Quote:
magma resupply to the shallow Mauna Loa reservoir is episodic and is associated with eruption; during repose, extensive CO2 degassing and a low rate of magma resupply minimizes the CO2 content of stored reservoir magma.
Endquote

http://www.volcanic.com/library/agumonograph/agumonograph.html

Hmmm. Not the best site in the world for measuring CO2.

.

“That is a fantasy,” Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull told Fairfax Radio on Tuesday.

There were other countries with emissions trading schemes that were not working.

“The European scheme has been a debacle.”

Mr Turnbull said putting a carbon price on an Australian industry competing with developing countries that did not have a carbon price was simply exporting jobs and emissions.

He may be signalling a change in thinking.That statement is true,hopefully more people will realise it.

PS, where on Earth did Penny Wong come from?

The assumption that Penny Wong is from the planet Earth is still to be tested…

“Based on reports of oil and coal consumption the world is consuming 5% less of those two fuels. Yet the seasonally corrected CO2 trend keeps going up.”

The ice cores from Antarctica and elsewhere show that in deep time atmospheric CO2 levels always rise several hundred years AFTER temperatures warm – the leading theory being that warming oceans support less dissolved CO2 (i.e. warming leads to “outgassing”). There is not a single datapoint in those ice cores which would support a mechanism whereby CO2 rises first, causing temperatures to rise later – that just doesn’t happen. Additionally, there is no evidence from those ice cores which shows that temperatures have ever catastrophically ran away under some positive feedback mechanism as proposed in AGW theory.

The raises the possibility that much of the CO2 increase we have seen in the last hundred years or so is largely natural and the RESULT OF (not the CAUSE of) warming temperatures since the last ice age. Of course, you wont see Al Gore or the Alarmists talk too much about that…

David Karoly a national embarrassment is addressed along with others. I saw an interview on ABC’s Lateline program where Tony Jones described the book as “The great global warming swindle part 2″ and preceded to attack him with a single IPCC type argument “the last ten years has had so many off the hottest records in history etc etc”.

The ABC needs to wake up and at least present an unbiased view.

The article can be read here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25429080-7583,00.html

http://listentous.org.au/

Mauna Loa IS A VOLCANO, and it’s increasing its CO2 emissions, Period.

Based on reports of oil and coal consumption the world is consuming 5% less of those two fuels. Yet the seasonally corrected CO2 trend keeps going up.

Does this mean that if we reduce carbon fuel consumption atmospheric CO2 concentration goes up?

Year M trend
2008 1 385.18
2008 2 384.89
2008 3 384.41
2008 4 384.44
2008 5 385.42
2008 6 385.53
2008 7 385.88
2008 8 385.87
2008 9 386.37
2008 10 386.31
2008 11 386.24
2008 12 386.34
2009 1 386.68
2009 2 386.58
2009 3 387.24

I am sure that I am missing something. Somebody set me straight.

Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Thousands of years of human evolution, exponential growth in technology and access to a wealth of knowledge via the internet, open access education and public libraries, and what are we left with? The blind leading the blind. Faith-based Mac-Science not worth the paper it is written on.

At what point did science become a democratic (theocratic?) process? Einstein did not develop General Relatively based on a vote. Newton did not discover gravity through a lobby group or peer-pressure. Galileo did not determine that the Earth revolved around the Sun based on the “good word”.

Please, please, please, put your blind faith behind you and go read some books, blogs and anything you can get your hands on – you might actually learn something. But from your attitude, it may be too late – like so many you appear to have donned the AGW goggles – doomed to only see what fits into your little linear plastic building block model of the world. Good luck to you.

Meanwhile, the rest of us will continue to do what scientists should be doing – being skeptical, considering ALL the data, questioning the motives behind those who make surprising claims that “the science is settled”.

Carl Sagan was correct on so many levels when he said that “science is a candle in the dark”…

well put! I am completely with you (I am not a US citizen, but several of my family are))

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/argentine-drought-crop-failure/

Might I suggest a WUWT article on cold oceans, dry land, and the weather cycles of, oh, 1910 – 1930 or so when last the sun and oceans were acting sort of like they are now?

IMHO, it is time to assure you have made reasonable preparations for a global reduction of crop yields from a turn to the cold and dry side… And hope that the Ministry of Stupidity does not make things worse as they have done with export restrictions in Argentina ( to keep enough crop at home, but discouraging farmers from growing since they instead grow a crop they can export for cash…)

So with Argentina down for the count, Ukraine having so quality issues, Kansas having drought, Dakotas and related northern areas a bit late to plant, Texas drought, Canada frozen, and yes, Australia on the dry side; I think its going to be an interesting time in the ag commodity pits…