<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOAA: China to Warm U.S. Heartland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/</link>
	<description>Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: China May Be the Death of The Environmental Movement</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-38157</link>
		<dc:creator>China May Be the Death of The Environmental Movement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-38157</guid>
		<description>[...] China&#8217;s pollution will warm U. S temperature by 3 degrees in the next 50 years, so says this article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] China&#8217;s pollution will warm U. S temperature by 3 degrees in the next 50 years, so says this article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-37465</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-37465</guid>
		<description>The whole issue of CO2 is completely bogus. 

Google &quot;McClenney The Sky is Falling&quot; for an entertaining, informative look at what is really going on with climate change. Should answer many questions I&#039;ve seen here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole issue of CO2 is completely bogus. </p>
<p>Google &#8220;McClenney The Sky is Falling&#8221; for an entertaining, informative look at what is really going on with climate change. Should answer many questions I&#8217;ve seen here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old conconstrution worker</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-37031</link>
		<dc:creator>old conconstrution worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-37031</guid>
		<description>&#039;Yes, we often boil down the relationship such that CO2 goes then Temp goes up, but it’s a ton more complicated than that.&#039; counter words
Or As Temp go up CO2 goes up or as temp goes down CO2 does not incease as expected (GHG models) or as temp goes down, CO2 goes down. Cherry pick your data.
In couple more weeks, we will know how well CO2 is mixed in the atmosphere.
The amplification number of 2.5 is nothing more than a figment of someone&#039;s imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Yes, we often boil down the relationship such that CO2 goes then Temp goes up, but it’s a ton more complicated than that.&#8217; counter words<br />
Or As Temp go up CO2 goes up or as temp goes down CO2 does not incease as expected (GHG models) or as temp goes down, CO2 goes down. Cherry pick your data.<br />
In couple more weeks, we will know how well CO2 is mixed in the atmosphere.<br />
The amplification number of 2.5 is nothing more than a figment of someone&#8217;s imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-37006</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard in Wisconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-37006</guid>
		<description>In a world battered by global warming and global cooling reports, my tractor lurches violently out of control as it pushes through the particulates from China.  Meanwhile, we usually plant about 100 to 105 day relative maturity corn here in Wisconsin, near LaCrosse.  Global warming had promised a climate like northern Illinois where we could grow perhaps 110 to 115 day corn and gain maybe ten or fifteen bushels per acre yield.  Then the cycle of a less active sun threatened us with a northern Wisconsin climate where it would no longer be profitable to grow corn.  Now the particles will send us on a detour back to northern Illinois?

Due to the somewhat cool summer, the corn and soybeans need a warm September to mature and an early frost would hurt.  We had no 90 degree days here this summer, although LaCrosse recorded two 90s in August and a 91 and 93 on September 1 and 2.  I think that weather station is located just north of the airport and strong southerly winds will improve the temperature a little.

I wonder if the global warming publicity changed the mix of hybrids sold by the seed companies in recent years to later maturing varieties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a world battered by global warming and global cooling reports, my tractor lurches violently out of control as it pushes through the particulates from China.  Meanwhile, we usually plant about 100 to 105 day relative maturity corn here in Wisconsin, near LaCrosse.  Global warming had promised a climate like northern Illinois where we could grow perhaps 110 to 115 day corn and gain maybe ten or fifteen bushels per acre yield.  Then the cycle of a less active sun threatened us with a northern Wisconsin climate where it would no longer be profitable to grow corn.  Now the particles will send us on a detour back to northern Illinois?</p>
<p>Due to the somewhat cool summer, the corn and soybeans need a warm September to mature and an early frost would hurt.  We had no 90 degree days here this summer, although LaCrosse recorded two 90s in August and a 91 and 93 on September 1 and 2.  I think that weather station is located just north of the airport and strong southerly winds will improve the temperature a little.</p>
<p>I wonder if the global warming publicity changed the mix of hybrids sold by the seed companies in recent years to later maturing varieties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beng</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36998</link>
		<dc:creator>beng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36998</guid>
		<description>Brian D, yes, I&#039;ve noticed unusually &quot;red&quot; sunsets here just recently, and I haven&#039;t read or noticed anything about it in the MSM.

Funny how the obvious gets missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian D, yes, I&#8217;ve noticed unusually &#8220;red&#8221; sunsets here just recently, and I haven&#8217;t read or noticed anything about it in the MSM.</p>
<p>Funny how the obvious gets missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: counters</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36990</link>
		<dc:creator>counters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36990</guid>
		<description>jdaniels, you&#039;re jumping to conclusions from the Keeling Curve. CO2 has a residency time in the atmosphere of 8-10 years. In lay terms, you should think about it this way - If one molecule of CO2 is pumped anywhere into the atmosphere, it will take about 8-10 years on average for it to be removed. The bi-annual fluctuation of the Keeling Curve is not related to this; the fluctuation illustrates the &quot;breathing&quot; of the biosphere - the alternation of which hemisphere&#039;s plant life is dominating interactions with the atmosphere.

The Keeling Curve says nothing about individual molecules, it only deals with the concentration of those molecules (this is your &quot;crucial factor). Gases are dramatically dispersed due to the natural circulation within the atmosphere.

As for your other query, the increase hasn&#039;t been relatively constant; there is a slight exponential shape to it if you look carefully. But that&#039;s irrelevant, because we&#039;re not dealing with linear systems. Yes, we often boil down the relationship such that CO2 goes then Temp goes up, but it&#039;s a ton more complicated than that. However, the Keeling Curve will take on a much clearer  shape on various time scales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jdaniels, you&#8217;re jumping to conclusions from the Keeling Curve. CO2 has a residency time in the atmosphere of 8-10 years. In lay terms, you should think about it this way &#8211; If one molecule of CO2 is pumped anywhere into the atmosphere, it will take about 8-10 years on average for it to be removed. The bi-annual fluctuation of the Keeling Curve is not related to this; the fluctuation illustrates the &#8220;breathing&#8221; of the biosphere &#8211; the alternation of which hemisphere&#8217;s plant life is dominating interactions with the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The Keeling Curve says nothing about individual molecules, it only deals with the concentration of those molecules (this is your &#8220;crucial factor). Gases are dramatically dispersed due to the natural circulation within the atmosphere.</p>
<p>As for your other query, the increase hasn&#8217;t been relatively constant; there is a slight exponential shape to it if you look carefully. But that&#8217;s irrelevant, because we&#8217;re not dealing with linear systems. Yes, we often boil down the relationship such that CO2 goes then Temp goes up, but it&#8217;s a ton more complicated than that. However, the Keeling Curve will take on a much clearer  shape on various time scales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STAFFAN LINDSTROEM</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36984</link>
		<dc:creator>STAFFAN LINDSTROEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36984</guid>
		<description>Excuse me...Richard North Sept 5 2008 12:27:07 
Since when is Yorkshire not a part of England??? [and I don&#039;t mean linguistically, sorry bad joke, Alan Partridge aka Steve Coogan&#039;s fault...LOL]
 But seriously electricity power black-outs can also make people pay higher bills...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me&#8230;Richard North Sept 5 2008 12:27:07<br />
Since when is Yorkshire not a part of England??? [and I don't mean linguistically, sorry bad joke, Alan Partridge aka Steve Coogan's fault...LOL]<br />
 But seriously electricity power black-outs can also make people pay higher bills&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STAY WARM, WORLD&#8230; Roger Carr &#171; Stay Warm, World&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36952</link>
		<dc:creator>STAY WARM, WORLD&#8230; Roger Carr &#171; Stay Warm, World&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36952</guid>
		<description>[...] from the full story on: Watts Up With That? ____________________________________________ Please Don&#8217;t Rain On My Parade&#8230; Uh&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the full story on: Watts Up With That? ____________________________________________ Please Don&#8217;t Rain On My Parade&#8230; Uh&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lindt</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36943</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lindt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36943</guid>
		<description>Nathan Stone (11:40:11) : 

The smog from all the smouldering cook fires was extremely thick and looked like a fog over the valley all day. I know it wasn’t from transportation because aside from the occasional mafioso in his Ferrari, everyone is walking or pedalling (or riding around in tin cans with lawnmower engines). That town needed a good, clean, coal fired plant which offered cheap electricity. The air would have been so much nicer, but the pizza probably wouldn’t be as good

this is so right... right on man!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan Stone (11:40:11) : </p>
<p>The smog from all the smouldering cook fires was extremely thick and looked like a fog over the valley all day. I know it wasn’t from transportation because aside from the occasional mafioso in his Ferrari, everyone is walking or pedalling (or riding around in tin cans with lawnmower engines). That town needed a good, clean, coal fired plant which offered cheap electricity. The air would have been so much nicer, but the pizza probably wouldn’t be as good</p>
<p>this is so right&#8230; right on man!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edcon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36931</link>
		<dc:creator>edcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36931</guid>
		<description>I am not a scientist but only an old engineer and I don’t think they know neither the earth’s CO2 level  nor its surface temperature; however, the satellite data is different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a scientist but only an old engineer and I don’t think they know neither the earth’s CO2 level  nor its surface temperature; however, the satellite data is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdaniels</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36928</link>
		<dc:creator>jdaniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36928</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a scientist and I&#039;m hoping one of the many knowledgeable people on this site can answer a couple of questions that I have in relation to this article. First, regarding this claim &quot;For decades, scientists have concentrated on carbon dioxide, the most damaging greenhouse gas because it lingers in the atmosphere for decades.&quot;  

I&#039;ve seen this claim made elsewhere and it always puzzles me because the Mauna Loa CO2 Chart clearly shows seasonal drops in CO2 levels. There seems to be widespread agreement that the seasonal drops are from natural sources (northern hemisphere forests primarily).  It&#039;s also evident that this natural carbon cycle *nearly* wipes out the entire &quot;surplus&quot; of CO2 that was previously in the atmosphere. Doesn&#039;t this demonstrate that CO2 is not long-lived but is actually rather short lived? Maybe I&#039;ve missed a crucial factor; I&#039;m hoping someone can explain this to me.

My other question relates to the yearly average increase in CO2 as reported by the same Mauna Loa site. It&#039;s fairly obvious (I think) that the yearly rate of CO2 increase (in ppm) has been fairly constant at about 2 or 3 molecules per year.  Why would the rate of increase remain relatively constant year after year when the human contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere has not held constant but has been rapidly increasing? Please help me understand this because I haven&#039;t had much luck googling for an answer.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a scientist and I&#8217;m hoping one of the many knowledgeable people on this site can answer a couple of questions that I have in relation to this article. First, regarding this claim &#8220;For decades, scientists have concentrated on carbon dioxide, the most damaging greenhouse gas because it lingers in the atmosphere for decades.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this claim made elsewhere and it always puzzles me because the Mauna Loa CO2 Chart clearly shows seasonal drops in CO2 levels. There seems to be widespread agreement that the seasonal drops are from natural sources (northern hemisphere forests primarily).  It&#8217;s also evident that this natural carbon cycle *nearly* wipes out the entire &#8220;surplus&#8221; of CO2 that was previously in the atmosphere. Doesn&#8217;t this demonstrate that CO2 is not long-lived but is actually rather short lived? Maybe I&#8217;ve missed a crucial factor; I&#8217;m hoping someone can explain this to me.</p>
<p>My other question relates to the yearly average increase in CO2 as reported by the same Mauna Loa site. It&#8217;s fairly obvious (I think) that the yearly rate of CO2 increase (in ppm) has been fairly constant at about 2 or 3 molecules per year.  Why would the rate of increase remain relatively constant year after year when the human contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere has not held constant but has been rapidly increasing? Please help me understand this because I haven&#8217;t had much luck googling for an answer.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Florida</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36923</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36923</guid>
		<description>Perhaps all the particle China has been spewing the last couple of years is the source of the lower temps we are now seeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps all the particle China has been spewing the last couple of years is the source of the lower temps we are now seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old conconstrution worker</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36910</link>
		<dc:creator>old conconstrution worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36910</guid>
		<description>&#039;This pollution will likely create three “hot spots” in the world: the central United States, Europe around the Mediterranean Sea, and Kazakhstan, which borders Russia and China. In the United States it’s “a big blob in the middle of the country” stretching from the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachians, Levy said.&#039;

Oh No Not more &quot;Hot Spots&quot;. I&#039;m still looking for upper troposphere&#039;s &quot;Hot Spot&quot;.
&#039;This pollution will likely create three “hot spots” in the world: the central United States,&#039; Maybe the &quot; boys&quot; have a new source. Page 80 in Old Farmer&#039;s 2009 Almanac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;This pollution will likely create three “hot spots” in the world: the central United States, Europe around the Mediterranean Sea, and Kazakhstan, which borders Russia and China. In the United States it’s “a big blob in the middle of the country” stretching from the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachians, Levy said.&#8217;</p>
<p>Oh No Not more &#8220;Hot Spots&#8221;. I&#8217;m still looking for upper troposphere&#8217;s &#8220;Hot Spot&#8221;.<br />
&#8216;This pollution will likely create three “hot spots” in the world: the central United States,&#8217; Maybe the &#8221; boys&#8221; have a new source. Page 80 in Old Farmer&#8217;s 2009 Almanac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Syme</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36906</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Syme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36906</guid>
		<description>So if the US mainland is getting pollution from China, is not Mona Lowa in Hawaii getting is CO2 measurement from China&#039;s exhaust pipe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if the US mainland is getting pollution from China, is not Mona Lowa in Hawaii getting is CO2 measurement from China&#8217;s exhaust pipe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klausb</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36905</link>
		<dc:creator>klausb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36905</guid>
		<description>JFA in Montreal,

yout don&#039;t talk serously, you don&#039;t!
Because,  if you really do it, what are you doing here?
Provide hate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JFA in Montreal,</p>
<p>yout don&#8217;t talk serously, you don&#8217;t!<br />
Because,  if you really do it, what are you doing here?<br />
Provide hate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Brozyna</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36902</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Brozyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36902</guid>
		<description>Politicians want to save us from global warming/climate change.

Everything mankind does contributes to AGW.

Therefore, give the politicians {Repubs/Demos/ UN} all your money as restitution for detroying the planet so the politicians {and the environmental lobbyists &amp; their Hollywood elitist buddies} can save the planet. No money left for food or houses? Live under a bridge and go dumpster diving. And if such harsh conditions become untenable to your continued life, then consider that the ultimate restitution for your sin of living. This will also support the radical environmentalists&#039; ultimate goal of reducing the population by 4 to 6 billion. Save the planet for the &#039;right&#039; kind of people and let us uppity serfs just die off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians want to save us from global warming/climate change.</p>
<p>Everything mankind does contributes to AGW.</p>
<p>Therefore, give the politicians {Repubs/Demos/ UN} all your money as restitution for detroying the planet so the politicians {and the environmental lobbyists &amp; their Hollywood elitist buddies} can save the planet. No money left for food or houses? Live under a bridge and go dumpster diving. And if such harsh conditions become untenable to your continued life, then consider that the ultimate restitution for your sin of living. This will also support the radical environmentalists&#8217; ultimate goal of reducing the population by 4 to 6 billion. Save the planet for the &#8216;right&#8217; kind of people and let us uppity serfs just die off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobJM</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36890</link>
		<dc:creator>RobJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36890</guid>
		<description>It seems that the fear campaign is not being effective enough so the have called in the CIA to help them up the pressure. Except now its someone else&#039;s fault, where&#039;d the guilt trip go?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the fear campaign is not being effective enough so the have called in the CIA to help them up the pressure. Except now its someone else&#8217;s fault, where&#8217;d the guilt trip go?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFA in Montreal</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36884</link>
		<dc:creator>JFA in Montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36884</guid>
		<description>Ahhh,  but, there is one easy solution to all of that problem.

Spray neurotoxic agent over the populated areas of China, United States, India, Africa and Europe. Reduce the population to less  than 500 million people and the pristine Nature will come back again (after the 5.5B corpses have finished rotting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh,  but, there is one easy solution to all of that problem.</p>
<p>Spray neurotoxic agent over the populated areas of China, United States, India, Africa and Europe. Reduce the population to less  than 500 million people and the pristine Nature will come back again (after the 5.5B corpses have finished rotting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klausb</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36874</link>
		<dc:creator>klausb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36874</guid>
		<description>...to follow the logic, the next market crash will be caused by  Climate Change.
The following top - after a big, big while - will be caused by Climate Change, too.

I&#039;ve, somehow lost my database of collected phrases - really, no joke - Climate Change must be the reason! 
I&#039;ve missed a visit to my  doc early today, cancelled the date, did come home from work tonight by far after midnight, was bone tired. Hummm - Climate Change - obviously was the reason. 

I don&#039;t look on TV anymore, since about three years - can&#039;t swallow that s**t anymore - this is climate related, I am pretty shure. 

I am nearly 55 years now, my - former - black hairs are getting greyish, partly white already. Due to Climate Change, of course.  

Our ten yrs old Mitsubishi Space Wagon is getting the first specks of rust.  Hummm, Climate Change? 

My oldest son has black hairs, the second one has brown hairs, with here and there
some blond strains, the third one has &#039;copper&#039; hairs, which did change from birth until now from copper-blond to dark-copper, going to brown, sooner or later.
Very obviously, all related to Climate Change, no question!

I&#039;m getting tired, whilst writing this sermon.  This MUST BE related to CLIMATE CHANGE. Anybody, who offers other expainations, can only be one out of the nasty deniers.

OK, folks, have fun. 

KlausB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;to follow the logic, the next market crash will be caused by  Climate Change.<br />
The following top &#8211; after a big, big while &#8211; will be caused by Climate Change, too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve, somehow lost my database of collected phrases &#8211; really, no joke &#8211; Climate Change must be the reason!<br />
I&#8217;ve missed a visit to my  doc early today, cancelled the date, did come home from work tonight by far after midnight, was bone tired. Hummm &#8211; Climate Change &#8211; obviously was the reason. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t look on TV anymore, since about three years &#8211; can&#8217;t swallow that s**t anymore &#8211; this is climate related, I am pretty shure. </p>
<p>I am nearly 55 years now, my &#8211; former &#8211; black hairs are getting greyish, partly white already. Due to Climate Change, of course.  </p>
<p>Our ten yrs old Mitsubishi Space Wagon is getting the first specks of rust.  Hummm, Climate Change? </p>
<p>My oldest son has black hairs, the second one has brown hairs, with here and there<br />
some blond strains, the third one has &#8216;copper&#8217; hairs, which did change from birth until now from copper-blond to dark-copper, going to brown, sooner or later.<br />
Very obviously, all related to Climate Change, no question!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting tired, whilst writing this sermon.  This MUST BE related to CLIMATE CHANGE. Anybody, who offers other expainations, can only be one out of the nasty deniers.</p>
<p>OK, folks, have fun. </p>
<p>KlausB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbstealey</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/09/05/noaa-china-to-warm-us-heartland/#comment-36873</link>
		<dc:creator>dbstealey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=2790#comment-36873</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;klausb&lt;/b&gt;

Marcus Aurelius: &lt;i&gt;The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.&lt;/i&gt;

Perfect quote: pogies note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>klausb</b></p>
<p>Marcus Aurelius: <i>The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.</i></p>
<p>Perfect quote: pogies note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
