”“False and/or misleading statements on material matters may violate the anti-fraud provision of the federal securities laws

Not may, but do.

Guidance from the SEC will set the scene for court challenges to the numerous claims being made about AGW. And as we know, AGW claims haven’t faired very well in court.

Note, while other countries have SEC equivalents, their rules are less strict and less specific. So this kind of challenge can only occur in the USA.

junkscience.com is very much on top of the bogus DDT scare.

Your somewhat snippy exchange with the Canadian above brought to mind what must be the high personal cost to you (in time) and the worth to me of this blog.

I’ve sent you some more money.

Regards,

Steamboat Jack

REPLY: Just for clarification, Jeez helps me, Anthony, the site operator, as a volunteer moderator. But I’ll make sure he gets some of the kind help you’ve provided when I visit him in SFO. Your are correct, there is a high cost in personal time. Thanks so much for your kind and thoughtful support.

REPLY 2: Your thoughtfulness is much appreciated~jeez

Malicious intent must be present and proved, not just percieved by someone with a different opinion.

Charles the moderator.

The carbon market as I see is being introduced now into US economy with the help of a clear back-door strategy. What is not easily possible to achieve by Liberman-Warner bill as it faces lawmakers opposition, both from the left and the right, is being pushed ahead by bypassing American law. But what you are not discussing is a broader view of the topic.

It’s part of bigger picture. Once California put the scheme into fabrics of economy it will make a precedence which could be used as a weapon against opponents of carbon market. Of course there are more issues at stake – for example: testing possibilities in manipulation of American people’s minds, and __money__. The main goal of Kyoto deals and all follow-ups, is to control every aspect of NEW Economy in a Making. Global warming is an excellent live experimental laboratory how far people will get rid of their freedoms to those who want to rule the world. And global carbon market is an important part in this scheme.

Let me quote myself from the comments to point 2) (below):
Any “cap and trade” system is a “money generator” without production and with ZERO investment! Who do you think will benefit at the expense of the whole American society (thru higher prices)? You know the answer very well. :)

Whether the SEC will answer this or that is immaterial in the light of my comment. I could only add that they will do every possible nefarious deeds to get the spoils (money for nothing). (Maybe with the help of SEC as well, who knows?)

Regards,
Przemysław Pawełczyk

1) A terse description of Liberman-Warner bill:
Warner-Lieberman bill could raise gas prices
http://thehill.com/business–lobby/warner-lieberman-bill-could-raise-gas-prices-2008-05-19.html

2) My comments to :
Opening Statement of Senator James Inhofe Senate Environment and Public Works Full Committee An Update on the Science of Global Warming and its Implications
http://p2o2.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-socialism-is-being-built-in-usa_22.html

and the new media (net, blogs, etc) will prevail over the sensationalism of the old media

I guess all the pipe threads were left hand???

Glaring false advertising, and deliberate misrepresentation, no? Is global cooling a choice, too? Is solar irradiance a choice? El Nino? The PDO?

I recall that the last nuclear power plant that PG&E tried to build in the ’70′s, their hotshot managers inadvertently flipped the entire blueprint set, and built everything backwards. The plant never went online. The current PG&E ad writers must be their linear descendants.