<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your chance to tell NOAA/NWS what you think about &#8220;climate services&#8221;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Smith</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-132381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-132381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pops: Running Mac OS-X here with Safari, and &quot;Block Pop-up Windows&quot; checked. I haven&#039;t seen a single pop-up ad.

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; That&#039;s because there are no popup ads on WUWT, and I would NEVER allow any.. If you are getting popup ads, then your system is infected with malware or adware of some sorts. - Anthony]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pops: Running Mac OS-X here with Safari, and &#8220;Block Pop-up Windows&#8221; checked. I haven&#8217;t seen a single pop-up ad.</p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> That&#8217;s because there are no popup ads on WUWT, and I would NEVER allow any.. If you are getting popup ads, then your system is infected with malware or adware of some sorts. &#8211; Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-132315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-132315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re. Nuclear energy -

Well I can sincerely say I hope you people are right about the radiation and residuals management for nuclear waste.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. Nuclear energy -</p>
<p>Well I can sincerely say I hope you people are right about the radiation and residuals management for nuclear waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Spencer</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-132142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H. Spencer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-132142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an irony to this discussion.  Mike Hall, now retired, was one of the individuals who played a key role in establishing climate change research in the Federal system in 1988 under George Bush Sr.  Mike was responsible for the Office of Global Programs now known as the Climate Program Office.  He, unlike his colleagues at other Federal agencies, deliberately chose to focus on climate variability rather than long term climate change.  Because of his unit&#039;s research and the operationalization of the work by National Weather Service we have a great deal of the information Watts up and other information sources present on El Nino and the PDO.

More importantly for this discussion the work by Mike, and later leaders, also recognized the need for linking that information to decision support.  NOAA&#039;s funding of research and operations associated with river forecasting and management, forest fire forecasting and logistics support, agriculture decision support, and drought management have made significant contributions to helping manage the impacts of climate variability and drought.

The challenge you identify, however, is that if the service focuses strictly on climate change given the ambiguities and discrepancies that exist about the concept it is possible that NOAA will find itself allocating resources to a mirage of a problem and ignoring the valuable work it is doing with regards to climate variability.

There may well be a need for a climate service but it is one that needs to be able to continue to advance the successes that have been achieved with seasonal and decadal research.  On the long term trends it needs to have a enough room to manouver that should the current theory be falsified it is able to address what are considered currently as outliers in the mainstream thought such as global cooling due to solar variability.

Do I think a climate service could be of value?  I do, but with the caveat that it is not trapped in focusing only on long term trends as understood by GCM output but rather is focused on addressing climate issues of value to decision makers across a range of temporal and spatial scales.  

Given the scale of the current budget deficits the issue may rapidly become moot if significant budget cuts are triggered over the next 2-3 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an irony to this discussion.  Mike Hall, now retired, was one of the individuals who played a key role in establishing climate change research in the Federal system in 1988 under George Bush Sr.  Mike was responsible for the Office of Global Programs now known as the Climate Program Office.  He, unlike his colleagues at other Federal agencies, deliberately chose to focus on climate variability rather than long term climate change.  Because of his unit&#8217;s research and the operationalization of the work by National Weather Service we have a great deal of the information Watts up and other information sources present on El Nino and the PDO.</p>
<p>More importantly for this discussion the work by Mike, and later leaders, also recognized the need for linking that information to decision support.  NOAA&#8217;s funding of research and operations associated with river forecasting and management, forest fire forecasting and logistics support, agriculture decision support, and drought management have made significant contributions to helping manage the impacts of climate variability and drought.</p>
<p>The challenge you identify, however, is that if the service focuses strictly on climate change given the ambiguities and discrepancies that exist about the concept it is possible that NOAA will find itself allocating resources to a mirage of a problem and ignoring the valuable work it is doing with regards to climate variability.</p>
<p>There may well be a need for a climate service but it is one that needs to be able to continue to advance the successes that have been achieved with seasonal and decadal research.  On the long term trends it needs to have a enough room to manouver that should the current theory be falsified it is able to address what are considered currently as outliers in the mainstream thought such as global cooling due to solar variability.</p>
<p>Do I think a climate service could be of value?  I do, but with the caveat that it is not trapped in focusing only on long term trends as understood by GCM output but rather is focused on addressing climate issues of value to decision makers across a range of temporal and spatial scales.  </p>
<p>Given the scale of the current budget deficits the issue may rapidly become moot if significant budget cuts are triggered over the next 2-3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3x2</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-132119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3x2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-132119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Don B (13:35:13) :
Someone should do a study about quality of stations. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Will nobody out there take up the challenge?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don B (13:35:13) :<br />
Someone should do a study about quality of stations. </p></blockquote>
<p>Will nobody out there take up the challenge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtom</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-132114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jtom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-132114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same problem here outside Atlanta as Bill had in AL. I geared up to work on my roof this past Tuesday based on a 5 am forecast calling for a 20% chance of rain. It began raining before noon over a widespread area that lasted several hours.

When there is a major storm system crossing the country, anyone in front of it can predict what the weather will be. 

When conditions are setting up which are favorable to a weather change (e.g., sudden storm build-up, or the creation of a storm system), or there are no prevailing systems, models must be used to forecast what will happen. 

And the models suck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same problem here outside Atlanta as Bill had in AL. I geared up to work on my roof this past Tuesday based on a 5 am forecast calling for a 20% chance of rain. It began raining before noon over a widespread area that lasted several hours.</p>
<p>When there is a major storm system crossing the country, anyone in front of it can predict what the weather will be. </p>
<p>When conditions are setting up which are favorable to a weather change (e.g., sudden storm build-up, or the creation of a storm system), or there are no prevailing systems, models must be used to forecast what will happen. </p>
<p>And the models suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in Vigo</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill in Vigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not a commercial farmer. I agree with Pamela.  All the weather forecast are for the nearest major population center with their as and heat.  I grow to feed a large family and it makes a difference to me.  I buy fertilizer and insecticide based on the temperature and precipitation forecasts and they are practically never correct.  I have fertilizer in storage that has been in the barn for 3 years now.  If they want to provide the service that they intend they need to get off their AGW high horse and use empirical data not corrupted by manipulation.  They need to understand what drives the weather and use that for their models.  I know that it isn&#039;t exact but at least it should get close.  Here in NE Alabama the prediction of a warm dry spring is so cool and wet that many farms haven&#039;t been able to plant.  Perhaps we should put some of this stimulus moneys into true investigation of our weather systems so that we can get a better understanding of what makes up our climate.

Don&#039;t mean to be long winded but all we need is a division  of NOAA to argue with each other and compete.  I would love to see some investments in better surface stations properly located.  new satellites with better sensors and raw data back to 1895 as advertised.

Bill Derryberry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not a commercial farmer. I agree with Pamela.  All the weather forecast are for the nearest major population center with their as and heat.  I grow to feed a large family and it makes a difference to me.  I buy fertilizer and insecticide based on the temperature and precipitation forecasts and they are practically never correct.  I have fertilizer in storage that has been in the barn for 3 years now.  If they want to provide the service that they intend they need to get off their AGW high horse and use empirical data not corrupted by manipulation.  They need to understand what drives the weather and use that for their models.  I know that it isn&#8217;t exact but at least it should get close.  Here in NE Alabama the prediction of a warm dry spring is so cool and wet that many farms haven&#8217;t been able to plant.  Perhaps we should put some of this stimulus moneys into true investigation of our weather systems so that we can get a better understanding of what makes up our climate.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t mean to be long winded but all we need is a division  of NOAA to argue with each other and compete.  I would love to see some investments in better surface stations properly located.  new satellites with better sensors and raw data back to 1895 as advertised.</p>
<p>Bill Derryberry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pops - I&#039;m running Internet Explorer with no ad blockers or anything. I get the text google ads but nothing flash based or anything that jumps out.

I would advise a malware scan as you may have something that pops up these ads on your system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pops &#8211; I&#8217;m running Internet Explorer with no ad blockers or anything. I get the text google ads but nothing flash based or anything that jumps out.</p>
<p>I would advise a malware scan as you may have something that pops up these ads on your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took the long road survey.  My biggest beef is that predictions are wrong, wrong, wrong for areas of the country where there are crops.  We don&#039;t plant in the blankety blank fricken city park next to the water treatment plant and the weather sensor.  I have a wheat field that is no where near telephone poles or electric wires, let alone a road that can be navigated with a car.  Hell, Doppler radar doesn&#039;t even cover it.  The weather forecast is based on population centers, but I don&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass if a city dweller misses the weather report and leaves the umbrella behind on a rainy day.  However, they might get a bit testy with me if there is no bread on the table.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the long road survey.  My biggest beef is that predictions are wrong, wrong, wrong for areas of the country where there are crops.  We don&#8217;t plant in the blankety blank fricken city park next to the water treatment plant and the weather sensor.  I have a wheat field that is no where near telephone poles or electric wires, let alone a road that can be navigated with a car.  Hell, Doppler radar doesn&#8217;t even cover it.  The weather forecast is based on population centers, but I don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass if a city dweller misses the weather report and leaves the umbrella behind on a rainy day.  However, they might get a bit testy with me if there is no bread on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbateman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rbateman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don B (13:35:13) : 

You beat me to it.  
When I think of Climate Services, I immediately think of climate alteration.  Haven&#039;t taken the survey yet, will get to it shortly.  

Pamela Gray (17:22:19) : 
I&#039;m sure my distributor needs to know that too.  They need to know where to do thier sourcing for the year, to keep the shelves stocked with their feeds.  That would be an excellent service: adaptation to warming or cooling climate (and yes, weather-climate).
The sales reps eyes lit up when I told him of the Deep Solar Minimum.  The sound of gears turning in his head were deafening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don B (13:35:13) : </p>
<p>You beat me to it.<br />
When I think of Climate Services, I immediately think of climate alteration.  Haven&#8217;t taken the survey yet, will get to it shortly.  </p>
<p>Pamela Gray (17:22:19) :<br />
I&#8217;m sure my distributor needs to know that too.  They need to know where to do thier sourcing for the year, to keep the shelves stocked with their feeds.  That would be an excellent service: adaptation to warming or cooling climate (and yes, weather-climate).<br />
The sales reps eyes lit up when I told him of the Deep Solar Minimum.  The sound of gears turning in his head were deafening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bcreekski</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bcreekski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have never had any ads or pop ups. I use an ad blocker and that may be the reason. At any rate, I would not mind anything since you are doing yeoman work for all of us. I will send the comments but have the usual reservations regarding the NWS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never had any ads or pop ups. I use an ad blocker and that may be the reason. At any rate, I would not mind anything since you are doing yeoman work for all of us. I will send the comments but have the usual reservations regarding the NWS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t need a climate change service.  I need weather pattern variation prediction based on natural drivers so that I know whether or not to plant my spring wheat or stick with winter red.  These are not decisions I can make 3 weeks prior to implementation.  I need higher predictive accuracy a year or more in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t need a climate change service.  I need weather pattern variation prediction based on natural drivers so that I know whether or not to plant my spring wheat or stick with winter red.  These are not decisions I can make 3 weeks prior to implementation.  I need higher predictive accuracy a year or more in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awoxar</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awoxar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LlsMBK  &lt;a href=&quot;http://unjeosyvxcct.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unjeosyvxcct&lt;/a&gt;, [url=http://bitxlmobqzhx.com/]bitxlmobqzhx[/url], [link=http://tjujrfouryit.com/]tjujrfouryit[/link], http://yslqnpubmtdk.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LlsMBK  <a href="http://unjeosyvxcct.com/" rel="nofollow">unjeosyvxcct</a>, [url=http://bitxlmobqzhx.com/]bitxlmobqzhx[/url], [link=http://tjujrfouryit.com/]tjujrfouryit[/link], <a href="http://yslqnpubmtdk.com/" rel="nofollow">http://yslqnpubmtdk.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Woods</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely off-topic for this post but certainly worth a blog entry of it&#039;s own, and maybe even a &quot;Quote of the week&quot;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090514/ap_on_re_ca/cn_canada_britain_polar_explorers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;British explorers cut short trek to North Pole&lt;/a&gt;

Beginning of article:

  By CHARMAINE NORONHA, Associated Press Writer Charmaine Noronha, Associated Press Writer   – 1 hr 20 mins ago

TORONTO – &lt;b&gt;British explorers in northern Canada to measure the thickness of floating Arctic sea ice ended their expedition short of reaching the North Pole due to an early summer ice melt&lt;/b&gt;, the team said Thursday.

Explorers Pen Hadow, Ann Daniel and photographer Martin Hartley had planned a three-month journey to the North Pole, but ended their arduous trek Wednesday, approximately 304 miles (490 kilometers) from their destination, said Hadow.

The trio stopped after 73 days, during which they measured the thickness of floating sea ice to provide data to scientists studying the impact of global warming in the region.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;This year, the summer melt came a little early***&quot;&lt;/b&gt; Hadow said during a Webcast conference from Resolute Bay in northern Canada


***There&#039;s your quote of the week, maybe of the year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely off-topic for this post but certainly worth a blog entry of it&#8217;s own, and maybe even a &#8220;Quote of the week&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090514/ap_on_re_ca/cn_canada_britain_polar_explorers" rel="nofollow">British explorers cut short trek to North Pole</a></p>
<p>Beginning of article:</p>
<p>  By CHARMAINE NORONHA, Associated Press Writer Charmaine Noronha, Associated Press Writer   – 1 hr 20 mins ago</p>
<p>TORONTO – <b>British explorers in northern Canada to measure the thickness of floating Arctic sea ice ended their expedition short of reaching the North Pole due to an early summer ice melt</b>, the team said Thursday.</p>
<p>Explorers Pen Hadow, Ann Daniel and photographer Martin Hartley had planned a three-month journey to the North Pole, but ended their arduous trek Wednesday, approximately 304 miles (490 kilometers) from their destination, said Hadow.</p>
<p>The trio stopped after 73 days, during which they measured the thickness of floating sea ice to provide data to scientists studying the impact of global warming in the region.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;This year, the summer melt came a little early***&#8221;</b> Hadow said during a Webcast conference from Resolute Bay in northern Canada</p>
<p>***There&#8217;s your quote of the week, maybe of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Sceptic</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UK Sceptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhat O/T.  It seems that I&#039;ve been providing a climate service peripheral over the last week.

Climate depot has used a couple of my graphics (I take photographs and produce simple graphic designs as a hobby and licence them to be used for free).  First my &quot;No BS&quot; graphic to illustrate on article on Plimer&#039;s excellent book and now my witch image.

http://www.climatedepot.com/

I&#039;m well chuffed that the images are being used in a good cause.  However, there&#039;s a flipside to this as I discovered yesterday:

http://www.supereco.com/news/2009/05/13/epa-effectiveness-on-the-upswing/

Do you think the supereco webmaster will listen if I explained to him/her that the cooling tower emissions in my power station image are water vapour and not CO2?

;0)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat O/T.  It seems that I&#8217;ve been providing a climate service peripheral over the last week.</p>
<p>Climate depot has used a couple of my graphics (I take photographs and produce simple graphic designs as a hobby and licence them to be used for free).  First my &#8220;No BS&#8221; graphic to illustrate on article on Plimer&#8217;s excellent book and now my witch image.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatedepot.com/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m well chuffed that the images are being used in a good cause.  However, there&#8217;s a flipside to this as I discovered yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.supereco.com/news/2009/05/13/epa-effectiveness-on-the-upswing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.supereco.com/news/2009/05/13/epa-effectiveness-on-the-upswing/</a></p>
<p>Do you think the supereco webmaster will listen if I explained to him/her that the cooling tower emissions in my power station image are water vapour and not CO2?</p>
<p>;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jorgekafkazar</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/14/your-chance-to-tell-the-nws-what-you-think-about-climate-services/#comment-131865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jorgekafkazar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7836#comment-131865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see any flash ads. All is see is some text ads and a little icon, a cartoon of James Hansen wearing his floppy white hat...and a trench coat, and...oh, wait...aaaaughgh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any flash ads. All is see is some text ads and a little icon, a cartoon of James Hansen wearing his floppy white hat&#8230;and a trench coat, and&#8230;oh, wait&#8230;aaaaughgh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

