<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WUWT Poll: Do we need a &#8220;National Climate Service&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wansbeck</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-129325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wansbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-129325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnonyMoose (11:36:25) :
&quot;Wansbeck (17:38:09)
.....  1. You’re implying that population densities must increase. You’re obviously not aware that birth rates have been declining.”

I am not implying that anything must increase and I am well aware of declining birth rates and that the birth rate of immigrants has tended towards the norm after a generation or two but people are still moving from rural to urban areas although our banker friends have reversed some of this as unemployed manufacturing workers return to the country. 

I wonder if any bankers will receive a Nobel Prize for their part in reducing carbon emissions ;-) 

As for “You probably also don’t get out of town much and observe there is plenty of empty space.” 
I live in North East England and frequently visit miles of beaches so unspoilt that they have been used by the Alberta tourist office in a recent promotion much to their embarrassment.

This is the region where much of the industrial revolution started.  Within a short drive I can visit the first house in the world to be lit by incandescent electric lights ( powered by hydro-electricity), the worlds first turbine powered ship or the home of much of the worlds railways yet, as you say, there is still plenty of open space.

Sadly there is nothing left of the shipyards that once built a large part of the world&#039;s navies.  As I write the last of the cranes are being transported for use in India. 

Unless they&#039;ve been captured by pirates!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AnonyMoose (11:36:25) :<br />
&#8220;Wansbeck (17:38:09)<br />
&#8230;..  1. You’re implying that population densities must increase. You’re obviously not aware that birth rates have been declining.”</p>
<p>I am not implying that anything must increase and I am well aware of declining birth rates and that the birth rate of immigrants has tended towards the norm after a generation or two but people are still moving from rural to urban areas although our banker friends have reversed some of this as unemployed manufacturing workers return to the country. </p>
<p>I wonder if any bankers will receive a Nobel Prize for their part in reducing carbon emissions ;-) </p>
<p>As for “You probably also don’t get out of town much and observe there is plenty of empty space.”<br />
I live in North East England and frequently visit miles of beaches so unspoilt that they have been used by the Alberta tourist office in a recent promotion much to their embarrassment.</p>
<p>This is the region where much of the industrial revolution started.  Within a short drive I can visit the first house in the world to be lit by incandescent electric lights ( powered by hydro-electricity), the worlds first turbine powered ship or the home of much of the worlds railways yet, as you say, there is still plenty of open space.</p>
<p>Sadly there is nothing left of the shipyards that once built a large part of the world&#8217;s navies.  As I write the last of the cranes are being transported for use in India. </p>
<p>Unless they&#8217;ve been captured by pirates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-129265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-129265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Public Radio program &lt;i&gt;Living on Earth&lt;/i&gt; broadcast an with interview Jane Lubchenco this morning (Saturday, 9 May 2009).  The purpose of the National Climate Service will be to prove global warming.  You can hear it here:  http://www.loe.org/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Public Radio program <i>Living on Earth</i> broadcast an with interview Jane Lubchenco this morning (Saturday, 9 May 2009).  The purpose of the National Climate Service will be to prove global warming.  You can hear it here:  <a href="http://www.loe.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.loe.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Woods</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-129161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-129161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do believe that a new national climate service should be commenced. With that being said, I would hope the new service would have state of the art monitoring equipment to replace outdated and erroneous equipment. Placing such equipment in well-sited areas and adjusted properly for urban heat island effects. All data gathered should be transparent and since this being a tax-payer funded operation all scientific studies written off such data should allow free public access to such papers. This new service should serve as a climatic data clearinghouse without agenda or political motive. With that being said I would also hope those working under the name of this service aren&#039;t global warming blowhards, strive for accuracy and avoid making predictions of when the sea-ice will melt away in the arctic or when we&#039;ll all be feral dehydrated warring tribes of climate refugees dodging methane fireballs burping out of the ocean whilst living on the last habitable continent on the planet, Antarctica. 

Picture it, billions of people standing on some ice sheet like penguins in a blizzard thinking, &quot;Gee, I think we were duped&quot; but too afraid to admit it for fear of being branded a heretic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe that a new national climate service should be commenced. With that being said, I would hope the new service would have state of the art monitoring equipment to replace outdated and erroneous equipment. Placing such equipment in well-sited areas and adjusted properly for urban heat island effects. All data gathered should be transparent and since this being a tax-payer funded operation all scientific studies written off such data should allow free public access to such papers. This new service should serve as a climatic data clearinghouse without agenda or political motive. With that being said I would also hope those working under the name of this service aren&#8217;t global warming blowhards, strive for accuracy and avoid making predictions of when the sea-ice will melt away in the arctic or when we&#8217;ll all be feral dehydrated warring tribes of climate refugees dodging methane fireballs burping out of the ocean whilst living on the last habitable continent on the planet, Antarctica. </p>
<p>Picture it, billions of people standing on some ice sheet like penguins in a blizzard thinking, &#8220;Gee, I think we were duped&#8221; but too afraid to admit it for fear of being branded a heretic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-129096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-129096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short answer - No.   
Long answer - H___ No!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short answer &#8211; No.<br />
Long answer &#8211; H___ No!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bryant</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-129038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bryant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-129038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;AnonyMoose (12:31:43) : 
A National Climate Service might end up with the job of rating how well polar bears and bigfoot tribes are doing.&quot;

I hadn&#039;t thought of it before, but since bigfoot is obviously a relative of the yeti, it makes perfect sense that bigfoot must be just as endangered as the polar bears. Thanks, anon, for pointing that out.
Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;AnonyMoose (12:31:43) :<br />
A National Climate Service might end up with the job of rating how well polar bears and bigfoot tribes are doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t thought of it before, but since bigfoot is obviously a relative of the yeti, it makes perfect sense that bigfoot must be just as endangered as the polar bears. Thanks, anon, for pointing that out.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smokey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Code Tech&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;The current zones are in relatively logical locations for their respective climates.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some of the zones might make sense, but I don&#039;t understand how the climate can be similar within the People&#039;s Soviet Western Regional Climate Center, which contains both Alaska and Hawaii.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Code Tech</b>:<br />
<blockquote>The current zones are in relatively logical locations for their respective climates.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some of the zones might make sense, but I don&#8217;t understand how the climate can be similar within the People&#8217;s Soviet Western Regional Climate Center, which contains both Alaska and Hawaii.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonyMoose</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnonyMoose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A National Climate Service might end up with the job of rating how well polar bears and bigfoot tribes are doing.  If officials don&#039;t have a population census, they&#039;ll issue official ratings of the sizes of estimated living zones and use that to control what is allowed to affect those regions.  Until someone is able to point out their errors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A National Climate Service might end up with the job of rating how well polar bears and bigfoot tribes are doing.  If officials don&#8217;t have a population census, they&#8217;ll issue official ratings of the sizes of estimated living zones and use that to control what is allowed to affect those regions.  Until someone is able to point out their errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodNfish</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[woodNfish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adolfo Giurfa - I&#039;ve read both of your posts. What&#039;s your point?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adolfo Giurfa &#8211; I&#8217;ve read both of your posts. What&#8217;s your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bryant</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bryant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cpt. Charles,
&quot;As much as the Beltway Critters would like to be the center of the universe, a cap-and-trade [authority] network needs more than one command node.&quot;

Good point, all those new green soldiers.... i mean workers need bases...

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded”.
Just some more billions to make sure we are all green as we should be...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cpt. Charles,<br />
&#8220;As much as the Beltway Critters would like to be the center of the universe, a cap-and-trade [authority] network needs more than one command node.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good point, all those new green soldiers&#8230;. i mean workers need bases&#8230;</p>
<p>“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded”.<br />
Just some more billions to make sure we are all green as we should be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonyMoose</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnonyMoose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Wansbeck (17:38:09) : As population density increases and resources become scarcer we will need a better understanding of climate variations to assist planning and avoid disaster.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
1.  You&#039;re implying that population densities must increase. You&#039;re obviously not aware that birth rates have been declining.  In many regions the birth rate is below the replacement rate, so population growth would be negative if immigration was not happening.  You probably also don&#039;t get out of town much and observe there is plenty of empty space.
2. Many resources are being recycled, and with cheap nuclear-generated electricity more can be recycled (in a laboratory anything from a landfill can be broken down to component elements, but we need industrial versions of the equipment).  You&#039;re also not thinking outside your nest.  There are plenty of raw materials in asteroids.
3. We need better understanding of everything.  And desire and funding to do what is needed to execute good planning and avoid disaster.  New York City needs to be moved due to geologic, weather, tsunami, and glacial problems, but is it likely to be moved?  And a sea level rise of six inches or six feet won&#039;t be enough to move it -- except maybe cause the whole city to be raised several feet as Galveston did.  A few degrees in temperature won&#039;t affect New York City as much as if it was farmland on the edge of a desert (and I&#039;m not saying what kind of temperature change would cause what kind of change to the farmland).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Wansbeck (17:38:09) : As population density increases and resources become scarcer we will need a better understanding of climate variations to assist planning and avoid disaster.
</p></blockquote>
<p>1.  You&#8217;re implying that population densities must increase. You&#8217;re obviously not aware that birth rates have been declining.  In many regions the birth rate is below the replacement rate, so population growth would be negative if immigration was not happening.  You probably also don&#8217;t get out of town much and observe there is plenty of empty space.<br />
2. Many resources are being recycled, and with cheap nuclear-generated electricity more can be recycled (in a laboratory anything from a landfill can be broken down to component elements, but we need industrial versions of the equipment).  You&#8217;re also not thinking outside your nest.  There are plenty of raw materials in asteroids.<br />
3. We need better understanding of everything.  And desire and funding to do what is needed to execute good planning and avoid disaster.  New York City needs to be moved due to geologic, weather, tsunami, and glacial problems, but is it likely to be moved?  And a sea level rise of six inches or six feet won&#8217;t be enough to move it &#8212; except maybe cause the whole city to be raised several feet as Galveston did.  A few degrees in temperature won&#8217;t affect New York City as much as if it was farmland on the edge of a desert (and I&#8217;m not saying what kind of temperature change would cause what kind of change to the farmland).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT. Charles</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CPT. Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The semi-joking aside, some of the comments have brushed against the potential &#039;utility&#039; of this new entity.  And doubtlessly, some of the other observations are correct: information control, to include &#039;co-ordination&#039; of data...just as a clever gang of thieves insure they have the same &#039;cover story&#039; when they&#039;re brought in for questioning.

But I see something entirely different; I see proto-&#039;administrative&#039; zones.  That&#039;s not to say they won&#039;t start out as advertised, but I can &#039;game&#039; out the logistical/administrative difficulties of a national GHG/CO2 control authority [among other things...].  As much as the Beltway Critters would like to be the center of the universe, a cap-and-trade [authority] network needs more than one command node.

Granted, this a &#039;gut&#039; hunch on my part, but you should note that these &#039;districts&#039; aren&#039;t totally distinct weather zones, but they are pretty distinct geo-political zones.

Just my 2 cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The semi-joking aside, some of the comments have brushed against the potential &#8216;utility&#8217; of this new entity.  And doubtlessly, some of the other observations are correct: information control, to include &#8216;co-ordination&#8217; of data&#8230;just as a clever gang of thieves insure they have the same &#8216;cover story&#8217; when they&#8217;re brought in for questioning.</p>
<p>But I see something entirely different; I see proto-&#8217;administrative&#8217; zones.  That&#8217;s not to say they won&#8217;t start out as advertised, but I can &#8216;game&#8217; out the logistical/administrative difficulties of a national GHG/CO2 control authority [among other things...].  As much as the Beltway Critters would like to be the center of the universe, a cap-and-trade [authority] network needs more than one command node.</p>
<p>Granted, this a &#8216;gut&#8217; hunch on my part, but you should note that these &#8216;districts&#8217; aren&#8217;t totally distinct weather zones, but they are pretty distinct geo-political zones.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adolfo Giurfa</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adolfo Giurfa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Heidegger&#039;s critique of anthropocentric humanism, his call for humanity to learn to &quot;let things be,&quot; his notion that humanity is involved in a &quot;play&quot; or &quot;dance&quot; with earth, sky, and gods, his meditation on the possibility of an authentic mode of &quot;dwelling&quot; on the earth, his complaint that industrial technology is laying waste to the earth, his emphasis on the importance of local place and &quot;homeland,&quot; his claim that humanity should guard and preserve things, instead of dominating them -- all these aspects of Heidegger&#039;s thought help to support the claim that he is a major deep ecological theorist.&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Heidegger&#8217;s critique of anthropocentric humanism, his call for humanity to learn to &#8220;let things be,&#8221; his notion that humanity is involved in a &#8220;play&#8221; or &#8220;dance&#8221; with earth, sky, and gods, his meditation on the possibility of an authentic mode of &#8220;dwelling&#8221; on the earth, his complaint that industrial technology is laying waste to the earth, his emphasis on the importance of local place and &#8220;homeland,&#8221; his claim that humanity should guard and preserve things, instead of dominating them &#8212; all these aspects of Heidegger&#8217;s thought help to support the claim that he is a major deep ecological theorist.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Heretic</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Heretic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes we should do it, Create a Department of Climate Truth and Conformity with a Divsion of Politcally Correct Climate Speak

DCTC/PCCS - Does not seem as bad as an acronym...

We can then be sure of only the most accurate and acceptable data for desemination to the people. The message is getting muddled because of all the sources of data keeping each other honest and the lack of coherent vocabulary that must only...

Invoke images of Unicorns in Meadows being Killed by Oil Corporations as they defile the planet and the Government with the &quot;full faith and backing&quot; ( read massive amounts of tax revenue) of the people is the only entity capable of standing in the way of these evil monliths of Capitalism that sacrifice the environment daily in the name of the cursed profit!

All Hail Central Planning! All Hail Group Think via Manipulation of Science! All Hail Massive Government Spending! All Hail Government the New Masters of the Climate!

Ok I got carried away... actually it is a very bad idea because of the real danger of central point distribution of data can lead to biases in when and how information is made available and reduce the innovation being applied in interpreting said data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we should do it, Create a Department of Climate Truth and Conformity with a Divsion of Politcally Correct Climate Speak</p>
<p>DCTC/PCCS &#8211; Does not seem as bad as an acronym&#8230;</p>
<p>We can then be sure of only the most accurate and acceptable data for desemination to the people. The message is getting muddled because of all the sources of data keeping each other honest and the lack of coherent vocabulary that must only&#8230;</p>
<p>Invoke images of Unicorns in Meadows being Killed by Oil Corporations as they defile the planet and the Government with the &#8220;full faith and backing&#8221; ( read massive amounts of tax revenue) of the people is the only entity capable of standing in the way of these evil monliths of Capitalism that sacrifice the environment daily in the name of the cursed profit!</p>
<p>All Hail Central Planning! All Hail Group Think via Manipulation of Science! All Hail Massive Government Spending! All Hail Government the New Masters of the Climate!</p>
<p>Ok I got carried away&#8230; actually it is a very bad idea because of the real danger of central point distribution of data can lead to biases in when and how information is made available and reduce the innovation being applied in interpreting said data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need a National Climate Service like we need a national eugenics service.
This is a transparent way to steal more money from taxpayers and to reward charlatans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a National Climate Service like we need a national eugenics service.<br />
This is a transparent way to steal more money from taxpayers and to reward charlatans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Harvey</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/wuwt-poll-do-we-need-a-national-climate-service/#comment-128737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claude Harvey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.com/?p=7662#comment-128737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I think a &quot;National Climate Service&quot; would improve our climate immensely. With our national climate bureaucracy fragmented the way it is now, our climate is just all over the place! Look at the difference between Florida and Nebraska!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think a &#8220;National Climate Service&#8221; would improve our climate immensely. With our national climate bureaucracy fragmented the way it is now, our climate is just all over the place! Look at the difference between Florida and Nebraska!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

