dee doo Sheryl, here, have another square on me!

I think what cap n&#039; trade (or &quot;tax n&#039; crap&quot;, whatever) might do is expand welfare to a global scale whereby the people of the 3rd world will become totally dependent receiving money to NOT use their own energy resources, (by them selling us their &quot;carbon credits&quot;), so that rich elitists can then take control of those resources.  That will prevent 3rd world countries from having any hope of ever becoming rich thus sentencing them to huge populations, poverty and disease forever.    Add in the bio-fuel mandate and you can add starvation to the list.

Are you listening in Nigeria?  Why wait, start printing up those carbon credits right now! (and to show respect for Sheryl, print them on toilet paper).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a GL320 SUV that Sheryl is driving? It&#8217;s EPA rating is 17/23 MPG.  About the same as my 99 Ford Taurus &#8230; whoop dee doo Sheryl, here, have another square on me!</p>
<p>I think what cap n&#8217; trade (or &#8220;tax n&#8217; crap&#8221;, whatever) might do is expand welfare to a global scale whereby the people of the 3rd world will become totally dependent receiving money to NOT use their own energy resources, (by them selling us their &#8220;carbon credits&#8221;), so that rich elitists can then take control of those resources.  That will prevent 3rd world countries from having any hope of ever becoming rich thus sentencing them to huge populations, poverty and disease forever.    Add in the bio-fuel mandate and you can add starvation to the list.</p>
<p>Are you listening in Nigeria?  Why wait, start printing up those carbon credits right now! (and to show respect for Sheryl, print them on toilet paper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, you wrote: &quot;However, you’re missing the other part of this and that is that part of those massive energy revenues will be most likely redistributed back to low-income people within developed nations.&quot;

You are probably right, but therein lies the dilema. If energy is taxed to make it too expensive, and the revenue from this tax is then given back to those who would be unable to purchase it, then suddenly they will be able to purchase it, thus defeating the whole purpose of the exercise. Emissions will never decrease under this scenario.

When I said that cap and trade marginalises the poor, I was referring to the idealized or pure concept of cap and trade. I understand that the current bill is loaded with just such contingencies that you refer to. Therefore it won&#039;t work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you wrote: &#8220;However, you’re missing the other part of this and that is that part of those massive energy revenues will be most likely redistributed back to low-income people within developed nations.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are probably right, but therein lies the dilema. If energy is taxed to make it too expensive, and the revenue from this tax is then given back to those who would be unable to purchase it, then suddenly they will be able to purchase it, thus defeating the whole purpose of the exercise. Emissions will never decrease under this scenario.</p>
<p>When I said that cap and trade marginalises the poor, I was referring to the idealized or pure concept of cap and trade. I understand that the current bill is loaded with just such contingencies that you refer to. Therefore it won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert A Cook PE</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert A Cook PE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M. Simon (17:02:02) :

How big a house does one need?

About 20 sq ft per person. Room enough for a bed a chair and a very small cook stove.


--

And if they feed you at the communal tables down the corridor, your cell (er, house) for you and youe entire family only needs to be 6 ft wide x 8 ft long ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M. Simon (17:02:02) :</p>
<p>How big a house does one need?</p>
<p>About 20 sq ft per person. Room enough for a bed a chair and a very small cook stove.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>And if they feed you at the communal tables down the corridor, your cell (er, house) for you and youe entire family only needs to be 6 ft wide x 8 ft long &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;You don’t seriously believe that governments are going to make it harder for low-income people by making things more expensive for them, do you?&lt;/i&gt;

Actually - yes I do.

We have the example of Zimbabwe to show what can be done if we really get serious.

http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2009/07/meeting_the_tar.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You don’t seriously believe that governments are going to make it harder for low-income people by making things more expensive for them, do you?</i></p>
<p>Actually &#8211; yes I do.</p>
<p>We have the example of Zimbabwe to show what can be done if we really get serious.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2009/07/meeting_the_tar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2009/07/meeting_the_tar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;How big a house does one need?&lt;/i&gt;

About 20 sq ft per person. Room enough for a bed a chair and a very small cook stove.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How big a house does one need?</i></p>
<p>About 20 sq ft per person. Room enough for a bed a chair and a very small cook stove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann's New Friend</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann's New Friend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johnny Honda is onto something.  Perhaps we should turn it into a &quot;pledge.&quot; &quot;I pledge to keep my carbon footprint smaller than Al Gore&#039;s.&quot;  

I like it!  

It&#039;s high time that Gore and his Hollywood Hypocrites got called on it.  May the shovel-ready material hit the fan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny Honda is onto something.  Perhaps we should turn it into a &#8220;pledge.&#8221; &#8220;I pledge to keep my carbon footprint smaller than Al Gore&#8217;s.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I like it!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s high time that Gore and his Hollywood Hypocrites got called on it.  May the shovel-ready material hit the fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re, Vincent (10:42:05):

Vincent,

You said &quot;It should be clear from this description that the poor will be able to purchase less goods and services because the energy that underpins their creation will be artificially made scarce. &quot;

Well, this is true. However, you&#039;re missing the other part of this and that is that part of those massive energy revenues will be most likely redistributed back to low-income people within developed nations. You don&#039;t seriously believe that governments are going to make it harder for low-income people by making things more expensive for them, do you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re, Vincent (10:42:05):</p>
<p>Vincent,</p>
<p>You said &#8220;It should be clear from this description that the poor will be able to purchase less goods and services because the energy that underpins their creation will be artificially made scarce. &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, this is true. However, you&#8217;re missing the other part of this and that is that part of those massive energy revenues will be most likely redistributed back to low-income people within developed nations. You don&#8217;t seriously believe that governments are going to make it harder for low-income people by making things more expensive for them, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curiousgeorge</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curiousgeorge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George, Cheryl is a country singer who gained notoriety a while back for a comment she made about how much toilet paper should be used per sitting.  One sheet.  Various conservative talk shows ridiculed her for weeks, and she became the poster girl for liberal hippocracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, Cheryl is a country singer who gained notoriety a while back for a comment she made about how much toilet paper should be used per sitting.  One sheet.  Various conservative talk shows ridiculed her for weeks, and she became the poster girl for liberal hippocracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E. Smith</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to ask; but who the blazes is Cheryl Crow; and what is her relationship with Daimler Benz company; is this something I need to know ?

George]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to ask; but who the blazes is Cheryl Crow; and what is her relationship with Daimler Benz company; is this something I need to know ?</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curiousgeorge</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curiousgeorge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ John Galt (13:47:12) :

&quot;............................ Nor has anybody ever found direct evidence that ‘carbon’ is causing any climate changes, so the whole thing is just a load of crap anyway.&quot;

Hence, my earlier comment about my septic tank capacity. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ John Galt (13:47:12) :</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Nor has anybody ever found direct evidence that ‘carbon’ is causing any climate changes, so the whole thing is just a load of crap anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hence, my earlier comment about my septic tank capacity. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallbloke</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tallbloke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Vincent (12:30:08) :
 is not that socialism worked, it obviously did not. .... drove those wealthy enough to afford it to emigrate.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah. The aim of the Club of Rome lurking in the background (Tony B Liar is a member) is to institute world government. There will be no co2 tax havens to emigrate to. In the big scheme, it&#039;s felt that we&#039;re better off having all the dirty industry and the concomitant pollution, health and social welfare issues around it hived off to the near and far east. This will leave the west to thrive on hi tech services and research and development. Ho Ho.

The truth is, the populations of the west are going to get shafted, and the jet setters will go to live somewhere warm and tropical when the going gets cold.

I&#039;m saving hard for a bit of land within 9 degrees of the equator, in a culturally rich, religiously tolerant country with no oil reserves to worry about defending. I like walking anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Vincent (12:30:08) :<br />
 is not that socialism worked, it obviously did not. &#8230;. drove those wealthy enough to afford it to emigrate.</i></p>
<p>Yeah. The aim of the Club of Rome lurking in the background (Tony B Liar is a member) is to institute world government. There will be no co2 tax havens to emigrate to. In the big scheme, it&#8217;s felt that we&#8217;re better off having all the dirty industry and the concomitant pollution, health and social welfare issues around it hived off to the near and far east. This will leave the west to thrive on hi tech services and research and development. Ho Ho.</p>
<p>The truth is, the populations of the west are going to get shafted, and the jet setters will go to live somewhere warm and tropical when the going gets cold.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m saving hard for a bit of land within 9 degrees of the equator, in a culturally rich, religiously tolerant country with no oil reserves to worry about defending. I like walking anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Galt</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Galt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow, it &lt;i&gt;almost&lt;/i&gt; seems right when we&#039;re talking about preachy celebs and other elitists who live jet-setter lifestyles while telling the rest of us to live with less.

But I don&#039;t believe in class warfare or in punishing success. Nor has anybody ever found direct evidence that &#039;carbon&#039; is causing any climate changes, so the whole thing is just a load of crap anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, it <i>almost</i> seems right when we&#8217;re talking about preachy celebs and other elitists who live jet-setter lifestyles while telling the rest of us to live with less.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t believe in class warfare or in punishing success. Nor has anybody ever found direct evidence that &#8216;carbon&#8217; is causing any climate changes, so the whole thing is just a load of crap anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert A Cook PE</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert A Cook PE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmn.

Lettuce begin by taxing 90% of Hollywood&#039;s money.  
Then continue by taking all of New York&#039;s money earned - say, just picking an arbitrary source - by speculating in stocks.
Then we could tax 50% of any money given by the federal government to any receiptant of a non-defense federal W-2, starting with a 75% surcharge on Congress and the White House.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmn.</p>
<p>Lettuce begin by taxing 90% of Hollywood&#8217;s money.<br />
Then continue by taking all of New York&#8217;s money earned &#8211; say, just picking an arbitrary source &#8211; by speculating in stocks.<br />
Then we could tax 50% of any money given by the federal government to any receiptant of a non-defense federal W-2, starting with a 75% surcharge on Congress and the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallbloke</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/06/the-success-penalty/#comment-155454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tallbloke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=9147#comment-155454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Indiana Bones (10:29:12) :

tallbloke (03:21:14) :

You win the virtual Grammy! (Yank music award)&lt;/i&gt;

Aww Geeee, thank you!
I&#039;d just like to say I couldn&#039;t have achieved this without my tireless hardworking support staff, and my BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Indiana Bones (10:29:12) :</p>
<p>tallbloke (03:21:14) :</p>
<p>You win the virtual Grammy! (Yank music award)</i></p>
<p>Aww Geeee, thank you!<br />
I&#8217;d just like to say I couldn&#8217;t have achieved this without my tireless hardworking support staff, and my BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

