Comments on: Earth’s Magnetic Field Has Massive Breach – scientists baffled

By: Poch

Poch — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:57:35 +0000

I hope someone answers Peggy.

By: Peggy

Peggy — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:20:12 +0000

I remember one night long ago, I was about 18 or 19 years old at the time.
( either 1948 or 49)sitting on a headland overlooking the ocean near Sydney (Australia) 34 degrees latitude, and watching the Aurora Australis lights play the sky.
This phenomenon has never been seen since. Were there any unusual atmospheric occurences around that time to anyone’s knowledge ?

By: witness11

witness11 — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:12:09 +0000

when was that 17 mile underground big bang inquisition by man fired up??? remember “curiousity killed the cat”

By: pochp

pochp — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:26:54 +0000

HA HA HA!! At least we’re getting a light break here.

By: Cranstorre

Cranstorre — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:22:37 +0000

Mike said: “So I should start wearing a tinfoil hat again?”

There is no tin foil anymore guys and girls, it’s called Aluminum foil. Unless Mike is over 60 I forgive him. Otherwise – buy a periodic table for Krize sakes.

Cran

By: pitt bull

pitt bull — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:53:45 +0000

[snip]

Reply: illuminati conspiracy theories not appropriate to this site ~ charles the moderator

By: Bush-Hat Man

Bush-Hat Man — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:49:50 +0000

I don’t believe that the core “generates” the earth’s magnetic field. Think they have it all wrong. I believe that the massive ion currents that result from the jetstreams that sit atop the troposphere are largely responsible for “generating” the magnetic field (along with some extra help from a rotating ionosphere) and that this induces a field in the iron core which acts as a “stabiliser” (effectively a reactive “low pass” filter, like a kind of magnetic “inertia”) for the field. This would account for the high variability and rapid fluctuations of earth’s magnetic field as well as its tendency to be oriented to the earth’s axis whilst allowing for the magnetic poles to “wander” around 100′s of km every year. Recent discoveries of much more rapid field fluctuations than previously known lend strength to this theory, because a core of iron, whether solid or liquid iron, doing a dance like that would be shaking the earth quite violently, but I haven’t noticed such activity of late. Has anybody else???

By: Robert Bateman

Robert Bateman — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:12:47 +0000

The cloud bands of Venus were brought up by my Astronomy Professor as the most puzzling of all the planetary atmospheres. They start at the ternimator all pointing to the equator, then rapidly shift to straight across.
The theory being that at night, the jet streams are transporting the equatorial heat to the poles, but during the heating of the day, the energy absorbed sends them straight across. I may have that in reverse.
Was reminded by the statement above to jet streams heading to the poles.

By: pitt bull

pitt bull — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:51:38 +0000

Not better just a bit faster

By: the_Butcher

the_Butcher — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:38:43 +0000

pitt bull

Your dealer must be better than mine…

By: pitt bull

pitt bull — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:54:18 +0000

Once i’ve read that stars could get briefly very intense perhaps our sun is responsible for the heating since we are travelleing almost trough the galactic plane making the magnetic fields concentrate on certain regions only in alignment to the galactic equator.

Also does anyone know about the current manhatten project which is currently being done by chemtrails.

I think there is definitely a reversal on the coming the magnetic fields must be gradually weakening and shifting.

The jet stream is also moving worldwide to the poles, this can’t be some kind of coincidence something terribly wrong must be going on and most of all it is being actively suppressed by all governments.

They want to depopulate the entire world by 80 % but they can’t just build concentration camps all over the place this pole shift will make their dream come true of killing almost everyone.

Unless world war 3 kicks in that could also mean the collapse of human kind.
By the way ww2 started with a depression first….
And looking at the recent economic events well ….. you know …….
deflation then inflation then hyperinflation then a white flash followed by a red cloud of 1000 C at 300 miles an hour….

PS: does anyone have good links about nibiru you toube is biased with disinformation videos anyway.

By: Robert Bateman

Robert Bateman — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:29:01 +0000

Tallbloke (01:32:59) :
Yes, the Black Death and the demise of 1/2 the population of Europe actually happened. So do Hurricanes, Tsunamis, Tornadoes, Earthquakes and Volcanoes. The glass of reason I gave you was full, not made up.

It’s not a question of worry, it’s a question of do we care enough to try and warn, like we do with other natural disasters.

Well, do we?

By: Chris Schoneveld

Chris Schoneveld — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:29:14 +0000

Leif, my question: “And if that is so what caused the Little Ice Age?” was not meant as an argument for a solar cause but a genuine question and wascertainly not meant to be a “what else?” argument, as you seems to take it.
The imagination of your reforestation proponent is ludicrous and says something about the peer review process.

By: Tallbloke

Tallbloke — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:32:59 +0000

Robert Bateman (18:46:34) :

E.M.Smith (00:08:26) :
You are overreading things if you think that I am worried. Crop failures from climate change hit Europe in the early 14th century.

Which were immediately followed by the Black Death and the disappearance of half the population of europe….

By: WestHighlander

WestHighlander — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:08:31 +0000

As for the Stanford “Tree Diggers” — I’ve got one word (well in the parlance of VP-elect Biden) — Younger Dryas
“an event of 1300 70 years duration that terminated abruptly, as evidenced by an 7 C rise in temperature and a twofold increase in accumulation rate, at 11.64 kyr BP…. The transitions…were all remarkably fast, each occurring over a period of a decade or so [Alley et al., 1993]” – see for instance — http://www.agu.org/revgeophys/mayews01/node6.html

We went from Glacial state to non glacial (Holocene period) and then almost dived back into glaciation (temperature wise) in a blink of and eye (on the geologic timescale) and no human activity could possibly be involved

No burning of fossil fuels or rain forest, no spraying deodorant, no tilling of prairie, no draining of swamps

So what triggered the rapid change in global temperature to make a single damped oscillation? — that by the way seems to have triggered the development of civilization!

Westy