Calls for Geo-Engineering at the Royal Society

2 09 2008

Several British scientists have apparently decided that geo-engineering is better than nothing.
(Posted by John Goetz)

Extreme and risky action the only way to tackle global warming, say scientists

From The Guardian
Monday September 1 2008
David Adam, environment correspondent

Terraforming (image not part of Guardian article)

Political inaction on global warming has become so dire that nations must now consider extreme technical solutions – such as blocking out the sun – to address catastrophic temperature rises, scientists from around the world warn today.

The experts say a reluctance “at virtually all levels” to address soaring greenhouse gas emissions means carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are on track to pass 650 parts-per-million (ppm), which could bring an average global temperature rise of 4C. They call for more research on geo-engineering options to cool the Earth, such as dumping massive quantities of iron into oceans to boost plankton growth, and seeding artificial clouds over oceans to reflect sunlight back into space.

Writing the introduction to a special collection of scientific papers on the subject, published today by the Royal Society, Brian Launder of the University of Manchester and Michael Thompson of the University of Cambridge say: “While such geoscale interventions may be risky, the time may well come when they are accepted as less risky than doing nothing.”

They add: “There is increasingly the sense that governments are failing to come to grips with the urgency of setting in place measures that will assuredly lead to our planet reaching a safe equilibrium.”

Well, we certainly know just how risky geo-engineering was for the terraformers on LV-426.

Read the rest of this entry »





Global Warming Destroying Dublin’s Infrastructure

2 09 2008

More Signs of the Apocalypse
(Posted by John Goetz)

From the Belfast Telegraph, Sunday, 31 August 2008:

Expert called in amid fears for O’ Connell Bridge

Concerns are being expressed about the future of Dublin’s O’Connell Bridge.

An independent expert has been called in to examine the landmark over fears it is falling apart because of global warming.

Dublin City Council insists the bridge is structurally sound after routine repairs last week.

The National Conservation and Heritage Group believe higher tides caused by climate change are eroding the bridge’s structure and may have dangerously weakened its foundations.

What is interesting is that there does not seem to be a news story or report anywhere that describes how the tides have changed, or who the supposed expert is that made the assertion. It must be true because the newspaper said so, right?

I tried searching for the National Conservation and Heritage Group (NCHG) website and could not find it. The closest I got was the Northern California Hummer Group. I am guessing the two organizations do not have a lot in common.