<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlotte smashes 123 year record low temperature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foof</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-28583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-28583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GREG,
FYI - This month, July 2008 had the coolest average low temperature for Corpus Christi, Texas.  One morning it was 71 degrees, unheard of for July.  The Gulf has been relatively cool as well...Milankovitch cycle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREG,<br />
FYI &#8211; This month, July 2008 had the coolest average low temperature for Corpus Christi, Texas.  One morning it was 71 degrees, unheard of for July.  The Gulf has been relatively cool as well&#8230;Milankovitch cycle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-25152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-25152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gotta chime in and concur.  It is abnormally cool here in Arkansas.  It has been in the lower 60&#039;s at night (with a few exceptions of nights leading up to rain storms).   I agree about the low humidity, too.  It&#039;s been very pleasant 90&#039;s during the day, due to low humidity.  You can stand in the shade and get instant relief; the air feels cool when it blows against your sweat.  Trust me, folks, this is absolutely abnormal for this time of year.

Here&#039;s a telltale sign:  I&#039;ve been turning off my AC at night and opening the windows.  It&#039;s cooler outside than inside, even if I run the AC nonstop.  Standing in front of a window, it feels as cool (or cooler) as the air coming from the AC vent.  (Very scientific of me, isn&#039;t it?  62 degree air is quite cool.  I be smart.  I orta git me one of them there college educations like folks are always talking about.)  I got chilly several times last night (July 15) with only two windows open in the entire house!  Both windows in my bedroom were closed!  This is Summer in the South?  I&#039;d best cut a little more wood to lay up for the coming winter...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta chime in and concur.  It is abnormally cool here in Arkansas.  It has been in the lower 60&#8242;s at night (with a few exceptions of nights leading up to rain storms).   I agree about the low humidity, too.  It&#8217;s been very pleasant 90&#8242;s during the day, due to low humidity.  You can stand in the shade and get instant relief; the air feels cool when it blows against your sweat.  Trust me, folks, this is absolutely abnormal for this time of year.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a telltale sign:  I&#8217;ve been turning off my AC at night and opening the windows.  It&#8217;s cooler outside than inside, even if I run the AC nonstop.  Standing in front of a window, it feels as cool (or cooler) as the air coming from the AC vent.  (Very scientific of me, isn&#8217;t it?  62 degree air is quite cool.  I be smart.  I orta git me one of them there college educations like folks are always talking about.)  I got chilly several times last night (July 15) with only two windows open in the entire house!  Both windows in my bedroom were closed!  This is Summer in the South?  I&#8217;d best cut a little more wood to lay up for the coming winter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatmatter</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-23562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-23562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well it all true , but how can we teach people so that they understand and be aware of their  own actions toward  terrable climate changes ,so they collectively  consciousely  and actively do something about  keeping our  eco system clean and safe for our own sake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it all true , but how can we teach people so that they understand and be aware of their  own actions toward  terrable climate changes ,so they collectively  consciousely  and actively do something about  keeping our  eco system clean and safe for our own sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeztheadmin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-23443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeeztheadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-23443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is easy to get confused as so many people who know nothing of what they speak spout so many opinions and conflate unrelated issues.

Whatever side you are on here is the perspective on ice.

Sea ice is argued as an indicator of climate change, not sea level issues.

Glacial ice, either in Antarctica or Greenland can have a large affect on sea levels.

Ocean temperatures can have a smaller, but measureable affect on sea levels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easy to get confused as so many people who know nothing of what they speak spout so many opinions and conflate unrelated issues.</p>
<p>Whatever side you are on here is the perspective on ice.</p>
<p>Sea ice is argued as an indicator of climate change, not sea level issues.</p>
<p>Glacial ice, either in Antarctica or Greenland can have a large affect on sea levels.</p>
<p>Ocean temperatures can have a smaller, but measureable affect on sea levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Couey</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-23431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Couey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-23431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeez,
Thank you for you kind and patient reply.  I have, since discovering WUWT, come to rely on this blog for straight talk on climate.  I may not understand everything written here (my field is Political Science) but I am learning.

The impetus for my query began as an innocent conversation with someone who was...shall we say...enthusiastic about anthropogenically-caused climate change.  He spoke at length about the melting sea ice and the implications for coastal cities throughout the world.  I posed that same question to him, essentially, if the sea ice had suffered extensive melting already, then why wasn&#039;t NYC underwater?

In response, he changed the subject with a rapidity that, if it had been a tennis match, I certainly would have dislocated my entire cervical vertibrae.

Thank you again, and to Mr. Watts as well, for this wonderfully informative...and fair and balanced...resource.

Sincerely,
Ralph Couey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez,<br />
Thank you for you kind and patient reply.  I have, since discovering WUWT, come to rely on this blog for straight talk on climate.  I may not understand everything written here (my field is Political Science) but I am learning.</p>
<p>The impetus for my query began as an innocent conversation with someone who was&#8230;shall we say&#8230;enthusiastic about anthropogenically-caused climate change.  He spoke at length about the melting sea ice and the implications for coastal cities throughout the world.  I posed that same question to him, essentially, if the sea ice had suffered extensive melting already, then why wasn&#8217;t NYC underwater?</p>
<p>In response, he changed the subject with a rapidity that, if it had been a tennis match, I certainly would have dislocated my entire cervical vertibrae.</p>
<p>Thank you again, and to Mr. Watts as well, for this wonderfully informative&#8230;and fair and balanced&#8230;resource.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Ralph Couey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If ozone were a constant and therefor could be disregarded as an influential factor, there would be no ozonewatch web sites.  It varies.  Lots.  Did you see 2007&#039;s ozone hole over the Antarctic?  My that was a big one.  Not a record, but big anyway.  Nature appears to have replaced what was lost though.  It is my understanding that the old ozone didn&#039;t come back to life, it was destroyed.  New ozone was created.

I like studying things that change.  It makes me curious as to why they change.  Check the ozone over the western US.  Getting thin.  Earlier this year, it was mostly green colored (meaning there was more ozone).  Now its yellow (meaning there is less ozone).  Does that not make your curious side itch to find out why?  It does mine.

Final discussion point: UV B light from the Sun creates this ozone.  What if a significant decrease in UV B light from the Sun occurs?  Might that change the amount of ozone being created?  What if at the same time, cosmic rays hit the thinner ozone layer?  It seems these two things might be a factor based on ozone measurements at the poles as well as globally.  I am not saying this to prove a point.  I am discussing this to open up a conversation about ozone and whether or not it is a factor in global climate.

Lets not split the dog hair over &quot;lost&quot; versus &quot;forever lost&quot;.  That detracts from the discussion.  Tell me what you know about ozone and how it varies.  Tell me what you think the climate influences are related to thicker or thinner ozone.  Stuff like that.

Finally, I think most people who post on this blog are aware of the basics of ozone.  I like to assume that people are pretty darn smart.  Otherwise we end up talking down to each other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ozone were a constant and therefor could be disregarded as an influential factor, there would be no ozonewatch web sites.  It varies.  Lots.  Did you see 2007&#8242;s ozone hole over the Antarctic?  My that was a big one.  Not a record, but big anyway.  Nature appears to have replaced what was lost though.  It is my understanding that the old ozone didn&#8217;t come back to life, it was destroyed.  New ozone was created.</p>
<p>I like studying things that change.  It makes me curious as to why they change.  Check the ozone over the western US.  Getting thin.  Earlier this year, it was mostly green colored (meaning there was more ozone).  Now its yellow (meaning there is less ozone).  Does that not make your curious side itch to find out why?  It does mine.</p>
<p>Final discussion point: UV B light from the Sun creates this ozone.  What if a significant decrease in UV B light from the Sun occurs?  Might that change the amount of ozone being created?  What if at the same time, cosmic rays hit the thinner ozone layer?  It seems these two things might be a factor based on ozone measurements at the poles as well as globally.  I am not saying this to prove a point.  I am discussing this to open up a conversation about ozone and whether or not it is a factor in global climate.</p>
<p>Lets not split the dog hair over &#8220;lost&#8221; versus &#8220;forever lost&#8221;.  That detracts from the discussion.  Tell me what you know about ozone and how it varies.  Tell me what you think the climate influences are related to thicker or thinner ozone.  Stuff like that.</p>
<p>Finally, I think most people who post on this blog are aware of the basics of ozone.  I like to assume that people are pretty darn smart.  Otherwise we end up talking down to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeztheadmin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeeztheadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I will admit to a second (brine inclusions) error. Precision is important. How important the discrepancy is to the overall picture, as noted, is separate matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I will admit to a second (brine inclusions) error. Precision is important. How important the discrepancy is to the overall picture, as noted, is separate matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Andrews</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeez,

Thanks for your comment, which prompted me to delve into this a bit further.

 It seems that measurements of the salt content of sea ice vary widely, depending on ice age, thickness, the salinity of the underlying sea and other factors but that, as one might expect, first year sea ice retains most brine inclusions. So the sea ice may not be exactly &quot;freshwater ice&quot;.

The above comes from a preprint of the paper by Noerdlinger and Brower which Skippy linked. Interestingly Skippy&#039;s NSIDC link was dated 24 August 2005 whereas the N &amp;B paper was published in June 2007 and their preprint references papers from 2006. Just a typo by NSIDC I guess!

N&amp;B also note that their argument has not been considered in the mainstream
science before and that it has faced &quot;some resistance&quot;.

As you say the effect of their argument is not particularly significant, especially as the the majority of the 4cm rise come from the melting of Antarctic ice shelfs. Indeed, a later Aug 2007 paper by Jenkins &amp; Holland (GRL Vol 34), which references N&amp;B ( N&amp; B also acknowledge J &amp; H in their paper) estimates that the effect of  total Arctic sea ice melt on sea level rises would be 2.1 - 3.1 mm!

So aren&#039;t we back where we started? Arctic sea ice melt will not affect sea level  in any meaningful way. (But, hey, scientists can join theologians on arguing how many.... can fit on the head of a ...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, which prompted me to delve into this a bit further.</p>
<p> It seems that measurements of the salt content of sea ice vary widely, depending on ice age, thickness, the salinity of the underlying sea and other factors but that, as one might expect, first year sea ice retains most brine inclusions. So the sea ice may not be exactly &#8220;freshwater ice&#8221;.</p>
<p>The above comes from a preprint of the paper by Noerdlinger and Brower which Skippy linked. Interestingly Skippy&#8217;s NSIDC link was dated 24 August 2005 whereas the N &amp;B paper was published in June 2007 and their preprint references papers from 2006. Just a typo by NSIDC I guess!</p>
<p>N&amp;B also note that their argument has not been considered in the mainstream<br />
science before and that it has faced &#8220;some resistance&#8221;.</p>
<p>As you say the effect of their argument is not particularly significant, especially as the the majority of the 4cm rise come from the melting of Antarctic ice shelfs. Indeed, a later Aug 2007 paper by Jenkins &amp; Holland (GRL Vol 34), which references N&amp;B ( N&amp; B also acknowledge J &amp; H in their paper) estimates that the effect of  total Arctic sea ice melt on sea level rises would be 2.1 &#8211; 3.1 mm!</p>
<p>So aren&#8217;t we back where we started? Arctic sea ice melt will not affect sea level  in any meaningful way. (But, hey, scientists can join theologians on arguing how many&#8230;. can fit on the head of a &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Florida</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom in Florida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela Gray: &quot;Did I fricken say it would be forever lost? Gawd I hate it when people assume. Makes an ass outa me and you. &quot;

You said &quot;And we are losing ozone (remember, cosmic rays eat up ozone). &quot;

Unless cosmic rays are going to crap ozone back out, it would be safe to assume that whatever ozone you say is &quot;eaten up&quot;  will be lost forever. Perhaps you assumed everyone would know that ozone is also constantly being created.  Gawd I hate it when people assume. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela Gray: &#8220;Did I fricken say it would be forever lost? Gawd I hate it when people assume. Makes an ass outa me and you. &#8221;</p>
<p>You said &#8220;And we are losing ozone (remember, cosmic rays eat up ozone). &#8221;</p>
<p>Unless cosmic rays are going to crap ozone back out, it would be safe to assume that whatever ozone you say is &#8220;eaten up&#8221;  will be lost forever. Perhaps you assumed everyone would know that ozone is also constantly being created.  Gawd I hate it when people assume. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just spent more time at the Enterprise weather station website and have this to report:

Record Low Temperature: year set 2008
Record Low Wind Chill Temp: year set 2008
Coldest Night on Record: year set 2008
Coldest Day on Record: year set 2004]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spent more time at the Enterprise weather station website and have this to report:</p>
<p>Record Low Temperature: year set 2008<br />
Record Low Wind Chill Temp: year set 2008<br />
Coldest Night on Record: year set 2008<br />
Coldest Day on Record: year set 2004</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to being 15 degrees cooler here than last year.  By my records heat waves (hotter than last year) are transient but cool periods (cooler than last year) are longer according to the weather station data in Enterprise.  So the trend continues.  We have breezy, cloudy weather today with sprinkles and showers.  Usually, July 4th has always been a scorcher, since the 80&#039;s.  Ozone map shows a relatively weak layer from the midwest/Rockies to the West Coast.  It&#039;s a bit thicker going East to the East Coast.  I wonder if cosmic rays, which are up a bit, are seeding water vapor here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to being 15 degrees cooler here than last year.  By my records heat waves (hotter than last year) are transient but cool periods (cooler than last year) are longer according to the weather station data in Enterprise.  So the trend continues.  We have breezy, cloudy weather today with sprinkles and showers.  Usually, July 4th has always been a scorcher, since the 80&#8242;s.  Ozone map shows a relatively weak layer from the midwest/Rockies to the West Coast.  It&#8217;s a bit thicker going East to the East Coast.  I wonder if cosmic rays, which are up a bit, are seeding water vapor here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron McCarley</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron McCarley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, not as long a record as Charlotte, but Johnson City, TN also set a record low of 55 degrees, beating the 1990 previous low of 56. Talk about anecdotal- look at the hurricanes, forest fires, flooding, or diaper rashes being caused by AGW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, not as long a record as Charlotte, but Johnson City, TN also set a record low of 55 degrees, beating the 1990 previous low of 56. Talk about anecdotal- look at the hurricanes, forest fires, flooding, or diaper rashes being caused by AGW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purely anecdotal (and thus unscientific) from the UK - ground frosts overnight in Scotland. Dewy cars every morning in the south-east where I live caused by overnight lows of 5C or so. Interestingly, daytime highs seem about normal for Britain i.e not very, prone to rain (it IS Wimbledon week).

Not showing up much in the Hadley CET data though....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purely anecdotal (and thus unscientific) from the UK &#8211; ground frosts overnight in Scotland. Dewy cars every morning in the south-east where I live caused by overnight lows of 5C or so. Interestingly, daytime highs seem about normal for Britain i.e not very, prone to rain (it IS Wimbledon week).</p>
<p>Not showing up much in the Hadley CET data though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beng</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing about Charlotte, NC is that it&#039;s near the center of a rather severe drought area. The low moisture levels there will encourage low nite-time temps, especially in relatively cool Canadian air after a cold-front passes.

W. Virginia had record early frosts in &lt;i&gt;August&lt;/i&gt; in the blistering hot &amp; dry summer of 1936.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about Charlotte, NC is that it&#8217;s near the center of a rather severe drought area. The low moisture levels there will encourage low nite-time temps, especially in relatively cool Canadian air after a cold-front passes.</p>
<p>W. Virginia had record early frosts in <i>August</i> in the blistering hot &amp; dry summer of 1936.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Gosselin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/03/charlotte-smashes-123-year-record-low-temperature/#comment-22825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierre Gosselin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1565#comment-22825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pam,
&quot;The South Pole just keeps getting colder.&quot;
Boy I&#039;ll say!
http://www.coolantarctica.com/Antarctica%20fact%20file/antarctica%20environment/weather.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam,<br />
&#8220;The South Pole just keeps getting colder.&#8221;<br />
Boy I&#8217;ll say!<br />
<a href="http://www.coolantarctica.com/Antarctica%20fact%20file/antarctica%20environment/weather.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolantarctica.com/Antarctica%20fact%20file/antarctica%20environment/weather.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

