<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sydney&#8217;s historic weather station: 150 meters makes all the difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/</link>
	<description>Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Climate Data Collection Corrupted? &#171; Symon Sez</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-23057</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Climate Data Collection Corrupted? &#171; Symon Sez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-23057</guid>
		<description>[...] the fact that the inconsistency of the data made it no good for usage in long term climate studies, Anthony Watts claims that noted &#8220;global warming expert&#8221;, Dr. James Hanson used the data when making one of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the fact that the inconsistency of the data made it no good for usage in long term climate studies, Anthony Watts claims that noted &#8220;global warming expert&#8221;, Dr. James Hanson used the data when making one of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22453</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22453</guid>
		<description>Phillip_B,  agree re contrast between AUS and US airports, but there is a lot of potential bias at sites like TVL and WAG and other RAAF/RAN sites (like CB or NAS Nowra).
I&#039;d go for the inland sites, or places like Cape Leeuwin or Cabramurra which don&#039;t show much UHI normally!
On the whole they may be OK, but changes like those I&#039;ve noted at CB are quite clear, but may not be tracked any better than those exposed by surfacestations.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phillip_B,  agree re contrast between AUS and US airports, but there is a lot of potential bias at sites like TVL and WAG and other RAAF/RAN sites (like CB or NAS Nowra).<br />
I&#8217;d go for the inland sites, or places like Cape Leeuwin or Cabramurra which don&#8217;t show much UHI normally!<br />
On the whole they may be OK, but changes like those I&#8217;ve noted at CB are quite clear, but may not be tracked any better than those exposed by surfacestations.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SezaGeoff</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22413</link>
		<dc:creator>SezaGeoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22413</guid>
		<description>Stand by for significant Global Warming in Melbourne!  The Laverton air force base that is the site of the nearest Australian reference site has just been sold for medium-density housing, so that all the building/paving/heat source addition should cause the temperature to rise markedly.  Might almost be enough to make up for global cooling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stand by for significant Global Warming in Melbourne!  The Laverton air force base that is the site of the nearest Australian reference site has just been sold for medium-density housing, so that all the building/paving/heat source addition should cause the temperature to rise markedly.  Might almost be enough to make up for global cooling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip_B</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22400</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22400</guid>
		<description>Geraldton Airport is definitely irrigated. You can see the contrast between the green grass at the airport and nearby brown and reddish areas which will be unirrigated at the link below.

Sigh. Changes to the irrigation schedule will swamp any natural temperature trend. And changes will have occured in recent years because the government has mandated irrigation restrictions that even apply to bore (well) water, which is likely used at Geraldton.

Carnarvon airport doesn&#039;t look irrigated, although there is extensive agricultural irrigation nearby.

I know that Halls Creek airport isn&#039;t irrigated, nor is Meekathara airport and neither have nearby agriculture.

I&#039;ll try and put together a comparison of these 4 airports to get a feel for the effect of irrigation.

http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/Images/photoAirport.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/technical.html&amp;h=543&amp;w=740&amp;sz=114&amp;hl=en&amp;start=2&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=r_RR0h2WfQ6fvM:&amp;tbnh=103&amp;tbnw=141&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgeraldton%2Bairport%2Bpictures%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DGGLL,GGLL:2008-22,GGLL:en%26sa%3DX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geraldton Airport is definitely irrigated. You can see the contrast between the green grass at the airport and nearby brown and reddish areas which will be unirrigated at the link below.</p>
<p>Sigh. Changes to the irrigation schedule will swamp any natural temperature trend. And changes will have occured in recent years because the government has mandated irrigation restrictions that even apply to bore (well) water, which is likely used at Geraldton.</p>
<p>Carnarvon airport doesn&#8217;t look irrigated, although there is extensive agricultural irrigation nearby.</p>
<p>I know that Halls Creek airport isn&#8217;t irrigated, nor is Meekathara airport and neither have nearby agriculture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try and put together a comparison of these 4 airports to get a feel for the effect of irrigation.</p>
<p><a href="http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/Images/photoAirport.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/technical.html&amp;h=543&amp;w=740&amp;sz=114&amp;hl=en&amp;start=2&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=r_RR0h2WfQ6fvM:&amp;tbnh=103&amp;tbnw=141&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgeraldton%2Bairport%2Bpictures%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DGGLL,GGLL:2008-22,GGLL:en%26sa%3DX" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/Images/photoAirport.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.geraldtonairport.com.au/technical.html&amp;h=543&amp;w=740&amp;sz=114&amp;hl=en&amp;start=2&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=r_RR0h2WfQ6fvM:&amp;tbnh=103&amp;tbnw=141&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgeraldton%2Bairport%2Bpictures%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DGGLL,GGLL:2008-22,GGLL:en%26sa%3DX</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip_B</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22391</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22391</guid>
		<description>All Australian state capitals, with the partial exception of Adelaide, are located on large bodies of water about 10Ks from the ocean.

The water will create a micro-climate that rapidly decreases with distance.

Over time 2 things have happened. One is that as CBDs get built up weather stations get moved to less urbanized locations further away from the water. This happened in Perth in 1992 and the move took the station about one K further from the water.

The second is that the water gets moved further away due to land reclamation. I&#039;d have to check old maps to be certain, but at some point Perth&#039;s river shoreline has been moved at least 300 meters away from the CBD.

scott, most of the airports are not airports in the sense a North American would recognize. I am familiar with a number of them. Most are 90% grass or bare earth with a single concrete strip and a couple of modest buildings.

One of the airports in the network, Halls Creek, doesn&#039;t have any buildings, at least it didn&#039;t when I was last there 10 years ago.

I very much doubt there has been UHI creep at any of the airports I know. I&#039;d say they will be some of the best stations in Australia. Except, I think some of them are irrigated. I recall Geraldton Airport had nice green grass in  the middle of summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Australian state capitals, with the partial exception of Adelaide, are located on large bodies of water about 10Ks from the ocean.</p>
<p>The water will create a micro-climate that rapidly decreases with distance.</p>
<p>Over time 2 things have happened. One is that as CBDs get built up weather stations get moved to less urbanized locations further away from the water. This happened in Perth in 1992 and the move took the station about one K further from the water.</p>
<p>The second is that the water gets moved further away due to land reclamation. I&#8217;d have to check old maps to be certain, but at some point Perth&#8217;s river shoreline has been moved at least 300 meters away from the CBD.</p>
<p>scott, most of the airports are not airports in the sense a North American would recognize. I am familiar with a number of them. Most are 90% grass or bare earth with a single concrete strip and a couple of modest buildings.</p>
<p>One of the airports in the network, Halls Creek, doesn&#8217;t have any buildings, at least it didn&#8217;t when I was last there 10 years ago.</p>
<p>I very much doubt there has been UHI creep at any of the airports I know. I&#8217;d say they will be some of the best stations in Australia. Except, I think some of them are irrigated. I recall Geraldton Airport had nice green grass in  the middle of summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22385</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22385</guid>
		<description>Braddles,

I&#039;vé made a couple of comments on the Australian RCS in the past.  A lot are at airports, though most not at all major.  Some of the stations appear to be excellent, others might not quite make Anthony&#039;s 1 rating!  Have a browse through the BOM site photos at www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/reference.shtml

For instance Canberra&#039;s RCS is at the airport (Google Earth Lat long):
35deg 18min 17.45sec S 149deg 12min 04.78 sec E
You can see the new car park under construction next to it (now finished) on Google Earth, and it is down (prevailing) wind from the RAAF Tarmac.  FWIW, Canberra just had its second hottest June on record...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braddles,</p>
<p>I&#8217;vé made a couple of comments on the Australian RCS in the past.  A lot are at airports, though most not at all major.  Some of the stations appear to be excellent, others might not quite make Anthony&#8217;s 1 rating!  Have a browse through the BOM site photos at <a href="http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/reference.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/reference.shtml</a></p>
<p>For instance Canberra&#8217;s RCS is at the airport (Google Earth Lat long):<br />
35deg 18min 17.45sec S 149deg 12min 04.78 sec E<br />
You can see the new car park under construction next to it (now finished) on Google Earth, and it is down (prevailing) wind from the RAAF Tarmac.  FWIW, Canberra just had its second hottest June on record&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22370</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22370</guid>
		<description>According to what i can gather from CA, GISS adjusts the upwards of half their urban site warmer rather than cooler.

Just how does  GISS choose their sites, anyway? (Not the first time THAT question has been asked.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to what i can gather from CA, GISS adjusts the upwards of half their urban site warmer rather than cooler.</p>
<p>Just how does  GISS choose their sites, anyway? (Not the first time THAT question has been asked.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22367</link>
		<dc:creator>swampie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22367</guid>
		<description>Russ R, moderate warming since the end of the LIA will not get you a million in funding from environmental activist organizations and George Soros. 

It&#039;s all in the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ R, moderate warming since the end of the LIA will not get you a million in funding from environmental activist organizations and George Soros. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all in the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ R.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22362</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22362</guid>
		<description>GISS uses urban sites because they need to be &quot;adjusted&quot;. I don&#039;t see how you can manufacture an emergency scenerio, with the clean temps. They fall well within the bounds of moderate warming, we have enjoyed since the end of the LIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GISS uses urban sites because they need to be &#8220;adjusted&#8221;. I don&#8217;t see how you can manufacture an emergency scenerio, with the clean temps. They fall well within the bounds of moderate warming, we have enjoyed since the end of the LIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22359</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22359</guid>
		<description>Sydney&#039;s surface temps it can be argued teleconnects with the strip bark bristle cones in California  /sracasm off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sydney&#8217;s surface temps it can be argued teleconnects with the strip bark bristle cones in California  /sracasm off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22346</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22346</guid>
		<description>&quot;the artificial spike has meant Observatory Hill&#039;s statistics cannot be included in climate change studies&quot;

This is the problem with ALL the station data.  I bet if you had detailed history on every site, all of them would have some major instrument/siting change that would significantly contaminate the data.  And any attempt to &quot;adjust&quot; the data to remove that contamination is just a guess.  The effect of siting, the adjacent tollroad, general UHI, the sidewalk, the parking lot, etc etc, are not a one-step or linear process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the artificial spike has meant Observatory Hill&#8217;s statistics cannot be included in climate change studies&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the problem with ALL the station data.  I bet if you had detailed history on every site, all of them would have some major instrument/siting change that would significantly contaminate the data.  And any attempt to &#8220;adjust&#8221; the data to remove that contamination is just a guess.  The effect of siting, the adjacent tollroad, general UHI, the sidewalk, the parking lot, etc etc, are not a one-step or linear process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22345</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22345</guid>
		<description>The bias in this whole tale, did they actually think no one would figure it out, and report on it? Or do you think they were depending on the media to hold the line and make the story stick? While that has happened, the story has far from stuck.

It&#039;s as if no one understands what is meant by 1918 levels of CO2 production. Energy use has contributed to man&#039;s life extension, that fact cannot be denied. Aren&#039;t humans to be treated as part of the &#039;natural environment&#039;? Humans aren&#039;t aliens afterall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bias in this whole tale, did they actually think no one would figure it out, and report on it? Or do you think they were depending on the media to hold the line and make the story stick? While that has happened, the story has far from stuck.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if no one understands what is meant by 1918 levels of CO2 production. Energy use has contributed to man&#8217;s life extension, that fact cannot be denied. Aren&#8217;t humans to be treated as part of the &#8216;natural environment&#8217;? Humans aren&#8217;t aliens afterall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bryant</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22341</guid>
		<description>I can almost see the gears turning in hansen&#039;s mind... &quot;We keep and accentuate the data from airports, sewage treatment plants, parking lots and anything that smacks of progress. I can push the world back to the dark ages using their own progress against them...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can almost see the gears turning in hansen&#8217;s mind&#8230; &#8220;We keep and accentuate the data from airports, sewage treatment plants, parking lots and anything that smacks of progress. I can push the world back to the dark ages using their own progress against them&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22340</link>
		<dc:creator>swampie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22340</guid>
		<description>And speaking of crazy, I read on ScienceDaily how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080629074053.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nutsedge&lt;/a&gt; grows better in an artificially CO2-enriched environment and are we ever going to be sorry when our CO2 levels rise.

I would have thought that there would be an adult somewhere on the staff that would have said &quot;And the point is?  &lt;b&gt;All&lt;/b&gt; of the plants will be in an elevated CO2 environment and will grow better, so the nutsedge won&#039;t be any more invasive than it already is&quot; but, sadly, I was expecting too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And speaking of crazy, I read on ScienceDaily how <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080629074053.htm" rel="nofollow">nutsedge</a> grows better in an artificially CO2-enriched environment and are we ever going to be sorry when our CO2 levels rise.</p>
<p>I would have thought that there would be an adult somewhere on the staff that would have said &#8220;And the point is?  <b>All</b> of the plants will be in an elevated CO2 environment and will grow better, so the nutsedge won&#8217;t be any more invasive than it already is&#8221; but, sadly, I was expecting too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lane</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22339</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22339</guid>
		<description>The site is not in a depression.  The &quot;ring&quot; around it is a loop ramp that joins traffic from the Cahill Expressway to the Harbour Bridge.

If the modern site is sheltered from the West, that would explain the sharp increase in winter temperatures at the time of the move, as cold westerlies are the prevailing wind in Sydney in winter.

The UHI impact on this site must be enormous, as it has transformed from a parkland location to being a few meters from the busiest piece of road in Australia.  There was no adjacent roadway until the Bridge was constructed in the 1930s.

I believe Phil Jones (HADcru) dumped Sydney observatory in favour of Sydney Airport many years ago (the airport having its own UHI issues).

There is one splendid site in sydney - Fort Denison, which is an island in the harbour.  Unfortunately, it no longer collects temp data (if, indeed, it ever did).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is not in a depression.  The &#8220;ring&#8221; around it is a loop ramp that joins traffic from the Cahill Expressway to the Harbour Bridge.</p>
<p>If the modern site is sheltered from the West, that would explain the sharp increase in winter temperatures at the time of the move, as cold westerlies are the prevailing wind in Sydney in winter.</p>
<p>The UHI impact on this site must be enormous, as it has transformed from a parkland location to being a few meters from the busiest piece of road in Australia.  There was no adjacent roadway until the Bridge was constructed in the 1930s.</p>
<p>I believe Phil Jones (HADcru) dumped Sydney observatory in favour of Sydney Airport many years ago (the airport having its own UHI issues).</p>
<p>There is one splendid site in sydney &#8211; Fort Denison, which is an island in the harbour.  Unfortunately, it no longer collects temp data (if, indeed, it ever did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22338</link>
		<dc:creator>swampie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22338</guid>
		<description>Fanatics do not possess rational reasons for doing the things they do.  The end justifies the means.

No matter how crazy those means may appear to outsiders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fanatics do not possess rational reasons for doing the things they do.  The end justifies the means.</p>
<p>No matter how crazy those means may appear to outsiders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Coté</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22337</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Coté</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22337</guid>
		<description>Wanna  bet that temperature rise tracks the AADT of the adjacent motorway almost 1:1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanna  bet that temperature rise tracks the AADT of the adjacent motorway almost 1:1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Covert</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22336</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Covert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22336</guid>
		<description>The cherry tree is full of AGW. Maybe Hansen cut down the cherry tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cherry tree is full of AGW. Maybe Hansen cut down the cherry tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braddles</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22335</link>
		<dc:creator>braddles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22335</guid>
		<description>The BoM in Australia has an array of &quot;high quality&quot; stations, more than 100 in number, that it uses for climatic trends. Sydney is not one of them. All of them  are still actively reporting, yet GISS stopped colecting data from most of them in the early 1990s, while keeping Sydney and various airports.

You can see that GISS also stopped collecting data from Sydney in 1992, but it still collects data from Sydney airport, which has a huge UHI.

(I&#039;m not sure how high quality the BoM network really is. Many are towns of various size or small regional airports.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BoM in Australia has an array of &#8220;high quality&#8221; stations, more than 100 in number, that it uses for climatic trends. Sydney is not one of them. All of them  are still actively reporting, yet GISS stopped colecting data from most of them in the early 1990s, while keeping Sydney and various airports.</p>
<p>You can see that GISS also stopped collecting data from Sydney in 1992, but it still collects data from Sydney airport, which has a huge UHI.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m not sure how high quality the BoM network really is. Many are towns of various size or small regional airports.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Vance</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/02/sydneys-weather-station-150-meters-makes-all-the-difference/#comment-22331</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1532#comment-22331</guid>
		<description>All your hockey sticks are belong to GISS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your hockey sticks are belong to GISS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
